Efficacy of Immediate Postoperative Instillation of Chemotherapy for Primary Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice

The prognosis and safety of continuous saline bladder irrigation in patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative study

The prognosis and safety of continuous saline bladder irrigation (CSBI) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB) as an alternative method needs to be explored. A literature review and meta-analysis were performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and original references of the included articles. PRISMA checklists were followed. We used the GRADEpro GDT to assess the certainty of evidence from the results of our meta-analysis. A total of eight articles including 1600 patients were studied. The results indicated that patients received CSBI after TURB had no statistical differences compared to the control group in the recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival. However, the CSBI group showed significant improvements compared to the control group in terms of the number of recurrences during follow-up and the period to first recurrence except for the number of tumor progression during follow-up. Furthermore, patients treated with CSBI did not show an inferior effect than those treated with immediate intravesical chemotherapy (IC) in respects of recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, the number of recurrences during follow-up, the number of tumor progression during follow-up and the period to first recurrence. But the immediate IC group had a higher incidence than the CSBI group in terms of macrohematuria, micturition pain, frequency of urination, dysuria, retention and local toxicities. Patients treated with CSBI after TURB showed a significant improvement compared to the control group in terms of the number of recurrences during follow-up and the period to first recurrence. However, compared to immediate IC, CSBI did not show an inferior effect except for lower incidence of adverse reactions.PROSPERO registration number CRD42021247088.

Initial experience with surrounding en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor and simultaneous intravesical treating for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Purpose

The high recurrence rate after traditional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains a challenge for management of non-muscle invasive bladder tumor (NMIBC). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility, efficacy and safety of surrounding en bloc resection using a general wire bipolar loop electrode and simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of 111 consecutive patients with NMIBC treated from June 2018 to December 2021. These patients underwent conventional TURBT and immediate intravesical chemotherapy (n = 45) or surrounding en bloc TURBT and simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy in the Urology Department of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, The former and latter were defined as the conventional TURBT group and the surrounding en bloc TURBT group, respectively. All patients were followed up from 6 to 40 months, with an average of 24 months. Demographic characteristics, location and number of tumors, perioperative and postoperative data, pathological results and recurrence were documented.

Results

There were no significant differences in clinicopathological data between the conventional TURBT group (n = 45) and the surrounding en bloc TURBT group (n = 66). Operative time and complications associated with TURBT were comparable in the two groups. Recurrent tumors were found during follow-up in 2 (3.0%) of 66 patients in the surrounding en bloc group and 9 (20%) of 45 patients in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Lower urinary tract symptoms developed in 2 (3.0%) of 66 patients after surrounding en bloc TURBT and in 11(24.4%) of 45 patients after conventional TURBT (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Surrounding en bloc TURBT and simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy might significantly decrease the recurrence rate of NMIBC, and showed favorable safety and tolerability profiles. The general bipolar loop electrode was appropriate to complete the procedure.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01140-2.

Surrounding en bloc TURBT combining simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy might decrease recurrent rate in intermediate-term.

Surrounding en bloc TURBT can be completed with general bipolar electrode loop.

Simultaneous intravesical chemotherapy might increase efficacy and compromise uncomfortability of agents Surrounding en bloc TURBT can be completed with general bipolar electrode loop.

The novel technique is feasible and safe for patients with NMIBC.

Single immediate instillation of chemotherapy is associated with decreased recurrence and progression in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who receive adjuvant induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether a single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy is associated with improved oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who receive adjuvant induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy.

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study included 205 patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who received adjuvant induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received the combined therapy of a single instillation of chemotherapy plus subsequent adjuvant induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy (combined therapy group), and those who received adjuvant induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy alone (bacillus Calmette-Guérin monotherapy group). Multivariable analyses using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method and Fine-Gray competing risk regression models were performed to evaluate the impact of a single instillation of chemotherapy on intravesical recurrence-free survival and muscle-invasive bladder cancer-free survival.

RESULTS

Among the 205 patients, 130 (63%) and 75 (37%) were classified as the combined therapy and bacillus Calmette-Guérin monotherapy groups, respectively. Multivariable analyses using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method showed that a single instillation of chemotherapy was significantly associated with longer intravesical recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 0.279; P < 0.001) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer-free survival (hazard ratio 0.078; P < 0.001). Fine-Gray competing risk regression model revealed that a single instillation of chemotherapy was associated with a significantly lower probability of intravesical recurrence and muscle-invasive bladder cancer progression, with an adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio of 0.477 (P = 0.008) and 0.261 (P = 0.043), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy may be a potential treatment option in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who receive adjuvant induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy.

Real World Outcomes of Patients with Bladder Cancer: Effectiveness Versus Efficacy of Modern Treatment Paradigms

Bladder cancer remains a common and insidious disease in the United States. There have been several advances in the understanding of the biology of bladder cancer, novel diagnostic tools, improvements in multidisciplinary care pathways, and new therapeutics for advanced disease over the past few decades. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy for new treatments in each disease state, but additional work is needed to advance the effectiveness of bladder cancer care. Real world data provide critical information regarding patterns of care, adverse events, and outcomes helping to bridge the efficacy versus effectiveness gap.

Fluorescent cystoscopy-assisted en bloc transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: study protocol of a prospective, open-label, randomized control trial (the FLEBER study)

Background

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is an essential procedure both for the treatment and staging of bladder cancer, particularly non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The dissemination of cancer cells during resection and the consequent seeding into the bladder mucosa is the main cause of post-TURBT intravesical recurrence. Although the tumor dissemination is inevitable during conventional TURBT (cTURBT), this drawback can be overcome by tumor resection in one piece with intact surrounding normal tissues, referred to as en bloc resection. We previously described the photodynamic diagnosis (PDD)-assisted en bloc TURBT (EBTUR) technique and its favorable outcomes. Based on our preliminary studies, this randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the superiority of PDD-EBTUR to PDD-cTURBT.

Methods

The FLEBER study is a single-center randomized controlled trial in NMIBC patients who require TURBT. The longest diameter of the tumor must be between 6 and 30 mm. A total of 160 eligible patients will be enrolled after screening and randomly allocated to the PDD-EBTUR (experimental) and PDD-cTURBT (control) groups in a 1:1 ratio (80 cases to 80 cases). All patients will be treated using a single, immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy with epirubicin. The primary endpoint of this trial is the 2-year recurrence-free survival after surgery in pathologically proven low- or intermediate-risk NMIBC. All patients will be monitored by cystoscopy and urine cytology every 3 months for 2 years. Patient data including adverse events and complications, and data from frequency volume charts, pain scales, and health-related QOL questionnaires will be collected before and after the TURBT at indicated visits.

Discussion

The goal of this trial is to determine the potential benefits of PDD-cTURBT and PDD-EBTUR followed by a single immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk NMIBC who undergo TURBT. Ultimately, our findings will lead to the development of better interventions and potentially change the standard of care.

Trial registration

This clinical trial was prospectively registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on 1 August 2020. The reference number is UMIN000041273, and the Ethics Committee of Nara Medical University Approval ID is 2702.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05094-y.