Pulmonary cavitations as an atypical CT finding in COVID-19 patients

COVID-19 associated lung cavitary lesions: A case series

Background

Our study discusses the probable etiologies and characteristics of pulmonary cavities in post-COVID-19 patients. A pulmonary cavity is a late complication of the disease, yet it has led to multiple referrals to our tertiary hospital in Tehran, Iran.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective case-series study on 20 patients who were admitted to our center between April 2020 and September 2021. They were all diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitantly developed pulmonary cavities. We assessed their electronic medical records in 2021 and compared their characteristics with other studies based on the available literature.

Result

Of the 20 patients with cavities, 12 (60%) had been diagnosed with prior COVID-19, and 9 (45%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. 9 patients (45%) had bacterial superinfections while 4 (44%) had fungal infections. All patients received corticosteroids, but only 4 (20%) were additionally administered Tocilizumab.

Conclusion

COVID-19 patients can develop pulmonary cavities during recovery; however, this infrequent radiologic finding depends on specific risk factors.

[Risk factors of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 pneumonia]

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 pneumonia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study included 8261 patients with COVID-19 between April 2020 and March 2022. Inclusion criteria: age >18 years, COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Two cohorts of patients were formed: 40 patients with pulmonary cavitation and 40 patients without these lesions. Both groups were comparable in age, lung lesion volume and oxygenation. Sex, age, length of hospital-stay, CT grade of lung lesion, comorbidities, treatment, respiratory support, oxygen saturation and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated. The highest lung lesion volume during hospitalization was assessed. CT was performed upon admission and approximately every 5 days for evaluation of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corporation, USA).

RESULTS

Patients with pulmonary cavitation significantly differed in age, SpO2, lung lesion volume, more common non-invasive ventilation and prolonged hospital-stay. Cardiovascular diseases were more common in both groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed age, cardiovascular diseases, CT-based severity of lung damage, absence of biological therapy and non-invasive ventilation as risk factors of pulmonary cavitation. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, these predictors were CT-based severity of lung damage and absence of biological therapy. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that pulmonary cavitation had no significant effect on mortality (OR=2.613, 95% CI: 0.732-9.322, p=0.139).

CONCLUSION

The risk of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 is directly related to advanced lung damage and untimely or absent biological therapy with IL-6 inhibitors. Pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 is not a typical manifestation of disease and can be caused by some factors: fungal infection, secondary bacterial infection, tuberculosis and pulmonary infarction. Further study of this problem is required to develop diagnostic algorithms and treatment tactics.

Co-Infections and Superinfections in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients Are Associated with CT Imaging Abnormalities and the Worst Outcomes

Background: Bacterial and fungal co-infections and superinfections have a critical role in the outcome of the COVID-19 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: The present study is a retrospective analysis of 95 patients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19-related ARDS during the first (February−May 2020) and second waves of the pandemic (October 2020−January 2021). Demographic and clinical data, CT imaging features, and pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications were recorded, as well as the temporal evolution of CT findings when more than one scan was available. The presence of co-infections and superinfections was registered, reporting the culprit pathogens and the specimen type for culture. A comparison between patients with and without bacterial and/or co-infections/superinfections was performed. Results: Sixty-three patients (66.3%) developed at least one confirmed co-infection/superinfection, with 52 (82.5%) developing pneumonia and 43 (68.3%) bloodstream infection. Gram-negative bacteria were the most common co-pathogens identified and Aspergillus spp. was the most frequent pulmonary microorganism. Consolidations, cavitations, and bronchiectasis were significantly associated with the presence of co-infections/superinfections (p = 0.009, p = 0.010 and p = 0.009, respectively); when considering only patients with pulmonary co-pathogens, only consolidations remained statistically significative (p = 0.004). Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis was significantly associated with the presence of cavitations and bronchiectasis (p < 0.001). Patients with co-infections/superinfections presented a significantly higher mortality rate compared to patients with COVID-19 only (52.4% vs. 25%, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Bacterial and fungal co-infections and superinfections are frequent in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU and are associated with worse outcomes. Imaging plays an important role in monitoring critically ill COVID-19 patients and may help detect these complications, suggesting further laboratory investigations.

Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Infarction Complicated by Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Case Report

Pulmonary cavitation is an atypical finding in COVID-19 patients. In this rare case report, a 63-year-old woman (35 days from COVID-19 symptom onset) presented to our emergency department with acute chest pain and shortness of breath. A chest X-ray established right-sided total pneumothorax, hence a tube thoracostomy was performed. Due to a persistent air leak, chest computed tomography was performed, which showed areas of lung consolidation and a cavitary mass in the upper lobe of the right lung. The woman undertook a thoracoscopy, which established multiple petechiae on the lung surface and a bronchopleural fistula of the right lung’s upper lobe. The treatment of choice was an atypical lung resection to remove the necrotic cavitary lesion. Histological and microbiological examination of the resected lung specimen showed a bland (aseptic) cavitary pulmonary infarct. Pulmonary infarction is a rare cause of cavitation in COVID-19 patients, nonetheless, something that should be considered in those presenting with respiratory symptoms or complications during or post-COVID-19.

Cavitary lung disease in hospitalized patients: Differences between melioidosis and tuberculosis

To differentiate cavitary lung lesions caused by melioidosis and tuberculosis is challenging, especially in endemic countries. A study with a matched-sampling method (16 cavitary pulmonary melioidosis vs. 16 cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis) showed characteristics of bacterial infection more obvious and severe in the melioidosis patients, which were useful to distinguish two conditions.

COVID-19 in Egypt after a year: the first and second pandemic waves from the radiological point of view; multi-center comparative study on 2000 patients

Background

One year has passed since the announcement of COVID-19 as a pandemic and two waves had already stricken Egypt. The authors witnessed several atypical radiological features through the second pandemic wave, either early at the active infective stage or delayed at the post-infectious convalescent period. They believed every radiologist should be familiar with these features. Therefore, they performed this comparative study on 2000 Egyptian patients using multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) to highlight the radiological differences between the first and second pandemic waves and correlate them to the clinical status.

Results

This random multi-center comparative study was retrospectively conducted on 2000 COVID-19 Egyptian patients; 1000 patients were registered at the first pandemic wave from April 2020 till September 2020, while the other 1000 patients were registered at the second pandemic wave from October 2020 till March 2020. Follow up CT examinations were performed for 49 and 122 patients through the first and second pandemic waves respectively. MSCT examinations were carefully evaluated by four expert consulting radiologists who came to a consensus. Meanwhile, the correlation with the clinical outcome was performed by two consulting pulmonologists. During the second pandemic wave, the prevalence rate of the “crazy-paving” pattern had significantly increased by 1.3 times (P value = 0.002). Additionally, the prevalence rate of the “air-bubble” sign had significantly increased by 1.9 times (P value = 0.02). Similarly, the presence of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (> 1 cm in short-axis diameter) had significantly increased by 1.7 times (P value = 0.036). Furthermore, the prevalence rate of pericardial effusion had significantly increased by 2.5 times (P value = 0.003). The above-mentioned signs were correlated to increased clinical severity and higher rates of hospitalization. Unexpectedly, other atypical radiological signs were only encountered through the second pandemic wave, including bronchiectatic changes (2.5%), “head-cheese” pattern (0.8%), cavitation (0.5%), and “bulls-eye” sign (0.2%). The prevalence rate of post-COVID fibrosis had doubled through the second wave but not in a significant way (P value = 0.234). Secondary fungal infection was only encountered throughout the second pandemic wave in four patients. COVID-19 reinfection was encountered in a single patient only during the second pandemic wave.

Conclusion

After 1 year from the announcement of COVID-19 as a pandemic, the radiological presentation of COVID-19 patients showed some significant differences between its first and second waves.