Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER-positive Breast Cancer: Results From a Prospective Institutional Database

Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Does it result in more breast-conserving surgery?

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally advanced endocrine positive tumors who will not benefit from chemotherapy can be treated by either primary surgery or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). How often does NET result in breast-conserving surgery (BCS)?

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase, to identify articles on surgical treatment after NET.

RESULTS

In 19 studies the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was reported after NET; an overall pCR rate of 1% was found. Compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), the BCS rate was significantly higher after NET (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69; P < 0.00001). The surgical conversion rate was reported in eight studies [4-75.9%], with a mean of 30.2%.

CONCLUSION

This review found that one out of three patients becomes eligible for BCS after treatment with NET.

A Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Sunitinib Malate in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel Followed by Doxorubicin and Daily Oral Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). We hypothesized that adding sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activity, to an anthracycline and taxane regimen would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rates to a prespecified endpoint of 45% in patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, phase II trial of neoadjuvant sunitinib with paclitaxel (S+T) followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for patients with HER2-negative LABC or IBC. Patients received sunitinib 25 mg PO daily with paclitaxel 80 mg/m² IV weekly ×12 followed by doxorubicin 24 mg/m² IV weekly + cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m² PO daily with G-CSF support. Response was evaluated using pCR in the breast and the CPS + EG score (clinical-pathologic scoring + estrogen receptor [ER] and grade).

RESULTS

Seventy patients enrolled, and 66 were evaluable for efficacy. Eighteen patients (27%) had pCR in the breast (10 had ER⁺ disease and 8 had triple-negative disease). When defining response as pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2, 31 (47%) were responders. In pateints with ER positive disease, 23 (64%) were responders. The most common toxicities were cytopenias and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant S+T followed by AC+G-CSF was safe and tolerable in LABC and IBC. The study did not meet the prespecified endpoint for pCR; however, 47% were responders using pCR and/or CPS + EG score ≤2. ER positive patients had the highest response rate (64%). The addition of sunitinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may provide promising incremental benefit for patients with ER positive LABC.

Prolonged Time from Diagnosis to Breast-Conserving Surgery is Associated with Upstaging in Hormone Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Time to surgery (TTS) has been suggested to have an association with mortality in early-stage breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the association between TTS and preoperative disease progression in tumor size or nodal status among women diagnosed with clinical T1N0M0 ductal breast cancer.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with clinical T1N0M0 ductal breast cancer who had breast-conserving surgery as their first definitive treatment between 2010 and 2016 (n = 90,405) were analyzed using the National Cancer Database. Separate multivariable logistic regression models for hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HR-negative patients, adjusted for clinical and demographic variables, were used to assess the relationship between TTS and upstaging of tumor size (T-upstaging) or nodal status (N-upstaging).

RESULTS

T-upstaging occurred in 6.76% of HR-positive patients and 11.00% of HR-negative patients, while N-upstaging occurred in 12.69% and 10.75% of HR-positive and HR-negative patients, respectively. Among HR-positive patients, odds of T-upstaging were higher for 61-90 days TTS (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.34) and ≥91 days TTS (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84) compared with ≤30 days TTS, and odds of N- upstaging were higher for ≥91 days TTS (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.62). No association between TTS and either T- or N-upstaging was found among HR-negative patients. Other clinical and demographic variables, including grade, tumor location, and race/ethnicity, were associated with both T- and N-upstaging.

CONCLUSION

TTS ≥61 and ≥91 days was a significant predictor of T- and N-upstaging, respectively, in HR-positive patients; however, TTS was not associated with upstaging in HR-negative breast cancer. Delays in surgery may contribute to measurable disease progression in T1N0M0 ductal breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Combined with Endocrine Therapy in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have been advocated for adjuvant therapy of metastatic hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- breast cancer (BC). However, the efficiency of adding CDK 4/6 inhibitors to neoadjuvant therapy was not unequivocal.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + endocrine therapy (ET) versus neoadjuvant endocrine monotherapy or standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- BC.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase online databases for randomized controlled trials and single-arm studies written in English until April 2021.

RESULTS

Five studies comparing CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET as neoadjuvant treatments to ET alone and 2 studies comparing neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. Neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET improved the rate of complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA: central Ki67 < 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 7.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.81-13.03, p < 0.001), increased the risk of adverse events (AEs; especially ≥3 AEs; AEs of all grades: OR = 9.10, 95% CI = 2.39-34.58, p = 0.001; AEs ≥3: OR = 12.24, 95% CI = 4.17-35.88, p < 0.001), led to no significant differences in pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with BC (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.04-2.85, p = 0.318) compared to endocrine monotherapy. Moreover, subgroup analysis showed that the 3 types of CDK 4/6 inhibitors all improved the rate of CCCA (ribociclib: OR = 10.31, 95% CI = 3.59-29.61, p < 0.001; palbociclib: OR = 7.39, 95% CI = 1.26-43.40, p = 0.027, and abemaciclib: OR = 8.28, 95% CI = 3.41-20.11, p < 0.001). Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET decreased the risk of AEs ≥3 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.29-0.87, p = 0.015) and showed similar ability to reach pCR (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.12-2.07, p = 0.342) and reduce the residual cancer burden (RCB, RCB 0-1: OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.18-1.22, p = 0.121; RCB 2-3: OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.89-5.91, p = 0.084).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that combination therapy had increased efficacy and toxicity compared to endocrine monotherapy and showed similar efficacy to and better safety than neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Palbociclib with letrozole as second-line neo-systemic therapy after failure of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for luminal type breast cancer: A case report

RATIONALE

Neo-adjuvant systemic therapy includes endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, which is widely used. Luminal breast cancer is resistant to chemotherapy and is more likely to not respond to chemotherapy before surgery. Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor. Palbociclib with letrozole combination therapy was an effective chemotherapy in metastatic luminal type breast cancer and had fewer side effects; however, the benefit of palbociclib in neoadjuvant systemic therapy is unclear.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 50-year-old female patient visited our hospital with palpable lump in the right breast. The lymph nodes fixed in the ipsilateral axilla.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast; the nuclear grade was moderate. The ipsilateral fixed lymph node was diagnosed as metastasis. The breast cancer subtype was luminal A type and was positive for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and negative for HER2/neu and Ki-67 marker index <10% on immunohistochemistry.

INTERVENTIONS

Neo-systemic therapy was performed with 3 cycles of adriamycin with docetaxel. After follow-up study, the breast and axillary lesions progressed. Palbociclib with letrozole was administered as second neo-systemic therapy for 10 months. Subsequently, breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed.

OUTCOMES

In the postoperative pathologic result, 4 mm invasive lesion remained, and the sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative. The results achieved a residual cancer burden classification class 1.

CONCLUSION

Second-line neo-systemic therapy can further reduce the size of the tumor and increase the likelihood of avoiding the side effects of surgery. Palbociclib with letrozole may be a good treatment in the preoperative stage for luminal breast cancer that is resistant to chemotherapy.

Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To compare the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) and solvent-based taxanes (sb-taxanes) as neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, published in English, about the comparison between nab-paclitaxel and sb-taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer were searched up to September 2019.

Results

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with pathological complete response (pCR, defined as ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0). Other main outcomes included long-term survival and adverse events (AEs). Seven studies (five RCTs and two cohorts) and 2949 patients were included. Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel improved pCR compared with sb-taxanes (ypT0 ypN0: OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.27–1.83, P < 0.001; ypT0/is ypN0: OR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.17–1.68, P < 0.001). The benefits of nab-paclitaxel on pCR were persistent in HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.07–2.19, P = 0.020), triple-negative breast cancer (weekly/every 2 weeks regimen; OR = 2.95, 95%CI: 1.54–5.67, P < 0.001), and tumors with Ki-67 > 20% (OR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.26–2.12, P < 0.001). Patients treated with nab-paclitaxel had better event-free survival (EFS; HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.57–0.85, P < 0.001) than with sb-taxanes. There were no differences in most of grade > 3 AEs between nab-paclitaxel and sb-taxanes (all P > 0.05), besides of any grade hypersensitivity (OR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.11–0.72, P = 0.008), any grade (OR = 2.10, 95%CI: 1.37–3.23, P = 0.001) and grade > 3 (OR = 4.01, 95%CI: 2.51–6.41, P < 0.001) neuropathy.

Conclusion

Nab-paclitaxel is effective for the treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. Nab-paclitaxel could improve pCR rate and EFS compared with sb-taxanes and with reasonable toxicities.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07831-7.

Disease recurrence and oncological outcome of patients treated surgically with curative intent for estrogen receptor positive, lymph node negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The molecular era has identified four breast cancer subtypes. Luminal A breast cancer (LABC) is defined by estrogen-receptor positive (ER+), progesterone-receptor positive (PgR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) tumours; these cancers are the most common and carry favourable prognoses.

AIMS

To describe clinicopathologic features, oncological outcome and relapse patterns in LABC.

METHODS

Consecutive female patients diagnosed with ER/PgR+/HER2-, lymph node negative (LN-) breast cancer between 2005 and 2015 were included. Clinicopathological and recurrence data was recorded using descriptive statistics. Oncological outcome was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed for 849 patients with median follow-up of 102.1 months. Mean disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 85.8% and 91.8%. Seventy patients died during this study (8.2%), while 58 patients had recurrence; 7 had local recurrence (0.8%) and 51 had distant recurrence (DDR) (6.0%). Patients developing DDR were likely to be postmenopausal (P = 0.028), present symptomatically (P < 0.001) and have larger tumours (P < 0.001). The mean time to DDR was 65.7 months, with fatal recurrence occurring in 66.6% of patients with DDR (34/51). Systemic chemotherapy prescription did not influence DDR (P = 0.053). Age >65 (hazards ratio (HR):1.66, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.07-2.55, P = 0.022), presenting symptomatically (HR:2.28, 95%CI:1.21-4.29, P = 0.011) and tumour size >20 mm (HR:1.81, 95%CI:1.25-2.62, P = 0.002) predicted DFS, while age>65 (HR:2.60, 95%CI:1.49-4.53, P = 0.001) and being postmenopausal at diagnosis (HR:3.13, 95%CI:1.19-8.22, P = 0.020) predicted OS.

CONCLUSION

Our series demonstrated excellent survival outcomes for patients diagnosed with LN- LABC after almost a decade of follow-up. However, following DDR, fatal progression is often imminent.

Bayesian decision making in confirmatory early-stage breast cancer trial

Preoperative or neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, once reserved for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC) in whom the goal was to render breast cancer operable, has become increasingly common. In the early-stage BC neoadjuvant studies, clinical benefits such as event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) usually take long time to be observed. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate obtained at surgery as an endpoint after the neoadjuvant treatment has been accepted by FDA as a surrogate predictor for long-term time-to-event endpoints to support accelerated approval. Utilizing this early endpoint helps expedite the development of novel therapies in order to fulfill the unmet medical need for certain high-risk or poor prognosis subsets of early-stage BC patients. By applying the correlation between pCR and time-to-event endpoints, an early and informative Go/NoGo decision-making structure can be built with less cost so that it improves the overall clinical development efficiency. We propose a Bayesian hierarchy model procedure that utilizes Bayesian predictive power of EFS in phase III to guide the Go/NoGo decision based on a clinical plausible threshold for the pCR treatment difference in phase II. The model implements a double bootstrap method to estimate the correlation between pCR and EFS in simulated setting. Besides simulation results, a hypothetical example based on the 2-in-1 adaptive design is provided.

How Effective is Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy (NET) in Downstaging the Axilla and Achieving Breast-Conserving Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is effective in downstaging large hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers and increasing rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), but data regarding nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) are sparse. We reported nodal and breast downstaging rates with NET, and compared axillary response rates following NET and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Consecutive stage I-III breast cancer patients treated with NET and surgery from January 2009 to December 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Nodal pCR rates were compared between biopsy-proven node-positive patients treated with NET, and HR+/HER2- patients treated with NAC from November 2013 to July 2019.

RESULTS

127 cancers treated with NET and 338 with NAC were included. NET recipients were older, more likely to have lobular and lower-grade tumors, and higher HR expression. With NET, the nodal pCR rate was 11% (4/38) of biopsy-proven cases, and the breast pCR rate was 1.6% (2/126). Nodal-dowstaging rates with NET and NAC were not significantly different (11% vs 18%; P = 0.37). Patients achieving nodal pCR with NET versus NAC were older (median age 70 vs 50, P = 0.004) and had greater progesterone receptor (PR) expression (85% vs 13%, P = 0.031), respectively. Of patients not candidates for BCS due to a large tumor relative to breast size, 36/47 (77%) became BCS-eligible with NET (median PR expression 55% vs 5% in those remaining ineligible, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although nodal pCR is more frequent than breast pCR, NET is more likely to de-escalate breast surgery than axillary surgery. However, with a nodal pCR rate of 11%, NET remains an option for downstaging node-positive patients without clear indications for NAC.

The use of multi-omics data and approaches in breast cancer immunotherapy: a review

Breast cancer is projected to be the most common cancer in women in 2020 in the USA. Despite high remission rates treatment side effects remain an issue, hence the interest in novel approaches such as immunotherapies which aim to utilize patients' immune systems to target cancer cells. This review summarizes the basics of breast cancer including staging and treatment options, followed by a discussion on immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade. After this, examples of the role of omics-type data and computational biology/bioinformatics in breast cancer are explored. Ultimately, there are several promising areas to investigate such as the prediction of neoantigens and the use of multi-omics data to direct research, with noted appropriate in clinical trial design in terms of end points.