Evaluation of the LI-RADS treatment response algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma after trans-arterial chemoembolization

LI-RADS Nonradiation Treatment Response Algorithm Version 2024: Diagnostic Performance and Impact of Ancillary Features

BACKGROUND. LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm (TRA) version 2024 (v2024) introduced separate algorithms for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) viability after radiation and nonradiation locoregional therapies (LRTs). The nonradiation algorithm incorporated MRI-based ancillary features to optionally upgrade lesions from LR-TR Equivocal to LR-TR Viable. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with that of LI-RADS TRA version 2017 (v2017) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for evaluating HCC response to LRT on MRI, with attention given to the impact of ancillary features. METHODS. This retrospective study included 231 patients (198 men and 33 women; median age, 56 years) who underwent LRT for HCC followed by liver resection or transplant between January 2017 and December 2022. Two radiologists (reader 1 and reader 2) independently evaluated treated lesions (n = 306) using LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024, LI-RADS TRA v2017, and mRECIST. Lesions were classified as showing pathologic viability (n = 249) or complete pathologic necrosis (n = 57) based on curative surgery pathology. The diagnostic performance for pathologic viability was compared using Bonferroni-adjusted McNemar tests, with LR-TR Equivocal assessments classified as test negative. RESULTS. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features were 85.5%, 75.4%, and 83.7%, respectively, for reader 1 and 87.2%, 63.2%, and 82.7%, respectively, for reader 2; for LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 without ancillary features, they were 81.1%, 78.9%, and 80.7%, respectively, for reader 1 and 80.3%, 78.9%, and 80.1%, respectively, for reader 2; for LI-RADS TRA v2017, they were 79.9%, 82.5%, and 80.4%, respectively, for reader 1 and 79.1%, 79.0%, and 79.1%, respectively, for reader 2; and for mRECIST, they were 83.9%, 54.4%, and 78.4%, respectively, for reader 1 and 87.2%, 40.4%, and 78.4%, respectively, for reader 2. LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than LI-RADS Nonradiation v2024 without ancillary features (both readers), higher sensitivity than LI-RADS TRA v2017 (both readers), higher specificity than mRECIST (both readers), and higher accuracy than LI-RADS TRA v2017 (reader 2) (p < .008); remaining comparisons between LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features and other systems were not significant (p > .008). CONCLUSION. LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 showed good diagnostic performance in detecting pathologic viability. Ancillary features yielded improved sensitivity and accuracy without a significant change in specificity. CLINICAL IMPACT. Use of LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features is recommended for guiding prognostic assessments and treatment decisions after LRT.

Association of LR treatment response category with outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma on explant pathology

OBJECTIVES

Liver transplant (LT) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in appropriately selected patients. Locoregional therapy (LRT) is often performed to extend a patient's eligibility for LT. Imaging has a modest sensitivity of approximately 40-77% for detecting pathologically viable HCC in post-LRT patients. The impact on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is unclear. We hypothesize that Liver Imaging Reporting & Data Systems Treatment Response (LI-RADS TR) category is equivalently correlated with long-term survival and overall disease-free progression when compared to explant pathology findings. We additionally hypothesize that neoadjuvant LRT can improve OS and DFS in LT patients initially within MC.

METHODS

Patients found to have HCC on explant between January 2005 and December 2021 were included. A total of 167 patients were divided into treatment (any pre-LT LRT except for Y-90 therapy) and control (no pre-LT LRT) groups. Of the patients who received pre-LT LRT, imaging studies were reviewed by two abdominal radiologists using 2018 LI-RADS criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models to assess OS and DFS.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in OS or DFS (p = 0.23 and p = 0.22 respectively) was initially found. Given significant difference in age between the groups (p < 0.0001), Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for age with statistical significance reached for better OS and DFS in the treatment group (p = 0.05 and p = 0.05 respectively). Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no difference between treatment response groups regarding overall survival or disease-free survival, presumably because of low number of HCC recurrences in our patient population (4%).

CONCLUSION

Despite not reaching statistical significance, LI-RADS TR categorization demonstrates a good interreader agreement (Kappa 0.6), helping radiologists feel comfortable that modest sensitivity of the LI-RADS TR treatment response category for detecting pathologically active malignancy does not confer a negative clinical outcome.

LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features

BACKGROUND

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm (TRA) (LI-RADS TRA) is used for assessing response of HCC to locoregional therapy (LRT), however, the value of ancillary features (AFs) for TACE-treated HCCs has not been extensively investigated on extracellular agent MRI (ECA-MRI).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018 TRA on ECA-MRI for HCC treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the value of ancillary features.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent TACE for HCC and then followed by hepatic surgery between January 2019 and June 2023 with both pre- and post-TACE contrast-enhanced MRI available. Two radiologists independently evaluated the post-treated lesions on MRI using LI-RADS treatment response (TR) (LR-TR) algorithm and modified LR-TR (mLR-TR) algorithm in which ancillary features (restricted diffusion and intermediate T2-weighted hyperintensity) were added, respectively. Lesions were categorized as complete pathologic necrosis (100%, CPN) and non-complete pathologic necrosis (< 100%, non-CPN) on the basis of surgical pathology. The diagnostic performance in predicting viable and non-viable tumors based on LR-TR and mLR-TR algorithms was compared using the McNemar test. Interreader agreement was calculated by using Cohen's weighted and unweighted κ.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients [mean age 59 years ± 10 (standard deviation); 47 men] with 79 lesions (57 pathologically viable) were included. For non-CPN prediction, the sensitivity, specificity of LR-TR viable and mLR-TR viable category were 75% (43 of 57), 82% (18 of 22) and 88% (50 of 57), 77% (17 of 22), respectively, the sensitivity of mLR-TR was significantly higher than that of LR-TR (P = 0.016) without difference in specificity (P = 1.000). Interreader agreement for LR-TR and mLR-TR category was moderate (k = 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.33, 0.67, k = 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20, 0.63). The sensitivity of both LR-TR and mLR-TR algorithms in predicting viable tumors between conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) did not have significant difference (cTACE: 76%, 89% vs. DEB-TACE: 73%, 82%).

CONCLUSIONS

On ECA-MRI, applying ancillary features to LI-RADS v2018 TRA can improve the sensitivity in predicting pathologic tumor viability in patients treated with TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma with no significant difference in specificity.

Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI

As the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and subsequent treatments with liver-directed therapies rise, the complexity of assessing lesion response has also increased. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was created to standardize the assessment of response after locoregional therapy (LRT) on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Originally created based on expert opinion, these guidelines are currently undergoing revision based on emerging evidence. While many studies support the use of LR-TRA for evaluation of HCC response after thermal ablation and intra-arterial embolic therapy, data suggest a need for refinements to improve assessment after radiation therapy. In this manuscript, we review expected MR imaging findings after different forms of LRT, clarify how to apply the current LI-RADS TRA by type of LRT, explore emerging literature on LI-RADS TRA, and highlight future updates to the algorithm. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Radiological findings in non-surgical recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: From locoregional treatments to immunotherapy

Since hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents an important cause of mortality and morbidity all over the world. Currently, it is fundamental not only to achieve a curative treatment but also to manage in the best way any possible recurrence. Even if the latest update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines for HCC treatment has introduced new locoregional techniques and confirmed others as well-established clinical practices, there is still no consensus about the treatment of recurrent HCC (RHCC). Locoregional treatments and medical therapy represent two of the most widely accepted approaches for disease control, especially in the advanced stage of liver disease. Different medical treatments are now approved, and others are under investigation. On this basis, radiology plays a central role in the diagnosis of RHCC and the assessment of response to locoregional treatments and medical therapy for RHCC. This review summarized the actual clinical practice by underlining the importance of the radiological approach both in the diagnosis and treatment of RHCC.

LI-RADS Treatment Response versus Modified RECIST for Diagnosing Viable Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Locoregional Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Purpose

To systematically compare the performance of liver imaging reporting and data system treatment response (LR-TR) with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) for diagnosing viable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with locoregional therapy (LRT).

Materials and Methods

Original studies of intra-individual comparisons between the diagnostic performance of LR-TR and mRECIST using dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI were searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE, up to August 25, 2021. The reference standard for tumor viability was surgical pathology. The meta-analytic pooled sensitivity and specificity of the viable category using each criterion were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model and compared using bivariate meta-regression.

Results

For five eligible studies (430 patients with 631 treated observations), the pooled per-lesion sensitivities and specificities were 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45%–70%) and 93% (95% CI, 88%–96%) for the LR-TR viable category and 56% (95% CI, 42%–69%) and 86% (95% CI, 72%–94%) for the mRECIST viable category, respectively. The LR-TR viable category provided significantly higher pooled specificity (p < 0.01) than the mRECIST but comparable pooled sensitivity (p = 0.53).

Conclusion

The LR-TR algorithm demonstrated better specificity than mRECIST, without a significant difference in sensitivity for the diagnosis of pathologically viable HCC after LRT.