1
|
Management Strategies for Older Patients with Low-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Physician Survey. Curr Oncol 2021; 29:1-13. [PMID: 35049675 PMCID: PMC8774930 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
When managing older patients with lower-risk hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (EBC), the harms and benefits of adjuvant therapies should be taken into consideration. A survey was conducted among Canadian oncologists on the definitions of "low risk" and "older", practice patterns, and future trial designs. We contacted 254 physicians and 21% completed the survey (50/242). Most respondents (68%, 34/50) agreed with the definition of "low risk" HR+/HER2- EBC being node-negative and either: ≤3 cm and low histological grade, ≤2 cm and intermediate grade, or ≤1 cm and high grade. The most popular chronological and biological age definition for older patients was ≥70 (45%, 22/49; 45% 21/47). In patients ≥ 70 with low risk EBC, most radiation and medical oncologists would recommend post-lumpectomy radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET). Seventy-eight percent (38/49) felt that trials are needed to evaluate RT and ET's role in patients ≥ 70. The favored design was ET alone, vs. RT plus ET (39%, 15/38). The preferred primary and secondary endpoints were disease-free survival and quality of life, respectively. Although oncologists recommended both RT and ET, there is interest in performing de-escalation trials in patients ≥ 70.
Collapse
|
2
|
Saunders D, Liu M, Vandermeer L, Alzahrani MJ, Hutton B, Clemons M. The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) Program. A Canadian-Led Pragmatic Trials Program: Strategies for Integrating Knowledge Users into Trial Design. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3959-3977. [PMID: 34677255 PMCID: PMC8534460 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We reviewed patient and health care provider (HCP) surveys performed through the REaCT program. The REaCT team has performed 15 patient surveys (2298 respondents) and 13 HCP surveys (1033 respondents) that have addressed a broad range of topics in breast cancer management. Over time, the proportion of surveys distributed by paper/regular mail has fallen, with electronic distribution now the norm. For the patient surveys, the median duration of the surveys was 3 months (IQR 2.5-7 months) and the median response rate was 84% (IQR 80-91.7%). For the HCP surveys, the median survey duration was 3 months (IQR 1.75-4 months), and the median response rate, where available, was 28% (IQR 21.2-49%). The survey data have so far led to: 10 systematic reviews, 6 peer-reviewed grant applications and 19 clinical trials. Knowledge users should be an essential component of clinical research. The REaCT program has integrated surveys as a standard step of their trials process. The COVID-19 pandemic and reduced face-to-face interactions with patients in the clinic as well as the continued importance of social media highlight the need for alternative means of distributing and responding to surveys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna Saunders
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 511, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (D.S.); (M.L.); (L.V.)
| | - Michelle Liu
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 511, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (D.S.); (M.L.); (L.V.)
| | - Lisa Vandermeer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 511, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (D.S.); (M.L.); (L.V.)
| | - Mashari Jemaan Alzahrani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Box 912, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Box 511, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
| | - Mark Clemons
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Box 511, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (D.S.); (M.L.); (L.V.)
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Box 912, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cole KM, Clemons M, Alzahrani M, Larocque G, MacDonald F, Vandermeer L, Hutton B, Piper A, Pond G, McGee S. Developing patient-centred strategies to optimize the management of vasomotor symptoms in breast cancer patients: a survey of health care providers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 188:343-350. [PMID: 34159473 PMCID: PMC8219176 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06186-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) such as hot flashes and night sweats are common in breast cancer patients and can affect both quality of life and treatment adherence. However, there is limited practical data to guide clinicians in the optimal selection of therapeutic strategies. A survey of health care providers was performed to better understand perspectives and prescribing practices for managing this problem. METHODS Canadian health care providers who treat patients with early stage breast cancer (EBC) participated in an anonymous electronic survey. Participants provided their perspectives on the prevalence and severity of VMS among patients with EBC, outlined their management strategies, and provided feedback on the perceived efficacy of interventions for VMS. RESULTS Responses were received from 65 providers including breast oncologists (36/65, 55%) and nurses with oncology expertise (29/65, 45%). Seventy-seven percent of participants reported regularly asking patients about VMS, and most indicated that bothersome VMS occurred in the majority of patients. Health care providers cited hot flash severity and sleep disruption as the most important issues for patients. The most common first- and second-line interventions recommended were lifestyle modifications (n = 32/65, 49.2%) and pharmacologic strategies (n = 27/65, 41.5%), respectively. Most respondents felt that interventions, including pharmacologic, over-the-counter, and complementary therapies, were only "somewhat effective". Overall, half of respondents (n = 35/65, 54%) reported being "confident" in managing VMS. CONCLUSION Given the variability of treatment recommendations, and health care provider uncertainty around the benefits of therapies for VMS, more 'real-world' trials are needed to optimize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Marie Cole
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Meshari Alzahrani
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Gail Larocque
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Lisa Vandermeer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Ontario, Canada
| | - Ardelle Piper
- University of Ottawa Health Services, Ottawa Ontario, Canada
| | - Greg Pond
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sharon McGee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. .,Cancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alzahrani M, Clemons M, Sienkiewicz M, Shrem NS, McGee SF, Vandermeer L, Sehdev S, Savard MF, Awan A, Canil C, Hutton B, Pond G, Saunders D, Ng T. Perceptions around bone-modifying agent use in patients with bone metastases from breast and castration resistant prostate cancer: a patient survey. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:6903-6912. [PMID: 34023950 PMCID: PMC8140584 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06238-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal use of bone-modifying agent (BMA) therapy in patients with bone metastases from breast and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is evolving. METHODS Patients receiving BMA for bone metastases from breast or CRPC were surveyed. Information was collected on patient and disease characteristics, BMA treatments and perceptions regarding BMA benefits and side effects. Interest in participation in trials of de-escalated BMA therapy was also gauged. RESULTS Of 220 patients contacted, 172 eligible patients responded (response rate 78%). Median age was 67 (range: 21-91); 137 (80%) had breast cancer and 35 (20%) CRPC. Symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) occurred prior to starting BMAs in 61% (84/137) of breast and 48% (17/35) of CRPC patients. Among breast cancer patients, 47, 33 and 13% received zoledronate, pamidronate and denosumab, respectively. Eighty-five percent (30/35) of CRPC patients received denosumab. De-escalation of therapy was more common among breast cancer patients. Although most patients correctly reported the goals of BMA therapy were to "help stop fractures" (62%) and "[improve] quality of life" (63%), 46.5% felt it prolonged survival and 54% felt it reduced bone progression. Most respondents (102/129, 79%) were comfortable with de-escalating to 6-monthly treatment after 2 years of BMA therapy. Patients considered the most important endpoints of de-escalation studies to be "stability of bone metastases" (45%), "quality of life" (22%) and "SSE rates" (14%). CONCLUSION Twelve weekly BMA was more common in breast than in prostate cancer. There remain misconceptions about the benefits of BMAs, highlighting potential gaps in patient education. Patients were interested in further BMA de-escalation after 2 years of prior BMA and provided study endpoints that were most important to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mashari Alzahrani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Marta Sienkiewicz
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Noa Shani Shrem
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sharon F McGee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lisa Vandermeer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sandeep Sehdev
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Marie France Savard
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Arif Awan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Christina Canil
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Gregory Pond
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Deanna Saunders
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Terry Ng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada.
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McGee S, Alzahrani M, Vandermeer L, Cole K, Larocque G, Awan A, Hutton B, Pond G, Saunders D, Clemons M. Adjuvant bisphosphonate use in patients with early stage breast cancer: a physician survey. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:477-486. [PMID: 33755864 PMCID: PMC7985746 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06147-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Despite the increasing use of adjuvant bone-modifying agents (BMAs) such as zoledronate and clodronate in the treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer (EBC), little is known about real world practice patterns. A physician survey was performed to address this deficit and determine interest in clinical trials of alternative strategies for BMA administration. Methods Canadian oncologists treating patients with EBC were surveyed via an anonymized online survey. The survey collected information on: physician demographics, knowledge and interpretation of adjuvant bisphosphonate guidelines, and real world prescribing practices. Questions also determined thoughts around the design of future adjuvant BMA trials. Results Of 127 surveyed physicians, 53 eligible invitees responded (response rate 42%). The majority of physicians are offering high-risk postmenopausal patients adjuvant BMAs. The most common BMA regimen was adjuvant zoledronate (45/53, 85%) every 6 months for 3 years. Concerns around toxicities and repeated visits to the cancer centre were perceived as the greatest barriers to adjuvant bisphosphonate use. Respondents were interested in future trials of de-escalation of BMAs comparing a single infusion of zoledronate vs. 6-monthly zoledronate for 3 years. The most favoured primary endpoints for such a trial included disease recurrence and fragility fracture rates. Conclusion Questions around optimal use of adjuvant bisphosphonates in patients with EBC still exist. There is interest among physicians in performing trials of de-escalation of these agents. The results of this survey will assist in designing pragmatic clinical trials to address this question. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06147-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon McGee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mashari Alzahrani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lisa Vandermeer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Katherine Cole
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Gail Larocque
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Arif Awan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Gregory Pond
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Deanna Saunders
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada. .,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research, and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McGee S, AlZahrani M, Stober C, Ng TL, Cole K, Larocque G, Awan A, Sehdev S, Hilton J, Vandermeer L, Hutton B, Pond G, Saunders D, Clemons M. Adjuvant bisphosphonate use in patients with early stage breast cancer: Patient perspectives on treatment acceptability and potential de-escalation. J Bone Oncol 2021; 27:100351. [PMID: 33680749 PMCID: PMC7930351 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the increasing use of adjuvant bisphosphonates for early stage breast cancer (EBC), little is known about the patient experience with such treatments. A patient survey was performed to identify current prescribing practices, perceptions around the role of treatment, the impact of treatment on patients' quality of life, and future trial designs. Methods EBC patients who had either completed or were currently receiving adjuvant bisphosphonates were sent an anonymized survey. The survey collected information on patient and disease characteristics, bisphosphonate scheduling, compliance, and tolerance. Questions also assessed patient interest in trials of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy. Results A total of 255 patients were contacted, with 164 eligible respondents (eligible response rate 164/255, 64.3%). Median patient age was 52 years (range 28 to 82 years). The majority (111/163, 68.1%) were postmenopausal at the time of diagnosis, 23.3% (38/163) were premenopausal, and 7.4% (12/163) were perimenopausal. Most patients (78%) had received chemotherapy. Zoledronate was the most commonly used bisphosphonate (92%), with the majority receiving treatment every 6 months for 3 years (73%). While 66% (107/161) of respondents had experienced side effects with treatment, most had, or expected to, complete treatment (154/163, 94%). Provided there was no detriment in breast cancer outcomes, there was strong interest in future studies of de-escalating adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy. Conclusion While most patients tolerate their treatment, there is interest in performing trials of de-escalation of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon McGee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mashari AlZahrani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Carol Stober
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Terry L Ng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Katherine Cole
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Gail Larocque
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Arif Awan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sandeep Sehdev
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - John Hilton
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lisa Vandermeer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Gregory Pond
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Deanna Saunders
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McGee SF, Mazzarello S, Caudrelier JM, Lima MAG, Hutton B, Sienkiewicz M, Stober C, Fernandes R, Ibrahim MFK, Vandermeer L, Hilton J, Shorr R, Fergusson D, Clemons M. Optimal sequence of adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer - A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 69:132-142. [PMID: 30014951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Clinical equipoise exists around the optimal time to start adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients who will receive post-operative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Concerns continue to exist regarding potential reduced efficacy, or increased toxicity, when radiation, and endocrine therapy are administered concurrently. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of studies comparing outcomes between sequential and concurrent adjuvant radiation and endocrine therapy in early-stage breast cancer. All modalities of radiation therapy were considered, and endocrine therapy could be either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. Outcomes of interest included; local, regional or distant recurrence, overall survival and treatment-related toxicities. EVIDENCE REVIEWED PubMed, Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1946 to December 2017. Two reviewers independently assessed each citation using the criteria outlined above. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for prospective studies, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for retrospective studies. FINDINGS Of 2137 unique citations identified, 13 met eligibility criteria. Eleven were unique studies (7569 patients), while 2 of the studies were updated analyses of previous studies. Studies evaluated the timing of adjuvant radiation, and tamoxifen (5 studies, 1550 patients), or aromatase inhibitors (6 studies, 6019 patients). We identified 1 complete randomized clinical trial (150 patients), and 5 retrospective studies (1580 patients), in addition to conference abstracts (5 studies, 5839 patients). Overall, none of the studies showed a significant difference in efficacy, or toxicity, with concurrent versus sequential treatment. However, given the significant heterogeneity of the study populations, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In the absence of high quality data, adequately powered randomized trials are required to answer this important clinical question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F McGee
- Department of Medicine and Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - S Mazzarello
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - J M Caudrelier
- Department of Radiation Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - M A G Lima
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - B Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Department, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - M Sienkiewicz
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - C Stober
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - R Fernandes
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - M F K Ibrahim
- Department of Medicine and Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - L Vandermeer
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - J Hilton
- Department of Medicine and Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - R Shorr
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - D Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Department, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - M Clemons
- Department of Medicine and Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|