1
|
Patel S, Sheshadri RA, Saklani A, Sp S, Kumar R, Singh S, Sukumar V, Bhatt A. INDEPSO-ISPSM Consensus on Peritoneal Malignancies: Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2400306. [PMID: 39637347 DOI: 10.1200/go-24-00306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This manuscript reports the results of the Indian Network for Development of Peritoneal Surface Oncology and Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (INDEPSO-ISPSM) consensus that aimed to provide recommendations for some important aspects management of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) and address some issues unique to India. METHODS The modified Delphi technique was used with two rounds of voting. There were 29 questions on nine main topics-the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), patient selection for CRS, preoperative workup, role of systemic chemotherapy (SC), CPM with other visceral metastases, molecular profile, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and other modalities of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC), prophylactic/preventive strategies, and surveillances after CRS. A consensus was achieved if anyone option received >70 votes (strong consensus >90%). RESULTS Forty-eight surgical (n = 41) and gastrointestinal (n = 7) oncologists were invited; 44 agreed to participate. The response rate was 95.4% (42/44) in round 1 and 93.1% (41/44) in round 2. Overall, a consensus was achieved on 23/29 (79.3%) questions (strong consensus on 6/29 [20.6%]). The panel strongly recommended considering surgery for limited CPM with limited liver metastases (92.5%), not altering the surgical approach in patients with KRAS mutations (91.67%), and limiting the use of IPC for unresectable CPM outside clinical trials (95%). Adjuvant SC was recommended for all patients undergoing CRS (89.47%). CRS is a therapeutic option for selected patients with CPM including those with metachronous CPM (79.49) and signet ring cell cancers (76.92%). HIPEC was recommended outside clinical trials only for patients with peritoneal cancer index 11-15(80%). CONCLUSION The panel recommended CRS for most indications but was very selective in recommending HIPEC and IPC outside clinical trials. These recommendations should be a useful resource in clinical decision making for clinicians treating CPM in India and regions with a similar sociodemographic background.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swapnil Patel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Upkar Hospital and Cancer Institute, Varanasi, India
| | | | - Avanish Saklani
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and GI Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Somashekhar Sp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India
| | - Rohit Kumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India
| | - Shivendra Singh
- Department of GI and HPB Surgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Vivek Sukumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Specialty Surgical Oncology, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shalby Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seibæk L, Thaysen HV, Lomborg KE. Non-curative surgical oncology: postoperative needs and preferences. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 14:208-214. [PMID: 33941572 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE When intended curative cancer surgery is not completed, the postoperative transition to palliative care represents a prognostic landmark to patients and their families. In patients referred for highly specialised surgery for peritoneal metastases from the intestinal tract and ovaries, surgery is not performed in approximately 25%. Still, little is known of their postoperative needs and preferences. METHODS We performed 14 qualitative research interviews with 12 patients (four men and eight women, aged 41-85 years) undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases; five of these were together with a relative. Five of the participants had ovarian, and seven had colorectal cancer (four men and seven women). The interviews followed a semistructured interview guide, were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using meaning condensation. RESULTS Patients accepted the surgeon's decision of refraining from the intended surgery. During the postoperative period, when realising the prognostic consequences, their needs changed rapidly, in some cases from day to day, and gradually they developed a reoriented focus on their lives. The findings were framed by two themes dealing with 'Change in treatment strategy' and 'Physical and psychosocial aspects of not undergoing curative surgery'. CONCLUSION When curative cancer surgery is not completed as intended, patient-centred communication is essential for patients' psychosocial reorientation and quality of life. Further, to support their well-being and action competences, patients have a need for basic supportive care and physical restitution. Finally, high-quality postoperative palliative care needs to be coordinated, which requires staff training and reorganisation of pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Seibæk
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nuytens F, Drubay V, Eveno C, Renaud F, Piessen G. Systematic review of risk factors, prognosis, and management of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:2141-2158. [PMID: 38764832 PMCID: PMC11099453 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.2141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma (CSRCC) is a rare clinical entity which accounts for approximately 1% of all colorectal cancers. Although multiple studies concerning this specific topic have been published in the past decades, the pathogenesis, associated risk factors, and potential implications on treatment are still poorly understood. Besides the low incidence, historically confusing histological criteria have resulted in confusing data. Nevertheless, the rising incidence of CSRCC along with relatively young age at presentation and associated dismal prognosis, highlight the actual interest to synthesize the known literature regarding CSRCC. AIM To provide an updated overview of risk factors, prognosis, and management of CSRCC. METHODS A literature search in the MEDLINE/PubMed database was conducted with the following search terms used: 'Signet ring cell carcinoma' and 'colorectal'. Studies in English language, published after January 1980, were included. Studies included in the qualitative synthesis were evaluated for content concerning epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical, diagnostic, histological, and molecular features, as well as metastatic pattern and therapeutic management. If possible, presented data was extracted in order to present a more detailed overview of the literature. RESULTS In total, 67 articles were included for qualitative analysis, of which 54 were eligible for detailed data extraction. CSRCC has a reported incidence between 0.1%-2.4% and frequently presents with advanced disease stage at the time of diagnosis. CSRCC is associated with an impaired overall survival (5-year OS: 0%-46%) and a worse stage-corrected outcome compared to mucinous and not otherwise specified adenocarcinoma. The systematic use of exploratory laparoscopy to determine the presence of peritoneal metastases has been advised. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, although the rates of curative resection in CSRCC (21%-82%) are lower compared to those in other histological types. In case of peritoneal metastasis, cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy should only be proposed in selected patients. CONCLUSION CSRCC is a rare clinical entity most often characterized by young age and advanced disease at presentation. As such, diagnostic modalities and therapeutic approach should be tailored accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederiek Nuytens
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Vincent Drubay
- Cambrai Hospital Center and Sainte Marie, Group of Hospitals of The Catholic Institute of Lille, Cambrai 59400, France
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
| | - Florence Renaud
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ghabra S, Desale S, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical and Histopathologic Features of 35 Patients Treated for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Who Survived 5 Years. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1329-1338. [PMID: 36856661 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, patients with a limited extent of peritoneal metastases from colon and rectal cancer are treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative chemotherapy performed at experienced centers. OBJECTIVE To statistically evaluate features that may impact survival of ≥5 years. These data are used in the risk/benefit analyses performed by the multidisciplinary team. DESIGN This was a retrospective review of a prospective database. SETTINGS This single-institution study was conducted at an academic center. PATIENTS All patients who had biopsy-proven colon or rectal peritoneal metastases treated by systemic chemotherapy, complete cytoreductive surgery, and perioperative surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were the clinical-, histologic-, and treatment-related features that had an impact on 5-year survival. RESULTS From 131 patients who had complete cytoreduction, 35 patients (26.7%) were identified as 5-year survivors. The median survival time was 27 months. The median age was 50.5 (range, 25-80) years. By univariant analysis, an absence of lymph node involvement at the time of primary colorectal cancer resection (HR 1.899 [95% CI, 1.064-3.388]; p = 0.03), complete or near-complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.251 [95% CI, 0.092-0.684]; p = 0.007), peritoneal cancer index ≤17 (HR 0.509 [95% CI, 0.329-0.788]; p = 0.002), complete visible resection of disease indicated by the completeness of cytoreduction score of 0 (HR 0.412 [95% CI, 0.224-0.756]; p = 0.004), and well-differentiated tumor (HR 0.34 [95% CI, 0.157-0.737]; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with ≥5 years survival. LIMITATIONS Limitations include its retrospective nature, unmeasured confounders, and data from a single institution. CONCLUSIONS The tumor biology as revealed by lymph node status and tumor differentiation plus extent of disease as measured by the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, peritoneal cancer index, and no visible residual disease indicated a favorable outcome. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C62 . CARACTERSTICAS CLNICAS E HISTOPATOLGICAS EN PACIENTES TRATADOS POR METASTASIS PERITONEALES DE ORGEN COLORECTAL Y QUE SOBREVIVIERON AOS ANTECEDENTES:Actualmente, los pacientes con extensión limitada de metástasis peritoneales de orígen colorectal son tratados mediante cirugía citorreductora asociada con una quimioterapia peri-peratoria realizadas en centros experimentados.OBJETIVO:Estúdio y evaluación estadística de las características que puedan impactar en la sobrevida de los pacientes a 5 años o más. Se utilizaron estos datos en el análisis de riesgo /beneficio realizados por un equipo multidisciplinario.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTES:Estudio realizado en una sola institución académica.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos que presentaban metástasis peritoneales de orígen colorectal, comprobadas por biopsia y tratadas con quimioterapia sistémica, cirugía peri-operatoria y citorreductora completas.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Las medidads de resultados primarios fueron las características clínicas, histológicas y relacionadas con el tratamiento que tuvieron un impacto en la sobrevida a 5 años.RESULTADOS:De 131 pacientes que tuvieron una cirugía de citorreducción completa, 35 pacientes (26, 7%) fueron identificados como sobrevivientes a 5 años. La mediana de sobrevida fué de 27 meses. Se identificarion 16 varones. La mediana de edad fue de 50, 5 años con un rango de 25 a 80 años. Según análisis univariante, la ausencia de compromiso de los ganglios linfáticos en el momento de la resección del cáncer colorrectal primario (HR 1,899 (1,064, 3,388) p = 0,03), la respuesta completa o casi completa al tratamiento neoadyuvante con quimioterapia (HR 0,251 (0,092, 0,684) p = 0,007), el índice de cáncer peritoneal ≤17 (HR 0,509 (0,329, 0,788) p = 0,002), la resección completa y visible de la enfermedad indicada por la puntuación de citorreducción de 0 (HR 0,412 (0,224), 0,756) p = 0,004) y los tumores bien diferenciados (HR 0,34 (0,157, 0,737) p = 0,006) se asociaron significativamente con 5 o más años de sobrevida.LIMITACIONES:El estudio se encontró limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva, por la no medida de factores de confusión y por los datos provenientes de una sola institución.CONCLUSIONES:La biología tumoral demostrada según el estado de los ganglios linfáticos y la diferenciación tumoral, agregada a la extensión de la enfermedad medida por la respuesta a la quimioterapia neoadyuvante, el índice de cáncer peritoneal y la ausencia visible de enfermedad residual, demostraron un resultado favorable. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C62(Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadin Ghabra
- Department of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Sameer Desale
- Biostatistics and Biomedical Informatics Department, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland
| | - Paul H Sugarbaker
- Department of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bootsma S, Bijlsma MF, Vermeulen L. The molecular biology of peritoneal metastatic disease. EMBO Mol Med 2023; 15:e15914. [PMID: 36700339 PMCID: PMC9994485 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202215914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases are a common form of tumor cell dissemination in gastrointestinal malignancies. Peritoneal metastatic disease (PMD) is associated with severe morbidity and resistance to currently employed therapies. Given the distinct route of dissemination compared with distant organ metastases, and the unique microenvironment of the peritoneal cavity, specific tumor cell characteristics are needed for the development of PMD. In this review, we provide an overview of the known histopathological, genomic, and transcriptomic features of PMD. We find that cancers representing the mesenchymal subtype are strongly associated with PMD in various malignancies. Furthermore, we discuss the peritoneal niche in which the metastatic cancer cells reside, including the critical role of the peritoneal immune system. Altogether, we show that PMD should be regarded as a distinct disease entity, that requires tailored treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Bootsma
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular MedicineAmsterdam UMC, Location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer BiologyAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Oncode InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular MedicineAmsterdam UMC, Location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer BiologyAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Oncode InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Louis Vermeulen
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular MedicineAmsterdam UMC, Location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer BiologyAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Oncode InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tonello M, Baratti D, Sammartino P, Di Giorgio A, Robella M, Sassaroli C, Framarini M, Valle M, Macrì A, Graziosi L, Coccolini F, Lippolis PV, Gelmini R, Deraco M, Biacchi D, Santullo F, Vaira M, Di Lauro K, D'Acapito F, Carboni F, Giuffrè G, Donini A, Fugazzola P, Faviana P, Sorrentino L, Scapinello A, Del Bianco P, Sommariva A. Microsatellite and RAS/RAF Mutational Status as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3405-3417. [PMID: 34783946 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11045-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to prolonged survival for selected patients with colorectal (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aimed to analyze the prognostic role of micro-satellite (MS) status and RAS/RAF mutations for patients treated with CRS. METHODS Data were collected from 13 Italian centers with PM expertise within a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Clinical and pathologic variables and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational and MS status were correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS The study enrolled 437 patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. The median OS was 42.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.4-51.2 months], and the median DFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 12.3-14.9 months). The local (peritoneal) DFS was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.4-24.6 months). In addition to the known clinical factors, KRAS mutations (p = 0.005), BRAF mutations (p = 0.01), and MS status (p = 0.04) were related to survival. The KRAS- and BRAF-mutated patients had a shorter survival than the wild-type (WT) patients (5-year OS, 29.4% and 26.8% vs 51.5%, respectively). The patients with micro-satellite instability (MSI) had a longer survival than the patients with micro-satellite stability (MSS) (5-year OS, 58.3% vs 36.7%). The MSI/WT patients had the best prognosis. The MSS/WT and MSI/mutated patients had similar survivals, whereas the MSS/mutated patients showed the worst prognosis (5-year OS, 70.6%, 48.1%, 23.4%; p = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, OS was related to the Peritoneal Cancer Index [hazard ratio (HR), 1.05 per point], completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (HR, 2.8), N status (HR, 1.6), signet-ring (HR, 2.4), MSI/WT (HR, 0.5), and MSS/WT-MSI/mutation (HR, 0.4). Similar results were obtained for DFS. CONCLUSION For patients affected by CRC-PM who are eligible for CRS, clinical and pathologic criteria need to be integrated with molecular features (KRAS/BRAF mutation). Micro-satellite status should be strongly considered because MSI confers a survival advantage over MSS, even for mutated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Tonello
- Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Dario Baratti
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Sammartino
- Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Robella
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Cinzia Sassaroli
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Framarini
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Mario Valle
- Peritoneal Malignancies Unit, INT "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Macrì
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Program, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Luigina Graziosi
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Piero Vincenzo Lippolis
- General and Peritoneal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital University Pisa (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberta Gelmini
- General and Oncological Surgery Unit, AOU of Modena University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Biacchi
- Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Vaira
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Katia Di Lauro
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio D'Acapito
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Fabio Carboni
- Peritoneal Malignancies Unit, INT "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giuffrè
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age 'Gaetano Barresi', Section of Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Annibale Donini
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Pinuccia Faviana
- Pathological Anatomy III, Laboratory Medicine Department, Hospital University Pisa (AOUP), Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorena Sorrentino
- General and Oncological Surgery Unit, AOU of Modena University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Paola Del Bianco
- Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Antonio Sommariva
- Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Davis CH, Alexander HR. What is the Current Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer? Adv Surg 2021; 55:159-174. [PMID: 34389090 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Davis
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. https://twitter.com/CDavisMD
| | - H Richard Alexander
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu L, Ling C, Xu T, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Fang C, Yang L, Zhuang W, Wang R, Ping J, Wang M. Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Right Colon, Left Colon, and Rectum. Pathol Oncol Res 2021; 27:1609800. [PMID: 34276258 PMCID: PMC8283508 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2021.1609800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Histological subtype plays an important role in the different clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). However, in previous studies, the influences of tumor locations and tumor stages have not been strictly controlled. This study focused on the assessment of the prognostic value of each histological subtype in different tumor locations and tumor stages of CRC. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2011) to analyze 818,229 CRC patients with different clinical and pathological features, and analyzed the prognostic value of each histological subtype. Under the condition of stratification by tumor stage, signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) presented the worst survival in each stage of right colon cancer (stage I, log-rank, p = 0.002, stages II, III, and IV, log-rank, p < 0.001), rectal cancer (RC) (log-rank, p < 0.001), and in stages II, III, and IV of left colon cancer (log-rank, p < 0.001). Multivariate survival analysis suggested SRCC subtype, male gender, age ≥ 70 years, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, stage progression, and poor differentiation were all significant factors worsening survival in CRC (p < 0.001, respectively). Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) histological subtype proved to be an independent protective factor for the prognosis of right colon cancer (p = 0.003). Overall, in our study, the results suggested SRCC had the worst survival among the three histological subtypes of CRC. MC was associated with favorable prognosis in right colon cancer but not with other tumor locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chunrun Ling
- Department of General and Pediatric Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Department of General Surgery, Suining Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suining, China
| | - Jinglin Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yibin Second People's Hospital, Yibin, China
| | - Yujie Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yingjie Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chao Fang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lie Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wen Zhuang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Ping
- Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Mojin Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kazi M, Nekkanti SS, Rohila J, Patel S, Sukumar V, Desouza A, Saklani A. Impact of surgical staging for aggressive histology rectal cancers: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:E119-E122. [PMID: 33377582 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and signet ring adenocarcinomas are aggressive histological subtypes of rectal cancer with a high incidence of occult peritoneal metastasis. METHODS This was a retrospective review of aggressive histology of rectal cancer patients who underwent pre-treatment surgical staging as part of ovarian transposition or ostomy creation for diversion at a single tertiary cancer centre between January 2014 and December 2019. RESULTS A total of 117 patients underwent surgical staging and were deemed non-metastatic on imaging. Surgical staging led to the detection of metastasis in 29.9% of patients. This led to modification in treatment protocol in 20.5% and change in intent of therapy in 15.4%. The majority (80%) was found to have peritoneal disease with peritoneal carcinomatosis index <17. Only T4 disease predicted the presence of metastasis on surgical staging with an odds ratio of 2.69 (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of patients with aggressive histology rectal cancers are upstaged after surgical staging. Further investigation of this tool for staging is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mufaddal Kazi
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sri Siddhartha Nekkanti
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Jitender Rohila
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Swapnil Patel
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vivek Sukumar
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ashwin Desouza
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Avanish Saklani
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fadel MG, Malietzis G, Constantinides V, Pellino G, Tekkis P, Kontovounisios C. Clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes of signet-ring cell and mucinous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Discov Oncol 2021; 12:5. [PMID: 35201441 PMCID: PMC8762524 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-021-00398-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histological subtypes of colorectal cancer may be associated with varied prognostic features. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence and overall survival between colorectal signet-ring cell (SC) and mucinous carcinoma (MC) to conventional adenocarcinoma (AC). METHODS A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid and Cochrane Library was performed for studies that reported data on clinicopathological and survival outcomes on SC and/or MC versus AC from January 1985 to May 2020. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. RESULTS Thirty studies of 1,087,055 patients were included: 11,510 (1.06%) with SC, 110,179 (10.13%) with MC and 965,366 (88.81%) with AC. Patients with SC were younger than patients with AC (WMD - 0.47; 95% CI - 0.84 to -0.10; I2 88.6%; p = 0.014) and more likely to have right-sided disease (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.72-2.60; I2 82.9%; p < 0.001). Locoregional recurrence at 5 years was more frequent in patients with SC (OR 2.81; 95% CI 1.40-5.65; I2 0.0%; p = 0.004) and MC (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.18-3.15; I2 74.0%; p = 0.009). 5-year overall survival was significantly reduced when comparing SC and MC to AC (HR 2.54; 95% CI 1.98-3.27; I2 99.1%; p < 0.001 and HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19-1.61; I2 98.6%; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION SC and MC are associated with right-sided lesions, advanced stage at presentation, higher rates of recurrence and poorer overall survival. This has strong implications towards surgical and oncological management and surveillance of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Fadel
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
| | - George Malietzis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | - Paris Tekkis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang SY, Kang JH, Kim HS, Han YD, Min BS, Lee KY. Status of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:1251-1265. [PMID: 31949946 PMCID: PMC6955007 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was previously considered an incurable disease with a poor survival outcome. As our understanding of its biology evolved, the paradigm of the management of PC from colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed, including the combination of macroscopic disease control, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), maximal regional chemotherapy to treat residual microscopic disease, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As with many surgical innovations, CRS with HIPEC has evolved faster than data to support it, leaving many skeptics and critics. This review highlights the recent evidence of current practice and outcome of CRS with HIPEC. Furthermore, it also summarizes the ongoing clinical trials and potential future progress of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yoon Yang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho Seung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Dae Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kosumi K, Hamada T, Koh H, Borowsky J, Bullman S, Twombly TS, Nevo D, Masugi Y, Liu L, da Silva A, Chen Y, Du C, Gu M, Li C, Li W, Liu H, Shi Y, Mima K, Song M, Nosho K, Nowak JA, Nishihara R, Baba H, Zhang X, Wu K, Wang M, Huttenhower C, Garrett WS, Meyerson ML, Lennerz JK, Giannakis M, Chan AT, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS, Ogino S. The Amount of Bifidobacterium Genus in Colorectal Carcinoma Tissue in Relation to Tumor Characteristics and Clinical Outcome. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2018; 188:2839-2852. [PMID: 30243655 PMCID: PMC6284552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Evidence indicates a complex link between microbiota, tumor characteristics, and host immunity in the tumor microenvironment. In experimental studies, bifidobacteria appear to modulate intestinal epithelial cell differentiation. Accumulating evidence suggests that bifidobacteria may enhance the antitumor immunity and efficacy of immunotherapy. We hypothesized that the amount of bifidobacteria in colorectal carcinoma tissue might be associated with tumor differentiation and higher immune response to colorectal cancer. Using a molecular pathologic epidemiology database of 1313 rectal and colon cancers, we measured the amount of Bifidobacterium DNA in carcinoma tissue by a quantitative PCR assay. The multivariable regression model was used to adjust for potential confounders, including microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylator phenotype, long-interspersed nucleotide element-1 methylation, and KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations. Intratumor bifidobacteria were detected in 393 cases (30%). The amount of bifidobacteria was associated with the extent of signet ring cells (P = 0.002). Compared with Bifidobacterium-negative cases, multivariable odd ratios for the extent of signet ring cells were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.74-2.24) for Bifidobacterium-low cases and 1.87 (95% CI, 1.16-3.02) for Bifidobacterium-high cases (Ptrend = 0.01). The association between intratumor bifidobacteria and signet ring cells suggests a possible role of bifidobacteria in determining distinct tumor characteristics or as an indicator of dysfunctional mucosal barrier in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Kosumi
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hideo Koh
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jennifer Borowsky
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Conjoint Gastroenterology Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research Berghofer, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan Bullman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Tyler S Twombly
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Nevo
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yohei Masugi
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Li Liu
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Annacarolina da Silva
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yang Chen
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chunxia Du
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mancang Gu
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chenxi Li
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wanwan Li
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hongli Liu
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yan Shi
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kosuke Mima
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Mingyang Song
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katsuhiko Nosho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Jonathan A Nowak
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Reiko Nishihara
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Xuehong Zhang
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kana Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Molin Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Curtis Huttenhower
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wendy S Garrett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew L Meyerson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marios Giannakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Clinicopathologic Significance of CXCL12 and CXCR4 Expressions in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018; 2018:9613185. [PMID: 29887884 PMCID: PMC5977022 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9613185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is both a global and national burden, being the third most common malignancy in men and the second in women, worldwide. The prognosis of CRC is affected by various factors like the histological grade, angiolymphatic invasion, and distant metastases. Metastasis is an intricate process; one of the possible mechanisms is through the interaction of the chemokines CXCL12 and CXCR4. This study aims to reveal the expression patterns of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in CRC. Methods The quantitative expressions of CXCL12 and CXCR4 messenger RNA (mRNA) were evaluated in 32 patients with adenocarcinoma-type CRC. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed on formalin-fixed tissues. CXCL12 and CXCR4's expressions, clinicopathologic features, and the treatment response to the CRC were analysed. Results All tumour tissues showed higher levels of both chemokines compared to normal colonic tissue. The expression of CXCL12 mRNA was higher in rectal location (p = 0.04) with a tendency to be higher in later stages (p = 0.15), while the expression of CXCR4 was lower in tumours with a lymphatic invasion (p = 0.02), compared to their counterparts. There was no difference in the expression of CXCL12 and CXCR4 according to the patients' ages, gender, tumour differentiation, or response to chemotherapy. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that the mRNA expression of CXCL12 was significantly correlated with rectal location. CXCR4 mRNA expression was inversely correlated in tumours with a lymphatic invasion.
Collapse
|
14
|
Brandl A, Weiss S, von Winterfeld M, Krannich A, Feist M, Pratschke J, Raue W, Rau B. Predictive value of peritoneal cancer index for survival in patients with mucinous peritoneal malignancies treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a single centre experience. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 34:512-517. [PMID: 28679331 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1351627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated the correlation between the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and patient outcome depending on the tumour type. BACKGROUND Peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) treatment depends on tumour type. Mucinous PSM (m-PSM) is associated with a better prognosis than non-mucinous PSM (nm-PSM). The PCI's predictive ability has not yet been evaluated. METHODS We analysed 123 patients with PSM treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) between 2008 and 2015. The m-PSM group (n = 75) included patients with appendiceal cancer (n = 15), colorectal cancer (n = 21), or low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 39); the nm-PSM group (n = 48) included patients with gastric (n = 18) or colorectal (n = 30) cancer. The PCI's predictive ability was evaluated by multiple Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS The 5-year survival and PCI were higher in m-PSM patients (67.0%; 20.5 ± 12.1) than in nm-PSM patients (32.6%; p = 0.013; 8.9 ± 6.0; p < 0.001). Colorectal nm-PSM patients with PCI ≥16 had a worse 2-year survival (25.0%) vs. patients with PCI <16 (79.1%; log rank = 0.009), but no significant effect was observed in patients with m-PSM (66.7% vs. 68.1%; p = 0.935). Underlying disease (HR 5.666-16.240), BMI (HR 1.109), and PCI (HR 1.068) significantly influenced overall survival in all patients. CONCLUSIONS PCI is prognostic in nm-PSM, but not in m-PSM. CRS and HIPEC may benefit not only patients with low PCI, but also those with high PCI and m-PSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Brandl
- a Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité , Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Sascha Weiss
- a Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité , Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Moritz von Winterfeld
- b Institute of Pathology, Campus Mitte, Charité , Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Alexander Krannich
- c Biostatistics Unit , Berlin Institute of Health and Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Mathilde Feist
- a Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité , Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- a Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité , Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Wieland Raue
- a Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité , Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- a Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Charité , Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Simkens GA, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:259-266. [PMID: 28721098 PMCID: PMC5501638 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s119569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a viable option for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal origin, resulting in long-term survival and even cure in some cases. However, adequate patient selection for this treatment is currently one of the major challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of clinically relevant factors associated with overall survival. This may help to guide clinicians through the complex interplay of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics to adequately select patients who benefit the most from this extensive surgical treatment. First, basic principles of colorectal PM and the CRS and HIPEC treatment will be discussed. According to available literature, especially extent of peritoneal disease, completeness of cytoreduction, and signet ring cell histology have great influence on the outcome after CRS and HIPEC. Other factors that seem to have a negative prognostic value are the presence of liver metastases and the absence of treatment with neo-adjuvant systemic therapy. Prognostic models combining the above-mentioned factors, such as the Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score nomogram, may provide clinically relevant tools to use in everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maciver AH, Lee N, Skitzki JJ, Boland PM, Francescutti V. Cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS/HIPEC) in colorectal cancer: Evidence-based review of patient selection and treatment algorithms. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2017; 43:1028-1039. [PMID: 28029523 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Cytoreduction and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS/HIPEC) is increasingly utilized as a treatment strategy for patients with peritoneal metastases from various primary tumor sites. For this heterogenous procedure, related to patient characteristics, patient selection, and the extent of surgical completeness of cytoreduction, high level evidence (ex: multiple randomized controlled trials) is not available to support efficacy. This review of the available literature supporting application of the procedure, focusing on colorectal cancer, provides a summary of current evidence for patient selection and treatment algorithms based on patient presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Maciver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - N Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - J J Skitzki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - P M Boland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - V Francescutti
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rau B, Brandl A, Pascher A, Raue W, Sugarbaker P. Oligometastatic Disease in the Peritoneal Space with Gastrointestinal Cancer. Visc Med 2017; 33:42-46. [PMID: 28612016 DOI: 10.1159/000454694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment options for patients with gastrointestinal cancer and oligometastastic disease remain the domain of the medical oncologist. However, in selected cases, attempts to remove or destroy the tumor burden seem appropriate. BACKGROUND DATA During the last decade, the treatment of localized and isolated tumor nodules, such as lung, liver or peritoneal metastasis, has changed. Previously, these patients with metastatic disease only received palliative chemotherapy. Combined treatment approaches and new techniques demonstrate that additional surgery to destroy or remove the metastases seem to be of major benefit to patients. METHODS The recently published important literature regarding peritoneal metastases and oligometastases in gastrointestinal cancer was analyzed. RESULTS The most important factor in the treatment of peritoneal metastases and in cytoreductive surgery is patient selection. Resection of peritoneal metastases should be considered. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is feasible. However, further results of randomized trials are necessary. Several randomized trials are on the way and will be available in 1-2 years. Systemic chemotherapy alone as an adequate management plan for all sites of metastatic disease is not compatible with a high standard of care. Formulating an optimal plan combining re-operative surgery with regional plus systemic chemotherapy is a necessary task of the multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS In oligometastastic disease of gastrointestinal cancer origin, the selection process is the most important factor for survival. Further studies are needed to determine optimal treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Rau
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | - Wieland Raue
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prognostic relevance of histopathological features in signet ring cell carcinoma of the colorectum. Virchows Arch 2016; 469:267-75. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-1983-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2016] [Revised: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
19
|
Simkens GA, Razenberg LG, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Creemers GJ, de Hingh IH. Histological subtype and systemic metastases strongly influence treatment and survival in patients with synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:794-800. [PMID: 27055946 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment possibilities for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) are increasing. It is however unclear how treatment choice and outcome are influenced by histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases. Therefore, this study assessed the impact of histological subtype and systemic metastases on treatment choice and survival in patients with colorectal PM. METHODS This population-based study included patients with synchronous PM originating from colorectal adenocarcinoma (AC), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC), or signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). Data of patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 were extracted from the National Cancer Registry (IKNL) of the Netherlands. Treatment strategy and survival were analyzed with logistic regression and cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS In total, 5516 patients were included, of whom 71.8% had an AC, 21.2% an MC, and 7.0% had an SRCC. The use of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was dependent on histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases, and increased over time, especially in AC and MC patients. The relative survival gain of CRS + HIPEC, corrected for systemic metastases, was comparable in AC, MC, and SRCC patients (hazard ratio: 0.17, 0.21, and 0.13, respectively). Compared to supportive care only, the absolute survival gain was 30, 35, and 18 months, respectively. Systemic therapy improved survival in all histological subtypes. CONCLUSIONS Histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases strongly influenced treatment choice and survival in patients with synchronous colorectal PM. These results can be used to optimize treatment strategy for patients with synchronous colorectal PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - L G Razenberg
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E Lemmens
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J Rutten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G-J Creemers
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|