Adjuvant Management of Pathologic Node-Positive Disease After Definitive Surgery for Clinical T1-2 N0 Rectal Cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-negative but pathologically node-positive rectal cancer in the Netherlands: A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Accurate clinical staging of rectal cancer is hampered by suboptimal sensitivity of MRI in the detection of regional lymph node metastases. Consequently, some patients may be understaged and have been withheld neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in retrospect. Although Dutch guidelines do not advocate adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in rectal cancer, some of these clinically understaged patients receive ACT according to local policy. We aim to assess the benefit of ACT in these patients.

METHODS

Population-based data from patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) but pathologically node-positive (pN+) rectal cancer that underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) without neoadjuvant treatment between 2008 and 2018 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Stabilised inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance clinical characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was compared in ACT and non-ACT patients.

RESULTS

Of 34,724 patients, 13,861 had cN0 disease of whom 3016 were pN+ (21.8%). 1466 (48.6%) of these patients underwent upfront TME and were included. Median follow-up was 84 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 76-97) versus 79 months (95% CI 77-81) in patients that did (n = 290, 19.8%) and did not (n = 1176, 80.2%) receive ACT, respectively. After sIPTW adjustment, ACT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% CI 0.49-0.99; p = 0.04). The estimated 5-year OS rate was 74.2% versus 65.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based cohort of patients with cN0 but pN+ rectal cancer who underwent upfront TME, ACT was associated with a significant OS benefit. These data support to discuss ACT in this population.

Risk of nodal disease in patients with MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) in distant metastasis is well known but its correlation with prevalence of lymph node metastasis is less studied. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of nodal disease in mrEMVI-positive and negative cases in rectal cancer.

METHODS

Following guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBase was carried out to identify relevant studies published up to May 2019.

RESULTS

Our literature search generated 10 studies (863 and 1212 mrEMVI-positive and negative patients, respectively). The two groups (mrEMVI-positive and negative) were significantly different in terms of nodal disease status (odds ratio [OR] 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-4.67; p < 0.001). The prevalence of nodal disease was 75.90% vs 52.56% in the positive mrEMVI vs negative mrEMVI group, respectively (p < 0.001). The prevalence of positive lymph node in positive mrEMVI patients treated with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT/CRT) (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.65-3.69; p < 0.001) was less compared with the patients who underwent surgery alone (OR 6.25; 95% CI 3.74-10.44; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The probability of positive lymph nodes in cases of positive mrEMVI is distinctly greater compared with negative cases in rectal cancer. Positive mrEMVI indicates risk of nodal disease prevalence increased by threefold in rectal cancer.

Development and external validation of a predictive scoring system associated with metastasis of T1-2 colorectal tumors to lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

It is critical for determining the optimum therapeutic solutions for T1-2 colorectal cancer (CRC) to accurately predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) status. The purpose of the present study is to establish and verify a nomogram to predict LNM status in T1-2 CRCs.

METHODS

A total of 16 600 T1-2 CRC patients were enrolled and classified into the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. The independent predictive parameters were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses to develop a nomogram to predict the probability of LNM status. The calibration curve, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram, and an external verification cohort was to verify the applicability of the nomogram.

RESULTS

Seven independent predictors of LNM in T1-2 CRC were identified in the multivariable analysis, including age, tumor site, tumor grade, perineural invasion, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, clinical assessment of LNM, and T stage. A nomogram incorporating the seven predictors was constructed. The nomogram yielded good discrimination and calibration, with AUROCs of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.75), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.67-0.74), and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. DCA showed that the predictive scoring system had high clinical application value.

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a novel predictive model for LNM in T1-2 CRC patients to assist physicians in making treatment decisions. The nomogram is advantageous for tailoring therapy in T1-2 CRC patients.

Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Elderly Esophageal Cancer Patients Not Meeting Age-based Criteria of the CROSS Trial

OBJECTIVES

The CROSS trial established neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT-S) as superior to surgery alone (S) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). However, because patients above 75 years of age were excluded, this comparison cannot be extrapolated to older patients. This study of a large, contemporary national database evaluated practice patterns in elderly patients ineligible for CROSS, and analyzed overall survival (OS) between nCRT+S, S, and definitive CRT (dCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for EC patients with cT1N1M0/T2-3N0-1M0 EC (per the CROSS trial) but 76 years and above of age. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with nCRT+S (vs. S). Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated OS; Cox multivariate analysis determined variables associated with OS. Propensity matching aimed to address group imbalances and indication biases.

RESULTS

Of 4099 total patients, 594 (14%) underwent nCRT+S, 494 (12%) underwent S, and 3011 (73%) underwent dCRT. Since 2010, trimodality management has risen, corresponding to declines in S and dCRT. Median OS in the respective groups were 26.7, 20.3, and 17.8 months (P<0.05). Following propensity matching, there was a trend towards higher OS with nCRT-S over S (P=0.077); dCRT showed poorer OS than nCRT-S (P<0.001) but was equivalent to S (P=0.669). Before and following matching, nCRT-S experienced equivalent 30- and 90-day mortality as S (P>0.05), with lower 30-day readmission and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most older patients not meeting CROSS criteria undergo dCRT, utilization of trimodality therapy is rising. Despite the trend towards higher OS with trimodality therapy without poorer postoperative outcomes, careful patient selection continues to be essential in this population.