Is Cure Possible After Sequential Resection of Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Cancer?

Debulking hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: Analysis of risk factors for progression free survival

BACKGROUND

The study explores the role of liver debulking surgery in cases of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), challenging the traditional notion that surgery is not a valid option in such scenarios.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced but resectable disease who underwent surgery with a curative intent (Group I) and those with advanced incompletely resectable disease who underwent a "debulking" hepatectomy (Group II) were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the intra-operative and post-operative results between the two groups. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 69% and 47% for group 1 vs 64% and 35% for group 2 respectively (p = 0.14). The 3-year and 5-year PFS rates were 32% and 21% for group 1 vs 12% and 8% for group 2 respectively (p = 0.009). Independent predictors of PFS in the debulking group were bilobar metastases (HR = 2.70; p = 0.02); the presence of extrahepatic metastasis (HR = 2.65, p = 0.03) and the presence of more than 9 metastases (HR = 2.37; p = 0.04). Iterative liver surgery for CRLM was a significant protective factor (HR = 0.34, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

An aggressive palliative surgical approach may offer a survival benefit for selected patients with unresectable CRLM, without increasing the morbidity. The decision for surgery should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Surgical strategy for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver and extrahepatic metastases: A scoring system and decision tree model

BACKGROUND

The role of hepatectomy in a specific group of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (SCRLM) and synchronous extrahepatic disease (SEHD) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of liver surgery and define the selection criteria for surgical candidates in patients with SCRLM + SEHD.

METHODS

Between July 2007 and October 2018, 475 patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent liver resection were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients with SCRLM + SEHD were identified and included in the study. Clinical pathological data of these patients were analyzed to evaluate the influence on survival. Important prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. The risk score system and decision tree analysis were generated according to the important prognostic factors for better patient selection.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of patients with SCRLM + SEHD was 21.9%. The most important prognostic factors were SCRLM number of more than five, site of SEHD other than the lung only, inability to achieve SCRLM + SEHD R0 resection, and BRAF mutation of cancer cells. The proposed risk score system and decision tree model easily discriminated between patients with different survival rates and identified the profile of suitable surgical patients.

CONCLUSION

Liver surgery should not be a contraindication for patients with SCRLM + SEHD. Patients with complete SCRLM + SEHD R0 resection, SCRLM number less than or equal to five, SEHD confined to the lung only, and wild-type BRAF could have favorable survival outcomes. The proposed scoring system and decision tree model may be beneficial to patient selection in clinical use.

Effect of primary tumor resection on survival in patients with asymptomatic unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

It remains controversial whether primary tumor resection (PTR) improves survival in patients with asymptomatic, unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the latest evidence on clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for eligible studies published between database inception and May 2022. RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies were included, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five retrospective cohort studies. Meta-analysis showed that overall survival (OS) [HR = 0.89, 95%CI (0.74, 1.06), P = 0.19] and progression-free survival (PFS) [HR = 0.87, 95%CI (0.71, 1.06), P = 0.17] were not significantly different between the PTR and non-PTR groups. In the subgroup analysis, all subgroups showed no significant difference in OS between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

PTR may not provide additional survival benefits over chemotherapy in asymptomatic, unresectable mCRC patients. However, in view of the limitations of this study, more well-designed RCTs are needed to validate our conclusions.

Long-term Results of Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Terms of Primary Tumour Location and Clinical Risk Factors

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of primary tumour location and clinical risk factors for long-term results of surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated in 636 patients. Patients were divided by tumour location (right-/left-sided colorectal cancer: RCRC/LCRC; rectal cancer), and age, gender, number and size of CLMs, type of liver surgery and interval from primary operation were evaluated.

RESULTS

One-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS were independent of primary tumour location (p<0.59). CLM diameter was negatively associated with OS for the whole cohort (p<0.002), and RCRC (p<0.03) and LCRC (p<0.04) groups, as well as for RFS of those with LCRC (p<0.04). CLM number was negatively associated with RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0001), RCRC (p<0.02), LCRC (p<0.0001) and RC (p<0.02). Radiofrequency ablation and combined procedures led to worse OS for the whole cohort (p<0.03), and to worse RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0003) and for those with LCRC (p<0.03). A shorter interval between primary colorectal cancer surgery and CLMs procedure was risky for poor OS and RFS of patients with CLMs from RCRC (p<0.05), LCRC (p<0.05) and RC (p<0.02).

CONCLUSION

Primary tumour location together with clinical risk factors are important for long-term results of surgery CLMs.

Outcome of Radical Surgery for Simultaneous Liver and Lung Metastases Synchronous with Primary Colorectal Cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to metastatic disease in approximately 30% of patients. In patients with newly diagnosed CRC with both liver and lung metastases, curative resection is rarely possible. The aim of this study is to evaluate the overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates of these patients after resection with curative intent.

Methods

This study is a retrospective analysis of colorectal cancer patients (n=8, median age 54.3 years) with simultaneous liver and lung metastasis undergoing resection with curative intent between May 1st, 2002, to December 31st, 2016, at our institution.

Results

Colon was the primary tumour site in 2 patients and rectum in 6 patients. The median number of liver and lung metastases was 3 and 2, respectively. Patients received various treatment sequences individualized on tumour disease burden. R0 resection was achieved after all but one procedure. Two severe Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications were present. Median hospital stay was 9 (3–24) days per procedure. Tumour relapse was observed in all patients with median RFS of 9 (3–28) months and median OS of 40 (17–52) months. In 4 cases, where repeated resection of recurrent metastases (3 liver and 1 lung) was possible, the median OS was 43 months.

Conclusion

Our data suggests that patients seem to benefit from resection with curative intent, with tendency to prolonged OS and with acceptable complication rate. Tumour recurrence occurred in all patients. Repeated resection was beneficial and led to further prolonged OS.

Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (TSCRS) Consensus for Cytoreduction Selection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Taiwan has witnessed a surge in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), of which 40-60% metastasize. Continuous updating of cytoreductive strategies in metastatic CRC (mCRC) has contributed to median overall survival reaching 40 months. In this changing scenario, to standardize the approaches across Taiwan, a group of experts from the Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (TSCRS) convened to establish evidence- and opinion-based recommendations for defining the criteria of "resectability" in mCRC.

METHODS

Over the course of one-on-one consultations, lasting 30-40 min each, with 30 medical specialists (19 colorectal surgeons, 4 general surgeons, and 7 medical oncologists) from 16 hospitals in Taiwan followed by a 2-h meeting with 8 physician experts (3 general surgeons, 4 colorectal surgeons, and 1 thoracic surgeon), 12 key questions on cytoreduction were addressed. This was further contextualized based on published literature.

RESULTS

The final consensus includes eight recommendations regarding the criteria for metastasis resection, role of local control treatment in liver potentially resectable patients, management of synchronous liver metastases, approach for peritoneal metastasis, place for resection in multiple-organ metastasis, and general criteria for resectability.

CONCLUSIONS

mCRC patients undergoing R0 resection have the greatest survival advantage following surgery. Our role as a multidisciplinary team (MDT) should be to treat potentially resectable mCRC patients as rapidly and safely as possible, and achieve R0 resection as far as possible and for as long as possible (continuum of care). This TSCRS consensus statement aims to help build clinical capacity within the MDTs, while making better use of existing healthcare resources.

Prognostic value of metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis in a real-life cohort

BACKGROUND

Metastatic patterns have been linked with prognosis in colorectal cancer. We aim to determine the distribution of metastases, their dynamics during disease and their prognostic impact for specific clinical treatment scenarios (resection of metastasis and/or systemic treatment, best supportive care).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

978 patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma treated at three oncological centers from 2006 to 2018 were included. Overall survival was assessed depending on tumor load, distribution of metastases and treatment of the patients.

RESULTS

Most patients had single site metastasis (n = 684; 69.9%): 398 patients had liver (n = 398; 40.7%) and 103 patients had lung only metastasis (10.6%). The number of organs involved in metastases at diagnosis was highly prognostic (HR 0.77; CI 0.65, 0.90), whereas the additional gain of metastases during progression of the disease was not. The majority of patients (62.9-74.2%) with initial lung, liver or both metastases retained their initial metastatic status. In the overall population, lung only metastases were associated with the most favorable outcome (HR 0.64; CI 0.50, 0.81). This was also observed in patients receiving best supportive care (HR 0.45; CI 0.27, 0.75). Resection of lung only metastases resulted in longer median survival (102.2 months). A relevant survival difference in patients treated by systemic therapy alone was not observed. Lung only metastasis was associated with rectal cancer (p < .001) and RAS-mutation (p = .01); both, lung and liver metastasis were associated with time from diagnosis to first metastasis (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The number of organs involved in metastasis at diagnosis but not the total cumulative number of involved organs is of prognostic relevance in colorectal adenocarcinoma. This prognostic relevant initial metastasis distribution remains unchanged in the majority of patients during the disease. However, the prognostic impact of the metastatic pattern is potentially altered by treatment modality.

Impact of Site-Specific Metastases on Surgical Value and Survival among Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

We aimed to explore the potential prognostic impact of the metastatic site on the management approach and prognosis of stage IV colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer patients reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database between 2010 and 2013 were included in this study. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with different treatment options using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models. Overall, 17,776 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer were identified. Of these patients, 2,052 (11.5%) underwent surgical resection for tumors at both the primary and meta-static sites. Patients who underwent surgical resection of both primary and metastatic sites with liver, lung, and simultaneous liver and lung metastases had a longer median OS ( P < 0.001) than patients who underwent nonsurgical treatments. Cox regression analysis revealed that surgical resection of both primary and metastatic sites was associated with a significantly enhanced OS ( P < 0.001). Colorectal cancer patients with hepatic or pulmonary metastases, who underwent metastasectomy, even in selected patients with both hepatic and pulmonary metastases after multidisciplinary evaluation, could have a better survival benefit than patients who underwent nonsurgical treatments.

Development and clinical application of bispecific antibody in the treatment of colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of colorectal cancer as one of the most commonly diagnosed and a frequent cause of cancer-related deaths is of great challenges in health-related issues.

AREAS COVERED

Immunotherapy is the fourth pillar of cancer treatment which provides more novel therapeutic options with expanding investigational potentials. One of the modalities in immunotherapy is the use of bispecific antibodies. Despite demonstrating many promising roles, it still needs more advanced studies to identify the actual pros and cons. In this review, the application of bispecific antibody in the treatment of colorectal cancer has been explained, based on preclinical and clinical studies. The literature search was conducted mainly through PubMed in June and September 2019.

EXPERT OPINION

Bispecific antibody is in its early stages in colorectal cancer treatment, requiring modern technologies in manufacturing, better biomarkers and more specific target antigens, more studies on individual genetic variations, and conducting later phase clinical trials and systematic reviews to achieve better survival benefits.

Clinicopathological and mutational differences between tumors with multiple metastases and single lung metastasis in colorectal cancer

Cancer metastasis, particularly multiple metastatic cancer, is a significant event that affects patient prognosis. However, single metastasis can be treated by partial resection, although the clinicopathological and molecular profile of single lung metastasis has not been thoroughly elucidated. The present study examined tumor heterogeneity by comparing the mutation status between primary colorectal cancer (CRC) and corresponding metastatic lesions to identify prognostic factors associated with single lung metastasis and multiple metastases. The present study enrolled 31 cases of CRC; 20 cases with multiple metastases and 11 cases with single lung metastasis. Clinicopathologically, all cases with multiple metastases were tubular adenocarcinoma, and 3/11 cases with single metastasis were mucinous adenocarcinoma originating from the left side, the remaining 8 cases were tubular adenocarcinoma from the left side. CRC cases with multiple metastases exhibited more frequent vascular invasion, but not lymphatic invasion, than those with single lung metastasis. Furthermore, CRC with multiple metastases was associated with strong tumor budding (P=0.04). Patients with CRC with multiple metastases had lower recurrence-free survival rates compared with those with single lung metastasis (P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference between these two groups in terms of overall survival rates. A next-generation sequencing cancer hotspot panel was used to analyze a heterochronous multiple metastases case, including brain metastasis. Sanger sequencing, immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability were examined for all 31 cases to reveal the molecular features. KRAS and TP53 mutation signatures were largely preserved throughout the metastatic events. TP53/APC mutations and overexpression of p53 appeared to be associated with the presence of lymphovascular invasion and strong tumor budding, respectively, although these differences were not statistically significant. Early relapses in patients with CRC could be a sign for eventual multiple metastases, although these may not affect the overall survival of patients with CRC. Considerable mutational changes were seemingly rare during metastatic events in patients with CRC.

Long-term outcome after sequential liver and lung metastasectomy is comparable to outcome of isolated liver or lung metastasectomy in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Previously, colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis of both liver and lungs was considered disseminated disease, which contraindicated surgical metastasectomies. Increasing evidence from studies on patient series have indicated that survival improved after resecting both liver and lung metastases. However, those results and long-term outcomes remain controversial. We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between patients treated for both liver and lung metastases to the patients who had only isolated liver or lung metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients (n = 105) underwent surgery for CRC metastases between July 2002 and September 2015. Three groups were compared: the sequentially operated group (n = 33 patients) underwent sequential liver and lung resections; the liver group (n = 38 patients) underwent liver resections; and the lung group (n = 34 patients) underwent lung resections. The main endpoints were long-term survival rates.

RESULTS

The groups were not different in disease-free survival (P = 0.727) or overall survival (P = 0.218). Five-year survival rates were 69.7% in the sequentially operated group, 65.1% in the liver group, and 50.0% in the lung group.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes after sequential liver and lung resections of CRC metastases were comparable to outcomes after isolated liver or lung metastasectomies. Therefore, aggressive surgical interventions should be considered for patients with both liver and lung metastases of CRC.