A pilot study of multiple time points and multidomain assessment in cerebrospinal fluid tap test for patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Temporary Drainage of Cerebrospinal Fluid for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hydrocephalus

Lumbar puncture is a frequently used procedure in the diagnosis and treatment of CSF disorders. Specialized tests such as the lumbar tap test and CSF infusion study are often used in the assessment of patients with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), but their utility in this setting is questionable. The Extended Lumbar Drainage (ELD) test is a better test for ruling out possible shunt responsiveness in iNPH but still has limitations. External ventricular drainage is an important temporizing measure in acute hydrocephalus particularly in the presence of possible infection or hemorrhagic CSF.

Standardizing the large-volume "tap test" for evaluating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by the clinical triad of gait, cognitive, and urinary dysfunction associated with ventriculomegaly on neuroimaging. Clinical evaluation before and after CSF removal via large volume lumbar puncture (the "tap test") is used to determine a patient's potential to benefit from shunt placement. Although clinical guidelines for iNPH exist, a standardized protocol detailing the procedural methodology of the tap test is lacking.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed and Embase identifying studies of the tap test in iNPH was performed, centered on four clinical questions (volume of CSF to remove, type of needle for lumbar puncture, which clinical assessments to utilize, and timing of assessments). A modified Delphi approach was then applied to develop a consensus standardized tap test protocol for the evaluation of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Two hundred twenty-two full-text articles encompassing a total of 80,322 participants with iNPH met eligibility and were reviewed. Variations in the tap test protocol resulted in minimal concordance among studies. A standardized protocol of the tap test was iteratively developed over a two-year period by members of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Study Group until expert consensus was reached.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature shows significant variability in the procedural methodology of the tap test. The proposed protocol was subsequently developed to standardize clinical management, improve patient outcomes, and better align future research in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

The PUMCH Evaluation System of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

Differentiating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) from other neurodegenerative diseases is challenging. Only a portion of the patients clinically suspected of iNPH would respond to surgical intervention. A cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test is usually used to predict surgery outcomes and hence aid clinical decision-making, but the workup varies. We introduce the CSF tap test conducted at our center and examine its power by analyzing data from a series of iNPH cases that underwent shunt placement. We analyze common features in the past medical history of our patients and investigate whether they are related to the etiology of iNPH.

METHODS

Data from 20 patients who were positive in the tap tests preoperatively and received ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative performance data were analyzed. History of any underlying medical conditions was taken into consideration. Patients with negative tap test results of the same period were also followed up.

RESULTS

We performed VPS placement in 20 NPH patients from October 2019 to February 2022. Of these, 90% exhibited improvement in at least 1 of the clinical triad, proving the predictive power of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital test workflow. The underlying conditions like hypertension, diabetes and insufficiency in cerebral blood supply were also found to be associated with the onset of NPH.

CONCLUSION

Our evaluation system is a valid tool for NPH assessment and can guide clinical decision-making. Comorbidities should be taken into consideration as they contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of NPH. Better identification of potential iNPH patients will lower the burden exerted on the family and the aging society.