Focal tDCS of auditory cortex in chronic tinnitus: A randomized controlled mechanistic trial

Perceptual and Cognitive Effects of Focal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Auditory Cortex in Tinnitus

OBJECTIVES

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as a potential treatment for many brain conditions. Although tDCS is well tolerated, continued study of perceptual and cognitive side effects is warranted, given the complexity of functional brain organization. This study tests the feasibility of brief tablet-based tasks to assess auditory and cognitive side effects in a recently reported pilot study of auditory-cortex tDCS in chronic tinnitus and attempts to confirm that this untested multisession tDCS protocol does not worsen hearing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with chronic tinnitus completed two hearing tasks (pure-tone thresholds, Words In Noise [WIN]) and two cognitive tasks (Flanker, Dimension Change Card Sort) from the NIH Toolbox (2024 Toolbox Assessments, Inc, Lincolnwood, IL). Participants were randomized to active or sham 4×1 silver/silver-chloride tDCS of left auditory cortex (n = 10/group). Tasks were completed immediately before and after the first tDCS session, and after the fifth/final tDCS session. Statistics included linear mixed-effects models for change in task performance over time.

RESULTS

Before tDCS, performance on both auditory tasks was highly correlated with clinical audiometry, supporting the external validity of these measures (r2 > 0.89 for all). Although overall auditory task performance did not change after active or sham tDCS, detection of right-ear WIN stimuli modestly improved after five active tDCS sessions (t34 = -2.07, p = 0.05). On cognitive tasks, reaction times (RTs) were quicker after sham tDCS, reflecting expected practice effects (eg, t88 = 3.22, p = 0.002 after five sessions on the Flanker task). However, RTs did not improve over repeated sessions in the active group, suggesting that tDCS interfered with learning these practice effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated sessions of auditory-cortex tDCS do not seem to adversely affect hearing or cognition but may modestly improve hearing in noise and interfere with some types of motor learning. Low-burden cognitive/perceptual test batteries could be a powerful way to identify adverse effects and new treatment targets in brain stimulation research.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial: Effect of tDCS on tinnitus modulation: A clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short and long-term effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) targeting the left temporoparietal area (LTA) on tinnitus severity, annoyance, and loudness.

METHODS

This is a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, and parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 42 individuals with tinnitus were randomized to a-tDCS (n = 24) or sham tDCS (n = 18). The a-tDCS group received tDCS over the LTA during five consecutive day sessions (2 mA, 20 min). The sham group received a placebo current with the same characteristics as the a-tDCS group. Participants were assessed at baseline, after the fifth session, and at the 30-day follow-up, using hearing assessments and symptom questionnaires.

RESULTS

There was no effect of comparison between groups or interaction effect (time x group) in all hearing assessments and symptom questionnaires. There was only a main effect of time for Tinnitus Handicap Inventory - THI [F(1.642, 45.988) = 5.128; p = 0.014; η2 = 0.155]. Bonferroni post hoc showed that there was a significant difference in THI in the sham group between pre and post-treatment [CI (0.107, 14.643; p = 0.046)]. However, there was no difference between pre-treatment and follow-up THI, or between post-treatment and follow-up THI. There was no treatment effect on tinnitus severity (assessed by Tinnitus Functional Inventory - TFI), tinnitus annoyance or loudness (assessed by Visual Analogue Scale - VAS), or tinnitus pitch, loudness or minimum masking level (assessed by tinnitometry).

CONCLUSION

Five consecutive sessions of a-tDCS targeting LTA do not improve tinnitus severity, annoyance, and loudness. Future studies should investigate if other tDCS protocols are effective or a combination of tDCS with other forms of treatment.

A Scoping Review of the Role of Attention in Tinnitus Management

There is strong evidence that attention plays an important role in tinnitus perception, but less is known about its role in treating tinnitus. This review scoped the literature for evidence of the role attention plays in tinnitus therapy and catalogued the methods employed, clinical outcomes, and the degree to which interventions for tinnitus were supported. The research question was "what role does attention play in the management or treatment of tinnitus." To identify relevant studies, database searches of Scopus (keywords) PsychArticle (title and abstract), CINAHL complete (title and abstract), and PubMed (title and abstract) were performed in March/April 2024 using the following search terms: [tinnitus] and [attention] and [treatment] or [therapy] or [management]. After the removal of duplicates, 494 articles were identified. After exclusions, and additions from references, 38 articles were included in the review. Treatments were classified into five types: electrical/magnetic stimulation, psychological, sound therapy, music therapy, and perceptual training. Sound therapy and perceptual training were identified as having the most evidence for their benefit via an attention mechanism. A model of sound and perceptual training in alleviating tinnitus through an attention pathway is presented.

Consecutive Dual-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Subjective Severe to Catastrophic Tinnitus with Normal Hearing

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is emerging as a promising non-invasive intervention for tinnitus by aiming to modulate abnormal brain activity. This study investigated the efficacy of dual-session tDCS for the relief of perception, distress, and loudness in patients with severe chronic subjective tinnitus and assessed the duration of tinnitus suppression effects compared to single-session and control groups over a 2-month follow-up. In a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 30 participants with severe chronic subjective tinnitus underwent bifrontal tDCS. The control group (n = 9), single-session group (n = 10), and dual-session group (n = 11) received 2 mA stimulation for 20 min per session, twice a week for one month. The treatment response was monitored weekly using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with additional assessments using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at the fourth and eighth weeks. The single- and dual-session groups showed statistically significant improvements in VAS, THI, and BDI scores compared to the control group. THI and BDI scores showed a significant difference between the single- and dual-session groups. The dual-session group demonstrated a more sustained tinnitus suppression effect than the single-session group. tDCS has been validated as an effective intervention for the suppression of tinnitus, with the dual-session protocol showing longer-term benefits. These findings support the potential of tDCS as a treatment for tinnitus, particularly in dual-session applications.

Perceptual and cognitive effects of focal tDCS of auditory cortex in tinnitus

OBJECTIVES

Noninvasive brain stimulation continues to grow as an effective, low-risk way of improving the symptoms of brain conditions. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is particularly well-tolerated, with benefits including low cost and potential portability. Nevertheless, continued study of perceptual and cognitive side effects is warranted, given the complexity of functional brain organization. This paper describes the results of a brief battery of tablet-based tasks used in a recent pilot study of auditory-cortex tDCS in people with chronic tinnitus.

METHODS

Volunteers with chronic tinnitus (n=20) completed two hearing tasks (pure-tone thresholds, Words In Noise) and two cognitive tasks (Flanker, Dimension Change Card Sort) from the NIH Toolbox. Volunteers were randomized to active or sham 4×1 Ag/AgCl tDCS of auditory cortex, and tasks were completed immediately before and after the first tDCS session, and after the fifth/final tDCS session. Statistics included linear mixed-effects models for change in task performance over time.

RESULTS

Before tDCS, performance on both auditory tasks was highly correlated with clinical audiometry, supporting the external validity of these measures (r2>0.89 for all). Although overall auditory task performance did not change after active or sham tDCS, detection of right-ear Words in Noise stimuli modestly improved after five active tDCS sessions (t(34)=-2.07, p=0.05). On cognitive tasks, reaction times were quicker after sham tDCS, reflecting expected practice effects (e.g., t(88)=3.22, p=0.002 after 5 sessions on Flanker task). However, reaction times did not improve over repeated sessions in the active group, suggesting that tDCS interfered with learning these practice effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated sessions of auditory-cortex tDCS does not appear to adversely affect hearing or cognition, but may modestly improve hearing in noisy environments and interfere with some types of motor learning. Low-burden cognitive/perceptual test batteries could be a powerful way to identify adverse effects and new treatment targets in brain stimulation research.