Influence of different sizes of composite femora on the biomechanical behavior of cementless hip prosthesis

Design and Verification of a Metaphyseal Filling Stem for Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Novel Measurements of Proximal Femoral Anatomy

Background

Cementless metaphyseal filling stems rely on fixation in the medial-to-lateral and anterior-to-posterior (AP) planes. The purpose of this preclinical study was to develop Insignia, a new metaphyseal filling system to match the anatomy of the proximal femur, and then compare it to clinically successful stems in multiple simulations.

Methods

In this preclinical study, the geometry of the proximal femur in the AP plane among 1321 healthy subjects was evaluated using computed tomography. This data was then used to design insignia. Preclinical studies were performed to compare the broaching effort required to prepare a canal using this system, assess the reliability of seating heights for the stem, and compare in vitro micromotion testing of the stem under simulated stair climb activity.

Results

The proximal femur decreased approximately 50% in the AP plane spanning 20 mm above the lesser trochanter to 30 mm below the lesser trochanter. Additional bench top testing was performed, and the new stem system was found to demonstrate significantly reduced broaching effort (average 6 vs 29 hits, P-value = .000), reliable seating heights on stem placement, and 70% less proximal micromotion on 10,000-cyclic testing (P < .05) compared to another clinically successful metaphyseal filling stem.

Conclusions

The AP dimension of the proximal femur decreases nearly 50% throughout its length. Metaphyseal filling stems that match the AP anatomy of the proximal femur may require fewer hits during broaching, yield reproducible seating heights, and reduce micromotion on cyclic testing.

Calcar-collar contact during simulated periprosthetic femoral fractures increases resistance to fracture and depends on the initial separation on implantation: A composite femur in vitro study

BACKGROUND

A calcar collar may reduce risk of periprosthetic fracture of the femur, through collar contact. We estimated the effect of collar contact on periprosthetic fracture mechanics using a collared fully coated cementless femoral stem and then estimated the effect of initial calcar-collar separation on the likelihood of collar contact.

METHODS

Three groups of six composite left femurs with increasing calcar-collar separation in each group, underwent periprosthetic fracture simulation in a materials testing machine. Fracture torque and rotational displacement were measured and torsional stiffness and rotational work prior to fracture were estimated. Calcar collar contact prior to fracture was identified using high speed camera footage.

FINDINGS

Where calcar-collar contact occurred fracture torque was greater (47.33 [41.03 to 50.45] Nm versus 38.26 [33.70 to 43.60] Nm, p = 0.05), Rotational displacement was less (16.6 [15.5 to 22.3] degrees versus 21.2 [18.9 to 28.1] degrees, p = 0.07), torsional stiffness was greater (151.38 [123.04 to 160.42] rad.Nm^-1 versus 96.86 [84.65 to 112.98] rad.Nm^-1, p < 0.01) and rotational work was similar (5.88 [4.67, 6.90] J versus 5.31 [4.40, 6.56] J, p = 0.6). Odds ratio (OR) of not achieving collar contact (95% confidence interval) increased 3.8 fold (95% CI 1.6 to 30.2, p < 0.05) for each millimetre of separation in the regression model. 95% chance of collar contact was associated with a separation of 1 mm or less.

INTERPRETATION

Surgeons should reduce calcar-collar separation at stem implantation to a maximum of 1 mm to increase the chance of calcar-collar contact during injury and reduce the risk of early post-operative femoral fracture.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new femoral stem design for total hip replacement in a canine model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a novel total hip replacement femoral stem.

METHODS

Eight pairs of femurs from dog cadavers were used. The femurs were separated into different groups. A novel femoral stem with a convex proximal portion (Stem B) was biomechanically evaluated and compared to awell-known veterinary collared stem (Stem A). Femoral stems were inserted into the contralateral femurs from the same dog, forming 16 constructs. A flexo-compression load was applied on the axial axis of each sample. Maximum strength, deflection, stiffness, and energy absorption were analysed.

RESULTS

Group B constructs showed significantly higher values (p ? 0.05) for the variables, except stiffness. The mean maximum strength was 1,347 ± 357 N for Group A and 1,805 ± 123 N for Group B (p ? 0.0069). The mean deflection was5.54 ± 2.63 mm for Group A and 10.03 ± 3.99 mm for Group B (p ? 0.0056). For the energy variable, the force was 6,203 ± 3,488 N/mm for Group A and 12,885 ± 5,056 N/mm for Group B (p ? 0.0054). Stem B had greater maximum strength, deflection, and energy.

CONCLUSIONS

The new stem was effective in neutralizing the impact of axial flexion-compression stresses during biomechanical tests in cadaveric models.

How do the geometries of the broach handles relate to the distribution of force and moments in a femoral model?

The continuous improvement of minimally invasive hip endoprostheses surgery comes with a change in geometries of surgery instruments like the broach handles. Consequently, depending on the handles' curvature this results in a deviation between handle and femoral axis. Therefore, this study aimed to prove the influence of different handles' curvatures on the preparation of implant site and acting forces and moments in this process. Five femoral models attached to different handles (double-curved, single-curved, straight) were locked in a drop-weight device with standardize implantation forces and moments and five strokes were measured for each possible combination. Distribution of force and moment components was dependent on the handle's curvature, where the lowest variation from the standard force values was by the straight one (av:15.2% ± 0.5%) and the strongest discrepancies were exhibit by the double-curved one (av:54.3% ± 0.1%.). Moment values have also shown this trend with the lowest variation (12.4%-23.3%) by the straight one and the highest discrepancies (56,6%-90.9%) by the double-curved one. Results show that unguided axial impact introduces unwanted transverse forces and moments into the femur. Therefore, broach handles should be modified accordingly so that minimally invasive surgery remains feasible but unwanted forces or moments can still be compensated.

Influence of different anteversion alignments of a cementless hip stem on primary stability and strain distribution

BACKGROUND

Stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty is well known to have a high impact on dislocation, but empirical data regarding the clinical and biomechanical influence is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of different anteversion alignments on the primary stability and strain distribution of a cementless stem.

METHODS

The cementless CLS Spotorno stem was implanted in 3 different groups (each group n = 6, total n = 21) with different anteversion alignments: reference anteversion (8°), +15° torsion in anteversion (+23°), -15° torsion in retroversion (-7°) using composite femurs (Sawbones). Primary stability was determined by 3-dimensional micromotions using a dynamic loading procedure simulating walking on level ground. Additionally, surface strains were registered before and after stem insertion in the 3 different groups, using one composite femur for each group (total n = 3).

FINDINGS

The micromotion measurements did not show a significant difference between the 3 evaluated alignments. Moreover, determination of the strain distribution did also not reveal an obvious difference.

INTERPRETATION

This biomechanical study simulating walking on level ground indicates that there is no considerable influence of stem ante-/retroversion variation (±15°) on the initial stability and strain distribution when evaluating the cementless CLS Spotorno in composite femora.

Metaphyseal anchoring short stem hip arthroplasty provides a more physiological load transfer: a comparative finite element analysis study

BACKGROUND

Short stem total hip arthroplasty (SHA) preserves femoral bone stock and is supposed to provide a more natural load transfer compared to standard stem total hip arthroplasty (THA). As comparative biomechanical reference data are rare we used a finite element analysis (FEA) approach to compare cortical load transfer after implantations of a metaphyseal anchoring short and standard stem in native biomechanical femora.

METHODS

The subject specific finite element models of biomechanical femora, one native and two with implanted metaphyseal anchoring SHA (Metha, B. Braun Aesculap) and standard THA (CLS, Zimmer-Biomet), were generated from computed tomography datasets. The loading configuration was performed with an axial force of 1400 N. Von Mises stress was used to investigate the change of cortical stress distribution.

RESULTS

Compared to the native femur, a considerable reduction of cortical stress was recorded after implantation of SHA and standard THA. The SHA showed less reduction proximally with a significant higher metaphyseal cortical stress compared to standard THA. Moreover, the highest peak stresses were observed metaphyseal for the SHA stem while for the standard THA high stress pattern was observed more distally.

CONCLUSIONS

Both, short and standard THA, cause unloading of the proximal femur. However, the metaphyseal anchoring SHA features a clearly favorable pattern in terms of a lower reduction proximally and improved metaphyseal loading, while standard THA shows a higher proximal unloading and more distal load transfer. These load patterns implicate a reduced stress shielding proximally for metaphyseal anchoring SHA stems and might be able to translate in a better bone preservation.

Comparisons of the surface micromotions of cementless femoral prosthesis in the horizontal and vertical levels: a network analysis of biomechanical studies

BACKGROUND

Numerous quantitatively biomechanical studies measuring the fixation stability of femoral stem using micromotions at the bone-implant interfaces in different directions and levels remain inconclusive. This network meta-analysis performed systematically aims to explore the rank probability of micromotions at the bone-implant interfaces based on biomechanical data from studies published.

METHODS

Two electronic databases, PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase, were utilized to retrieve biomechanical studies providing the data of micromotions at the bone-stem interfaces. After screening and diluting out, the studies that met inclusion criteria will be utilized for statistical analysis. In order to contrast the stability of commonness and differences of the different parts of the femoral stem, the horizontal and vertical comparison of micromotions at the bone-implant interfaces were conducted using the pooled evaluation indexes including the mean difference (MD) and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve, while inconsistency analysis, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analyses, and publication bias were performed for the stability evaluation of outcomes.

RESULTS

Screening determined that 20 studies involving a total of 249 samples were deemed viable for inclusion in the network meta-analysis. Tip point registered the highest micromotions of 13 measurement points. In the horizontal level, the arrangements of 4 measurement points at the proximal (P1-P4), middle (P5-P8) and distal part of the stem (P9-P12) were P1 = P2 = P3 = P4, P7 > P8 > P6 = P5 and P10 ≥ P12 = P9 = P11, respectively. In the vertical level, the arrangements of 3 measurement points at the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral directions was P9 > P5 = P1, P10 > P6 > P2, P11 > P7 > P3, and P12 > P8 > P4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The network meta-analysis seems to reveal that the distal part of the femoral stem is easier to register higher micromotion, and tip point of femoral stem registers the highest micromotions.

Ex vivo estimation of cementless femoral stem stability using an instrumented hammer

BACKGROUND

The success of cementless hip arthroplasty depends on the primary stability of the femoral stem. It remains difficult to assess the optimal number of impacts to guarantee the femoral stem stability while avoiding bone fracture. The aim of this study is to validate a method using a hammer instrumented with a force sensor to monitor the insertion of femoral stem in bovine femoral samples.

METHODS

Different cementless femoral stem were impacted into five bovine femur samples, leading to 99 configurations. Three methods were used to quantify the insertion endpoint: the impact hammer, video motion tracking and the surgeon proprioception. For each configuration, the number of impacts performed by the surgeon until he felt a correct insertion was noted N_surg. The insertion depth E was measured through video motion tracking, and the impact number N_vid corresponding to the end of the insertion was estimated. Two indicators, noted I and D, were determined from the analysis of the time variation of the force, and the impact number N_d corresponding to a threshold reached in D variation was estimated.

FINDINGS

The pullout force of the femoral stem was significantly correlated with I (R² = 0.81). The values of N_surg, N_vid and N_d were similar for all configurations.

INTERPRETATION

The results validate the use of the impact hammer to assess the primary stability of the femoral stem and the moment when the surgeon should stop the impaction procedure for an optimal insertion, which could lead to the development of a decision support system.

Anatomic grooved stem mitigates strain shielding compared to established total hip arthroplasty stem designs in finite-element models

Aseptic loosening remains a major problem for uncemented femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Ideally, bone adaptation after THA manifests minimally and local bone density reduction is widely avoided. Different design features may help to approximate initial, post-THA bone strain to levels pre-THA. Strain-shielding effects of different SP-CL stem design features are systematically analyzed and compared to CLS Spotorno and CORAIL using finite element models and physiological musculoskeletal loading conditions. All designs show substantial proximal strain-shielding: 50% reduced medial surface strain, 40–50% reduction at lateral surface, >120 µm/m root mean square error (RMSE) compared to intact bone in Gruen zone 1 and >60 µm/m RMSE in Gruen zones 2, 6, and 7. Geometrical changes (ribs, grooves, cross sections, stem length, anatomic curvature) have a considerable effect on strain-shielding; up to 20%. Combinations of reduced stem stiffness with larger proximal contact area (anatomically curved, grooves) lead to less strain-shielding compared to clinically established implant designs. We found that only the combination of a structurally flexible stem with anatomical curvature and grooves improves strain-shielding compared to other designs. The clinical implications in vivo of this initial strain-shielding difference are currently under evaluation in an ongoing clinical analysis.

Varus malalignment of cementless hip stems provides sufficient primary stability but highly increases distal strain distribution

BACKGROUND

Varus position of cementless stems is a common malalignment in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical studies have reported a low rate of aseptic loosening but an increased risk for thigh pain. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate these clinical observations from a biomechanical perspective.

METHODS

A conventional cementless stem (CLS Spotorno) was implanted in a regular, straight (size 13.75) as well as in a varus position (size 11.25) in 6 composite femora (Sawbones), respectively. Primary stability was assessed by recording 3-dimensional micromotions under dynamic load bearing conditions and stress shielding was evaluated by registering the surface strain before and after stem insertion.

FINDINGS

Primary stability for stems in varus malposition revealed significantly lower micromotions (p < 0.05) for most regions compared to stems in neutral position. The greatest difference was observed at the tip of the stem where the straight aligned implants exceeded the critical upper limit for osseous integration of 150 μm. The surface strains for the varus aligned stems revealed a higher load transmission to the femur, resulting in a clearly altered strain distribution.

INTERPRETATION

This biomechanical study confirms the clinical findings of a good primary stability of cementless stems in a varus malposition, but impressively demonstrates the altered load transmission with the risk for postoperative thigh pain.

Monitoring cementless femoral stem insertion by impact analyses: An in vitro study

The primary stability of the femoral stem (FS) implant determines the surgical success of cementless hip arthroplasty. During the insertion, a compromise must be found for the number and energy of impacts that should be sufficiently large to obtain an adapted primary stability of the FS and not too high to decrease fracture risk. The aim of this study is to determine whether a hammer instrumented with a force sensor can be used to monitor the insertion of FS. Cementless FS of different sizes were impacted in four artificial femurs with an instrumented hammer, leading to 72 configurations. The impact number when the surgeon empirically felt that the FS was fully inserted was noted N_surg. The insertion depth E was assessed using video motion tracking and the impact number N_vid corresponding to the end of the insertion was estimated. For each impact, two indicators noted I and D were determined based on the analysis of the variation of the force as a function of time. The pull-out force F was significantly correlated with the indicator I (R² = 0.67). The variation of D was analyzed using a threshold to determine an impact number N_d, which is shown to be closely related to N_surg and N_vid, with an average difference of around 0.2. This approach allows to determine i) the moment when the surgeon should stop the impaction procedure in order to obtain an optimal insertion of the FS and ii) the FS implant primary stability. This study paves the way towards the development of a decision support system to assist the surgeon in hip arthroplasty.

Influence of undersized cementless hip stems on primary stability and strain distribution

INTRODUCTION

Undersizing of cementless hip stems is a risk factor for aseptic loosening and early subsidence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of undersized stems and determine whether a biomechanical study can predict the clinical results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three consecutive sizes of a clinically proven stem (CLS Spotorno) were implanted into six composite femora (size large, Sawbones^®), respectively. According to the Canal Fill Index (CFI), two stems (size 11.25 and 12.5) were undersized (CFI < 80%) and one stem (size 13.75) had an appropriate size (CFI > 80%). The primary stability was evaluated by measurement of 3-dimensional (3D)-micromotions under physiological adapted load and surface strains were recorded before and after implantation to detect stress-shielding processes.

RESULTS

Both undersized stems revealed significantly higher micromotions in all regions compared to the appropriate stem. The highest micromotions were registered at the distal tip of the three stem sizes. The changes in surface strain did not show a significant difference between the three stem sizes, but the highest strain reduction was observed proximally indicating a tendency for stress shielding.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the clinical assumption that undersized stem result in a significantly reduced primary stability. Furthermore, in vitro studies allow to determine the effects of undersizing and stress shielding processes.