Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Are there predictors for visual outcome or recurrences?

MRI features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension are not prognostic of visual and headache outcome

BACKGROUND

In idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), certain MRI features are promising diagnostic markers, but whether these have prognostic value is currently unknown.

METHODS

We included patients from the Vienna-Idiopathic-Intracranial-Hypertension (VIIH) database with IIH according to Friedman criteria and cranial MRI performed at diagnosis. Presence of empty sella (ES), perioptic subarachnoid space distension (POSD) with or without optic nerve tortuosity (ONT), posterior globe flattening (PGF) and transverse sinus stenosis (TSS) was assessed and multivariable regression models regarding visual outcome (persistent visual impairment/visual worsening) and headache outcome (headache improvement/freedom of headache) were fitted.

RESULTS

We included 84 IIH patients (88.1% female, mean age 33.5 years, median body mass index 33.7). At baseline, visual impairment was present in 70.2% and headache in 84.5% (54.8% chronic). Persistent visual impairment occurred in 58.3%, visual worsening in 13.1%, headache improvement was achieved in 83.8%, freedom of headache in 26.2%. At least one MRI feature was found in 78.6% and 60.0% had ≥3 features with POSD most frequent (64.3%) followed by TSS (60.0%), ONT (46.4%), ES (44.0%) and PGF (23.8%). In multivariable models, there was no association of any single MRI feature or their number with visual impairment, visual worsening, headache improvement or freedom. Visual impairment at baseline predicted persistent visual impairment (odds ratio 6.3, p<0.001), but not visual worsening. Chronic headache at baseline was significantly associated with lower likelihood of headache freedom (odds ratio 0.48, p=0.013), but not with headache improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI features of IIH are neither prognostic of visual nor headache outcome.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension presenting with migraine phenotype is associated with unfavorable headache outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic impact of migraine headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).

BACKGROUND

Migraine headache is common in IIH, but it is unclear whether it has prognostic relevance.

METHODS

We investigated patients with IIH from the Vienna-IIH-database and differentiated migraine (IIH-MIG) from non-migraine headache (IIH-nonMIG) and without headache (IIH-noHA). Using multivariable models, we analyzed the impact of IIH-MIG on headache and visual outcomes 12 months after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 97 patients (89% female, mean [SD] age 32.9 [11.1] years, median body mass index 32.0 kg/m2 , median cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure 310 mm), 46% were assigned to IIH-MIG, 37% to IIH-nonMIG (11% tension-type, 26% unclassifiable), and 17% to IIH-noHA. Overall, headache improvement was achieved in 77% and freedom of headache in 28%. The IIH-MIG group showed significantly lower rates for headache improvement (67% vs. 89% in IIH-nonMIG, p = 0.019) and freedom of headache (11% vs. 33% in IIH-nonMIG and 63% in IIH-noHA, p = 0.015). These differences persisted when only analyzing patients with resolved papilledema at follow-up. In contrast, visual worsening was significantly less common in IIH-MIG (9% vs. 28% in IIH-nonMIG and 31% in IIH-noHA, p = 0.045). In multivariable models, IIH-MIG was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of achieving headache improvement (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.78, p < 0.001) and freedom of headache (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.46, p < 0.001), but also a lower risk for visual worsening (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04-0.82, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In IIH, migraine headache is associated with unfavorable outcomes for headache, even when papilledema has resolved, and possibly favorable visual outcome.

Papilledema: A review of etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Papilledema is optic nerve head edema secondary to raised intracranial pressure (ICP). It is distinct from other causes of optic disk edema in that visual function is usually normal in the acute phase. Papilledema is caused by transmission of elevated ICP to the subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerve that hinders axoplasmic transport within ganglion cell axons. There is ongoing controversy as to whether axoplasmic flow stasis is produced by physical compression of axons or microvascular ischemia. The most common cause of papilledema, especially in patients under the age of 50, is idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH); however, conditions that decrease cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow by either causing CSF derangements or mechanically blocking CSF outflow channels, and rarely conditions that increase CSF production, can be the culprit. When papilledema is suspected clinically, blood pressure should be measured, and pseudopapilledema should be ruled out. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbits with venography sequences is the preferred neuroimaging modality that should be performed next to look for indirect imaging signs of increased ICP and to rule out nonidiopathic causes. Lumbar puncture with measurement of opening pressure and evaluation of CSF composition should then be performed. In patients not in a typical demographic group for IIH, further investigations should be conducted to assess for underlying causes of increased ICP. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neck and spine, magnetic resonance angiography of the brain, computed tomography of the chest, complete blood count, and creatinine testing should be able to identify most secondary causes of intracranial hypertension. Treatment for patients with papilledema should be targeted toward the underlying etiology. Most patients with IIH respond to weight loss and oral acetazolamide. For patients with decreased central acuity and constricted visual fields at presentation, as well as patients who do not respond to treatment with acetazolamide, surgical treatments should be considered, with ventriculoperitoneal shunting being the typical procedure of choice.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Do we diagnose and manage it appropriately in the light of current data?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is an increase of intracranial pressure without a known cause, which usually presented with headache. This study aimed to evaluate the changing diagnosis and management approaches of neurologists for IIH in light of recent data.

METHODS

An online questionnaire about IIH was developed covering 28 questions, and five sections: demographic data, diagnosis, examination, treatment, and follow-up. We compared the approach of neurologists with 1-9 years of experience (group-A) with that of neurologists with more than 10 years' experience (group-B).

RESULTS

A total of 517 neurologists (group A: n = 252, group B: n = 265) participated in the study. Responder rate of questionarre is 18.3%. The approach to IIH in diagnosis, examination, treatment, and follow-up processes was similar in both groups. The younger group (group A) recognized all neuro-radiologic findings, especially flattening of the posterior aspect of the globe (p = 0.001) and tortuosity of the optic nerve (p < 0.001) at higher rates compared with group B. The most commonly used medical treatment was acetazolamide (99%); corticosteroids were used more frequently by group B (p < 0.001). Optic nerve sheath fenestration (88.3%) was the first-line and ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (70.5%) was the second preferred surgical approach. It was observed that serial lumbar puncture applications (57.0%) were preferred more frequently than venous sinus stenting (19.0%) and bariatric surgery (10.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The changing information in the last decade about IIH was more closely followed by younger neurologists despite their lesser experience, but classic methods were preferred in surgical approaches in both groups. Our findings indicated that post-graduate education and guidelines should be disseminated for IIH.

The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT)

BACKGROUND

The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of these weight loss treatments for IIH.

METHODS

IIH:WT was a five-year randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicentre trial in the United Kingdom, where participants with active IIH and a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive access to bariatric surgery or a community weight management intervention. All clinical and quality of life data was recorded at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Economic evaluation was performed to assess health-care costs and cost-effectiveness. Evaluations were established on an intention to treat principle, followed by a sensitivity analysis using a per protocol analysis.

RESULTS

The mean total health care costs were GBP 1353 for the community weight management arm and GBP 5400 for the bariatric surgery arm over 24 months. The majority of costs for the bariatric surgery arm relate to the surgical procedure itself. The 85% who underwent bariatric surgery achieved a 12.5% reduction in intracranial pressure at 24 months as compared to 39% in the community weight management arm; a mean difference of 45% in favour of bariatric surgery. The cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The IIH:WT was the first to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery with community weight management interventions in the setting of a randomised control trial. The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time and therefore the incremental cost of surgery when offset against the incremental reduction of intracranial pressure improved after 24 months, as compared with 12 months follow up.

Long term outcomes of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Observational study and literature review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is an unexplained increase in intracranial pressure often associated with obesity. The aim of this study was to conduct a retrospective observational study of the long term clinical, visual, and treatment outcomes in IIH patients.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with IIH over a 12-year period at a single centre was completed via database review. Demographic data, symptoms at baseline and last visit, treatments undertaken, and duration of follow-up were included. Visual outcomes, including visual acuity, colour vision, 30-2 Humphrey automated perimetry data, and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL), were collected at baseline and last visit.

RESULTS

IIH was diagnosed in 132 patients (90.9 % female) with a median of 2.8 years (range: 0-9.1) follow-up. Mean BMI was 35.9 ± 7.9 kg/m2. Symptoms at presentation were headache (87.6 %), pulsatile tinnitus (27.2 %) and transient visual obscurations (27.2 %). First-line management was acetazolamide in 86.4 %, with 34.2 % of these patients ceasing treatment because of adverse events. Visual field measures and RNFL at last follow-up improved when compared to baseline (median MD: - 1.99 dB (IQR -3.6 to -0.9) to -0.85 (-2.1 to 0.0) (p < 0.001), median RNFL: 132 μm (IQR 116 - 183) to 103 (92 - 113) (p < 0.001)). Some patients (6.1 %) required surgery for more severe IIH.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term symptomatic and visual prognosis in IIH patients is excellent. However, a subset of patients with more severe disease require surgical intervention. Adverse events of treatment lead to high medication discontinuation rates.

An update on idiopathic intracranial hypertension in adults: a look at pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is a neurological syndrome determined by a rise in intracranial pressure without a detectable cause. Course and prognosis may be changeable, requiring a multidisciplinary approach for its diagnosis and management. Although its precise pathogenesis is still unknown, many studies have been carried out to define the possible causal and associated factors, such as retinoids, steroid hormones, body mass index and recent weight gains, cytokines and adipokines levels. The clinical presentation can be variable including chronic headache, disturbance of vision, diplopia and tinnitus. Even if papilloedema is considered the most specific sign, it could not be observed in more than 5% of patients during the evaluation of the fundus oculi. Neuroradiological signs acquire greater importance in patients who do not present papilloedema and may suggest the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Other assessments can be useful in the diagnostic process, such as optical coherence tomography, visual evoked potentials, ocular ultrasonography and fundus fluorescein angiography and autofluorescence. Nonetheless, cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurement is required to establish a definite diagnosis. Management may be different, since surgical procedures or lumbar punctures are often required when symptoms develop rapidly leading to a loss of visual function. Apart from these cases, patients can be treated with a pharmacological approach and low-calorie diet, but they also need to be monitored over time since relapses years later are not uncommon.

The role of opening CSF pressure in response to treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)

The aim of the current study was to assess the risk factors, clinical symptoms and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with emphasis on determining the risk factors which involved in poor response to treatment. We retrospectively included 202 patients who were diagnosed with IIH. Disease severity was classified according to prescribed therapeutic option into 4 groups: acetazolamide (group 1), Acetazolamide plus topiramate or Lasix (group 2), repeated LP (group 3) and surgical intervention (group 4). Being in the higher group was considered as a higher severity of disease and poor response to treatment. Among the evaluated features of IIH, the strongest association were observed between opening CSF pressure and disease severity. So that, the highest CSF pressure was observed in patients who underwent surgery, which represent the highest severity of disease (group 4) and poor response to therapy (mean ± SD: 43.9 ± 21.1 cm H₂O). Headache was the most prevalent symptom of IIH in our series which was significantly higher among acetazolamide group. Blurred vision was the second most common symptoms which, unlike the headache was more reported in surgery group. Our results suggested that higher CSF pressure could be the risk factors of poor response to therapy, which may raise need for more intensive treatment. Furthermore, suffering of headache without blurred vision can consider as a prognostic factor for mild severity and good response to treatment.