Effect of weight-bearing in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities

Clinical outcomes and biomechanics in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

To clarify the influence of biomechanics on post-operative clinical outcomes in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA).

Methods

Severe medial osteoarthritis who underwent BCR-TKA were examined. Each patient was asked to perform a squat (weight-bearing [WB]) and active assisted knee flexion (non-WB [NWB]) under single fluoroscopy surveillance. A 2D-to-3D registration technique was used. Patients were divided into two groups based on their 1-year post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using hierarchical cluster analysis. The rotational alignment on computed tomography, anterior stability at 30° of knee flexion, axial rotation of the femur relative to the tibial component and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral femorotibial contact points were measured.

Results

Components did not significantly differ between the groups, with 1.6 ± 5.0° and 5.4 ± 4.7° of femoral internal rotation in the low PROM (N = 28) and high PROM (N = 8) groups, respectively. Moreover, anterior stability did not significantly differ (low PROM: 4.9 ± 1.4 mm, high PROM: 5.3 ± 1.0 mm). The knee externally rotated from 0° to 70° and from 50° to 110° of flexion during WB and NWB, respectively. The low-PROM group exhibited more external rotation across all ranges of motion. Medial contact points moved backwards from 0° to 30° of flexion during WB, forward from 30° to 100° of flexion, and backwards from 100° to 110° of flexion. The low-PROM group was positioned more forward throughout the full range of motion during WB. Lateral contact points moved backwards at 0-30° of flexion, forward at 70-100° of flexion, and backwards at 100-110° of flexion during WB, while there was backward movement at 50° of flexion during NWB. Both activities exhibited a more posterior position in the low-PROM group throughout the full range of motion.

Conclusion

The femoral component in the low-PROM group was externally rotated across all ranges of motion, and the lateral contact points were posteriorly located in BCR-TKA.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prospective cohort study.

In vivo kinematic comparison of bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty between mechanical alignment and functional alignment methods

Background/objective

This study aimed to clarify the kinematics of bi-cruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing the mechanical alignment (MA) and functional alignment (FA) methods and to evaluate differences between the two alignment methods.

Methods

The in vivo kinematics of 20 MA TKA and 20 FA TKA knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting using a two-to three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, knee flexion angle, axial rotational angle, varus-valgus angle, anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral low contact points of the femoral component relative to the tibial component and kinematic pathway were evaluated.

Results

No difference in the knee flexion angle was observed between the MA and FA TKA groups. Femoral external rotation was observed in both groups and no significant difference was observed. Significant varus alignment from extension to early flexion range was observed in the FA TKA group. The posterior translation of the medial side was smaller in the FA TKA group than in the MA TKA group. Conversely, no significant difference in the anteroposterior translation of the lateral side was observed. In the kinematic pathway, a medial pivot motion from 0° to 20° of flexion and a lateral pivot motion beyond 20° of flexion were observed in both groups.

Conclusion

During squatting in BCR TKA, the FA TKA group significantly showed varus alignment and smaller posterior translation of the medial side than the MA TKA group from extension to early flexion range.

In Vivo Kinematics and Cruciate Ligament Tension Are Not Restored to Normal After Bicruciate-Preserving Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Whether cruciate ligament forces in cruciate-preserving designs, such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA), differ from those in normal knees remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vivo kinematics and cruciate ligament force in knees before and after UKA or BCR-TKA to those in normal knees during high-flexion activity.

METHODS

Overall, twenty normal knees, 17 knees with medial UKA, and 15 knees with BCR-TKA were fluoroscopically examined while performing a squatting activity. A 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional registration technique was employed to measure tibio-femoral kinematics. Ligament strains and tensions in the anteromedial bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament and the anterolateral bundle of the posterior cruciate ligament (aPCL) and posteromedial bundle of the posterior cruciate ligament (pPCL) during knee flexion were analyzed.

RESULTS

Tension in both bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament decreased with flexion. At 60° of flexion, anteromedial bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament tension in postoperative UKA knees was greater than that in normal knees. At 30° of flexion, posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament tension in postoperative UKA knees was greater than that in normal knees. On the other hand, aPCL and pPCL tensions increased with flexion. From 40 to 110° of flexion, the postoperative aPCL tension in UKA knees was greater than that in normal knees. At 110° of flexion, the preoperative pPCL tension in UKA knees was greater than that in normal knees. In addition, the postoperative pPCL tension in UKA knees was larger than that in normal knees beyond 20° of flexion. Furthermore, the pPCL tension of postoperative BCR-TKA knees was larger than that in normal knees from 20 to 50° and beyond 90° of flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

The cruciate ligament tensions, especially posterior cruciate ligament tension in knees after UKA, were greater than those in the normal knees. Surgeons performing bi-cruciat-preserving knee arthroplasties should therefore balance cruciate ligament tension more carefully in flexion and extension.

Comparison of finite helical axis of the knee joint before and after bi-cruciate-preserving knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Difference in the finite helical axis of the knee joints before and after anterior cruciate ligament-preserving knee arthroplasties such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty remains unknown. This study compared the knee finite helical axes before and after bi-cruciate-preserving knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were included. Under fluoroscopy, participants performed a deep knee bend before and after surgery. A two/three-dimensional registration technique was employed to measure tibiofemoral kinematics. Femoral finite helical axis was calculated in a flexion range of 0-120° using 30° windows (early-, mid-, late-, and deep-flexion phases).

FINDINGS

In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, the preoperative knee vertical angle was larger than the postoperative vertical angle in mid- and deep-flexion phases. The postoperative knee vertical angle was smaller in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than in bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. In unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, the preoperative horizontal angle was smaller than the postoperative horizontal angle in the early-flexion phase. However, in bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty, the preoperative horizontal angle was larger than the postoperative horizontal angle in mid- and deep-flexion phases. The horizontal angle was smaller before unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than that before bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in early-, mid-, and deep-flexion phases. However, the vertical angle was larger after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than that after bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in the early-flexion phase.

INTERPRETATION

The knee finite helical axes before and after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty differed from those before and after bi-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.