Benefit of Oxaliplatin in Stage III Colon Cancer According to IDEA Risk Groups: Findings from the ACCENT Database of 4934 Patients

Impact of the 12-gene recurrence score in influencing adjuvant chemotherapy prescription in mismatch repair proficient stage II/III colonic carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The 12-gene recurrence score (RS) is a clinically validated assay which predicts recurrence risk in patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy may be guided using this assay or based on the judgement of tumour board.

AIMS

To assess the concordance between the RS and MDT decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method using the Review Manager version 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Four studies including 855 patients with a mean age of 68 years (range: 25-90 years) met inclusion criteria. Overall, 79.2% had stage II disease (677/855) and 20.8% had stage III disease (178/855). For the entire cohort, concordant results between the 12-gene assay and MDT were more likely than discordant (odds ratio (OR): 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.56, P < 0.001). Patients were more likely to have chemotherapy omitted than escalated when using the RS (OR: 9.76, 95% CI: 6.72-14.18, P < 0.001). For those with stage II disease, concordant results between the 12-gene assay and MDT were more likely than discordant (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.53, P < 0.001). In stage II disease, patients were more likely to have chemotherapy omitted than escalated when using the RS (OR: 7.39, 95% CI: 4.85-11.26, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the 12-gene signature refutes the decision of tumour board in 25% of cases, with 75% of discordant decisions resulting in omission of adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, it is possible that a proportion of such patients are being overtreated when relying on tumour board decisions alone.

Calmangafodipir for Prevention of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Two Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Studies (POLAR-A/POLAR-M)

BACKGROUND

Calmangafodipir (CaM, PledOx) demonstrated efficacy in preventing patient-reported chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in a randomized phase 2 study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The Preventive Treatment of OxaLiplatin Induced peripherAl neuRopathy (POLAR) program aimed to assess efficacy and safety of CaM in the prevention of CIPN in patients treated with oxaliplatin in adjuvant (POLAR-A, ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT04034355) or metastatic (POLAR-M, ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT03654729) settings.

METHODS

Two randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials investigated patient-reported, moderate-to-severe CIPN 9 months after beginning folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin therapy with or without CaM. In POLAR-A, patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colorectal cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive CaM 5 μmol/kg or placebo. In POLAR-M, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive CaM 5 μmol/kg, CaM 2 μmol/kg, or placebo.

RESULTS

POLAR-A (n = 301) and POLAR-M (n = 291) were terminated early following unexpected hypersensitivity reactions in CaM-treated patients. In a combined analysis of month 9 CIPN (primary endpoint) data from both trials (CaM 5 μmol/kg, n = 175; placebo, n = 176), 54.3% of patients in the CaM group had moderate-to-severe CIPN compared with 40.3% in the placebo group. The estimated relative risk for moderate-to-severe CIPN at month 9 was 1.37 (95% confidence interval = 1.01 to 1.86; P = .045). A higher proportion of patients experienced serious hypersensitivity reactions across both trials with CaM treatment (3.6%) than with placebo (0.8%).

CONCLUSION

The POLAR clinical studies failed to meet their primary endpoint. These results highlight the challenges of targeting oxidative stress for preventing CIPN in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings.

Efficacy of risk-stratified indicators for adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin after hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

The recurrence rate after hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is high, and there is no consensus regarding the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using oxaliplatin (doublet AC) in these patients.

METHODS

The present study included 91 patients who underwent hepatectomy for complete resection at our hospitals between 2008 and 2018. Based on whether or not they had undergone doublet AC, patients were divided into AC (n = 35) and non-AC (n = 56) groups. The recurrent risk was evaluated by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center clinical risk score (MSKCC-CRS).

RESULTS

The number of females and median age were higher in the AC group (51.4% vs 25.0%, p = 0.010 and 67 vs 61 years, p = 0.012, respectively). The median follow-up period was 45 months (range, 6-101 months). Doublet AC was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.225; 95%CI, 0.097-0.522; p < 0.001) and for 5-year overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.165; 95%CI, 0.057-0.476; p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. In patients with a high risk of recurrence (MSKCC-CRS 3-5), 5-year relapse-free survival and 5-year overall survival was higher in the doublet AC group than in the non-AC group (p < 0.01). In low-risk patients (MSKCC-CRS 0-2), 5-year relapse-free survival and 5-year overall survival were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Doublet AC could have a positive effect on prognosis after curative resection of CRLM, especially in high-risk patients. The selection of patients and AC regimen should take into consideration the risk of recurrence.

Effect of oxaliplatin in elderly colon cancer patients with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using fluoro-pyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FU + oxaliplatin) is recommended after curative resection for locally advanced colon cancer patients, several randomized controlled trials have shown no additional effect of oxaliplatin in patients aged ≥ 70 years. Here, we examined the effectiveness of FU + oxaliplatin on the long-term outcome of old patients with a high risk of recurrence.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 346 colon cancer patients diagnosed with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease from 2016 to 2020. They were divided into an old group (≥ 70 years, n = 197) and a young group (< 70 years, n = 167). Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias, and 126 patients per group were matched.

RESULTS

Before matching, the rates of poor performance status (p < 0.001) and the presence of comorbidities (76.1% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the old group. Although all baseline factors were similar between groups, after matching, the AC rate was lower in the old group (45.2% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.002). In the old group, relapse-free (82.2% vs. 55.6% and 69.6%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (83.1% vs. 80.0% and 44.4%, p < 0.05) rates were significantly higher in the AC patients with FU + oxaliplatin than in the AC patients with only FU and the non-AC patients.

CONCLUSION

The selected old colon cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence gained an additional benefit with respect to prognosis from FU + oxaliplatin as AC.