The role of the brachialis muscle in elbow stability with collateral ligament injury: A biomechanical investigation

Evaluating the efficacy of hinged elbow braces in reducing passive valgus forces after ulnar collateral ligament injury-A biomechanical study

Purpose

This biomechanical study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a hinged elbow orthosis in reducing passive valgus forces following medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow joint. The hypothesis tested was that a hinged elbow orthosis reduces these passive valgus forces.

Methods

Eight fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were prepared and tested under three scenarios: intact ligaments, simulated UCL rupture and application of a hinged elbow brace after simulated UCL rupture. Valgus instability was assessed using a custom testing set-up and the Optotrak motion capture system. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the results across scenarios.

Results

Intraclass correlation (ICC) calculation showed that the testing set-up was reliable in investigating valgus deflection across all levels of applied force. The hinged elbow brace reduced passive valgus forces after UCL rupture. The reduction in valgus instability was consistent with close approximation to the native state, although not reaching its level.

Conclusion

The hypothesis-that a hinged elbow orthosis significantly reduces passive valgus forces in the elbow following UCL injuries-is not supported by the data and therefore has to be rejected. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates a tendency that a hinged elbow brace could mitigate these forces, at least in an experimental cadaveric model with static study conditions.

Level of Evidence

The level of evidence of this study is level IV.

A bilateral four-headed brachialis muscle with a variant innervation: a cadaveric report with possible clinical implications

PURPOSE

Anterior compartment muscles of the arm present high morphological variability, with possible clinical significance. The current cadaveric report aims to describe a bilateral four-headed brachialis muscle (BM) with aberrant innervation. Emphasis on the embryological background and possible clinical significance are also provided.

METHODS

Classical upper limb dissection was performed on an 84-year-old donated male cadaver. The cadaver was donated to the Anatomy Department of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

RESULTS

On the left upper limb, the four-headed BM was supplied by the musculocutaneous and the median nerves after their interconnection. On the right upper limb, the four-headed BM received its innervation from the median nerve due to the musculocutaneous nerve absence. A bilateral muscular tunnel for the radial nerve passage was identified, between the BM accessory heads and the brachioradialis muscle.

CONCLUSION

BM has clinical significance, due to its proximity to important neurovascular structures and frequent surgeries at the humerus. Hence, knowledge of these variants should keep orthopedic surgeons alert when intervening in this area. Further dissection studies with a standardized protocol are needed to elucidate the prevalence of BM aberrations and concomitant variants.

Coronoid fractures and traumatic elbow instability

The coronoid process is key to concentric elbow alignment. Malalignment can contribute to post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The aim of treatment is to keep the joint aligned while the collateral ligaments and fractures heal. The injury pattern is apparent in the shape and size of the coronoid fracture fragments: (1) coronoid tip fractures associated with terrible triad (TT) injuries; (2) anteromedial facet fractures with posteromedial varus rotational type injuries; and (3) large coronoid base fractures with anterior (trans-) or posterior olecranon fracture dislocations. Each injury pattern is associated with specific ligamentous injuries and fracture characteristics useful in planning treatment. The tip fractures associated with TT injuries are repaired with suture fixation or screw fixation in addition to repair or replacement of the radial head fracture and reattachment of the lateral collateral ligament origin. Anteromedial facet fractures are usually repaired with a medial buttress plate. If the elbow is concentrically located on computed tomography and the patient can avoid varus stress for a month, TT and anteromedial facet injuries can be treated nonoperatively. Base fractures are associated with olecranon fractures and can usually be fixed with screws through the posterior plate or with an additional medial plate. If the surgery makes elbow subluxation or dislocation unlikely, and the fracture fixation is secure, elbow motion and stretching can commence within a week when the patient is comfortable.

Pedicle or lateral mass screws in Goel-Harms construct? A biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of the posterior arch of C1 as pedicle has shown beneficial stability regarding screw loosening, however, the C1 pedicle screw placement is challenging. Therefore, the study aimed to analyse the bending forces of the Harms construct used in fixation of C1/C2 when using pedicle screws compared to lateral mass screws.

METHODS

Five cadaveric specimens with a mean age of 72 years at death and bone mineral density measuring for 512.4 Hounsfield Units (HU) on average were used. A custom-made biomechanical setup was used to test the specimens with a C1/C2 Harms construct each with the use of lateral mass screws and pedicle screws in sequence. Strain gauges were used to analyse the bending forces from C1 to C2 in cyclic axial compression (μm/m). All underwent cyclic biomechanical testing using 50, 75 and 100 N.

FINDINGS

In all specimens, placement of lateral mass screws and pedicle screws was feasible. All underwent cyclic biomechanical testing. For the lateral mass screw, a bending of 142.04 µm/m at 50 N, 166.56 µm/m at 75 N and 188.54 µm/m at 100 N was measured. For the pedicle screws, bending force was slightly elevated with 165.98 µm/m at 50 N, 190.58 µm/m at 75 N and 195.95 µm/m at 100 N. However, bending forces did not vary significantly. In all measurements, no statistical significance was found when comparing pedicle screws and lateral mass screws.

INTERPRETATION

The lateral mass screw used in the Harms Construct to stabilize C1/2 showed less bending forces, therefore the construct with lateral mass screws appears more stable in axial compression compared to the one with pedicle screws. However, bending forces did not vary significantly.