The evidence is finally here: Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are mainly dependent on utricular pathway function

Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by air-conducted, low-frequency sound

BACKGROUND

Sound is not only detected by the cochlea, but also, at high intensities, by the vestibular system. Acoustic activation of the vestibular system can manifest itself in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). In a clinical setting, VEMPs are usually evoked with rather high-frequency sound (500 Hz and higher), despite the fact that only a fraction of saccular and utricular hair cells in the striolar region is available for high-frequency stimulation.

OBJECTIVE

As a growing proportion of the population complains about low-frequency environmental noise, including reports on vestibular symptoms, the activation of the vestibular system by low-frequency sound deserves better understanding.

METHODS

We recorded growth functions of oVEMPs and cVEMPs evoked with air-conducted sound at 120 Hz and below. We estimated VEMP thresholds and tested whether phase changes of the stimulus carrier result in changes of VEMP amplitude and latency.

RESULTS

The VEMP response of the otholith organs to low-frequency sound is uniform and not tuned when corrected for middle ear attenuation by A-weighting the stimulus level. Different stimulus carrier phases result in phase-correlated changes of cVEMP latencies and amplitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

VEMPs can be evoked with rather low-frequency sound, but high thresholds suggest that they are unlikely to be triggered by environmental sounds.

Evidence-based diagnostic use of VEMPs : From neurophysiological principles to clinical application

BACKGROUND

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are increasingly being used for testing otolith organ function.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the anatomical, biomechanical and neurophysiological principles underlying the evidence-based clinical application of ocular and cervical VEMPs (oVEMPs and cVEMPs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature search in PubMed until April 2019.

RESULTS

Sound and vibration at a frequency of 500 Hz represent selective vestibular stimuli for the otolith organs. The predominant specificity of oVEMPs for contralateral utricular function and of cVEMPs for ipsilateral saccular function is defined by the different central projections of utricular and saccular afferents. VEMPs are particularly useful in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence and otolith organ specific vestibular dysfunction and as an alternative diagnostic approach in situations when video oculography is not possible or useful.

CONCLUSION

The use of VEMPs is a simple, safe, reliable and selective test of dynamic function of otolith organs.

Nondestructive and objective assessment of the vestibular function in rodent models: A review

The normal function of the vestibular system is crucial for the sense of balance. The techniques used to assess the vestibular function plays a vital role in the research of the vestibular system. In this article, we have systematically reviewed some popular methods employing vestibular reflexes and vestibular evoked potentials for assessing the vestibular function in rodent models. These vestibular reflexes and vestibular evoked potentials to effective stimuli have been used as nondestructive and objective functional measures. The main types of vestibular reflexes include the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), vestibulocollic reflex (VCR), and vestibulo-sympathetic reflex (VSR). They are all capable of indicating the functions of the semicircular canals and otoliths. However, the VOR assessment is much more prevalently used because of the relatively stereotypical inputoutput relationship and simple motion pattern of the ocular response. In contrast, the complicated motion pattern and small gain of the VCR response, as well as the undesired component possibly contributed from the acceleration receptors outside the labyrinths in the VSR response, restrict the widespread applications of VCR and VSR in the assessment of the vestibular system. The vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and vestibular sensory evoked potentials (VsEPs) are the two typical evoked potentials that have been also employed for evaluating the vestibular function. Through exploiting different types of the VEMPs, the saccular and utricular functions can be evaluated separately. The sound-induced VEMPs, moreover, are capable of noninvasively assessing the unilateral vestibular function. The VsEPs, via the morphology of their signal waveforms, enable the access to the location-specific information that indicates the functional statuses of different components within the vestibular neural pathway.

[Evidence-based diagnostic use of VEMPs : From neurophysiological principles to clinical application. German version]

BACKGROUND

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are increasingly being used for testing otolith organ function.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the anatomical, biomechanical and neurophysiological principles of an evidence-based clinical application of ocular and cervical VEMPs (oVEMPs and cVEMPs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature search in PubMed until April 2019.

RESULTS

Sound and vibration at a frequency of 500 Hz represent selective vestibular stimuli for the otolith organs. The predominant specificity of oVEMPs for contralateral utricular function and of cVEMPs for ipsilateral saccular function is defined by the different neuronal projections of the utricle and the saccule. VEMPs are particularly useful in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence and otolith organ-specific vestibular dysfunction and as an alternative diagnostic approach in situations when video oculography is not possible or useful.

CONCLUSION

The use of VEMPs is a simple, safe, reliable and selective test of dynamic function of otolith organs.

Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Where Are We Now?

OBJECTIVE

Over the last decade, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) have evolved as a new clinical test for dynamic otolith (predominantly utricular) function. The aim of this review is to give an update on the neurophysiological foundations of oVEMPs and their implications for recording and interpreting oVEMP responses in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Different lines of anatomical, neurophysiological, and clinical evidence support the notion that oVEMPs measure predominantly contralateral utricular function, while cervical cVEMPs are an indicator of ipsilateral saccular function. Bone-conducted vibration (BCV) in the midline of the forehead at the hairline (Fz) or unilateral air-conducted sound (ACS) are commonly used as stimuli for oVEMPs. It is recommended to apply short stimuli with short rise times for obtaining optimal oVEMP responses. Finally, this review summarizes the clinical application and interpretation of oVEMPs, particularly for vestibular neuritis, Ménière's disease, superior canal dehiscence and "challenging" patients.

Otolithic Receptor Mechanisms for Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials: A Review

Air-conducted sound and bone-conduced vibration activate otolithic receptors and afferent neurons in both the utricular and saccular maculae, and trigger small electromyographic (EMG) responses [called vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs)] in various muscle groups throughout the body. The use of these VEMPs for clinical assessment of human otolithic function is built on the following logical steps: (1) that high-frequency sound and vibration at clinically effective stimulus levels activate otolithic receptors and afferents, rather than semicircular canal afferents, (2) that there is differential anatomical projection of otolith afferents to eye muscles and neck muscles, and (3) that isolated stimulation of the utricular macula induces short latency responses in eye muscles, and that isolated stimulation of the saccular macula induces short latency responses in neck motoneurons. Evidence supports these logical steps, and so VEMPs are increasingly being used for clinical assessment of otolith function, even differential evaluation of utricular and saccular function. The proposal, originally put forward by Curthoys in 2010, is now accepted: that the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential reflects predominantly contralateral utricular function and the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential reflects predominantly ipsilateral saccular function. So VEMPs can provide differential tests of utricular and saccular function, not because of stimulus selectivity for either of the two maculae, but by measuring responses which are predominantly determined by the differential neural projection of utricular as opposed to saccular neural information to various muscle groups. The major question which this review addresses is how the otolithic sensory system, with such a high density otoconial layer, can be activated by individual cycles of sound and vibration and show such tight locking of the timing of action potentials of single primary otolithic afferents to a particular phase angle of the stimulus cycle even at frequencies far above 1,000 Hz. The new explanation is that it is due to the otoliths acting as seismometers at high frequencies and accelerometers at low frequencies. VEMPs are an otolith-dominated response, but in a particular clinical condition, semicircular canal dehiscence, semicircular canal receptors are also activated by sound and vibration, and act to enhance the otolith-dominated VEMP responses.

The new vestibular stimuli: sound and vibration-anatomical, physiological and clinical evidence

The classical view of the otoliths-as flat plates of fairly uniform receptors activated by linear acceleration dragging on otoconia and so deflecting the receptor hair bundles-has been replaced by new anatomical and physiological evidence which shows that the maculae are much more complex. There is anatomical spatial differentiation across the macula in terms of receptor types, hair bundle heights, stiffness and attachment to the overlying otolithic membrane. This anatomical spatial differentiation corresponds to the neural spatial differentiation of response dynamics from the receptors and afferents from different regions of the otolithic maculae. Specifically, receptors in a specialized band of cells, the striola, are predominantly type I receptors, with short, stiff hair bundles and looser attachment to the overlying otoconial membrane than extrastriolar receptors. At the striola the hair bundles project into holes in the otolithic membrane, allowing for fluid displacement to deflect the hair bundles and activate the cell. This review shows the anatomical and physiological evidence supporting the hypothesis that fluid displacement, generated by sound or vibration, deflects the short stiff hair bundles of type I receptors at the striola, resulting in neural activation of the irregular afferents innervating them. So these afferents are activated by sound or vibration and show phase-locking to individual cycles of the sound or vibration stimulus up to frequencies above 2000 Hz, underpinning the use of sound and vibration for clinical tests of vestibular function.