Timing to imaging and surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

The optimal timing between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery of breast cancer: A brief systematic review of the literature

Neoadjuvant therapy is a cornerstone of some early and locally advanced breast cancer treatment. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in fact, allows to obtain numerous advantages, including allowing a more conservative intervention, evaluating the in vivo response to therapy, modulating the intensity of subsequent treatments based on the degree of response to therapy and allowing to surgery with information on genetics. However, at the end of neoadjuvant cytotoxic therapy it is not possible to carry out surgery immediately, as a certain amount of time is required for recovery from toxicity, especially haematological, due to the systemic therapy itself. At the same time, it is intuitive that too much time must not pass between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. The goal of this systematic literature review is to summarize the most relevant literature data on this topic, selected and extracted according to the methodology of systematic reviews.

Texture Analysis of DCE-MRI Intratumoral Subregions to Identify Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors

Purpose

To evaluate the potential of the texture features extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) intratumoral subregions to distinguish benign from malignant breast tumors.

Materials and Methods

A total of 299 patients with pathologically verified breast tumors who underwent breast DCE-MRI examination were enrolled in this study, including 124 benign cases and 175 malignant cases. The whole tumor area was semi-automatically segmented on the basis of subtraction images of DCE-MRI in Matlab 2018b. According to the time to peak of the contrast agent, the whole tumor area was partitioned into three subregions: early, moderate, and late. A total of 467 texture features were extracted from the whole tumor area and the three subregions, respectively. Patients were divided into training (n = 209) and validation (n = 90) cohorts by different MRI scanners. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select the optimal feature subset in the training cohort. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was first performed on texture features selected by LASSO to test whether the samples followed a normal distribution. Two machine learning methods, decision tree (DT) and support vector machine (SVM), were used to establish classification models with a 10-fold cross-validation method. The performance of the classification models was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

In the training cohort, the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) for the DT_Whole model and SVM_Whole model were 0.744 and 0.806, respectively. In contrast, the AUCs of the DT_Early model (P = 0.004), DT_Late model (P = 0.015), SVM_Early model (P = 0.002), and SVM_Late model (P = 0.002) were significantly higher: 0.863 (95% CI, 0.808-0.906), 0.860 (95% CI, 0.806-0.904), 0.934 (95% CI, 0.891-0.963), and 0.921 (95% CI, 0.876-0.954), respectively. The SVM_Early model and SVM_Late model achieved better performance than the DT_Early model and DT_Late model (P = 0.003, 0.034, 0.008, and 0.026, respectively). In the validation cohort, the AUCs for the DT_Whole model and SVM_Whole model were 0.670 and 0.708, respectively. In comparison, the AUCs of the DT_Early model (P = 0.006), DT_Late model (P = 0.043), SVM_Early model (P = 0.001), and SVM_Late model (P = 0.007) were significantly higher: 0.839 (95% CI, 0.747-0.908), 0.784 (95% CI, 0.601-0.798), 0.890 (95% CI, 0.806-0.946), and 0.865 (95% CI, 0.777-0.928), respectively.

Conclusion

The texture features from intratumoral subregions of breast DCE-MRI showed potential in identifying benign and malignant breast tumors.