Metronomic Oral Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy Possibly Contributes to Stabilization of Disease in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of Consecutive Cases

Activity and safety of KEES - an oral multi-drug chemo-hormonal metronomic combination regimen in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a therapeutic challenge and evidence for late-line treatments in real-life is limited. The present study investigates the efficacy and safety of an oral metronomic chemo-hormonal regimen including cyclophosphamide, etoposide, estramustine, ketoconazole and prednisolone (KEES) administered in a consecutive biweekly schedule.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study in two Swedish regions was conducted. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical response rate (bRR) and toxicities were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-three patients treated with KEES after initial treatment with at least a taxane or an androgen-receptor targeting agents (ARTA) were identified. Of those, 95 (77%) had received both agents and were the primary analysis population. Median (95% CI) OS and PFS in the pre-treated population were 12.3 (10.1-15.0) and 4.4 (3.8-5.5) months, respectively. Biochemical response, defined as ≥ 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction, occurred in 26 patients (29%), and any PSA reduction in 59 (65%). PFS was independent of prior treatments used, and KEES seemed to be effective in late treatment lines. The bRR was higher compared to historical data of metronomic treatments in docetaxel and ARTA pre-treated populations. In multivariable analyses, performance status (PS) ≥ 2 and increasing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) predicted for worse OS. Nausea, fatigue, thromboembolic events and bone marrow suppression were the predominant toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

KEES demonstrated meaningful efficacy in heavily pre-treated CRPC patients, especially those with PS 0-1 and lower baseline ALP, and had an acceptable toxicity profile.

Metronomic Chemotherapy in Prostate Cancer

Despite the significant expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium associated with the introduction of novel endocrine therapies, cytotoxic agents, radiopharmaceuticals, and PARP inhibitors, progression of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) beyond treatment options remains the leading cause of death in advanced prostate cancer patients. Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) is an old concept of wise utilization of cytotoxic agents administered continuously and at low doses. The metronomic is unique due to its multidimensional mechanisms of action involving: (i) inhibition of cancer cell proliferation, (ii) inhibition of angiogenesis, (iii) mitigation of tumor-related immunosuppression, (iv) impairment of cancer stem cell functions, and (v) modulation of tumor and host microbiome. MC has been extensively studied in advanced prostate cancer before the advent of novel therapies, and its actual activity in contemporary, heavily pretreated mCRPC patients is unknown. We have conducted a prospective analysis of consecutive cases of mCRPC patients who failed all available standard therapies to find the optimal MC regimen for phase II studies. The metronomic combination of weekly paclitaxel 60 mg/m² i.v. with capecitabine 1500 mg/d p.o. and cyclophosphamide 50 mg/d p.o. was selected as the preferred regimen for a planned phase II study in heavily pretreated mCRPC patients.

Metronomic Chemotherapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Literature Review

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the ultimately lethal form of prostate cancer. Docetaxel chemotherapy was the first life-prolonging treatment for mCRPC; however, the standard maximally tolerated dose (MTD) docetaxel regimen is often not considered for patients with mCRPC who are older and/or frail due to its toxicity. Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy (LDMC) is the frequent administration of typically oral and off-patent chemotherapeutics at low doses, which is associated with a superior safety profile and higher tolerability than MTD chemotherapy. We conducted a systematic literature review using the PUBMED, EMBASE, and MEDLINE electronic databases to identify clinical studies that examined the impact of LDMC on patients with advanced prostate cancer. The search identified 30 reports that retrospectively or prospectively investigated LDMC, 29 of which focused on mCRPC. Cyclophosphamide was the most commonly used agent integrated into 27/30 (90%) of LDMC regimens. LDMC resulted in a clinical benefit rate of 56.8 ± 24.5% across all studies. Overall, there were only a few non-hematological grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported. As such, LDMC is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with mCRPC, including those who are older and frail. Furthermore, LDMC is considered more affordable than conventional mCRPC therapies. However, prospective phase III trials are needed to further characterize the efficacy and safety of LDMC in mCRPC before its use in practice.

De-escalating cancer treatments during COVID 19 pandemic: Is metronomic chemotherapy a reasonable option?

•

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services.

•

The reorganization of the healthcare system has had an important impact on the management of cancer patients.

•

Oral treatments and de-escalation strategies are encouraged.

•

Oral metronomic chemotherapy could be a reasonable treatment option in some cancer patients subgroups during COVID 19 pandemic.

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services and containment measures to reduce the risk of infection have been promptly activated worldwide.

The healthcare systems reorganization has had a major impact on the management of cancer patients who are considered at high risk of infection.

Recommendations and guidelines on how to manage cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic have been published. Oral administration of chemotherapy is recommended to limit the access of cancer patients to hospital facilities and in some cases to guarantee the continuum of care.

Low-dose metronomic administration of chemotherapy with different drugs and schedules has emerged in the last years as a possible alternative to conventional chemotherapy, due to its promising tumor control rates and excellent safety profiles. Moreover, given that many metronomic schedules use the oral route administration, it could represent a therapeutic strategy to ensure continuum of cancer care during COVID 19 pandemic.

In this review we have selected all the clinical studies that have used the metronomic strategy, especially with oral drugs, in order to identify the subgroups of cancer patients who can benefit most from a metronomic approach even during COVID 19 pandemic.

Activity and safety of metronomic cyclophosphamide in the modern era of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Aim: To evaluate activity of metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCTX) in heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Patients & methods: We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 74 mCRPC patients treated with at least one new agent after docetaxel failure, who received once-daily oral mCTX treatment at a fixed dose of 50 mg. Results: The treatment was well tolerated. Sixteen percent of the patients experienced a major biochemical response. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months, and median overall survival was 8.1 months. Conclusions: In the modern context of mCRPC, mCTX may represent a valuable and inexpensive alternative to new agents, which have shown similar activity in heavily pretreated patients.

Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience

Metronomic chemotherapy, continuous and dose-dense administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with lowered doses, is being evaluated for substituting, augmenting, or appending conventional maximum tolerated dose regimens, with preclinical and clinical studies for the past few decades. To date, the principle mechanisms of its action include impeding tumoral angiogenesis and modulation of hosts' immune system, affecting directly tumor cells, their progenitors, and neighboring stromal cells. Its better toxicity profile, lower cost, and easier use are main advantages over conventional therapies. The evidence of metronomic chemotherapy for personalized medicine is growing, starting with unfit elderly patients and also for palliative treatment. The literature reviewed in this article mainly demonstrates that metronomic chemotherapy is advantageous for selected patients and for certain types of malignancies, which make it a promising therapeutic approach for filling in the gaps. More clinical studies are needed to establish a solidified role for metronomic chemotherapy with other treatment models in modern cancer management.

[Metronomic chemotherapy with oral cyclophosphamide : An individual option for the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient?]

BACKGROUND

Multiple experimental approaches are meanwhile available for progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients after failure of guideline recommended therapy (i. e., chemotherapy and/or hormonal treatment). We evaluated the outcome of metronomic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (CY) in combination with low-dose prednisolone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 14 mCRPC-patients were treated with CY 50 mg/day (plus prednisolone 10 mg/day) between November 2012 and September 2017 after being resistant or unfit for chemotherapy and/or further hormonal treatment. Time to progression and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively determined by using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Eight of 14 (57.1%) patients had undergone radical prostatectomy and 2 (14.3%) external beam radiation. All patients had at least three therapy lines and 50% had ≥5 mCRPC therapies. The median time from first diagnosis to mCRPC was 88 months; the median age was 78 years with a median baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 341 ng/ml. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 71, 64, and 43% after 2, 4, and 6 months, respectively. Median OS was 8.1 months. No relevant adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Since CY is a well-tolerated medication with partially good clinical tumor control, it seems to be a convenient, individual treatment option in progressive mCRPC patients after failure of guideline recommended therapy.

Carboplatin-etoposide combination chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A retrospective study

The combination of cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide is the standard treatment for certain poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancers, such as small-cell lung cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the carboplatin-etoposide regimen in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A total of 27 patients treated by carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC)=5] and etoposide (100 mg/m² intravenous infusion on days 1–3 or 75 mg orally/day for 10 days) for mCRPC were included for analysis. The median progression-free survival was 3.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9–4.2] and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months (95% CI: 4.06–12.36). The main grade 3–4 toxicities were haematological, namely anemia (33.3%), neutropenia (25.9%) and thrombocytopenia (22.2%), whereas the most common non-hematological toxicity was asthenia (22.2%). The efficacy, compliance and safety profile were generally similar between the oral and intravenous etoposide groups. Pretreated patients with mCRPC may benefit from the carboplatin-etoposide regimen in terms of OS. The toxicities were acceptable, without reported treatment-related mortality. Therefore, the oral etoposide regimen may be an viable alternative for improving the quality of life of the patients. However, this regimen requires further prospective investigation to confirm its efficacy.