Nonconvulsive seizures: developing a rational approach to the diagnosis and management in the critically ill population

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in patients under intensive care: Should we view epilepsy as a sleep disorder?

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) was initially described in patients with typical and atypical absence status epilepticus (ASE) characterized by states of confusion varying in severity and in focal epilepsies with or without alteration of consciousness. Continuous EEG monitoring of critically ill patients has further refined the classification of NCSE into two main categories: with coma and without coma. Hypnotic, soporific or somniferous epileptic seizures do not exist. On the contrary, patients usually awaken when seizures occur during sleep, and their eyes remain open during ASE. Excessive sleepiness and coma alone are not ictal signs but are observed in the postictal phase of convulsive seizures. On the other hand, excessive sleepiness evolving into coma is a cardinal sign of metabolic/toxic encephalopathies with triphasic waves evolving to burst suppression patterns and ultimately to cerebral inactivity and death. NCSE alone does not directly cause coma. Comas are related to the underlying etiology, patient age and comorbidities, as well as the administration of intravenous sedative drugs to control epileptic seizures. In cases of severe brain injury, NCSE can explain the failure to awaken after the withdrawal of anesthetics and is only an aggravating factor of the neurological condition. In typical ASE, which is characterized by sustained, rhythmic, bilateral, synchronous and unreactive discharges with evolving spatiotemporal patterns (the best example of NCSE), there is no vigilance impairment. This contrasts with metabolic/toxic encephalopathies, which exhibit monomorphic generalized periodic discharges in which patients may become comatose and die. The extended concept of NCSE in comatose patients may lead to an inflated assessment of NCSE, implying a potentially worse prognosis compared to convulsive status epilepticus.

Use of ketamine in Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This review specifically investigates ketamine's role in SRSE management.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to May 1st, 2023, for English-language literature. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies on SRSE in humans of all ages and genders treated with ketamine.

RESULTS

In this systematic review encompassing 19 studies with 336 participants, age ranged from 9 months to 86 years. Infections, anoxia, and metabolic issues emerged as the common causes of SRSE, while some cases had unknown origins, termed as NORSE (New Onset RSE) or FIRESs (Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome). Most studies categorized SRSE cases into convulsive (N = 105) and non-convulsive (N = 197). Ketamine was used after failed antiepileptics and anesthetics in 17 studies, while in others, it was a first or second line of treatment. Dosages varied from 0.5 mg/kg (bolus) and 0.2-15 mg/kg/hour (maintenance) in adults and 1-3 mg/kg (bolus) and 0.5-3 mg/kg/hour (maintenance) in pediatrics, lasting one to 30 days. Ketamine was concurrently used with other drugs in 40-100% of cases, most frequently propofol and midazolam. Seizure resolution rate varied from 53.3 to 91% and 40-100% in larger (N = 42-68) and smaller case series (N = 5-20) respectively. Seizure resolution occurred in every case of case report except in one in which the patient died. Burst suppression in EEG was reported in 12 patients from two case series and two case reports. Recurrence was reported in 11 patients from five studies. The reported all-cause mortality varied from 38.8 to 59.5% and 0-36.4% in larger and smaller case series., unrelated directly to ketamine dosage or duration.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ketamine demonstrates safety and effectiveness in SRSE, offering advantages over GABAergic drugs by acting on NMDA receptors, providing neuroprotection, and reducing vasopressor requirement.

Emergent Management of Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Status epilepticus is a neurologic emergency that can be life- threatening. The key to effective management is recognition and prompt initiation of treatment. Management of status epilepticus requires a patient-specific-approach framework, consisting of four axes: (1) semiology, (2) etiology, (3) EEG correlate, and (4) age. This article provides a comprehensive overview of status epilepticus, highlighting the current treatment approaches and strategies for management and control.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Administering appropriate doses of antiseizure medication in a timely manner is vital for halting seizure activity. Benzodiazepines are the first-line treatment, as demonstrated by three randomized controlled trials in the hospital and prehospital settings. Benzodiazepines can be administered through IV, intramuscular, rectal, or intranasal routes. If seizures persist, second-line treatments such as phenytoin and fosphenytoin, valproate, or levetiracetam are warranted. The recently published Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial found that all three of these drugs are similarly effective in achieving seizure cessation in approximately half of patients. For cases of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, IV anesthetics, including ketamine and γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABA-ergic) medications, are necessary. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the use of ketamine, not only in the early phases of stage 3 status epilepticus but also as a second-line treatment option.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

As with other neurologic emergencies, "time is brain" when treating status epilepticus. Antiseizure medication should be initiated quickly to achieve seizure cessation. There is a need to explore newer generations of antiseizure medications and nonpharmacologic modalities to treat status epilepticus.

Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus: A Review for Emergency Clinicians

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is divided into convulsive status epilepticus and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).

OBJECTIVE

This review provides a focused evaluation of NCSE for emergency clinicians.

DISCUSSION

NCSE is a form of status epilepticus presenting with prolonged seizure activity. This disease is underdiagnosed, as it presents with nonspecific signs and symptoms, most commonly change in mental status without overt convulsive motor activity. Causes include epilepsy, cerebral pathology or injury, any systemic insult such as infection, and drugs or toxins. Mortality is primarily related to the underlying condition. Patients most commonly present with altered mental status, but other signs and symptoms include abnormal ocular movements and automatisms such as lip smacking or subtle motor twitches in the face or extremities. The diagnosis is divided into electrographic and electroclinical, and although electroencephalogram (EEG) is recommended for definitive diagnosis, emergency clinicians should consider this disease in patients with prolonged postictal state after a seizure with no improvement in mental status, altered mental status with acute cerebral pathology (e.g., stroke, hypoxic brain injury), and unexplained altered mental status. Assessment includes laboratory evaluation and neuroimaging with EEG. Management includes treating life-threatening conditions, including compromise of the airway, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, and hypo- or hyperthermia, followed by rapid cessation of the seizure activity with benzodiazepines and other antiseizure medications.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of the presentation and management of NCSE can assist emergency clinicians in the care of these patients.

Delayed Diagnosis of an Invisible Seizure: Cefepime-Induced Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus

Cefepime-induced non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a recognized adverse event of cefepime. Risk factors for this adverse event include older age, underlying renal dysfunction, previous brain injury, diabetes, and severe infection. We present a case of a 79-year-old woman with no prior seizure history, who was admitted for Pseudomonas aeruginosa surgical wound infection for which she was on cefepime. She developed acute encephalopathy with associated, occasional, right-sided myoclonic facial twitches 11 days into her admission. Electroencephalogram (EEG) confirmed NCSE as evident by epileptiform activity described as generalized periodic discharges with predominantly triphasic morphology. Cefepime was substituted with piperacillin-tazobactam> 24 hours after symptom onset. NCSE completely resolved two days after the discontinuation of cefepime. This case highlights the fact that NCSE can occur even when precautions such as renal dosing of cefepime are observed. Clinicians need to have a high index of suspicion for the condition when taking care of at-risk patients on cefepime, as delayed diagnosis correlates with potentially fatal outcomes.

Rapid-Response Electroencephalography in Seizure Diagnosis and Patient Care: Lessons From a Community Hospital

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonconvulsive seizures are a major source of in-hospital morbidity and a cause of unexplained encephalopathy in critically ill patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) is essential to confirm nonconvulsive seizures and can guide patient-specific workup, treatment, and prognostication. In a 208-bed community hospital, EEG services were limited to 1 part-time EEG technician and 1 EEG machine shared between inpatient and outpatient settings. Its use was restricted to typical business hours. A nursing-led quality improvement (QI) project endeavored to enhance access to EEG by introducing a point-of-care rapid-response EEG program. METHODS: For this project, a multidisciplinary protocol was developed to deploy a Food and Drug Administration-cleared, point-of-care rapid-response EEG platform (Ceribell Inc) in a community hospital's emergency department and inpatient units to streamline neurodiagnostic workups. This QI project compared EEG volume, study location, time-to-EEG, number of cases with seizures captured on EEG, and hospital-level financial metrics of diagnosis-related group reimbursements and length of stay for the 6 months before (pre-QI, using conventional EEG) and 6 months after implementing the rapid-response protocol (post-QI). RESULTS: Electroencephalography volume increased from 35 studies pre-QI to 115 post-QI (3.29-fold increase), whereas the median time from EEG order to EEG start decreased 7.6-fold (74 [34-187] minutes post-QI vs 562 [321-1034] minutes pre-QI). Point-of-care EEG was also associated with more confirmed seizure diagnoses compared with conventional EEG (27/115 post-QI vs 0/35 pre-QI). This resulted in additional diagnosis-related group reimbursements and hospital revenue. Availability of point-of-care EEG was also associated with a shorter median length of stay. CONCLUSION: A nurse-led, rapid-response EEG protocol at a community hospital resulted in significant improvements in EEG accessibility and seizure diagnosis with hospital-level financial benefits. By expanding access to EEG, confirming nonconvulsive seizures, and increasing care efficiency, rapid-response EEG protocols can enhance patient care.

Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus as a Complication of Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment option among the biological treatments introduced in psychiatry. It has been used successfully to treat neurological conditions such as epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, and major psychiatric disorders. Non-convulsive status epilepticus can be seen as a complication after ECT, although it rarely occurs. Due to its rarity, this complication is not yet well understood, is challenging to diagnose, and information about treatment options is limited. Here, we present a 29-year-old patient with no previous neurological disease and a history of schizophrenia and refractory psychosis on clozapine; nonconvulsive status epilepticus was detected in the EEG after ECT.

Status Epilepticus in Older Adults: Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the older population given overlap with other causes of encephalopathy, complicating diagnosis, and the common occurrence of multiple comorbid diseases complicates treatment. First-line therapy involves the use of rescue benzodiazepine in the form of intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, intramuscular or intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam. Second-line therapies include parenteral levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, valproate and lacosamide, and underlying comorbidities guide the choice of appropriate medication, while third-line therapies may be influenced by the patient's code status as well as the cause and type of SE. The standard of care for convulsive SE is treatment with an intravenous anesthetic, including midazolam, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital. There is currently limited evidence guiding appropriate therapy in patients failing third-line therapies. Adjunctive strategies may include immunomodulatory treatments, non-pharmacological strategies such as ketogenic diet, neuromodulation therapies and surgery in select cases. Surrogate decision makers should be updated early and often in refractory episodes of SE and informed of the high morbidity and mortality associated with the disease as well as the high probability of subsequent epilepsy among survivors.

Multimodal monitoring: practical recommendations (dos and don'ts) in challenging situations and uncertainty

With the advancements in modern medicine, new methods are being developed to monitor patients in the intensive care unit. Different modalities evaluate different aspects of the patient's physiology and clinical status. The complexity of these modalities often restricts their use to the realm of clinical research, thereby limiting their use in the real world. Understanding their salient features and their limitations can aid physicians in interpreting the concomitant information provided by multiple modalities to make informed decisions that may affect clinical care and outcomes. Here, we present a review of the commonly used methods in the neurological intensive care unit with practical recommendations for their use.

Electrographic Seizures in the Critically Ill

Identifying and treating critically ill patients with seizures can be challenging. In this article, the authors review the available data on patient populations at risk, seizure prognostication with tools such as 2HELPS2B, electrographic seizures and the various ictal-interictal continuum patterns with their latest definitions and associated risks, ancillary testing such as imaging studies, serum biomarkers, and invasive multimodal monitoring. They also illustrate 5 different patient scenarios, their treatment and outcomes, and propose recommendations for targeted treatment of electrographic seizures in critically ill patients.

Pharmacotherapy for Nonconvulsive Seizures and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus

Most seizures in critically ill patients are nonconvulsive. A significant number of neurological and medical conditions can be complicated by nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), with brain infections, hemorrhages, global hypoxia, sepsis, and recent neurosurgery being the most prominent etiologies. Prolonged NCSs and NCSE can lead to adverse neurological outcomes. Early recognition requires a high degree of suspicion and rapid and appropriate duration of continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring. Although high quality research evaluating treatment with antiseizure medications and long-term outcome is still lacking, it is probable that expeditious pharmacological management of NCSs and NCSE may prevent refractoriness and further neurological injury. There is limited evidence on pharmacotherapy for NCSs and NCSE, although a few clinical trials encompassing both convulsive and NCSE have demonstrated similar efficacy of different intravenous (IV) antiseizure medications (ASMs), including levetiracetam, valproate, lacosamide and fosphenytoin. The choice of specific ASMs lies on tolerability and safety since critically ill patients frequently have impaired renal and/or hepatic function as well as hematological/hemodynamic lability. Treatment frequently requires more than one ASM and occasionally escalation to IV anesthetic drugs. When multiple ASMs are required, combining different mechanisms of action should be considered. There are several enteral ASMs that could be used when IV ASM options have been exhausted. Refractory NCSE is not uncommon, and its treatment requires a very judicious selection of ASMs aiming at reducing seizure burden along with management of the underlying condition.

Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Critically Ill Children: Frequency, Etiology and Outcomes

Background:

Critically ill individuals have an increased risk of acute symptomatic seizures secondary to systemic illnesses; unrecognized or untreated seizures can quickly convert into status epilepticus, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to determine frequency, etiology, and outcome of seizures in critical ill children admitted in intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective review of medical records of all children admitted in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Aga Khan University from January 2016 to December 2018 and who had a new-onset seizure irrespective of underlying diagnosis was carried out after ethical review committee approval. Data were collected on a structured proforma; it included demographic information as well as relevant clinical and outcome information. The data were analyzed on Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software program, version 19.0. The descriptive statistics frequency and percentage was computed for qualitative variable. Mean and standard deviation were computed for quantitative variable, and univariate analysis was performed.

Results:

During the study period, a total 2053 patients were admitted in the PICU. One hundred six (5%) had seizure. Sixty-three (59.5%) were males. Meningitis 21 (20%), sepsis 21 (20%), complicated pneumonia 18 (17%) were the major primary diagnosis in these children. Mean age of the study population was 75 months (standard deviation [SD] ± 54.4) and 72 (68%) were <5 years of age, whereas 63 (59.5%) were males. The seizures lasted >10min in 10 (10%) and were associated with high had neurological deficit (P = 0.001). We did not observe any correlation with electrolyte imbalance, renal failure, need of ventilator support with duration of seizure, and type of seizure (P > 0.005).

Conclusion:

Infection was the most common etiology associated with a new-onset seizure in children admitted in our PICU. Seizures lasting for >10min were observed with high neurological deficit. We did not find any association of mortality with seizure duration.

The Prehospital Evaluation and Care of Moderate/Severe TBI in the Austere Environment

Increased resource constraints secondary to a smaller medical footprint, prolonged evacuation times, or overwhelming casualty volumes all increase the challenges of effective management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the austere environment. Prehospital providers are responsible for the battlefield recognition and initial management of TBI. As such, targeted education is critical to efficient injury recognition, promoting both provider readiness and improved patient outcomes. When austere conditions limit or prevent definitive treatment, a comprehensive understanding of TBI pathophysiology can help inform acute care and enhance prevention of secondary brain injury. Field deployable, noninvasive TBI assessment and monitoring devices are urgently needed and are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Evidence shows that the assessment, monitoring, and treatment in the first few hours and days after injury should focus on the preservation of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation. For cases where medical management is inadequate (eg, evidence of an enlarging intracranial hematoma), guidelines have been developed for the performance of cranial surgery by nonneurosurgeons. TBI management in the austere environment will continue to be a challenge, but research focused on improving evidence-based monitoring and therapeutic interventions can help to mitigate some of these challenges and improve patient outcomes.

Status Epilepticus: Work-Up and Management in Adults

Status epilepticus is one of the most common neurological emergencies and is likely to have increasing prevalence in coming years given an aging "baby boomer" population in the United States. Because status epilepticus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, identification and treatment are paramount. Care should be taken to exclude nonorganic mimics and infectious and metabolic causes. Status epilepticus can be classified into stages with associated recommendations for escalation in therapy, increasing from push-dose benzodiazepines to continuous anesthetic infusions and other nontraditional therapies. Concurrent electroencephalogram monitoring helps to identify, localize, and assess resolution of ictal patterns alongside antiseizure drug administration. A protocol is proposed for the management of status epilepticus in a step-wise fashion.

Ictal-interictal continuum: a review of recent advancements

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) has become an indispensable technique in the management of critically ill patients for early detection and treatment of non-convulsive seizures (NCS) and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). It has also brought about a renaissance in a wide range of rhythmic and periodic patterns with heterogeneous frequency and morphology. These patterns share the rhythmic and sharp appearances of electrographic seizures, but often lack the necessary frequency, spatiotemporal evolution and clinical accompaniments to meet the definitive criteria for ictal patterns. They may be associated with cerebral metabolic crisis and neuronal injury, therefore not clearly interictal either, but lie along an intervening spectrum referred to as ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). Generally speaking, rhythmic and periodic patterns are categorized as interictal patterns when occurring at a rate of <1Hz, and are categorized as NCS and NCSE when occurring at a rate of >2.5 Hz with spatiotemporal evolution. As such, IIC commonly includes the rhythmic and periodic patterns occurring at a rate of 1–2.5 Hz without spatiotemporal evolution and clinical correlates. Currently there are no evidence-based guidelines on when and if to treat patients with IIC patterns, and particularly how aggressively to treat, presenting a challenging electrophysiological and clinical conundrum. In practice, a diagnostic trial with preferably a non-sedative anti-seizure medication (ASM) can be considered with the end point being both clinical and electrographic improvement. When available and necessary, correlation of IIC with biomarkers of neuronal injury, such as neuronal specific enolase (NSE), neuroimaging, depth electrode recording, cerebral microdialysis and oxygen measurement, can be assessed for the consideration of ASM treatment. Here we review the recent advancements in their clinical significance, risk stratification and treatment algorithm.

Epileptic Seizures in Critically Ill Patients: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes

Epileptic seizures in critically ill patients represent a major source of concern, because they are associated with significant mortality and morbidity rates. Despite recent advances that have enabled a better understanding of the global epidemiology of this entity, epileptic seizures in critically ill patients remain associated with a high degree of uncertainty and numerous questions remain unanswered. The present Special Issue aims to invite authors to contribute original research articles as well as review articles related to all aspects of epileptic seizures in critically ill patients, diagnosis, management, and outcomes.

Dexamethasone as Abortive Treatment for Refractory Seizures or Status Epilepticus in the Inpatient Setting

Refractory seizures or status epilepticus (RS/SE) continues to be a challenge in the inpatient setting. Failure to abort a seizure with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may lead to intubation and treatment with general anesthesia exposing patients to complications, extending hospitalization, and increasing the cost of care. Studies have shown a key role of inflammatory mediators in seizure generation and termination. We describe 4 patients with RS/SE that was aborted when dexamethasone was added to conventional AEDs: a 61-year-old female with temporal lobe epilepsy who presented with delirium, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and oculomyoclonic status; a 56-year-old female with history of traumatic left frontal lobe hemorrhage who developed right face and hand epilepsia partialis continua followed by refractory focal clonic seizures; a 51-year-old male with history of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage who exhibited left-sided epilepsia partialis continua; and a 75-year-old female with history of breast cancer who manifested nonconvulsive status epilepticus and refractory focal clonic seizures. All patients continued experiencing RS/SE despite first- and second-line therapy, and one patient continued to experience RS/SE despite third-line therapy. Failure to abort RS/SE with conventional therapy motivated us to administer intravenous dexamethasone. A 10-mg load was given (except in one patient) followed by 4.0- 5.2 mg q6h. All clinical and electrographic seizures stopped 3-4 days after starting dexamethasone. When dexamethasone was discontinued 1-3 days after seizures stopped, all patients remained seizure-free on 2-3 AEDs. The cessation of RS/SE when dexamethasone was added to conventional antiseizure therapy suggests that inflammatory processes are involved in the pathogenesis of RS/SE.

Rapid Response Electroencephalography for Urgent Evaluation of Patients in Community Hospital Intensive Care Practice

INTRODUCTION

Limited access to specialized technicians and trained neurologists results in delayed access to electroencephalography (EEG) and an accurate diagnosis of patients with critical neurological problems. This study evaluated the performance of Ceribell Rapid Response EEG System (RR-EEG), which promises fast EEG acquisition and interpretation without traditional technicians or EEG-trained specialists.

METHODS

The new technology was tested in a community hospital intensive care unit in Northern California. Three physicians (without previous training in EEG) were trained by the manufacturer of the RR-EEG and acquired EEG without the help of any EEG technicians. Time needed from order to EEG acquisition was noted. Quality of EEG and diagnostic information obtained with the new EEG technology were evaluated and compared with the same information from conventional clinical EEG system.

RESULTS

Ten patients were tested with this new EEG technology, and 6 of these patients went on to have conventional EEGs when the EEG technicians arrived at the site. In these cases, the conventional EEG was significantly delayed (11.2 ± 3.6 hours) compared with RR-EEG (5.0 ± 2.4 minutes; P < .005). Use of RR-EEG helped clinicians rule out status epilepticus and prevent overtreatment in 4 of 10 cases. RR-EEG and conventional EEG systems yielded similar diagnostic information.

CONCLUSION

RR-EEG can be set up by nurses, and diagnostic information about the presence or absence of seizures can be appreciated by nurses. The RR-EEG system, compared with the conventional EEG, did not require EEG technologists and enabled significantly faster access to diagnostic EEG information. This report confirms the ease of use and speed of acquisition and interpretation of EEG information at a community hospital setting using an RR-EEG device. This new technology has the potential to improve emergent clinical decision making and prevent overtreatment of patients in the intensive care unit setting while empowering nursing staff with useful diagnostic information in real time and at the bedside.

Clinical, Electroencephalographic Features and Prognostic Factors of Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) has been previously underestimated, and there have only been sporadic reports from critical neurological settings. The present study aimed to investigate the potential factors associated with disease development, electroencephalography (EEG) sub-classification, and outcome measures.

METHODS

The 10-year medical records of patients who underwent EEG between 2007 and 2016 at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan, and developed encephalopathy after cefepime therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Age- and sex-matched controls were included for further analysis. Demographic data, the occurrence of clinical seizures, non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), receiving maintenance or urgent hemodialysis, EEG findings, and functional outcomes were analyzed. The Chi-square test and a logistic regression model were applied to survey significant prognostic factors relating to mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 42 CIN patients were identified, including 25 patients from wards and 17 from intensive care units; their mean age was 75.8 ± 11.8 years. Twenty-one patients (50%) had chronic kidney disease, and 18 (43%) had acute kidney injury. Among these patients, 32 (76%) received appropriate cefepime dose adjustment. Three patients had a normal renal function at the time of CIN onset. The logistic regression model suggested that maintenance hemodialysis and longer duration of cefepime use were independently associated with the development of CIN, with odds ratios of 3.8 and 1.2, respectively. NCSE was frequently noted in the CIN patients (64%). Generalized periodic discharge with or without triphasic morphology was the most common EEG pattern (38%), followed by generalized rhythmic delta activity and generalized spike-and-waves. AEDs were administered to 86% of the patients. A total of 17 patients (40%) did not survive to hospital discharge. Adequate cefepime dose adjustment and early cefepime discontinuation led to a better prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CIN was associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Neurotoxic symptoms could still occur when the cefepime dose was adjusted, or in patients with normal renal function. Patients with maintenance hemodialysis or a longer duration of cefepime therapy tended to develop CIN. Early recognition of abnormal EEG findings allowed for the withdrawal of the offending agent, resulting in clinical improvements and a better prognosis at discharge.

The Ictal-Interictal Continuum: To Treat or Not to Treat (and How)?

Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring is becoming increasingly used in neurologic and non-neurologic intensive care units (ICUs). Non-convulsive seizures (NCSz) and periodic discharges (PDs) are commonly seen in critically ill patients. Some of these PD patterns, also known as the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC), are associated with an increased risk of seizures and poor outcome. However, we do not fully understand the significance of these periodic patterns and the decision of how aggressively to treat remains controversial. IIC patterns are associated with pathophysiologic changes that closely resemble those of seizures. Here we make the argument that, rather than feature description on EEG, associated changes in brain physiology should dictate management choices.

Nonconvulsive epileptic seizure monitoring with incremental learning

Nonconvulsive epileptic seizures (NCSz) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) are two neurological entities associated with increment in morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. In a previous work, we introduced a method which accurately detected NCSz in EEG data (referred here as 'Batch method'). However, this approach was less effective when the EEG features identified at the beginning of the recording changed over time. Such pattern drift is an issue that causes failures of automated seizure detection methods. This paper presents a support vector machine (SVM)-based incremental learning method for NCSz detection that for the first time addresses the seizure evolution in EEG records from patients with epileptic disorders and from ICU having NCSz. To implement the incremental learning SVM, three methodologies are tested. These approaches differ in the way they reduce the set of potentially available support vectors that are used to build the decision function of the classifier. To evaluate the suitability of the three incremental learning approaches proposed here for NCSz detection, first, a comparative study between the three methods is performed. Secondly, the incremental learning approach with the best performance is compared with the Batch method and three other batch methods from the literature. From this comparison, the incremental learning method based on maximum relevance minimum redundancy (MRMR_IL) obtained the best results. MRMR_IL method proved to be an effective tool for NCSz detection in a real-time setting, achieving sensitivity and accuracy values above 99%.

Approach to Managing Periodic Discharges

Use of continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit setting has increased detection of not only subclinical seizures, but also patterns of discharges that have epileptiform features and periodicity yet do not meet the criteria for seizures. These periodic discharges present a clinical challenge: some patterns may reflect brain injury that has already occurred, although there is evidence that some periodic discharges represent an ongoing process causing additional brain injury and necessitate treatment. Herein, we review the available data regarding the clinical significance of different categories of periodic discharges, specifically those that have features physiologically similar to seizures. We propose a stepwise approach to assessment and management of periodic discharges and lay out the general paradigm of (1) clinical assessment including benzodiazepine trial, (2) EEG assessment, with a focus on discharge frequency, and (3) integration of adjunctive data such as neuroimaging and metabolic data when available. A flowchart is provided to simplify and summarize this approach. The goal of this approach is to treat patterns associated with increased risk of seizures and/or additional brain injury, while avoiding unnecessary interventions.

Practical Management of Epileptic Seizures and Status Epilepticus in Adult Palliative Care Patients

In terminally ill patients, paroxysmal or episodic changes of consciousness, movements and behavior are frequent. Due to ambiguous appearance, the correct diagnosis of epileptic seizures (ES) and non-epileptic events (NEE) is often difficult. Treatment is frequently complicated by the underlying condition, and an approach indicated in healthier patients may not always be appropriate in the palliative care setting. This article provides recommendations for diagnosis of ES and NEE and treatment options for ES in adult palliative care patients, including aspects of alternative administration routes for antiepileptic drugs such as intranasal, subcutaneous, or rectal application.

Updates in Refractory Status Epilepticus

Refractory status epilepticus is defined as persistent seizures despite appropriate use of two intravenous medications, one of which is a benzodiazepine. It can be seen in up to 40% of cases of status epilepticus with an acute symptomatic etiology as the most likely cause. New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a recently coined term for refractory status epilepticus where no apparent cause is found after initial testing. A large proportion of NORSE cases are eventually found to have an autoimmune etiology needing immunomodulatory treatment. Management of refractory status epilepticus involves treatment of an underlying etiology in addition to intravenous anesthetics and antiepileptic drugs. Alternative treatment options including diet therapies, electroconvulsive therapy, and surgical resection in case of a focal lesion should be considered. Short-term and long-term outcomes tend to be poor with significant morbidity and mortality with only one-third of patients reaching baseline neurological status.

Detecting silent seizures by their sound

OBJECTIVE

The traditional approach to interpreting electroencephalograms (EEGs) requires physicians with formal training to visually assess the waveforms. This approach can be less practical in critical settings where a trained EEG specialist is not readily available to review the EEG and diagnose ongoing subclinical seizures, such as nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

METHODS

We have developed a novel method by which EEG data are converted to sound in real time by letting the underlying electrophysiological signal modulate a voice tone that is in the audible range. Here, we explored whether individuals without any prior EEG training could listen to 15-second sonified EEG and determine whether the EEG represents seizures or nonseizure conditions. We selected 84 EEG samples to represent seizures (n = 7), seizure-like activity (n = 25), or nonperiodic, nonrhythmic activity (normal or focal/generalized slowing, n = 52). EEGs from single channels in the left and right hemispheres were then converted to sound files. After a 4-minute training video, medical students (n = 34) and nurses (n = 30) were asked to designate each audio sample as "seizure" or "nonseizure." We then compared their performance with that of EEG-trained neurologists (n = 12) and medical students (n = 29) who also diagnosed the same EEGs on visual display.

RESULTS

Nonexperts listening to single-channel sonified EEGs detected seizures with remarkable sensitivity (students, 98% ± 5%; nurses, 95% ± 14%) compared to experts or nonexperts reviewing the same EEGs on visual display (neurologists, 88% ± 11%; students, 76% ± 19%). If the EEGs contained seizures or seizure-like activity, nonexperts listening to sonified EEGs rated them as seizures with high specificity (students, 85% ± 9%; nurses, 82% ± 12%) compared to experts or nonexperts viewing the EEGs visually (neurologists, 90% ± 7%; students, 65% ± 20%).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study confirms that individuals without EEG training can detect ongoing seizures or seizure-like rhythmic periodic patterns by listening to sonified EEG. Although sonification of EEG cannot replace the traditional approaches to EEG interpretation, it provides a meaningful triage tool for fast assessment of patients with suspected subclinical seizures.

Seizures, CSF neurofilament light and tau in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Patients with severe subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) often suffer from complications with delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) due to vasospasm that is difficult to identify by clinical examination. The purpose of this study was to monitor seizures and to measure cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of neurofilament light (NFL) and tau, and to see whether they could be used for predicting preclinical DCI.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 19 patients with aneurysmal SAH who underwent treatment with endovascular coiling. The patients were monitored with continuous EEG (cEEG) and received external ventricular drainage (EVD). CSF samples of neurofilament light (NLF) and total tau (T-tau) protein were collected at day 4 and day 10. Cox regression analysis was applied to evaluate whether seizures and protein biomarkers were associated with DCI and poor outcome.

RESULTS

Seven patients developed DCI (37%), and 4 patients (21%) died within the first 2 months. Six patients (32%) had clinical seizures, and electrographic seizures were noted in one additional patient (4.5%). Increased tau ratio (proportion tau10/tau4) was significantly associated with DCI and hazard ratio [HR=1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.055-1.680. P = .016].

CONCLUSION

Acute symptomatic seizures are common in SAH, but their presence is not predictive of DCI. High values of the tau ratio in the CSF may be associated with development of DCI.

Is Routine Continuous EEG for Traumatic Brain Injury Beneficial?

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with increased risk for early clinical and sub-clinical seizures. The use of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring after TBI allows for identification and treatment of seizures that may otherwise occur undetected. Benefits of “routine” cEEG after TBI remain controversial. We examined the rate of subclinical seizures identified by cEEG in TBI patients admitted to a Level I trauma center. We analyzed a cohort of trauma patients with moderate to severe TBI (head Abbreviated Injury Score ≥3) who received cEEG within seven days of admission between October 2011 and May 2015. Demographics, clinical data, injury severity, and costs were recorded. Clinical characteristics were compared between those with and without seizures as identified by cEEG. A total of 106 TBI patients with moderate to severe TBI received a cEEG during the study period. Most were male (74%) with a mean age of 55 years. Subclinical seizures were identified by cEEG in only 3.8 per cent of patients. Ninety-three per cent were on antiseizure prophylaxis at the time of cEEG. Patients who had subclinical seizures were significantly older than their counterparts (80 vs 54 years, P = 0.03) with a higher mean head Abbreviated Injury Score (5.0 vs 4.0, P = 0.01). Mortality and intensive care unit stay were similar in both groups. Of all TBI patients who were monitored with cEEG, seizures were identified in only 3.8 per cent. Seizures were more likely to occur in older patients with severe head injury. Given the high cost of routine cEEG and the low incidence of subclinical seizures, we recommend cEEG monitoring only when clinically indicated.

Hidden in plain sight: Non-convulsive status epilepticus-Recognition and management

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is an electroclinical state associated with an altered level of consciousness but lacking convulsive motor activity. It can present in a multitude of ways, but classification based on the clinical presentation and electroencephalographic appearances assists in determining prognosis and planning treatment. The aggressiveness of treatment should be based on the likely prognosis and the underlying cause of the NCSE.

An update on the recognition and treatment of non-convulsive status epilepticus in the intensive care unit

INTRODUCTION

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a complex and diverse condition which is often an under-recognised entity in the intensive care unit. When NCSE is identified the optimal treatment strategy is not always clear. Areas covered: This review is based on a literature review of the key literature in the field over the last 5-10 years. The articles were selected based on their importance to the field by the authors. Expert commentary: This review discusses the complex situations when a neurological consultation may occur in a critical care setting and provides an update on the latest evidence regarding the recognition of NCSE and the decision making around determining the aggressiveness of treatment. It also considers the ictal-interictal continuum of conditions which may be met with, particularly in the era of continuous EEG, and provides an approach for dealing with these. Suggestions for how the field will develop are discussed.

cEEG electrode-related pressure ulcers in acutely hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers resulting from continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring in hospitalized patients have gained attention as a preventable medical complication. We measured their incidence and risk factors.

METHODS

We performed an observational investigation of cEEG-electrode-related pressure ulcers (EERPU) among acutely ill patients over a 22-month period. Variables analyzed included age, sex, monitoring duration, hospital location, application methods, vasopressor usage, nutritional status, skin allergies, fever, and presence/severity of EERPU. We examined risk for pressure ulcers vs monitoring duration using Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis, and performed multivariate risk assessment using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Among 1,519 patients, EERPU occurred in 118 (7.8%). Most (n = 109, 92.3%) consisted of hyperemia only without skin breakdown. A major predictor was monitoring duration, with 3-, 5-, and 10-day risks of 16%, 32%, and 60%, respectively. Risk factors included older age (mean age 60.65 vs 50.3, p < 0.01), care in an intensive care unit (9.37% vs 5.32%, p < 0.01), lack of a head wrap (8.31% vs 27.3%, p = 0.02), use of vasopressors (16.7% vs 9.64%, p < 0.01), enteral feeding (11.7% vs 5.45%, p = 0.04), and fever (18.4% vs 9.3%, p < 0.01). Elderly patients (71-80 years) were at higher risk (hazard ratio 6.84 [1.95-24], p < 0.01), even after accounting for monitoring time and other pertinent variables in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

EERPU are uncommon and generally mild. Elderly patients and those with more severe illness have higher risk of developing EERPU, and the risk increases as a function of monitoring duration.

Response Rates to Anticonvulsant Trials in Patients with Triphasic-Wave EEG Patterns of Uncertain Significance

BACKGROUND

Generalized triphasic waves (TPWs) occur in both metabolic encephalopathies and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Empiric trials of benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-sedating AED (NSAEDs) are commonly used to differentiate the two, but the utility of such trials is debated. The goal of this study was to assess response rates of such trials and investigate whether metabolic profile differences affect the likelihood of a response.

METHODS

Three institutions within the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium retrospectively identified patients with unexplained encephalopathy and TPWs who had undergone a trial of BZD and/or NSAEDs to differentiate between ictal and non-ictal patterns. We assessed responder rates and compared metabolic profiles of responders and non-responders. Response was defined as resolution of the EEG pattern and either unequivocal improvement in encephalopathy or appearance of previously absent normal EEG patterns, and further categorized as immediate (within <2 h of trial initiation) or delayed (>2 h from trial initiation).

RESULTS

We identified 64 patients with TPWs who had an empiric trial of BZD and/or NSAED. Most patients (71.9%) were admitted with metabolic derangements and/or infection. Positive clinical responses occurred in 10/53 (18.9%) treated with BZDs. Responses to NSAEDs occurred in 19/45 (42.2%), being immediate in 6.7%, delayed but definite in 20.0%, and delayed but equivocal in 15.6%. Overall, 22/64 (34.4%) showed a definite response to either BZDs or NSAEDs, and 7/64 (10.9%) showed a possible response. Metabolic differences of responders versus non-responders were statistically insignificant, except that the 48-h low value of albumin in the BZD responder group was lower than in the non-responder group.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar metabolic profiles in patients with encephalopathy and TPWs between responders and non-responders to anticonvulsants suggest that predicting responders a priori is difficult. The high responder rate suggests that empiric trials of anticonvulsants indeed provide useful clinical information. The more than twofold higher response rate to NSAEDs suggests that this strategy may be preferable to BZDs. Further prospective investigation is warranted.

Diagnostic accuracy between readers for identifying electrographic seizures in critically ill adults

Objective

Electrographic seizures in critically ill patients are often equivocal. In this study, we sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of electrographic seizure annotation in adult intensive care units (ICUs) and to identify affecting factors.

Methods

To investigate diagnostic accuracy, interreader agreement (IRA) measures were derived from 5,769 unequivocal and 6,263 equivocal seizure annotations by five experienced electroencephalogram (EEG) readers after reviewing 74 days of EEGs from 50 adult ICU patients. Factors including seizure equivocality (unequivocal vs. equivocal) and laterality (generalized, partial, or bilaterally independent), cyclicity (cyclic vs. noncyclic), persistency (occurrence of status epilepticus), and patient consciousness level (coma vs. noncoma) were further investigated for their influence on IRA measures.

Results

On average, 70% of seizures marked by a reference reader overlapped, at least in part, with those marked by a test reader (any-overlap sensitivity, AO-Sn). Agreed seizure duration between reader pairs (overlap-integral sensitivity, OI-Sn) was 62%, while agreed nonseizure duration (overlap-integral specificity, OI-Sp) was 99%. A test reader would annotate one additional seizure not overlapping with a reference reader's annotation in every 11.7 h of EEG, that is, the false-positive rate (FPR) was 0.0854/h. Classifying seizure patterns into unequivocal and equivocal improved specificity and FPR (unequivocal patterns) but compromised sensitivity only for equivocal patterns. Sensitivity of all and unequivocal annotations was higher for patients with status epilepticus. Specificity was higher for partial than for bilaterally independent unequivocal seizure patterns, and lower for cyclic all seizure patterns.

Significance

Diagnosing electrographic seizures in critically ill adults is highly specific and moderately sensitive. Improved criteria for diagnosing electrographic seizures in the ICU are needed.

Seizures in the critically ill

Critically ill patients with seizures are either admitted to the intensive care unit because of uncontrolled seizures requiring aggressive treatment or are admitted for other reasons and develop seizures secondarily. These patients may have multiorgan failure and severe metabolic and electrolyte disarrangements, and may require complex medication regimens and interventions. Seizures can be seen as a result of an acute systemic illness, a primary neurologic pathology, or a medication side-effect and can present in a wide array of symptoms from convulsive activity, subtle twitching, to lethargy. In this population, untreated isolated seizures can quickly escalate to generalized convulsive status epilepticus or, more frequently, nonconvulsive status epileptics, which is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Status epilepticus (SE) arises from a failure of inhibitory mechanisms and an enhancement of excitatory pathways causing permanent neuronal injury and other systemic sequelae. Carrying a high 30-day mortality rate, SE can be very difficult to treat in this complex setting, and a portion of these patients will become refractory, requiring narcotics and anesthetic medications. The most significant factor in successfully treating status epilepticus is initiating antiepileptic drugs as soon as possible, thus attentiveness and recognition of this disease are critical.

Lateralized periodic discharges associated with status epilepticus in the first year after stroke

Backgrand. Lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) are infrequent electroencephalograph (EEG) findings, and may present in ictal or interictal form. They are regarded as potential electrophysiologic signs of convulsive or nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). We report four patients who presented with NCSE and one who presented with convulsive status epilepticus in the postictal period, characterized by LPDs in EEG recordings in the first year after stroke.

Material and methods. We prospectively evaluated patients who clinically presented with status epilepticus associated LPDs between March 2014 and March 2015. We investigated patients that presented with a new stroke occurrence. We excluded the other LPD etiologies. EEG studies of five patients (two men) who were admitted to our emergency unit with confusion, three of whom had visual symptoms; four were treated for NCSE as diagnosed with LPDs. The fifth patient had convulsive status epilepticus with LPD in the postictal period.

Results and Discussion. None of the five patients, who were aged between 68 and 92 years, showed any etiologic factor other than a history of cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Magnetic resonance imaging studies of the patients revealed old infarcts and transitional diffusion restrictions. The clinical and EEG findings decreased substantially upon antiepileptic drug treatment. Herein, we illustrate the first patient who had confusion, visual hallucinations, and ictal and interictal LPD in her consecutive EEGs.

Conclusions. CVDs may pave the way for LPDs in patients with a history of stroke because CVDs cause structural brain damage. Patients who present with a similar clinical profile and imaging signs of stroke should be checked for NCSE, particularly in the presence of LPDs in EEGs.

Ictal-interictal continuum: A proposed treatment algorithm

The ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) is characterized by periodic and/or rhythmic EEG patterns that occur with relative high frequency in critically ill patients. Several studies have reported that some patterns seen within the continuum are independently associated with poor outcome. However there is no consensus regarding when to treat them or how aggressive treatment should be. In this review we examine peer-reviewed original scientific articles, guidelines and reviews indexed in PubMed and summarize current knowledge related to the ictal-interictal continuum. A treatment algorithm to guide management of critically ill patients with EEG patterns that fall along the IIC is proposed. The algorithm-based on best current practice in adults-takes into account associated clinical events, risk factors for developing seizures, response to medication trials and biomarkers of neuronal injury.

Understanding and Managing the Ictal-Interictal Continuum in Neurocritical Care

OPINION STATEMENT

Continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring has become an invaluable tool for the assessment of brain function in critically ill patients. However, interpretation of EEG waveforms, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is fraught with ambiguity. The term ictal-interictal continuum encompasses EEG patterns that are potentially harmful and can cause neuronal injury. There are no clear guidelines on how to treat EEG patterns that lie on this continuum. We advocate the following approaches in a step wise manner: (1) identify and exclude clear electrographic seizures and status epilepticus (SE), i.e., generalized spike-wave discharges at 3/s or faster; and clearly evolving discharges of any type (rhythmic, periodic, fast activity), whether focal or generalized; (2) exclude clear interictal patterns, i.e., spike-wave discharges, periodic discharges, and rhythmic patterns at 1/s or slower with no evolution, unless accompanied by a clear clinical correlate, which would make them ictal regardless of the frequency; (3) consider any EEG patterns that lie in between the above two categories as being on the ictal-interictal continuum; (4) compare the electrographic pattern of the ictal-incterictal continuum to the normal background and unequivocal seizures (if present) from the same patient; (5) when available, correlate ictal-interictal continuum pattern with other markers of neuronal injury such as neuronal specific enolase (NSE) levels, brain imaging findings, depth electrode recordings, data from microdialysis, intracranial pressure fluctuations, and brain oxygen measurement; and (6) perform a diagnostic trial with preferably a nonsedating antiepileptic drug with the endpoint being both clinical and electrographic improvement. Minimize the use of anesthetics or multiple AEDs unless there is clear supporting evidence from ancillary tests or worsening of the EEG patterns over time, which could indicate possible neuronal injury.

Electrophysiologic monitoring in acute brain injury

To determine the optimal use and indications of electroencephalography (EEG) in critical care management of acute brain injury (ABI). An electronic literature search was conducted for articles in English describing electrophysiological monitoring in ABI from January 1990 to August 2013. A total of 165 studies were included. EEG is a useful monitor for seizure and ischemia detection. There is a well-described role for EEG in convulsive status epilepticus and cardiac arrest (CA). Data suggest EEG should be considered in all patients with ABI and unexplained and persistent altered consciousness and in comatose intensive care unit (ICU) patients without an acute primary brain condition who have an unexplained impairment of mental status. There remain uncertainties about certain technical details, e.g., the minimum duration of EEG studies, the montage, and electrodes. Data obtained from both EEG and EP studies may help estimate prognosis in ABI patients, particularly following CA and traumatic brain injury. Data supporting these recommendations is sparse, and high quality studies are needed. EEG is used to monitor and detect seizures and ischemia in ICU patients and indications for EEG are clear for certain disease states, however, uncertainty remains on other applications.

Dual Therapeutic Effects of C-10068, a Dextromethorphan Derivative, Against Post-Traumatic Nonconvulsive Seizures and Neuroinflammation in a Rat Model of Penetrating Ballistic-Like Brain Injury

Post-traumatic seizures can exacerbate injurious outcomes of severe brain trauma, yet effective treatments are limited owing to the complexity of the pathology underlying the concomitant occurrence of both events. In this study, we tested C-10068, a novel deuterium-containing analog of (+)-N-methyl-3-ethoxymorphinan, in a rat model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) and evaluated the effects of C-10068 on PBBI-induced nonconvulsive seizures (NCS), acute neuroinflammation, and neurofunctional outcomes. NCS were detected by electroencephalographic monitoring. Neuroinflammation was evaluated by immunohistochemical markers, for example, glial fibrillary acidic protein and major histocompatibility complex class I, for activation of astrocytes and microglia, respectively. Neurofunction was tested using rotarod and Morris water maze tasks. Three infusion doses of C-10068 (1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 mg/kg/h × 72 h) were tested in the antiseizure study. Neuroinflammation and neurofunction were evaluated in animals treated with 5.0 mg/kg/h × 72 h C-10068. Compared to vehicle treatment, C-10068 dose dependently reduced PBBI-induced NCS incidence (40-50%), frequency (20-70%), and duration (30-82%). The most effective antiseizure dose of C-10068 (5.0 mg/kg/h × 72 h) also significantly attenuated hippocampal astrocyte activation and perilesional microglial reactivity post-PBBI. Within C-10068-treated animals, a positive correlation was observed in reduction in NCS frequency and reduction in hippocampal astrocyte activation. Further, C-10068 treatment significantly attenuated astrocyte activation in seizure-free animals. However, C-10068 failed to improve PBBI-induced motor and cognitive functions with the dosing regimen used in this study. Overall, the results indicating that C-10068 exerts both potent antiseizure and antiinflammatory effects are promising and warrant further investigation.

A Review of Phenytoin Monotherapy in Adults With Nonrefractory Status Epilepticus

Objective: To review the literature evaluating the efficacy of phenytoin monotherapy in adults with nonrefractory status epilepticus. Data Sources: Articles were selected through a search of MEDLINE/PubMed (1966 to August 2014), using the terms phenytoin and status epilepticus. A further review of reference citations was performed to identify other relevant articles. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language case reports and clinical studies were reviewed. Publications evaluating the efficacy of phenytoin monotherapy primarily in adults with nonrefractory status epilepticus were included in the review. Two case studies and 5 clinical studies met the criteria. Data Synthesis: The ultimate goal for status epilepticus treatment is seizure cessation. Phenytoin, a venerable and oft-utilized antiepileptic, has been employed in first-line and second-line regimens for status epilepticus. Unfortunately, despite decades of use, data on the efficacy of phenytoin monotherapy in these nonrefractory cases have been limited. The available studies are quite heterogeneous in design, with variable underlying etiologies of status epilepticus, doses of study drugs, and comparators. Additionally, most are underpowered. When administered as second-line therapy, phenytoin monotherapy is comparable to valproic acid in abating status epilepticus. As first-line therapy, phenytoin monotherapy was inferior to lorazepam but not diazepam when used in combination with phenytoin or phenobarbital. Two other studies comparing phenytoin with valproic acid as first-line therapy had conflicting results. Conclusions: In adults with nonrefractory status epilepticus, phenytoin monotherapy is a viable option for second-line therapy. The data do not consistently support phenytoin monotherapy's use as first-line treatment. More robust and adequately powered clinical studies are needed to assess whether these results remain consistent and extend to more long-term efficacy measures, such as morbidity and mortality.

Nonconvulsive seizures and status epilepticus in pediatric head trauma: A national survey

OBJECTIVES

It remains uncertain whether nonconvulsive seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus in pediatric traumatic brain injury are deleterious to the brain and/or impact the recovery from injury. Consequently, optimal electroencephalographic surveillance and management is unknown. We aimed to determine specialists' opinion regarding the detection and treatment of nonconvulsive seizures or nonconvulsive status epilepticus in pediatric traumatic brain injury, regardless of their practice.

METHODS

In 2012, 183 surveys were sent to all 93 neurologists, 27 neurosurgeons, and 63 intensivists in the14 tertiary pediatric hospitals across Canada. The survey included an initial scenario of pediatric TBI that evolved into three further scenarios. Each scenario had required responses and an embedded branching logic algorithm ascertaining clinical management. The survey instrument assimilated data about the importance of nonconvulsive status epilepticus and nonconvulsive seizures detection and treatment, and whether they are a cause of brain injury that adversely affects neurologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 79 specialists who replied (43% response rate), 68%-78% elected to order an electroencephalographic across all four scenarios, and one-third (31%-36%; scenario dependent) would request an urgent electroencephalographic (within the hour) in the comatose pediatric traumatic brain injury patient. In the absence of pharmacologic paralysis or intracranial pressure spikes, half-hour electroencephalographic (41%-55%) was preferred over ⩾24-h continuous electroencephalographic monitoring (29%-40%). Finally, nonconvulsive status epilepticus (81%-87%) and nonconvulsive seizures (61%-73%) were considered to be a cause of poor neurologic outcomes warranting aggressive pharmacologic management.

CONCLUSION

The Canadian specialists' opinion is that nonconvulsive seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus are biomarkers of brain injury and contribute to worsened outcomes. This suggests the urgency of future outcome-oriented research in the identification and management of nonconvulsive seizures or nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

Continuous EEG monitoring in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU)

Continuous EEG monitoring in the ICU is different from planned EEG due to the rather urgent nature of the indications, explaining the fact that recording is started in certain cases by the clinical team in charge of the patient's care. Close collaboration between neurophysiology teams and intensive care teams is essential. Continuous EEG monitoring can be facilitated by quantified analysis systems. This kind of analysis is based on certain signal characteristics, such as amplitude or frequency content, but raw EEG data should always be interpreted if possible, since artefacts can sometimes impair quantified EEG analysis. It is preferable to work within a tele-EEG network, so that the neurophysiologist has the possibility to give an interpretation on call. Continuous EEG monitoring is thus useful in the diagnosis of non-convulsive epileptic seizures or purely electrical discharges and in the monitoring of status epilepticus when consciousness disorders persist after initial treatment. A number of other indications are currently under evaluation.