Prevention and treatment of postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergone craniotomy: Systematic review of clinical evidence

Pediatric neuroanesthesia experiences: A single center retrospective cohort study

Background/Aim: Pediatric neuroanesthesia is a special field that requires significant experience and infrastructure because of anatomical, neurological, and pharmacological differences in the pediatric patient population. Although technological improvements provide more effective and safer neuroanesthesiological management, the principles of neuroanesthesia, neurocognitive development, and the effects of anesthetic agents on central nervous system development are well-known. The majority of pediatric neuroanesthesia articles in the literature are reviews; however, retrospective/prospective case series and controlled research are limited. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to contribute to the existing literature by reviewing and analyzing our single-center 10-year experiences and results addressing pediatric neuroanesthesia management. Methods: After ethical committee approval, anesthetic and surgical reports from 1165 pediatric neurosurgical cases over ten years were collected. Demographic data, intra-operative vascular management, anesthesia techniques, airway management, patient positions, analgesia methods, and complications were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. The available surgical intervention, patient positions, intra-operative neuromonitorization (IONM), and intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging (IOMR) records were also analyzed. Results: Six-hundred forty-six (55.4%) girls and 519 (44.5%) boys were included in the study. The median age was 60 (0–216) months. Cranial interventions were performed in 842 (72.3%) patients, and spinal interventions were performed in 323 (27.7%) patients. Patients’ American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical scales grouped as I, II, III, and IV were 718 (61.6%), 360 (30.9%), 82 (7%), and 5 (0.4%), respectively. Sevoflurane (40.3%), propofol (37.2%), and sodium thiopental (2.5%) were used for anesthetic induction. Neuromuscular block was performed with rocuronium (56.7%) and atracurium (14.4%). Neuromuscular blocking agents were not used in 337 patients (28.9%). A blood transfusion was required in 120 patients (10.3%), and 40% of these patients underwent surgery for craniosynostosis. Two-hundred twenty-two (19.1%) were monitored with IONM, and IOMR was carried out in 124 (10.6%) of the cases. The anesthesia-related complication rate was 5.15% (60 patients). Conclusion: Although pediatric neurosurgical interventions involve high risks, they are becoming increasingly common in our daily practice. Neuroanesthesiologists should know the procedures, techniques, and advances for safe and effective management of pediatric neurosurgical cases. We think that these data may be helpful as a guide for the anesthetic management of pediatric neurosurgical cases.

Effect of scalp nerve block with ropivacaine on postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Scalp nerve block (SNB) is widely used for postoperative pain control, intraoperative hemodynamic control, and opioid-sparing in adult craniotomies. However, there are few studies of SNB in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effect of SNB on postoperative pain, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and narcotic consumption in pediatric craniotomy under general anesthesia.

Methods

This trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. A total of 50 children aged between 2 and 12 years who are undergoing elective brain tumor surgery will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 0.2% ropivacaine for SNB (group SNB, intervention group, n = 25) or the same volume of saline (group Ctrl, control group, n = 25). The primary outcome was to assess the score of postoperative pain intensity at time 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using the FLACC score method. Secondary outcomes were to record intraoperative hemodynamic variables (MAP and HR) during skull-pin fixation, skin incision and end of skin closure, intraoperative total consumption of remifentanil and propofol, postoperative opioid consumption, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Results

Fifty patients were analyzed (n = 25 in SNB group; n = 25 in control group). Compared to the control group, postoperative pain intensity was significantly relieved in the SNB group up to 8 h post-operatively. In addition, SNB provided good intraoperative hemodynamic stability, reduced intraoperative overall propofol and remifentanil consumption rate, and postoperative fentanyl consumption compared to the control group. However, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not different between SNB and the control group.

Conclusions

In pediatric craniotomies, SNB with 0.2% ropivacaine provides adequate postoperative pain control and good intraoperative hemodynamic stability during noxious events compared to the control group.

Clinical trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry [No: ChiCTR2100050594], Prospective registration.