Pharmacokinetic interaction of telmisartan with s-amlodipine: an open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy Korean male volunteers

Population Pharmacokinetics of Telmisartan in Healthy Subjects and Hypertensive Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Telmisartan exhibits significant pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, but it remains unclear whether its PK profile is altered in hypertensive patients. This study aimed to characterize telmisartan PKs by conducting a meta-analysis and developing a pooled population PK model based on data from healthy subjects and hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Relevant literature was identified by a systematic approach. Eighteen studies were selected for analysis, which included 394 healthy subjects receiving single doses of telmisartan, 190 healthy subjects receiving repeated doses, along with 295 hypertensive patients receiving repeated doses. Pooled population PK analysis incorporated 20 mean concentration-time profiles from 14 studies. Meta-analyses were performed using OpenMeta-Analyst, and population PK modeling was performed using NONMEM®.

RESULTS

Repeated telmisartan doses increased peak plasma concentrations. However, other noncompartmental PK parameters remained consistent across healthy and hypertensive populations. Telmisartan PKs were best described using a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination in pooled analysis. Typical PK parameter values for apparent clearance (CL/F), apparent central and peripheral volumes of distribution (V1/F and V2/F), absorption rate constant (ka), and absorption lag time were 18.3 L/h, 20.7 L, 360 L, 0.183 h-1 and 0.228 h, respectively. Interindividual variabilities in CL/F, V1/F, and ka were 84%, 122%, and 106%, respectively. Covariate analysis revealed significantly lower CL/F (63.7%) and V1/F (90.3%) values in hypertensive patients than healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

These findings quantified the variability of telmisartan PK profile and highlighted the differences between healthy individuals and hypertensive patients, suggesting the need for optimized dosage strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between the Fixed-Dose Combination of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10/20 Mg and the Fixed-Dose Combination of Telmisartan/Amlodipine 80/5 Mg in Healthy Subjects

Background

Management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, which are common comorbid risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, require multiple medications. The development of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) containing ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine aims to enhance patient adherence and persistence, but the potential interactions among the four medications have not been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the FDC of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg (ER) and the FDC of telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg (TA).

Methods

An open-label, single-sequence, three-period, three-treatment crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. All subjects received ER for 7 days, TA for 9 days and ER combined with TA for 7 days during each treatment period. For PK analysis of total/free ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine, serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours at steady state. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study.

Results

Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled, and 34 subjects completed the study. The systemic exposure to each active ingredient after coadministration of the two FDCs was similar to that after each FDC alone. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for the maximum plasma concentration (µg/L) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (h·µg/L) of the combination therapy to monotherapy, assessed at steady state, were as follows: total ezetimibe, 1.0264 (0.8765-1.2017) and 0.9359 (0.7847-1.1163); free ezetimibe, 1.5713 (1.2821-1.9257) and 0.9941 (0.8384-1.1788); rosuvastatin, 2.1673 (1.7807-2.6379) and 1.1714 (0.9992-1.3733); telmisartan, 1.0745 (0.8139-1.4186) and 1.1057 (0.8379-1.4591); and amlodipine, 0.9421 (0.8764-1.0126) and 0.9603 (0.8862-1.0405). Both combination therapy and monotherapy were well tolerated by the subjects.

Conclusion

The coadministration of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg and ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg was well tolerated in healthy subjects, and the PK interaction between those two FDCs was not clinically significant.

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Between Amlodipine and Tadalafil: An Open-Label, Randomized, Multiple-Dose Crossover Study in Healthy Male Volunteers

Purpose

The combined administration of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, and amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, can be a promising therapeutic option for hypertension patients with erectile dysfunction. This study aimed to examine the pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tadalafil and amlodipine and the tolerability of their combined administration in healthy male subjects.

Subjects and Methods

Healthy volunteers (N = 24) were randomly assigned to one of the six sequences that consisted of three treatments: tadalafil (5 mg) alone, amlodipine (10 mg) alone, and tadalafil plus amlodipine. The study drugs were administered orally for 9 d, and the collected serial blood samples were analyzed up to 72 h after the last dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis.

Results

For tadalafil, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence interval (CI)) of the combined therapy over the monotherapy were 1.57 (1.46–1.68) for AUC_τ,ss and 1.34 (1.24–1.45) for C_max,ss. For amlodipine, the GMRs (90% CI) of AUC_τ,ss and C_max,ss were 0.93 (0.90–0.97) and 0.95 (0.91–0.99), respectively. The severity of all observed adverse events (AEs) related to the study drugs was mild, and the frequency of AEs of the combined administration was not significantly different from the monotherapy.

Conclusion

A substantial pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tadalafil and amlodipine was observed with respect to the concentration of tadalafil when administered concomitantly. However, the dose range of the combined administration of tadalafil and amlodipine in the present study was well tolerated by the subjects.

The use of single-pill combinations as first-line treatment for hypertension: translating guidelines into clinical practice

: The 2008 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension guidelines recommend the first-line prescription of two antihypertensive drugs in single-pill combinations (SPCs), also known as fixed-dose combinations, for the treatment of most patients with hypertension. This recommendation is based on a large amount of data, which shows that first-line treatment with SPCs supports reaching blood pressure targets rapidly and reducing cardiovascular outcome risk while keeping the therapeutic strategies as simple as possible and fostering adherence and persistence. As this approach constitutes a big shift from the stepped-care approaches that have been dominant for many years, practicing physicians have expressed concerns about using SPCs as first-line agents. In this review, we will discuss the barriers to the uptake of this recommendation. We will also offer suggestions to reduce the impact of these barriers and address specific concerns that have been raised.

Plasma Trough Concentrations of Antihypertensive Drugs for the Assessment of Treatment Adherence: A Meta-Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Biochemical drug screening by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in plasma is an accurate method for the quantification of plasma concentrations of antihypertensive medications in patients with hypertension. Trough concentrations could possibly be used as drug-specific cutoff values in the biochemical assessment of (non-)adherence. We performed a literature review and meta-analysis of pharmacokinetic studies to determine plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan. PubMed was searched for pharmacokinetic studies up to September 2020. Eligible studies reported steady-state mean trough concentration and their variance. Pooled trough concentrations were estimated using a three-level random effects meta-analytic model. Moderator analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. One thousand three hundred eighteen potentially relevant articles were identified of which 45 were eligible for inclusion. The pooled mean trough concentration was 9.2 ng/mL (95% CI, 7.5–10.8) for amlodipine, 41.0 ng/mL (95% CI, 17.4–64.7) for hydrochlorothiazide, and 352.9 ng/mL (95% CI, 243.5–462.3) for valsartan. Substantial heterogeneity was present for all 3 pooled estimates. Moderator analyses identified dosage as a significant moderator for the pooled trough concentration of amlodipine (β₁=0.9; P<0.05), mean age, and mean body weight for the mean trough concentration of hydrochlorothiazide (β₁=2.2, P<0.05, respectively, β₁=−4.0, P<0.05) and no significant moderators for valsartan. Plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan, measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, are highly heterogeneous over the different studies. Use of the pooled trough concentration as a cutoff in the biochemical assessment of adherence can result in inaccurate diagnosis of (non-)adherence, which may seriously harm the patient-physician relationship, and is therefore not recommended.

No pharmacokinetic interactions between candesartan and amlodipine following multiple oral administrations in healthy subjects

PURPOSE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of candesartan and amlodipine in the absence and presence of each other in healthy subjects.

METHODS

This study consisted of two parts: part 1, the effect of amlodipine on candesartan; part 2, the effect of candesartan on amlodipine. Each part was designed as a randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period, two-intervention crossover study with 20 subjects and performed separately in different populations. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed over 48 hours for candesartan in part 1 and 72 hours for amlodipine in part 2 after drug administration on Day 10. Safety data included the results of physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, an electrocardiogram, and adverse events.

RESULTS

For both candesartan and amlodipine, the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of dosing interval of 24 hours and maximum concentration after drug administration fell within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria. Although this study was conducted in normotensive subjects, blood pressure lowering effects were observed in all intervention groups and co-administration of candesartan and amlodipine reduced blood pressure more than amlodipine alone, but similar to candesartan alone. No serious adverse event was reported throughout the study, and all treatment emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and were recovered without sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of candesartan and amlodipine did not change the systemic exposure of each drug alone in healthy subjects. The administration of candesartan 32 mg alone, amlodipine 10 mg alone, and co-administration of candesartan and amlodipine were well tolerated during the study.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic predictions of intestinal BCRP-mediated drug interactions of rosuvastatin in Koreans

It was recently reported that the C_max and AUC of rosuvastatin increases when it is coadministered with telmisartan and cyclosporine. Rosuvastatin is known to be a substrate of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, NTCP, and BCRP transporters. The aim of this study was to explore the mechanism of the interactions between rosuvastatin and two perpetrators, telmisartan and cyclosporine. Published (cyclosporine) or newly developed (telmisartan) PBPK models were used to this end. The rosuvastatin model in Simcyp (version 15)'s drug library was modified to reflect racial differences in rosuvastatin exposure. In the telmisartan–rosuvastatin case, simulated rosuvastatin C_maxI/C_max and AUC_I/AUC (with/without telmisartan) ratios were 1.92 and 1.14, respectively, and the T_max changed from 3.35 h to 1.40 h with coadministration of telmisartan, which were consistent with the aforementioned report (C_maxI/C_max: 2.01, AUC_I/AUC:1.18, T_max: 5 h → 0.75 h). In the next case of cyclosporine–rosuvastatin, the simulated rosuvastatin C_maxI/C_max and AUC_I/AUC (with/without cyclosporine) ratios were 3.29 and 1.30, respectively. The decrease in the CL_{int,BCRP,intestine} of rosuvastatin by telmisartan and cyclosporine in the PBPK model was pivotal to reproducing this finding in Simcyp. Our PBPK model demonstrated that the major causes of increase in rosuvastatin exposure are mediated by intestinal BCRP (rosuvastatin–telmisartan interaction) or by both of BCRP and OATP1B1/3 (rosuvastatin–cyclosporine interaction).

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of a telmisartan/S-amlodipine fixed-dose combination (CKD-828) formulation and coadministered telmisartan and S-amlodipine in healthy subjects

PURPOSE

A new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of telmisartan 80 mg and S-amlodipine 5 mg (CKD-828) has been developed to increase convenience (as only one tablet is required per day) and improve treatment compliance.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic characteristics and tolerability of an FDC of telmisartan and S-amlodipine were compared to those after coadministration of the individual agents in this randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way, four-period, crossover study. To analyze the telmisartan and S-amlodipine plasma concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours post-dose for telmisartan and 144 hours post-dose for S-amlodipine, in each period.

RESULTS

Forty-eight healthy subjects were enrolled, and 43 completed the study. The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurement (AUC0-t) values of telmisartan were 522.29 ng/mL and 2,475.16 ng·h/mL for the FDC, and 540.45 ng/mL and 2,559.57 ng·h/mL for the individual agents concomitantly administered, respectively. The mean Cmax and AUC0-t values of S-amlodipine were 2.71 ng/mL and 130.69 ng·h/mL for the FDC, and 2.74 ng/mL and 129.81 ng·h/mL for the individual agents concomitantly administered, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the telmisartan Cmax and AUC0-t (FDC of telmisartan and S-amlodipine/concomitant administration) were 0.8509 (0.7353-0.9846) and 0.9431 (0.8698-1.0226), respectively. The GMR and 90% CI for the S-amlodipine Cmax and AUC0-t (FDC/concomitant administration) were 0.9829 (0.9143-1.0567) and 0.9632 (0.8798-1.0546), respectively. As the intrasubject variability of the Cmax for telmisartan administered individually was 42.94%, all 90% CIs of the GMRs fell within the predetermined acceptance range. Both treatments were well tolerated in this study.

CONCLUSION

CKD-828 FDC tablets were shown to be bioequivalent to coadministration of the individual agents with the respective strength, in healthy subjects under fasting conditions. There was no significant difference in safety profile between the two treatments.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination vs concomitant administration of telmisartan and S-amlodipine in healthy adult volunteers

Objective

This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of telmisartan and S-amlodipine with those of concomitant administration of the two drugs.

Materials and methods

This was an open-label, randomized, crossover study in healthy male Koreans. All subjects were administered an FDC tablet containing 40 mg telmisartan and 5 mg S-amlodipine and were also coadministered the same dose of both drugs given separately. The crossover study design included a 14-day washout period between the two treatments. Blood samples were collected up to 168 h following drug administration. The plasma concentrations of telmisartan and S-amlodipine were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters and plasma concentration–time curves were compared. Safety was assessed by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and patient interviews.

Results

The geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs for the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC_t) were 0.8782 (0.8167–0.9444) and 0.9662 (0.9210–1.0136) for telmisartan and 1.0069 (0.9723–1.0427) and 1.0324 (0.9969–1.0690) for S-amlodipine, respectively. A total of 36 adverse events (AEs) were reported by 23 subjects, but no statistical differences were observed between the two treatments. The most frequently reported AE was a mild-to-moderate headache that was generally self-limiting.

Conclusion

For both telmisartan and S-amlodipine, the C_max and AUC_t 90% CIs were between ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results suggest that the FDC formulation is pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and has a similar safety profile to the coadministration of these drugs.

Retracted: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic predictions of intestinal BCRP-mediated effect of telmisartan on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in humans

'Physiologically based pharmacokinetic predictions of intestinal BCRP-mediated effect of telmisartan on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in humans' by Soo Hyeon Bae, Wan-Su Park, Seunghoon Han, Gab-jin Park, Jongtae Lee, Taegon Hong, Sangil Jeon and Dong-Seok Yim The above article, published online on 06 February 2017 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal Editor in Chief, K. Sandy Pang, and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The authors retracted the paper due to errors associated with use of log D vs. log P of telmisartan as inputs of the PBPK model. The authors concluded that there are too many changes in the article to be resolved by an Erratum, and had requested a retraction. Reference Bae, S. H., Park, W.-S., Han, S., Park, G., Lee, J., Hong, T., Jeon, S., and Yim, D.-S. (2016) Physiologically based pharmacokinetic predictions of intestinal BCRP-mediated effect of telmisartan on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in humans. Biopharm. Drug Dispos., doi: 10.1002/bdd.2060.

Efficacy and safety of two fixed-dose combinations of S-amlodipine and telmisartan (CKD-828) versus S-amlodipine monotherapy in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled using S-amlodipine monotherapy: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase III clinical study

Purpose

To evaluate the blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy and safety of CKD-828, a fixed-dose combination of S-amlodipine (the more active isomer of amlodipine besylate, which is calcium channel blocker) and telmisartan (long acting angiotensin receptor blocker), in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled with S-amlodipine monotherapy.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients (N=187) who failed to respond after 4-week S-amlodipine 2.5 mg monotherapy (sitting diastolic blood pressure [sitDBP] ≥90 mmHg) to receive CKD-828 2.5/40 mg (n=63), CKD-828 2.5/80 mg (n=63), or S-amlodipine 2.5 mg (n=61) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, mean sitDBP change from baseline to Week 8, was compared between the combination (CKD-828 2.5/40 mg and CKD-828 2.5/80 mg) and S-amlodipine monotherapy groups. The safety was assessed based on adverse events, vital signs, and physical examination findings.

Results

After the 8-week treatment, changes in sitDBP/systolic BP (SBP) were −9.67±6.50/−12.89±11.78, −10.72±6.19/−13.79±9.41, and −4.93±7.26/−4.55±11.27 mmHg in the CKD-828 2.5/40 mg (P<0.0001/P<0.0001), CKD-828 2.5/80 mg (P<0.0001/P<0.0001), and S-amlodipine 2.5 mg (P<0.0001/P=0.0027) groups, respectively, which were all significant BP reductions. At Week 8, the CKD-828 2.5/40 mg (sitDBP/SBP: P=0.0002/P<0.0001) and CKD-828 2.5/80 mg (sitDBP/SBP: P=0.0001/P<0.0001) showed superior BP-lowering effects to S-amlodipine 2.5 mg (P<0.001). At Week 4, all groups showed significant antihypertensive effects but both CKD-828 combinations (CKD-828 2.5/40 mg and CKD-828 2.5/80 mg) exhibited superior BP-lowering effects to that of S-amlodipine 2.5 mg (sitDBP/SBP: P=0.0028/P=0.0001 and P<0.0001/P=0.0012, respectively). The adverse event incidence was significantly lower in the CKD-828 2.5/40 mg (9.52%, P=0.0086) than in the S-amlodipine 2.5 mg group (27.87%) and increasing the telmisartan dose induced no unexpected adverse events, suggesting the safety of CKD-828.

Conclusion

CKD-828 is an effective and safe option for patients with inadequate responses to S-amlodipine monotherapy.

Long-term safety and efficacy of telmisartan/amlodipine single pill combination in the treatment of hypertension

The use of multiple drug regimens is increasingly recognized as a tacit requirement for the management of hypertension, a necessity fueled in part by rising rates of metabolic syndrome and diabetes. By targeting complementary pathways, combinations of antihypertensive drugs can be applied to provide effective blood pressure control while minimizing side effects and reducing exposure to high doses of individual medications. In addition, combination therapies, including angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), have the added benefit of reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity over other dual therapies while providing equivalent blood pressure control. It is possible that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which unlike ACE inhibitors are minimally affected by upregulation of alternative pathways for angiotensin II accumulation following long-term treatment, would also provide such outcome benefits. At issue, however, is maintaining patient compliance, as adding medications is known to reduce adherence to treatment regimens. The purpose of this review is to summarize existing trial data for the long-term safety and efficacy of a recent addition to the armamentarium of dual-antihypertensive therapeutic options, the telmisartan/amlodipine single pill combination. The areas where long-term data are lacking, notably clinical information regarding minorities and women, will also be discussed.