Localization of the ictal onset zone with MEG using minimum norm estimate of a narrow band at seizure onset versus standard single current dipole modeling

Beamforming Seizures from the Temporal Lobe Using Magnetoencephalography

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) depends on proper identification of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) and differentiation of mesial, temporolimbic seizure onsets from temporal neocortical seizure onsets. Noninvasive source imaging using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) can provide accurate information on interictal spike localization; however, EEG and MEG have low sensitivity for epileptiform activity restricted to deep temporolimbic structures. Moreover, in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), interictal spikes frequently arise in neocortical foci distant from the SOZ, rendering interictal spike localization potentially misleading for presurgical planning.

METHODS

In this study, we used two different beamformer techniques applied to the MEG signal of ictal events acquired during EEG-MEG recordings in six patients with TLE (three neocortical, three MTLE) in whom the ictal source localization results could be compared to ground truth SOZ localizations determined from intracranial EEG and/or clinical, neuroimaging, and postsurgical outcome evidence.

RESULTS

Beamformer analysis proved to be highly accurate in all cases and was able to identify focal SOZs in mesial, temporolimbic structures. In three patients, interictal spikes were absent, too complex for dipole modeling, or localized to anterolateral temporal neocortex distant to a mesial temporal SOZ, and thus unhelpful in presurgical investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG beamformer source reconstruction is suitable for analysis of ictal events in TLE and can complement or supersede the traditional analysis of interictal spikes. The method outlined is applicable to any type of epileptiform event, expanding the information value of MEG and broadening its utility for presurgical recording in epilepsy.

Clinical significance of ictal magnetoencephalography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

The significance of ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) is not well appreciated. We evaluated the relationships between ictal MEG, MRI, intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG), surgery and postoperative seizure outcome.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients (46 cases) with ictal MEG who underwent epilepsy surgery was included. We examined the localization of each modality, surgical resection area and seizure freedom after surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (45.7%) out of 46 cases were seizure-free at more than 6 months follow-up. Median duration of postoperative follow-up was 16.5 months. The patients in whom ictal, interictal single equivalent current dipole (SECD) and MRI lesion localization were completely included in the resection had a higher chance of being seizure-free significantly (p < 0.05). Concordance between ictal and interictal SECD localizations was significantly associated with seizure-freedom. Concordance between MRI lesion and ictal SECD, concordance between ictal ICEEG and ictal and interictal SECD, as well as concordance between ictal ICEEG and MRI lesion were significantly associated with seizure freedom.

CONCLUSIONS

Ictal MEG can contribute useful information for delineating the resection area in epilepsy surgery.

SIGNIFICANCE

Resection should include ictal, interictal SECDs and MRI lesion localization, when feasible. Concordant ictal and interictal SECDs on MEG can be a favorable predictor of seizure freedom.

Interictal and Ictal MEG in presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery

Although presurgical evaluation of patients with pharamacoresistent focal epilepsies provides essential information for successful epilepsy surgery, there is still a need for further improvement. Developments of noninvasive electrophysiological recording and analysis techniques offer additional information based on interictal and ictal epileptic activities. In this review, we provide an overview on the application of ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG). The results of a literature research for published interictal/ictal MEG findings and experiences with own cases are demonstrated and discussed. Ictal MEG may provide added value in comparison to interictal recordings. The results may be more focal and closer to the invasively determined seizure onset zone. In some patients without clear interictal findings, ictal MEG could provide correct localization. Novel recording and analysis techniques facilitate ictal recordings. However, extended recording durations, movement and artifacts still represent practical limitations. Ictal MEG may provide added value regarding the localization of the seizure onset zone but depends on the selection of patients and the application of optimal analysis techniques.

MEG Reporting

The report generated by the magnetoencephalographer's interpretation of the patient's magnetoencephalography examination is the magnetoencephalography laboratory's most important product and is a representation of the quality of the laboratory and the clinical acumen of the personnel. A magnetoencephalography report is not meant to enumerate all the technical details that went into the test nor to fulfill some imagined requirements of the electronic health record. It is meant to clearly and concisely answer the clinical question posed by the referring doctor and to convey the key findings that may inform the next step in the patient's care. The graphical component of a magnetoencephalography report is ordinarily the most welcomed by the referring doctor. Much of the text of the report may be glossed over, so the illustrations must be sufficiently annotated to provide clear and unambiguous findings. The particular images chosen for the report will be a function of the analysis software but should be selected and edited for maximum clarity. There should be a composite pictorial summary slide at the beginning or at the end of the report, which accurately conveys the gist of the report. Along with representative source localizations, reports should contain examples of the simultaneously recorded EEG that enable the referring physician to determine whether epileptic discharges occurred and whether they are consistent with the patient's previously recorded spikes. Information and images (e.g., statistics, magnetic field patterns) that provide convincing evidence of the validity of the source location should also be included.

Assessment of the Utility of Ictal Magnetoencephalography in the Localization of the Epileptic Seizure Onset Zone

Importance

Literature on ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in clinical practice and the relationship to other modalities is limited because of the brevity of routine studies.

Objective

To investigate the utility and reliability of ictal MEG in the localization of the epileptogenic zone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective medical record review and prospective analysis of a novel ictal rhythm analysis method was conducted at a tertiary epilepsy center with a wide base of referrals for epilepsy surgery evaluation and included consecutive cases of patients who experienced epileptic seizures during routine MEG studies from March 2008 to February 2012. A total of 377 studies screened. Data were analyzed from November 2011 to October 2015.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Presurgical workup and interictal and ictal MEG data were reviewed. The localizing value of using extended-source localization of a narrow band identified visually at onset was analyzed.

Results

Of the 44 included patients, the mean (SD) age at the time of recording was 19.3 (14.9) years, and 25 (57%) were male. The mean duration of recording was 51.2 minutes. Seizures were provoked by known triggers in 3 patients and were spontaneous otherwise. Twenty-five patients (57%) had 1 seizure, 6 (14%) had 2, and 13 (30%) had 3 or more. Magnetoencephalography single equivalent current dipole analysis was possible in 29 patients (66%), of whom 8 (28%) had no clear interictal discharges. Sublobar concordance between ictal and interictal dipoles was seen in 18 of 21 patients (86%). Three patients (7%) showed clear ictal MEG patterns without electroencephalography changes. Ictal MEG dipoles correlated with the lobe of onset in 7 of 8 patients (88%) who underwent intracranial electroencephalography evaluations. Reasons for failure to identify ictal dipoles included diffuse or poor dipolar ictal patterns, no MEG changes, and movement artifact. Resection of areas containing a minimum-norm estimate of a narrow band at onset, not single equivalent current dipole, was associated with sustained seizure freedom.

Conclusions and Significance

Ictal MEG data can provide reliable localization, including in cases that are difficult to localize by other modalities. These findings support the use of extended-source localization for seizures recorded during MEG.

Source localization of the seizure onset zone from ictal EEG/MEG data

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy relies on the identification of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) and often requires intracranial EEG (iEEG). We have developed a new approach for non-invasive magnetic and electric source imaging of the SOZ (MSI-SOZ and ESI-SOZ) from ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) and EEG recordings, using wavelet-based Maximum Entropy on the Mean (wMEM) method. We compared the performance of MSI-SOZ and ESI-SOZ with interictal spike source localization (MSI-spikes and ESI-spikes) and clinical localization of the SOZ (i.e., based on iEEG or lesion topography, denoted as clinical-SOZ).

METHODS

A total of 46 MEG or EEG seizures from 13 patients were analyzed. wMEM was applied around seizure onset, centered on the frequency band showing the strongest power change. Principal component analysis applied to spatiotemporal reconstructed wMEM sources (0.4-1 s around seizure onset) identified the main spatial pattern of ictal oscillations. Qualitative sublobar concordance and quantitative measures of distance and spatial overlaps were estimated to compare MSI/ESI-SOZ with MSI/ESI-Spikes and clinical-SOZ.

RESULTS

MSI/ESI-SOZ were concordant with clinical-SOZ in 81% of seizures (MSI 90%, ESI 64%). MSI-SOZ was more accurate and identified sources closer to the clinical-SOZ (P = 0.012) and to MSI-Spikes (P = 0.040) as compared with ESI-SOZ. MSI/ESI-SOZ and MSI/ESI-Spikes did not differ in terms of concordance and distance from the clinical-SOZ.

CONCLUSIONS

wMEM allows non-invasive localization of the SOZ from ictal MEG and EEG. MSI-SOZ performs better than ESI-SOZ. MSI/ESI-SOZ can provide important additional information to MSI/ESI-Spikes during presurgical evaluation. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2528-2546, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ictal Magnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Assessment

Ictal MEG recordings constitute rare data. The objective of this study was to evaluate ictal magnetic source localization (MSI), using two algorithms: linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV), a beamforming technique and equivalent current dipole (ECD). Ictal MSI was studied in six patients. Three of them were undergoing post-operative re-evaluation. For all patients, results were validated by the stereoelectroencephalographic (SEEG) definition of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). EZ was quantified using the epileptogenicity index (EI) method, which accounts for both the propensity of a brain area to generate rapid discharges and the time for this area to become involved in the seizure. EI values range from 0 (no epileptogenicity) to 1 (maximal epileptogenicity). Levels of concordance between ictal MSI and EZ were determined as follows: A: ictal MSI localized the site whose value EI = 1, B: MSI localized a part of the EZ (not corresponding to the maximal value of EI = 1), C: a region could be identified on ictal MSI but not on SEEG, D: a region could be identified on SEEG but not on MSI, E: different regions were localized on MSI and SEEG. Ictal MEG pattern consisted of rhythmic activities between 10 and 20 Hz for all patients. For LCMV (first maxima), levels of concordance were A (two cases), B (two cases) and E (two cases). For ECD fitted on each time point separately (location characterized by the best goodness-of-fit value), levels of concordance were A (one case), B (one case), D (three cases) and E (one case). For ECD calculated for the whole time window, levels of concordance were A (two cases) and D (four cases). Source localization methods performed on rhythmic patterns can localize the EZ as validated by SEEG. In terms of concordance, LCMV was superior to ECD. In some cases, LCMV allows extraction of several maxima that could reflect ictal dynamics. In a medial temporal lobe epilepsy case, ictal MSI indicated an area of delayed propagation and was non-contributory to the presurgical assessment.

Epileptic focus localization based on resting state interictal MEG recordings is feasible irrespective of the presence or absence of spikes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether epileptogenic focus localization is possible based on resting state connectivity analysis of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data.

METHODS

A multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) model was constructed using the sensor space data and was projected to the source space using lead field and inverse matrix. The generalized partial directed coherence was estimated from the MVAR model in the source space. The dipole with the maximum information inflow was hypothesized to be within the epileptogenic focus.

RESULTS

Applying the focus localization algorithm (FLA) to the interictal MEG recordings from five patients with neocortical epilepsy, who underwent presurgical evaluation for the identification of epileptogenic focus, we were able to correctly localize the focus, on the basis of maximum interictal information inflow in the presence or absence of interictal epileptic spikes in the data, with three out of five patients undergoing resective surgery and being seizure free since.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results suggest that accurate localization of the epileptogenic focus may be accomplished using noninvasive spontaneous "resting-state" recordings of relatively brief duration and without the need to capture definite interictal and/or ictal abnormalities.

SIGNIFICANCE

Epileptogenic focus localization is possible through connectivity analysis of resting state MEG data irrespective of the presence/absence of spikes.