The effects of laterality on obstacle crossing performance in unilateral trans-tibial amputees

Sensorimotor function and standing balance in older adults with transtibial limb loss

BACKGROUND

Limited research has focused on older prosthesis users despite the expected compounded effects of age and amputation on sensorimotor function, balance, and falls. This study compared sensorimotor factors and standing balance between older individuals with and without transtibial amputation, hypothesizing that prosthesis users would demonstrate worse sensorimotor function. Secondarily we assessed the relationship between standing balance and somatosensation in prosthesis users.

METHODS

Thirteen persons with unilateral transtibial amputation (71.7 years) and 10 able-bodied controls (71.7 years) participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Passive joint range-of-motion, muscle strength, proprioception (joint position sense), tactile sensitivity, and standing balance (center-of-pressure sway) were compared between groups. A multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between proprioception and balance (without vision) in prosthesis users.

FINDINGS

Our hypotheses were generally not supported, with the only differences being reduced joint range-of-motion and strength in prosthesis users (with large effect sizes), but comparable sensation and balance. Notably, prosthesis users demonstrated better proprioception than controls as reflected through better joint position sense when the limb was non-weight bearing. Worse amputated limb proprioception was associated with better standing balance in prosthesis users.

INTERPRETATION

Older prosthesis users have impaired passive joint motion and muscle strength compared to controls that could challenge their ability to position and control the amputated limb to avoid falls during daily activities. However, their better amputated limb proprioception might help counteract those limitations by leveraging sensory feedback from the suspended limb. The relationship between amputated limb proprioception and standing balance suggests a nuanced relationship that warrants further study.

An Experimental Setup to Test Obstacle-Dealing Capabilities of Prosthetic Feet

Small obstacles on the ground often lead to a fall when caught with commercial prosthetic feet. Despite some recently developed feet can actively control the ankle angle, for instance over slopes, their flat and rigid sole remains a cause of instability on uneven grounds. Soft robotic feet were recently proposed to tackle that issue; however, they lack consistent experimental validation. Therefore, this paper describes the experimental setup realized to test soft and rigid prosthetic feet with lower-limb prosthetic users. It includes a wooden walkway and differently shaped obstacles. It was preliminary validated with an able-bodied subject, the same subject walking on commercial prostheses through modified walking boots, and with a prosthetic user. They performed walking firstly on even ground, and secondly on even ground stepping on one of the obstacles. Results in terms of vertical ground reaction force and knee moments in both the sagittal and frontal planes show how the poor performance of commonly used prostheses is exacerbated in case of obstacles. The prosthetic user, indeed, noticeably relies on the sound leg to compensate for the stiff and unstable interaction of the prosthetic limb with the obstacle. Therefore, since the limitations of non-adaptive prosthetic feet in obstacle-dealing emerge from the experiments, as expected, this study justifies the use of the setup for investigating the performance of soft feet on uneven grounds and obstacle negotiation.

Development of a physical mobility prediction model to guide prosthetic rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic rehabilitation decisions depend on estimating a patient's mobility potential. However, no validated prediction models of mobility outcomes exist for people with lower-limb amputation (LLA).

OBJECTIVES

To develop and test predictions for self-reported mobility after LLA, using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

Eight hundred thirty-one patient records (1,860 PLUS-M observations) were used to develop and test a neighbors-based prediction model, using previous patient data to predict the 6-month PLUS-M T-score trajectory for a new patient (based on matching characteristics). The prediction model was developed in a training data set (n = 552 patients) and tested in an out-of-sample data set of 279 patients with later visit dates. Prediction performance was assessed using bias, coverage, and precision. Prediction calibration was also assessed.

RESULTS

The average prediction bias for the model was 0.01 SDs, average coverage was 0.498 (ideal proportion within the 50% prediction interval = 0.5), and prediction interval was 8.4 PLUS-M T-score points (40% improvement over population-level estimates). Predictions were well calibrated, with the median predicted scores falling within the standard error of the median of observed scores, across all deciles of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

This neighbors-based prediction approach allows for accurate estimates of PLUS-M T-score trajectories for people with LLA.

Bodyweight distribution between limbs, muscle strength, and proprioception in traumatic transtibial amputees: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how transtibial amputation (TT) affects bodyweight distribution, voluntary knee joint position sense (JPS), and quadriceps (QUA) and hamstrings (HAM) strength in prosthetized patients.

METHODS

Only TT patients who had been prosthetized for more than one year were included, and an age-paired able-bodied group was used as control. The participants stood on force plates with their eyes open to measure bodyweight distribution between the limbs. Knee voluntary JPS was assessed by actively reproducing a set of given arbitrary joint angles using a video analysis approach, and QUA and HAM strength were assessed isometrically with a hand-held dynamometer.

RESULTS

Sixteen TT subjects (age: 39.4±4.8 years) and sixteen age-paired control subjects (age: 38.4±4.3 years) participated in the study. The amputees supported their bodyweight majorly on the sound limb (54.8±8.3%, p<0.001). The proprioceptive performance was similar between the amputated (absolute error (AE): 2.2±1.6°, variable error (VE): 1.9±1.6°, constant error (CE): -0.7±2.0°) and non-amputated limbs (AE: 2.6±0.9°, VE: 2.1±0.9°, CE: 0.02±2.3°), and was not different from that of control subjects (AE: 2.0±0.9°, VE: 1.4±0.4°, CE: -1.1±1.7°). There was a considerable weakness of the QUA and HAM in the amputated limb compared with the sound limb and control subjects (p<0.001 both).

CONCLUSIONS

The asymmetric bodyweight distribution in the transtibial amputees was not accompanied by a reduction in knee proprioception. There was significant weakness in the amputated limb, which could be a potential issue when designing rehabilitation programs.

The addition of stripes (a version of the 'horizontal-vertical illusion') increases foot clearance when crossing low-height obstacles

Trips over obstacles are one of the main causes of falling in older adults, with vision playing an important role in successful obstacle negotiation. We determined whether a horizontal-vertical illusion, superimposed onto low-height obstacles to create a perceived increase in obstacle height, increased foot clearances during obstacle negotiation thus reducing the likelihood of tripping. Eleven adults (mean ± 1 SD: age 27.3 ± 5.1 years) negotiated obstacles of varying heights (3, 5, 7 cm) with four different appearance conditions; two were obstacles with a horizontal-vertical illusion (vertical stripes of different thickness) superimposed on the front, one was a plain obstacle and the fourth a plain obstacle with a horizontal black line painted on the top edge. Foot clearance parameters were compared across conditions. Both illusions led to a significant increase in foot clearance when crossing the obstacle, compared to the plain condition, irrespective of obstacle height. Superimposing a horizontal-vertical illusion onto low-height obstacles can increase foot clearance, and its use on the floor section of a double-glazing door frame for example may reduce the incidence of tripping in the home. Practitioner Summary: Low-height obstacles such as the floor section of a double-glazing door frame are potential tripping hazards. In a gait lab-based study we found that a horizontal-vertical illusion superimposed onto low-height obstacles led to significantly higher foot clearances; indicating their potential as a useful safety measure.