Pre-analytical and analytical aspects affecting clinical reliability of plasma glucose results

Establishing, evaluating and monitoring analytical quality in the traceability era

Poor analytical quality may be the bane of medical use of laboratory tests, and the fight against excessive analytical variability presents a daily struggle. Laboratories should prioritize the perspectives and needs of their customers (the patients and healthcare personnel). Among them, comparability of results from the same patient sample when measured by different laboratories using different in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices is a logical priority to avoid result misinterpretation and potential patient harm. Harmonization (standardization) of laboratory measurements can be achieved by establishing metrological traceability of the results on clinical samples to stated higher-order references and providing an estimate of the uncertainty of measurement (MU). This estimate should be based on an MU budget including all known MU contributions generated by the employed calibration hierarchy, which in turn should be validated against fit-for-purpose maximum allowable MU derived according to internationally recommended models. In this report, we review the available strategies for establishing, evaluating, and monitoring analytical quality, drawing on three decades experience in the field. We discuss the most important aspects that may influence obtaining and maintaining analytical standardization in laboratory medicine, and offer practical solutions aimed at educating all stakeholders for the achievement of harmonized laboratory results. To fully implement the recommended approaches, all involved parties-i.e. reference providers, IVD manufacturers, medical laboratories, and External Quality Assessment organizers-must agree on their importance and enhance their specific knowledge.

Glucometer versus analyzer: comparable results with negligible clinical risk

This study assessed the reliability of Roche Accu-Chek Inform II glucometers in a real-world setting. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 6,695 paired results. Capillary samples were tested using Roche Accu-Chek Inform II glucometers, while venous samples were analyzed using Roche Cobas c503/702 analyzers. Compliance was assessed using modified criteria based on the ISO 15197 guideline and the CLSI EP09-A3 guideline using Passing-Bablok regression analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and Surveillance Error Grid (SEG) analysis. The overall compliance of glucometer results within ±15% or 0.83 mmol/L (15 mg/dL) of the reference method was 81.5%, below the acceptance criterion of 94.6%. SEG analysis showed that 90.3% of the paired results fell within the No-risk zone, with less than 0.001% in the moderate/lower-risk zone. The Emergency Department results indicated 87.8% overall compliance and 92.2% of pairs falling in the No-risk zone. Based on the regression analysis, the glucometer results showed a positive constant bias of nearly 0.33 mmol/L (6 mg/dL). The Bland-Altman plots showed a positive mean difference of 0.43 mmol/L for results ≤5.55 mmol/L (≤100 mg/dL) and a positive mean percentage difference of 3.77% for results >5.55 mmol/L (>100 mg/dL), within the permissible deviation. The compliance values ranged from 76.0% to 90.3% for clinical concentration groups, with the highest compliance found between >16.65-22.20 mmol/L (>300-400 mg/dL). The Accu-Chek Inform II glucometers demonstrated in real-world reliability, with most results falling within acceptable risk categories. However, compliance still needs improvement, so manufacturers should assess opportunities for advancement.

Biological variation of capillary blood glucose: A systematic review

Biological variation (BV) refers to changes in biochemical constituents in the blood or other biological fluids, indicative of body regulation via homeostatic processes. Intra- and interindividual BV data are essential for establishing analytical performance specifications and evaluating the significance between consecutive measurements of an analyte. Given this context, the present study conducted a systematic review of the intra- and interindividual BV of capillary blood glucose. Out of 461 initial studies identified, only 4 met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis after excluding 419 for title irrelevance, 10 for duplication, 21 based on abstract content and 7 based on article content. Notably, none of the studies primarily focused on the intra- and interindividual BV of capillary blood glucose; rather, they reported it as a secondary outcome. Regarding fasting, data analyses revealed intra-individual BVs of 4.5 and 31.1% for healthy and diabetic individuals, respectively, and interindividual coefficient of variations of 4.7-5.8 and 12.9-16.3% for healthy and diabetic individuals, respectively. Only one study provided the analytical coefficient of variation, corroborating the recommended practices. Additionally, the fasting duration, meal standardization before sampling, and number and interval between collections varied among the studies. Hence, the results suggest that there are no reliable data on intra- and interindividual BVs for capillary blood glucose in the literature.

How pre-analytical conditions impact glucose measurement and (gestational) diabetes diagnosis: A real-world stability study and a call for harmonization

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since 2023, guidelines of the AACC/ADA recommend the use of citrate buffer-containing tubes as a first option for glucose measurement. This study aims to assess the pre-analytical stability of glucose under various conditions (room temperature (RT) or at 4 °C) and the potential real-world impact of introducing these tubes on (gestational) diabetes and IFG prevalence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

25 healthy volunteers were sampled to assess glucose stability across time, at 4 °C and at RT, before and following centrifugation. 701 patients undergoing fasting plasma glucose analysis and 109 women having OGTT were collected according to current procedures (NaFl K2C2O4 (NaFl) tubes) as well as with citrate-containing tubes (FC Mix).

RESULTS

The mean glucose concentration bias between FC Mix and NaFl tubes when centrifugation occurred within 5 min was 0.53 % and this difference raised slowly to reach 2.3 %, six-hours post-centrifugation. When centrifugation was delayed, a rapid decrease in glucose concentrations was observed for NaFl tubes (4.9 % at 30 min) and this trend was only partially reduced by placing samples at 4 °C (3.1 %). The decrease reached 10.8 % (RT) and 7.8 % (4 °C) at 2 h, before reaching a plateau. Samples collected on citrate remained stable during 24 h. In real-life conditions, the mean bias between FC Mix and NaFl tubes increased progressively over time and reached 8.59 % for samples centrifuged between two- and four-hours following sampling. Compared to widespread practices, the use of citrate-containing tubes increased IFG, DM and GDM prevalences by 84.0 %, 36.7 % and 150 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Glucose concentrations rapidly decrease in NaFl tubes following collection and placing samples at 4 °C reduces only marginally the decay. Citrate-containing tubes offer a valuable solution for direct and long-lasting glucose stabilization but, before wider adoption, large epidemiologic studies should confirm or redefine current diabetes diagnostic thresholds.

Analytical performance of publicly dispensed glucometers in primary health care in a southern Brazilian city

Aims

This study aimed to assess the use of glucometers by patients and the analytical performance of glucometers provided by the primary care services.

Methods

The analytical performance of 48 glucometers Accu-Chek® Active, was assessed through quintuplicate analyses of one Roche and one PNCQ (National Quality Control Program) control sample at different concentrations; 31 were also evaluated by a single proficiency testing sample. The evaluation metrics included imprecision, bias, and total error and were measured according to quality specifications based on biological variation (QSBV). Glucometer users answered a questionnaire regarding their experience.

Results

Among the 48 glucometers evaluated with internal control samples, 17 met precision criteria at both control levels according to QSBV, while 24 met the criteria at only one control level. Of the 31 glucometers further evaluated through proficiency test, 11 met accuracy criteria according to QSBV, and only one device showed an unacceptable result. Out of these 31, only 15 demonstrated a total error within the acceptable maximum limits based on QSBV.

Conclusions

Overall, our findings showed that patients had a good understanding of glucometer usage and suggested that some glucometers should be replaced, as they sometimes failed to meet even the manufacturer's acceptable variation limits, and/or did not meet QSBV.

What the Milan conference has taught us about analytical performance specification model definition and measurand allocation

Analytical performance specifications (APS) represent the criteria that specify the quality required for laboratory test information to satisfy clinical needs. In 2014 the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) considered timely to update the topic of APS by organizing a conference in Milan in which some strategic concepts were proposed. Here I summarize the essential points representing the EFLM Strategic Conference heritage and discuss the approaches that will permit us to become more concrete, including roles and main actions expected from each of involved stakeholders for contributing a quantum leap forward in the way of practicality of Milan consensus about APS.

Measurement uncertainty in clinical chemistry: ISO 20914 versus nordtest or intermediate precision versus bias

AIM

Measuring uncertainty (MU) is crucial to ensure the accuracy and precision of laboratory results. This study compares the ISO 20914 and Nordtest guidelines to analyze the MU values for 20 clinical chemistry analytes over six months.

METHODS

The researchers calculated MU components, including within-laboratory reproducibility (Rw), laboratory analytical performance bias (u(bias)), and combined standard uncertainty (uc), based on internal quality control and external quality assessment data. The final expanded uncertainty (U) values were determined by multiplying the combined uncertainty with a coverage factor (k = 2 for 95% Confidence Interval), following each guideline's respective procedures. Clinical chemistry analytes were analyzed on Roche Cobas 6000 c501 auto analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and manufacturer's kits were used analysis.

RESULTS

The results show that 11 out of 20 clinical chemistry analytes met the targeted maximum allowable measurement uncertainty (MAU) values when calculated according to ISO 20914 guideline. Also, 11 out of 20 clinical chemistry analytes' MU values met the MAU values with the Nordtest guideline's recommended calculations. However, some tests met the MAU in the ISO 20914 approach but not in the Nordtest guideline, and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that intermediate precision (uRw) in the ISO 20914 approach and performance bias (u(bias)) in the Nordtest approach significantly impacted MU values. The research highlights the importance of standardization in MU calculation approaches across clinical laboratories. These findings have implications for patient care and clinical decision-making, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate laboratory guidelines for routine use.

Oral glucose tolerance test to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus: Impact of variations in specimen handling

To improve birth outcomes, all pregnant women without known diabetes are recommended for an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to screen for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (diabetes in pregnancy or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)). This narrative review presents contemporary approaches to minimise preanalytical glycolysis in OGTT samples with a focus on GDM diagnosis using criteria derived from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study. The challenges of implementing each approach across a diverse Australian healthcare setting were explored. Many Australian sites currently collect and transport OGTT samples at ambient temperature in sodium fluoride (NaF) tubes which is likely to lead to missed diagnosis of GDM in a significant proportion of cases. Alternative preanalytical solutions should be pragmatic and tailored to individual settings and as close as possible to the preanalytical conditions of the HAPO study for correct interpretation of OGTT results. Rapid centrifugation of barrier tubes to separate plasma could be suitable in urban settings provided time to centrifugation is strictly controlled. Tubes containing NaF and citrate could be useful for remote or resource poor settings with long delays to analysis but the impact on the interpretation of OGTT results should be carefully considered. Testing venous blood glucose at the point-of-care bypasses the need for glycolytic inhibition but requires careful selection of devices with robust analytical performance. Studies to evaluate the potential error of each solution compared to the HAPO protocol are required to assess the magnitude of misdiagnosis and inform clinicians regarding the potential impact on patient safety and healthcare costs.

Glucose biosensors in clinical practice: principles, limits and perspectives of currently used devices

The demand of glucose monitoring devices and even of updated guidelines for the management of diabetic patients is dramatically increasing due to the progressive rise in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and the need to prevent its complications. Even though the introduction of the first glucose sensor occurred decades ago, important advances both from the technological and clinical point of view have contributed to a substantial improvement in quality healthcare. This review aims to bring together purely technological and clinical aspects of interest in the field of glucose devices by proposing a roadmap in glucose monitoring and management of patients with diabetes. Also, it prospects other biological fluids to be examined as further options in diabetes care, and suggests, throughout the technology innovation process, future directions to improve the follow-up, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients.

Impact of optimizing pre-analytical phase on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes and related outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Pre-analytical plasma glucose (PG) sampling methodology may significantly affect gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) incidence, but no studies directly examined the impact on perinatal outcomes. We compared the effect on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results of using for blood sampling the traditional sodium fluoride (NaF) tubes, batched at controlled temperature, and the more effective citrate-buffered tubes, in terms of GDM diagnosis and related outcomes.

METHODS

We evaluated 578 pregnant women performing OGTT between 24- and 28-weeks' gestation. Paired NaF and citrate blood samples were drawn and analyzed for PG. GDM diagnosis was made by applying the 'one-step' American Diabetes Association strategy. Data on perinatal outcomes were collected in a subset of 330 women who delivered in our hospital network.

RESULTS

Using the standard NaF approach, 69 (11.9%) GDM women were detected. Using citrate PG values, 90 women were additionally identified as GDM, increasing the GDM prevalence to 27.5%. Perinatal outcomes were analyzed according to the different diagnostic allocation (NaF-diagnosed GDM, additional citrate-diagnosed GDM, and no GDM). NaF-diagnosed GDM showed a higher incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) (p=0.034), and of cesarean and preterm delivery (p<0.01) vs. no GDM. The only outcome remaining more frequent in the additional citrate diagnosed GDM when compared with no GDM group was LGA (17.2 vs. 6.8%, p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

If a health care system plans to use citrate tubes for GDM diagnosis, considerations about clinical implications are mandatory by balancing higher sensitivity in detecting a poor glycemic control with effects on outcomes to avoid "overdiagnosis".

Evaluation of venous plasma glucose measured by point-of-care testing (Accu-Chek Inform II) and a hospital laboratory hexokinase method (Cobas c701) in oral glucose tolerance testing during pregnancy - a challenge in diagnostic accuracy

To diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), plasma glucose measurements during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) put high demands on the methods in terms of accuracy. The aim was to evaluate and compare diagnostic performance of a point-of-care test and a glucose hexokinase laboratory method. Using risk-based screening, 175 pregnant women were included. They underwent a 75 g OGTT in their 28th (median) week of gestation. Venous blood was collected in two different tubes. Plasma glucose was measured on Cobas c701 and in duplicates on AccuChek Inform II (both methods from Roche Diagnostics). Accuracy was assessed by participating in external control programs with reference method assigned values. The methods were compared for all samples (n = 512) by regression analysis; slope of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.92), intercept of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.011-0.22) and r_s of 0.968. The average bias between AccuChek Inform II and Cobas c701 was -8%. The proportion of women diagnosed with GDM was 25% based on AccuChek Inform II versus 55% for Cobas c701. Results from the external control program showed a bias of approximately 5% for Cobas c701 and no significant bias for AccuChek Inform II. Cobas c701 showed a large bias both towards Accu-Chek Inform II and the reference method used in the external control program, clearly exceeding the desirable bias of <2.6%. The lack of accuracy has great implications on either over- or under-diagnosis of GDM.

Implementation of metrological traceability in laboratory medicine: where we are and what is missing

Background The Joint Committee on Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) has recently created the Task Force on Reference Measurement System Implementation (TF-RMSI) for providing guidance on traceability implementation to in vitro diagnostics (IVD) manufacturers. Using serum creatinine (sCr) as an example, a preliminary exercise was carried out by checking what type of information is available in the JCTLM database and comparing this against derived analytical performance specifications (APS) for measurement uncertainty (MU) of sCr. Content APS for standard MU of sCr measurements were established as a fraction (≤0.75, minimum quality; ≤0.50, desirable quality; and ≤0.25, optimum quality) of the intra-individual biological variation of the measurand (4.4%). By allowing no more than one third of the total MU budget for patient samples to be derived from higher-order references, two out of the four JCTLM reference materials (RMs) at least allow minimum APS to be achieved for the MU of patient samples. Commutability was explicitly assessed for one of the JCTLM-listed matrixed RMs, which was produced in compliance with ISO 15194:2009 standard, whereas the remaining three RMs were assessed against the ISO 15194:2002 version of the standard, which only required the extent of commutability testing to be reported. Regarding the three listed reference methods, the MU associated with isotopic dilution-mass spectrometry coupled to gas chromatography (ID/GC/MS) and isotopic dilution-mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography (ID/LC/MS) would allow APS to be fulfilled, while the isotope dilution surface-enhanced Raman scattering (ID/SERS) method displays higher MU. Summary The most recently listed RM for sCr in the JCTLM database meets the ISO 15194:2009 requirements with MU that would allow APS to be fulfilled and has had commutability demonstrated for use as a common calibrator in implementing traceability of sCr measurements. Splitting clinical samples with a laboratory performing ID/GC/MS or ID/LC/MS provides an alternative but would also require all components of uncertainty of these materials to be assessed. Outlook Using appropriately derived APS to judge whether reference measurement system components are fit for purpose represents a novel approach. The TF-RMSI is planning to review a greater number of measurands to provide more robust information about the state of the art of available reference measurement systems and their impact on the ability of clinical measurements to meet APS.

Performance specifications for measurement uncertainty of common biochemical measurands according to Milan models

OBJECTIVES

Definition and fullfillment of analytical performance specifications (APS) for measurement uncertainty (MU) allow to make laboratory determinations clinically usable. The 2014 Milan Strategic Conference have proposed models to objectively derive APS based on: (a) the effect of analytical performance on clinical outcome; (b) biological variation components; and (3) the state of the art of the measurement, defined as the highest level of analytical performance technically achievable. Using these models appropriately, we present here a proposal for defining APS for standard MU for some common biochemical measurands.

METHODS

We allocated a group of 13 measurands selected among the most commonly laboratory requested tests to each of the three Milan models on the basis of their biological and clinical characteristics. Both minimum and desirable levels of quality of APS for standard MU of clinical samples were defined by using information obtained from available studies.

RESULTS

Blood total hemoglobin, plasma glucose, blood glycated hemoglobin, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 were allocated to the model 1 and the corresponding desirable APS were 2.80, 2.00, 3.00, and 10.0%, respectively. Plasma potassium, sodium, chloride, total calcium, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, urea, and total bilirubin were allocated to the model 2 and the corresponding desirable APS were 1.96, 0.27, 0.49, 0.91, 4.65, 2.20, 7.05, and 10.5%, respectively. For C-reactive protein, allocated to the model 3, a desirable MU of 3.76% was defined.

CONCLUSIONS

APS for MU of clinical samples derived in this study are essential to objectively evaluate the reliability of results provided by medical laboratories.

Effect of Sample Volume Variation and Delay in Analysis on Plasma Glucose Concentration in Sri Lankan Healthy Adults

The correct volume of sample and time of storing prior to the analysis are important considerations in the estimation of plasma glucose concentration of patients. The present study was to determine the effect of sample volume variation and time delay in the analysis of plasma glucose results in healthy adults. A total of 30 individuals aged between 20 and 30 years were selected for the study. Blood samples were collected into three fluoride-oxalate collection tubes separately. The results revealed that the sample volume variation from 2.0 mL fluoride-oxalate tube to 1.0 mL and 3.0 mL did not significantly affect the plasma glucose concentration (p > 0.05). However, the plasma glucose concentration in the sample significantly decreased upon delaying the analysis. The mean fasting plasma glucose concentration of analysis after one hour of collection and analysis after three hours of collection was not significantly different (p > 0.05). The mean fasting plasma glucose concentrations between one hour and five hours timepoints after collection (p < 0.001) and between three hours and five hours after collection (p = 0.014) were significantly different. In conclusion, overfilling and underfilling (2.0 ± 1.0 mL) of fluoride-oxalate tubes did not affect the plasma glucose results significantly. If the samples are analyzed within three hours of collection, the time dependent change too is not statistically significant.

Biological variation: Understanding why it is so important?

This Review will describe the increasing importance of the concepts of biological variation to clinical chemists. The idea of comparison to 'reference' is fundamental in measurement. For the biological measurands, that reference is the relevant patient population, a clinical decision point based on a trial or an individual patient's previous results. The idea of using biological variation to set quality goals was then realised for setting Quality Control (QC) and External Quality Assurance (EQA) limits. The current phase of BV integration into practice is using Patient-Based Real-Time Quality Control (PBRTQC) and Patient Based Quality Assurance (PBQA) to detect a change in assay performance. The challenge of personalised medicine is to determine an individual reference interval. The Athletes Biological Passport may provide the solution.

The utility of measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories

The definition and enforcement of reference measurement systems, based on the implementation of metrological traceability of patient results to higher-order (reference) methods and/or materials, together with a clinically acceptable level of measurement uncertainty (MU), are fundamental requirements to produce accurate and equivalent laboratory results. The MU associated with each step of the traceability chain should be governed to obtain a final combined MU on clinical samples fulfilling the requested performance specifications. MU is useful for a number of reasons: (a) for giving objective information about the quality of individual laboratory performance; (b) for serving as a management tool for the medical laboratory and in vitro diagnostics (IVD) manufacturers, forcing them to investigate and eventually fix the identified problems; (c) for helping those manufacturers that produce superior products and measuring systems to demonstrate the superiority of those products; (d) for identifying analytes that need analytical improvement for their clinical use and ask IVD manufacturers to work for improving the quality of assay performance and (e) for abandoning assays with demonstrated insufficient quality. Accordingly, the MU should not be considered a parameter to be calculated by medical laboratories just to fulfill accreditation standards, but it must become a key quality indicator to describe both the performance of an IVD measuring system and the laboratory itself.

Preanalytical issues related to routine and diagnostic glucose tests: Results from a survey in Spain

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. The objective of this study was to find out under what preanalytical conditions routine and diagnostic glucose tests are performed across Spanish laboratories; and also what criteria are used for DM diagnosis.

Materials and methods

An online survey was performed by the Commission on Quality Assurance in the Extra-Analytical Phase of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML). Access to the questionnaire was available on the home page of the SEQC-ML website during the period April-July 2018. Data analysis was conducted with the IBM SPSS^© Statistics (version 20.0) program.

Results

A total of 96 valid surveys were obtained. Most laboratories were in public ownership, serving hospital and primary care patients, with high and medium workloads, and a predominance of mixed routine-urgent glucose testing. Serum tubes were the most used for routine glucose analysis (92%) and DM diagnosis (54%); followed by lithium-heparin plasma tubes (62%), intended primarily for urgent glucose testing; point-of-care testing devices were used by 37%; and plasma tubes with a glycolysis inhibitor, mainly sodium fluoride, by 19%. Laboratories used the cut-off values and criteria recognized worldwide for DM diagnosis in adults and glucose-impaired tolerance, but diverged in terms of fasting plasma glucose and gestational DM criteria.

Conclusion

Preanalytical processing of routine and DM diagnostic glucose testing in Spain does not allow a significant, non-quantified influence of glycolysis on the results to be ruled out. Possible adverse consequences include a delay in diagnosis and possible under-treatment.

Glucose meters: What's the laboratory reference glucose?

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of glucose meters is evaluated by comparing their results with those from a reference laboratory glucose analyser. The main scientific societies recommend the use of a prompt glycolysis inhibitor such as citrate for an accurate glucose determination. In the present preliminary study, we discuss the bias between capillary and plasma glucose measured concentrations, determined in two Italian clinical laboratories, using tubes containing an NaF and citrate mixture in liquid and granular form.

METHODS

139 volunteers in whom 75 g OGTT was requested were recruited. Basal capillary glucose was determined using Abbott FreeStyle Precision Neo in Brescia (n=63), while clinical laboratory reference P-glucose was determined using tubes containing NaF/K3EDTA and liquid NaF/Na2EDTA/citrate. Basal capillary glucose was determined using a Roche Cobas Accu-Chek Inform II in Vicenza (n=76), while P-glucose was determined using tubes containing NaF/K2Ox and NaF/Na2EDTA/citrate in granulated form. Reference P-glucose was determined with a hexokinase method on Dimension Vista systems. Differences between capillary and reference P-glucose were evaluated according to ADA/ISO 15197:2013 specifications.

RESULTS

96.82% and 97.37% of capillary determinations were within specifications when liquid and granular citrate mixture tubes were used, respectively. Conversely, only 73.02% and 80.26% of determinations were within criteria using NaF.

CONCLUSIONS

It's important to know what is the laboratory reference glucose in evaluating glucose meters' accuracy. The evaluation of glucometers' accuracy with respect to a reference laboratory may be wrong if tubes containing only NaF are used due to in vitro glycolysis. Only tubes containing citrate mixture permit the correct evaluation of glucose meters' accuracy.

Effects of different tube types on patient classification using current diabetes decision limits

Management of diabetes is a challenge starting in the pre-analytical phase with selecting the most appropriate glycolysis inhibitor. Study goal was to calculate the impact of tubes with different glycolysis inhibitors on the classification of the glycemic control of 157,415 consecutive hospital patients according to current WHO diabetes criteria.

Methods

Glucose and lactate were measured in parallel in samples from 68 healthy subjects collected and stored in different sample tubes from Sarstedt and Greiner. Bias to baseline conditions (fluoride heparin (FH) tubes, centrifugation within 1 h) was determined.

Results

In baseline samples, glucose concentration in fluoride/EDTA/citrate (FC) plasma was ~13% higher and lactate concentration ~20% lower compared to FH, fluoride oxalate, and fluoride EDTA plasma, and in serum. Glucose recovery after storage up to 48 h was 99–101% in the different tubes, but the effectiveness of glycolysis inhibition by FC was inconsistent. Based on the observed mean bias of 12% when FC tubes are used, we estimate an increase of 48.4–55.8% in the frequency of patients with impaired glucose levels using current WHO criteria.

Conclusion

Using current established decision limits, the number of patients with impaired glucose levels in the hospital would increase substantially with a strong impact on patient treatment and consumption of resources. The unpredictable failure of glycolysis inhibition in FC tubes does not allow to adjust the decision limits by a fixed factor. In the absence of prospective outcome studies with FC tubes, we recommend to measure glucose in samples containing FH.

•

Fluoride citrate EDTA (FC) fails to inhibit glycolysis consistently.

•

Glucose testing from FC tubes introduces a positive mean bias of ~0.5 mmol/L (12%) at the decision limit.

•

Fluoride EDTA/heparin or Fluoride oxalate tubes should be preferred for glucose and lactate measurement.

•

Use of FC tubes increases the frequency of impaired fasting glucose and diabetes by ~50% using current decision limits.

Associations Between Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) and Routinely Examined Parameters in Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome

The aim of the study was to investigate whether routine clinical parameters, including visceral adiposity index (VAI) and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), could become widely applicable predictors of insulin resistance (IR), evaluated using homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR, HOMA-β), with regard to presence of metabolic syndrome (MS). The study comprised 188 individuals identified to meet the MS criteria during regular health examinations and an equal number of age, sex-matched controls without MS. The strongest correlations were noted between HOMA-IR and waist circumference (WC) in the MS group (r=0.57) as well as between HOMA-IR and alanine aminotransferase (ALT, r=0.57) or aspartate aminotransferase (r=0.56) in the controls, with a statistical significance of p<0.001. In a multivariate linear regression model, the predictors of HOMA-IR were WC (linear coefficient β=0.1, p<0.001), ALT (β=2.28, p<0.001) and systolic blood pressure (β=0.04, p<0.001). HOMA-β was determined by WC (β=1.97, p=0.032) and ALT (β=99.49, p=0.004) and inversely associated with age (β=-1.31, p=0.004). Neither VAI nor AIP were significant predictors. The presence of MS was significantly associated with both HOMA-IR and HOMA-β. These results indicate that WC and ALT appear to be reliable predictors of IR. Comprehensive assessment of these parameters may serve for estimating the level of IR.

The impact of differences in plasma glucose between glucose oxidase and hexokinase methods on estimated gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence

We evaluated the extent of measurement discordance between glucose oxidase and hexokinase laboratory methods and the effect of this on estimated gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence in a routine clinical setting. 592 consecutive urban African women were screened for GDM. Paired venous specimens were submitted to two independent calibrated laboratories that used either method to measure plasma glucose concentrations. World Health Organisation diagnostic criteria were applied. GDM prevalence determined by the glucose oxidase and hexokinase methods was 6.9% and 5.1% respectively. The overall GDM prevalence was 9%. Only 34% of GDM positive diagnoses were common to both laboratory methods. Bland Altman plots identified a bias of 0.2 mmol/l between laboratory methods. Plasma glucose concentrations measured by the glucose oxidase method were more platykurtic in distribution. Low diagnostic agreement between laboratory methods was further indicated by a Cohen's kappa of 0.48 (p < 0.001). Reports of GDM prevalence using either the glucose oxidase or hexokinase laboratory methods may not be truly interchangeable or directly comparable.

A comparison between point-of-care testing and venous glucose determination for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus 6-12 weeks after gestational diabetes

AIM

To evaluate point-of-care-testing (POCT) for the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus 6-12 weeks post-partum in women with gestational diabetes (GDM).

METHODS

Post-partum glucose assessment (75-mg oral glucose tolerance test, OGTT) was performed prospectively in 122 women with GDM (1 November 2015 to 1 November 2017) at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Individuals with known pre-existing diabetes were excluded. The accuracy and clinical utility of POCT (capillary finger-prick) were compared with laboratory plasma glucose (hexokinase and glucokinase methods). The OGTT consisted of two time points (fasting and 2 h) during which concurrent glucose samples (POCT and laboratory) were obtained. Bland-Altman plots and paired analysis were used to assess the analytical accuracy of POCT, whereas its diagnostic performance was determined using positive and negative predictive values to calculate specificity and sensitivity.

RESULTS

Spearman's ranked correlation analysis indicated a strong association between POCT and laboratory glucose values at both OGTT time points (fasting, r = 0.95, P < 0.0001; 2 h, r = 0.88, P < 0.0001). Thirty-six women were diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes based on gold standard laboratory glucose levels (fasting > 7 mmol/l; 2 h > 11.1 mmol/l). POCT correctly identified Type 2 diabetes in 78% of women (28 of 36) with a positive predictive value of 89.3% and a negative predictive value of 96.7% at the fasting time point. The sensitivity and specificity of POCT to diagnose Type 2 diabetes were 89% (fasting), 85.7% (2 h) and 96.7% (fasting), 98.5% (2 h) respectively. POCT proved less sensitive to diagnose pre-diabetes (69%) but displayed satisfactory specificity (92%) at both time points assessed.

CONCLUSION

POCT accurately identifies women with Type 2 diabetes 6-12 weeks after GDM.

Long-term stability of glucose: glycolysis inhibitor vs. gel barrier tubes

BACKGROUND

Measuring the glucose concentration in whole blood samples is critical due to unsatisfactory glycolysis inhibition. Previous studies showed that Terumo tubes were superior, but they were taken off the European market in 2016 and alternatives were required. This initiated the present evaluation of glucose stability in five available tube types.

METHODS

Venous blood samples were collected from 61 healthy volunteers to test tubes supplied by Terumo (two sets), Greiner FC-Mix, BD FX-Mixture and BD serum. After sampling, the contents were thoroughly mixed and centrifuged within an hour. The glucose concentrations were determined and the samples resuspended except for BD serum tubes (gel barrier). The first 30 samples were stored at room temperature and the remaining 31 at 4°C. After 24, 48, 72 and 96 h, all tubes were (re)centrifuged, and glucose concentration measurements were repeated.

RESULTS

Changes in glucose concentrations over time differed significantly between the investigated tube types and to a certain extent between the two storing conditions. Glycolysis was most evident in the BD FX-mixture tubes. Good glucose stability was observed in samples retrieved form BD serum and Greiner tubes. The stability in both Terumo tubes was comparable to that in other studies. Although Greiner and both Terumo tubes are supposed to contain the same glycolysis inhibitor, glucose stability differed between these tubes.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that Greiner is an acceptable alternative to Terumo and that glucose in serum that was rapidly separated from corpuscles by a gel barrier is stable for an extended time.

Defining permissible limits for the combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability

In addition to the correct implementation of calibration traceability, the definition and the achievement of an appropriate analytical performance specification for the total uncertainty budget (G_U) is essential to ensure that laboratory measurements are clinically usable. To understand if it is possible to fulfil these specifications, limits for combined uncertainty across the entire metrological traceability chain should be defined. We recommended that no more than one third of G_U should be consumed by the uncertainty of higher order references and ≤50% of G_U by the combined measurement uncertainty at the manufacturer's calibration level. The remaining allowable uncertainty should be available for random sources, i.e. for the imprecision of the commercial measuring system (including the reagent batch-to-batch variation) and the individual laboratory performance, as a safety margin to fulfil G_U. Based on this approach, it is of interest to assess for each analyte measured in the clinical laboratory the status of the uncertainty budget of its measurement associated with the selected metrological traceability chain. Accordingly, we report three didactic cases that could occur in the clinical practice. This approach is very helpful to identify those analytes for which further technological improvements are probably needed to reduce uncertainty associated with their measurement.

The role of external quality assessment in the verification of in vitro medical diagnostics in the traceability era

Once an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) measuring system has been marketed and introduced into daily practice, the possible sources of degradation of its performance are numerous. It is therefore essential to put in place a continuous post-market surveillance of the quality of performance of the IVD system and of the laboratories that perform measurements in clinical setting. The participation to external quality assessment (EQA) schemes that meet specific metrological criteria is central to the evaluation of performance of clinical laboratories in terms of standardization and clinical suitability of their measurements. In addition to the use of commutable materials, in this type of EQA it is necessary to assign values (and uncertainty) to them with reference procedures and to define and apply clinically permissible analytical performance specifications to substantiate the suitability of laboratory measurements in the clinical setting. Unfortunately, there are still few permanent EQA programs fully covering these requirements because some practical constraints, including technical and economic aspects, which limit their introduction. It is, however, clear that these issues should be quickly overcome, since EQA schemes are in a unique position to add substantial value to the practice of laboratory medicine, by identifying analytes that need improved harmonization and by stimulating and sustaining standardization initiatives that are needed to support clinical practice. Importantly, this will definitively help those manufacturers that produce superior products to demonstrate the superiority of those products and oblige end users (and consequently industry) to abandon assays with demonstrated insufficient quality.

Measurement uncertainty: Friend or foe?

The definition and enforcement of a reference measurement system, based on the implementation of metrological traceability of patients' results to higher order reference methods and materials, together with a clinically acceptable level of measurement uncertainty, are fundamental requirements to produce accurate and equivalent laboratory results. The uncertainty associated with each step of the traceability chain should be governed to obtain a final combined uncertainty on clinical samples fulfilling the requested performance specifications. It is important that end-users (i.e., clinical laboratory) may know and verify how in vitro diagnostics (IVD) manufacturers have implemented the traceability of their calibrators and estimated the corresponding uncertainty. However, full information about traceability and combined uncertainty of calibrators is currently very difficult to obtain. Laboratory professionals should investigate the need to reduce the uncertainty of the higher order metrological references and/or to increase the precision of commercial measuring systems. Accordingly, the measurement uncertainty should not be considered a parameter to be calculated by clinical laboratories just to fulfil the accreditation standards, but it must become a key quality indicator to describe both the performance of an IVD measuring system and the laboratory itself.

Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference

Measurements in clinical laboratories produce results needed in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients. These results are always characterized by some uncertainty. What quality is needed and what measurement errors can be tolerated without jeopardizing patient safety should therefore be defined and specified for each analyte having clinical use. When these specifications are defined, the total examination process will be "fit for purpose" and the laboratory professionals should then set up rules to control the measuring systems to ensure they perform within specifications. The laboratory community has used different models to set performance specifications (PS). Recently, it was felt that there was a need to revisit different models and, at the same time, to emphasize the presuppositions for using the different models. Therefore, in 2014 the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) organized a Strategic Conference in Milan. It was felt that there was a need for more detailed discussions on, for instance, PS for EQAS, which measurands should use which models to set PS and how to set PS for the extra-analytical phases. There was also a need to critically evaluate the quality of data on biological variation studies and further discussing the use of the total error (TE) concept. Consequently, EFLM established five Task Finish Groups (TFGs) to address each of these topics. The TFGs are finishing their activity on 2017 and the content of this paper includes deliverables from these groups.

Various glycolysis inhibitor-containing tubes for glucose measurement cannot be used interchangeably due to clinically unacceptable biases between them

Background:

The aim of our study was to determine the difference between glucose concentration measured 30 min after venipuncture in ice-chilled heparin plasma sample and all currently available citrate buffer-containing tubes (Greiner Glucomedics, Greiner FC Mix and Sarstedt GlucoEXACT) and still widely used sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate (NaF/Kox) tubes from Greiner.

Methods:

Blood was collected from 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with diabetes into LiH, NaF/KOx, Glucomedics, FC mix and GlucoEXACT tubes. Glucose was measured within 30 min from blood sampling in duplicate on the Architect c8000 analyzer. Mean biases between all tube types were calculated and compared to the recommended criteria (1.95%). Additionally, glucose concentrations measured in all five tube types were compared using the Friedman test.

Results:

In the entire studied population, glucose concentrations measured in Glucomedics, FC mix and GlucoEXACT were higher (7.3%, 3.2% and 2.0%, respectively) than in the ice-chilled LiH tubes. When all glycolysis inhibitor-containing tubes were compared, Glucomedics tubes significantly differed from GlucoEXACT and FC mix tubes (biases −4.9% and 4.0%, respectively). In addition, there was a significant difference between the NaF/KOx tube and Glucomedics, as well as FC mix tubes (biases 7.1% and 3.0%, respectively).

Conclusions:

Glucose concentrations measured in recommended ice-chilled lithium heparin- and citrate buffer-containing tubes are not comparable. Significant biases exist between various glycolysis inhibitor-containing tubes; therefore, they cannot be used interchangeably.