1
|
Durcan C, Hossain M, Chagnon G, Perić D, Girard E. Mechanical experimentation of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2024; 23:23-59. [PMID: 37935880 PMCID: PMC10901955 DOI: 10.1007/s10237-023-01773-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
The gastrointestinal (GI) organs of the human body are responsible for transporting and extracting nutrients from food and drink, as well as excreting solid waste. Biomechanical experimentation of the GI organs provides insight into the mechanisms involved in their normal physiological functions, as well as understanding of how diseases can cause disruption to these. Additionally, experimental findings form the basis of all finite element (FE) modelling of these organs, which have a wide array of applications within medicine and engineering. This systematic review summarises the experimental studies that are currently in the literature (n = 247) and outlines the areas in which experimentation is lacking, highlighting what is still required in order to more fully understand the mechanical behaviour of the GI organs. These include (i) more human data, allowing for more accurate modelling for applications within medicine, (ii) an increase in time-dependent studies, and (iii) more sophisticated in vivo testing methods which allow for both the layer- and direction-dependent characterisation of the GI organs. The findings of this review can also be used to identify experimental data for the readers' own constitutive or FE modelling as the experimental studies have been grouped in terms of organ (oesophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine or rectum), test condition (ex vivo or in vivo), number of directions studied (isotropic or anisotropic), species family (human, porcine, feline etc.), tissue condition (intact wall or layer-dependent) and the type of test performed (biaxial tension, inflation-extension, distension (pressure-diameter), etc.). Furthermore, the studies that investigated the time-dependent (viscoelastic) behaviour of the tissues have been presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara Durcan
- Zienkiewicz Centre for Modelling, Data and AI, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Mokarram Hossain
- Zienkiewicz Centre for Modelling, Data and AI, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK.
| | - Grégory Chagnon
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Djordje Perić
- Zienkiewicz Centre for Modelling, Data and AI, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK
| | - Edouard Girard
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, 38000, Grenoble, France
- Laboratoire d'Anatomie des Alpes Françaises, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Strassner H, Caulk A, Reher N, Petrescu S, Vasanji A. Evaluating Performance of Circular Staplers Using Comparative Test Methods for Evidence-Based Surgery. Surg Innov 2023; 30:576-585. [PMID: 37029908 DOI: 10.1177/15533506231166447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circular stapler anastomosis is a common surgical procedure. Despite technological advancements, anastomotic leak remains a postoperative concern. Assessment of new technologies is impeded by variations in test methods and analysis, precluding outcome reproducibility and direct comparisons of results across studies. The development of robust and reproducible preclinical test methods is critical to accelerating stapling technology advancements. METHODOLOGY Leak pressure, staple line perfusion and security, and device removal force were quantified for triple-row (Tri-staple EEA, TriEEA) and double-row staplers (Echelon Circular Powered, ECP). Leak and perfusion testing were performed in vivo. Device removal force and staple line security testing were performed with synthetic medium using an Instron. Data were analyzed using unpaired student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test, with statistical significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS Leak pressure was 73% higher in TriEEA vs ECP (P = .016). TriEEA staple line failure force was lower than ECP at 40 and 50 mmHg (P = .001 and P = .023, respectively). Perfusion to the staple line was higher (148%) for TriEEA than for ECP (P = .003) and the force required to remove the device from its stapled anastomosis was 78% lower for TriEEA than for ECP (P < .001). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS This report addresses a primary limitation in stapling research by presenting novel methodologies which enhance clinical relevance and provide sufficient detail for reproduction by independent investigators. These methods are applied to a comparison between triple-row and double-row staplers to demonstrate utility of new test methods in assessing key technology design features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nicholas Reher
- Surgical Innovations, Medtronic plc, North Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caulk AW, Chatterjee M, Barr SJ, Contini EM. Mechanobiological considerations in colorectal stapling: Implications for technology development. Surg Open Sci 2023; 13:54-65. [PMID: 37159635 PMCID: PMC10163679 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Technological advancements in minimally invasive surgery have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes. One such technology is surgical stapling, which has evolved into a key component of many operating rooms by facilitating ease and efficacy in resection and repair of diseased or otherwise compromised tissue. Despite such advancements, adverse post-operative outcomes such as anastomotic leak remain a persistent problem in surgical stapling and its correlates (i.e., hand-sewing), most notably in low colorectal or coloanal procedures. Many factors may drive anastomotic leaks, including tissue perfusion, microbiome composition, and patient factors such as pre-existing disease. Surgical intervention induces complex acute and chronic changes to the mechanical environment of the tissue; however, roles of mechanical forces in post-operative healing remain poorly characterized. It is well known that cells sense and respond to their local mechanical environment and that dysfunction of this "mechanosensing" phenomenon contributes to a myriad of diseases. Mechanosensing has been investigated in wound healing contexts such as dermal incisional and excisional wounds and development of pressure ulcers; however, reports investigating roles of mechanical forces in adverse post-operative gastrointestinal wound healing are lacking. To understand this relationship well, it is critical to understand: 1) the intraoperative material responses of tissue to surgical intervention, and 2) the post-operative mechanobiological response of the tissue to surgically imposed forces. In this review, we summarize the state of the field in each of these contexts while highlighting areas of opportunity for discovery and innovation which can positively impact patient outcomes in minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander W. Caulk
- Corresponding author at: 60 Middletown Ave., North Haven, CT 06473, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Macro- and Micro-Mechanics of the Colon and Rectum I: Experimental Evidence. Bioengineering (Basel) 2020; 7:bioengineering7040130. [PMID: 33086503 PMCID: PMC7712174 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering7040130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Many lower gastrointestinal diseases are associated with altered mechanical movement and deformation of the large intestine, i.e., the colon and rectum. The leading reason for patients' visits to gastrointestinal clinics is visceral pain, which is reliably evoked by mechanical distension rather than non-mechanical stimuli such as inflammation or heating. The macroscopic biomechanics of the large intestine were characterized by mechanical tests and the microscopic by imaging the load-bearing constituents, i.e., intestinal collagen and muscle fibers. Regions with high mechanical stresses in the large intestine (submucosa and muscularis propria) coincide with locations of submucosal and myenteric neural plexuses, indicating a functional interaction between intestinal structural biomechanics and enteric neurons. In this review, we systematically summarized experimental evidence on the macro- and micro-scale biomechanics of the colon and rectum in both health and disease. We reviewed the heterogeneous mechanical properties of the colon and rectum and surveyed the imaging methods applied to characterize collagen fibers in the intestinal wall. We also discussed the presence of extrinsic and intrinsic neural tissues within different layers of the colon and rectum. This review provides a foundation for further advancements in intestinal biomechanics by synergistically studying the interplay between tissue biomechanics and enteric neurons.
Collapse
|
5
|
ZHANG PEISEN, LI JING, HAO YANG, CIUTI GASTONE, ARAI TATSUO, HUANG QIANG, DARIO PAOLO. EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF INTACT COLON DEFORMATION UNDER LOCAL FORCES APPLIED BY MAGNETIC CAPSULE ENDOSCOPES. J MECH MED BIOL 2020. [DOI: 10.1142/s0219519420500414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Magnetically guided capsule endoscopy is a promising technology for clinical application. A platform that simulates the magnetic capsule endoscope system is built to study the deformation process of the colon when its lumen suffers local forces. Force-displacement curves of the porcine large intestine under various experiment conditions, including different loading positions (haustra or taeniae coli), loading directions, colon inner pressures and specimen lengths, were measured to analyze the mechanical behavior of the intact large intestine during interactions with magnetic capsule endoscopes. In the practical application of the magnetic capsule endoscope, these data are imperative to optimize the control scheme and reduce operation risks. Based on our experiments, the taeniae coli of the intact large intestine show higher linear stiffness than the haustra, and inflation reduces the linear stiffness of the colon. Magnetic capsule with small edge radii can more easily damage or even perforate the colon. Based on our test results, we suggest that the force applied to the colon should be limited to below 17[Formula: see text]N when the capsule is actuated forward along the colon and limited to below 10[Formula: see text]N when the capsule is vertical to the colon during lesion screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PEISEN ZHANG
- Intelligent Robotics Institute, School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - JING LI
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - YANG HAO
- Intelligent Robotics Institute, School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - GASTONE CIUTI
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56025, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy
| | - TATSUO ARAI
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - QIANG HUANG
- Intelligent Robotics Institute, School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - PAOLO DARIO
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, P. R. China
- The Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56025, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|