Physiological arousal accompanying postural responses to external perturbations after stroke

Frequency-dependent behavior of paretic and non-paretic leg force during standing post stroke

Maintaining upright posture in quiet standing is an important skill that is often disrupted by stroke. Despite extensive study of human standing, current understanding is incomplete regarding the muscle coordination strategies that produce the ground-on-foot force (F) that regulates translational and rotational accelerations of the body. Even less is understood about how stroke disrupts that coordination. Humans produce sagittal plane variations in the location (center of pressure, xCP) and orientation (Fx/Fz) of F that, along with the force of gravity, produce sagittal plane body motions. As F changes during quiet standing there is a strong correlation between the xCP and Fx/Fz time-varying signals within narrow frequency bands. The slope of the correlation varies systematically with frequency in non-disabled populations, is sensitive to changes in both environmental and neuromuscular control factors, and emerges from the interaction of body mechanics and neural control. This study characterized the xCP versus Fx/Fz relationship as frequency-dependent Intersection Point (IP) heights for the paretic and non-paretic legs of individuals with history of a stroke (n = 12) as well as in both legs of non-disabled controls (n = 22) to reveal distinguishing motor coordination patterns. No inter-leg difference of IP height was present in the control group. The paretic leg IP height was lower than the non-paretic, and differences from control legs were in opposite directions. These results quantify disrupted coordination that may characterize the paretic leg balance deficit and non-paretic leg compensatory behavior, providing a means of monitoring balance impairment and a target for therapeutic interventions.

Cardiovascular response to anticipatory and reactionary postural perturbations in young adults

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? It has been suggested that the cardiovascular responses to a postural perturbation are centrally mediated and reflex mediated. We wanted to know the extent to which the cardiovascular responses to external perturbations could be executed in a feedforward manner, in anticipation of the perturbation. What is the main finding and its importance? We found no anticipatory component driving heart rate and systolic blood pressure responses, suggesting that reflexive mechanisms dominate cardiovascular regulation after a postural perturbation in young adults.

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular responses to postural perturbations have been reported, but whether the cardiovascular responses to external perturbations could be executed in anticipation of the perturbation is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of anticipated and reactionary perturbations on heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) responses in healthy young adults. A secondary aim was to determine whether perceived state anxiety scores were correlated with the change in HR response during postural perturbation. Twenty healthy young adults stood on a treadmill and experienced two perturbation conditions (anticipatory vs. reactionary), each with two intensity levels (Step vs. No Step). The HR and SBP were collected continuously. Two-way repeated-measures statistical non-parametric mapping tests were used to compare HR and SBP responses to the perturbations over time (from -3 to +8 s). The results indicated that HR was significantly elevated in the higher intensity perturbations [Step vs. No Step, at 0.56-1.32 s (P < 0.0001) and 1.92-3.44 s (P < 0.0001) post-perturbation], while there were no differences in HR between perturbation types (anticipatory vs. reactionary) or in SBP between perturbation types and intensity levels. The perceived state anxiety scores did not differ between perturbation types and intensity levels but were correlated with the change in HR post-perturbation (P = 0.013). We suggest that reflexive mechanisms dominate cardiovascular regulation after anticipatory and reactionary perturbations. The data highlight the cardiovascular mechanism(s) associated with perturbations that should be considered when assessing postural stability in populations with poor balance performance.

Does height-induced threat modulate shortening of reaction times induced by a loud stimulus in a lateral stepping and a wrist extension task?

INTRODUCTION

The StartReact (SR) effect is the accelerated release of a prepared movement when a startling acoustic stimulus is presented at the time of the imperative stimulus (IS). SR paradigms have been used to study defective control of balance and gait in people with neurological conditions, but differences in emotional state (e.g. fear of failure) may be a potential confounder when comparing patients to healthy subjects. In this study, we aimed to gain insight in the effects of postural threat on the SR effect by manipulating surface height during a postural (lateral step) task and a non-postural (wrist extension) task.

METHODS

Eleven healthy participants performed a lateral step perpendicular to the platform edge, and 19 participants performed a wrist extension task while standing at the platform edge. Participants initiated the movement as fast as possible in response to an IS that varied in intensity across trials (80 dB to 121 dB) at both low and high platform height (3.2 m). For the lateral step task, we determined anticipatory postural adjustments (APA) and step onset latencies. For the wrist extension task, muscle onset latencies were determined. We used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests on the relative onset latencies between both heights, to identify whether the effect of height was different for IS intensities between 103 and 118 dB compared to 121 dB.

RESULTS

For both tasks, onset latencies were significantly shortened at 121 dB compared to 80 dB, regardless of height. In the lateral step task, the effect of height was larger at 112 dB compared to 121 dB. The absolute onset latencies showed that at 112 dB there was no such stimulus intensity effect at high as seen at low surface height. In the wrist extension task, no differential effects of height could be demonstrated across IS intensities.

CONCLUSIONS

Postural threat had a significant, yet modest effect on shortening of RTs induced by a loud IS, with a mere 3 dB difference between standing on high versus low surface height. Interestingly, this effect of height was specific to the postural (i.e. lateral stepping) task, as no such differences could be demonstrated in the wrist extension task. This presumably reflects more cautious execution of the lateral step task when standing on height. The present findings suggest that applying stimuli of sufficiently high intensity (≥115 dB) appears to neutralize potential differences in emotional state when studying SR effects.

Mapping of electrodermal activity (EDA) during outdoor community-level mobility tasks in individuals with lower-limb amputation

Introduction

Balance confidence and perception of task challenge is an important construct to measure in rehabilitation of people with lower-limb amputation (LLA). Measurement of electrodermal activity (EDA) captures physiological arousal responses reflecting an individual’s perceived challenge in a task. This study explores the feasibility of the use of EDA during outdoor walking tasks to capture task-specific physiological arousal changes associated with perception of challenge in people with amputation.

Objective

To develop and demonstrate feasibility of a portable EDA/GPS system mapping physiological arousal while challenging walking balance outdoors in individuals with LLA and controls.

Methods

Sixteen people (eight with LLA and eight age-/sex-matched controls) completed an outdoor walking course in the community (3 laps). A battery-powered portable device was developed containing EDA/GPS sensors with data logged on a microcontroller. Phasic EDA response was extracted from EDA signal to explore the physiological arousal response to walking tasks.

Results

Physiological arousal demonstrated task-specific modulation with ascending stairs without a handrail showing higher levels of phasic EDA than walking on a paved incline (p = 0.01) or a gravel decline (p = 0.01) in people with LLA. While evidence of habituation over repeated trials was shown in controls with lap 1 of walking down a gravel decline showing higher levels of phasic EDA than lap 3 (p = 0.01). Phasic EDA maps, representative of arousal levels throughout the walking course, showed individual-specific response.

Conclusion

Mapping of EDA during outdoor walking is feasible. Modulation of physiological arousal between outdoor walking tasks and over repeated trials is suggestive of clinical utility. Further research is warranted to explore how EDA may be incorporated into assessment of response to outdoor walking amongst individuals following LLA.