Effect of ankle dorsiflexion on displacement and strain in the tibial nerve and biceps femoris muscle at the posterior knee during the straight leg raise: Investigation of specificity of nerve movement

Comparison of utilizing modified hold-relax, muscle energy technique, and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on hamstring muscle length in healthy athletes: Randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The hamstring muscle shortness is the primary risk factor for sports-related injuries. Numerous treatments are available for lengthening of hamstring muscle. The main purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effect of modified hold-relax, muscle energy technique (MET), and instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization-Graston techniques (IASTM-GT) on length of hamstring muscle in young healthy athletes.

METHODS

60 athletes comprising of 29 females and 31 males were recruited in the present study. Participants were allocated to 3 groups of IASTM-GT (N = 20, 13 male, 7 female), Modified Hold-relax (N = 20, 8 male, 12 female), and MET (N = 20, 7 male, 13 female). Active knee extension and passive straight leg raising (SLR), and toe touch test were performed before and immediately after the intervention by a blinded assessor. For the comparison of dependent variables across time, 3*2 repeated measure ANOVA was utilized.

RESULTS

Interaction of group by time was significant for passive SLR (P < 0.001). Interaction of group by time was not significant for active knee extension (P = 0.17). The results showed that dependent variables increased significantly in all groups. The effect size (Cohen's d) in the groups of IASTM-GT, modified Hold-relax, and MET was 1.7, 3.17, and 3.12, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the measures were improved in all groups, it seems that IASTM-GT can be used as a safe and efficient treatment, which can be a suitable candidate alongside modified hold-relax and MET for increasing the hamstrings muscle length in healthy athletes.

Short-Term Effects of Three Types of Hamstring Stretching on Length, Neurodynamic Response, and Perceived Sense of Effort-A Randomised Cross-Over Trial

Background: Stretching techniques for hamstring muscles have been described both to increase muscle length and to evaluate nerve mechanosensitivity. Aim: We sought to evaluate the short-term effects of three types of hamstring stretching on hamstring length and report the type of response (neural or muscular) produced by ankle dorsiflexion and perceived sense of effort in asymptomatic subjects. Methods: A randomised cross-over clinical trial was conducted. A total of 35 subjects were recruited (15 women, 20 men; mean age 24.60 ± 6.49 years). Straight leg raises (SLR), passive knee extensions (PKE), and maximal hip flexion (MHF) were performed on dominant and non-dominant limbs. In addition, the intensity of the applied force, the type and location of the response to structural differentiation, and the perceived sensation of effort were assessed. Results: All stretching techniques increased hamstring length with no differences between limbs in the time*stretch interaction (p < 0.05). The perceived sensation of effort was similar between all types of stretching except MHF between limbs (p = 0.047). The type of response was mostly musculoskeletal for MHF and the area of more neural response was the posterior knee with SLR stretch. Conclusions: All stretching techniques increased hamstring length. The highest percentage of neural responses was observed in the SLR stretching, which produced a greater increase in overall flexibility.

Minimizing risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during peroneus longus tendon autograft harvest: a cadaveric study at different ankle or knee positions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the distances using ultrasound between the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) and sural nerve along the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft harvest path at different ankle or knee positions in order to minimize risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during PLT autograft harvest.

METHODS

Twenty-four fresh-frozen human cadaveric lower extremities were used to harvest a full-thickness PLT autograft with a tendon stripper. Four specimens were utilized to validate correct identification of nerves under ultrasound. Sonographically guided perineural injections were performed at the start point and end point of the PLT harvest path using coloured latex, followed by dissection with gross inspection. Using ultrasound, the distance from the peroneus brevis muscle to the sural nerve at different ankle positions (20° dorsiflexion, neutral, and 20° plantarflexion) was measured, and the distance from the end of the tendon stripper to the SPN at different knee positions (full extension and 90° flexion) was also measured. Measurements were performed by two separate observers using ImageJ software.

RESULTS

Cadaveric dissection showed the presence of latex around nerves in all four specimens. The average distance from the brevis muscle to the sural nerve increased significantly from dorsiflexion to plantarflexion. The shortest distance from the tenodesis site to the sural nerve was 5.8 ± 1.7 mm. There was no significant difference from the end of the tendon stripper to the SPN between full extension or 90° flexion of the knee.

CONCLUSION

When harvesting the PLT, it is recommended to place the ankle at plantarflexion. The knee at full extension or 90° flexion had no effect. Joint positions at the time of graft harvest should be monitored to reduce risks of iatrogenic nerve injury.

Reliability of the straight leg raise test for suspected lumbar radicular pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The passive straight leg raise (SLR) and crossed SLR are recommended tests for lumbar radicular pain. There are no recent reviews of test reliability.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize SLR and crossed SLR reliability in patients with suspected lumbar radicular pain.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHOD

MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched for studies published before April 2021 that reported SLR or crossed SLR reliability in patients with low back-related leg pain. Supplemental analyses also included patients with low back pain only. Study selection, risk of bias assessment (QAREL), and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Kappa, intraclass correlation coefficients, and smallest detectable difference (SDD₉₅) quantified reliability. Meta-analysis was performed when appropriate. Confidence in the evidence was determined by applying GRADE principles.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

Fifteen studies met selection criteria. One-hundred-eighty-nine participants had low back-related leg pain. Four-hundred-thirty-nine were included in supplemental analyses. Meta-analyses showed at least fair inter-rater reliability when a positive SLR required provocation of lower extremity symptoms or pain. SLR reliability was at least moderate when testing included structural differentiation (e.g., ankle dorsiflexion). A low prevalence of positive crossed SLR tests led to wide-ranging reliability estimates. Confidence in the evidence for identifying a positive SLR or crossed SLR was moderate to very low. SDD₉₅ values for different raters measuring SLR range of motion ranged from 13 to 20°.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliability data support testing SLR with structural differentiation manoeuvres. Crossed SLR reliability data are inconclusive. Measurement error likely prohibits using SLR range of motion for clinical decision-making.