Setipiprant, a selective oral antagonist of human CRTH2: relative bioavailability of a capsule and a tablet formulation in healthy female and male subjects

Ramatroban-Based Analogues Containing Fluorine Group as Potential 18F-Labeled Positron Emission Tomography (PET) G-Protein Coupled Receptor 44 (GPR44) Tracers

Diabetes remains one of the fastest growing chronic diseases and is a leading source of morbidity and accelerated mortality in the world. Loss of beta cell mass (BCM) and decreased sensitivity to insulin underlie diabetes pathogenesis. Yet, the ability to safely and directly assess BCM in individuals with diabetes does not exist. Measures such as blood glucose provide only a crude indirect picture of beta cell health. PET imaging could, in theory, allow for safe, direct, and precise characterization of BCM. However, identification of beta cell-specific radiolabeled tracers remains elusive. G-protein coupled receptor 44 (GPR44) is a transmembrane protein that was characterized in 2012 as highly beta cell-specific within the insulin-positive islets of Langerhans. Accordingly, radiolabeling of existing GPR44 antagonists could be a viable method to accelerate PET tracer development. The present study aims to evaluate and summarize published analogues of the GPR44 antagonist ramatroban to develop 18F-labeled PET tracers for BCM analysis. The 77 corresponding ramatroban analogues containing a fluorine nuclide were characterized for properties including binding affinity, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic and metabolic profile, and 32 compounds with favorable properties were identified. This review illustrates the potential of GPR44 analogues for the development of PET tracers.

Lipid-Embedded Molecular Dynamics Simulation Model for Exploring the Reverse Prostaglandin D2 Agonism of CT-133 towards CRTH2 in the Treatment of Type-2 Inflammation Dependent Diseases

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) has been involved in several inflammation dependent diseases by mediating the chemotaxis of pro-inflammatory cells in response to allergy and other responses through PGD2 ligation. This CRTH2-PGD2 signaling pathway has become a target for treating allergic and type 2 inflammation dependent diseases, with many inhibitors developed to target the PGD2 binding pocket. One of such inhibitors is the ramatroban analog, CT-133, which exhibited therapeutic potency cigarette smoke-induced acute lung injury in patients. Nonetheless, the molecular mechanism and structural dynamics that accounts for its therapeutic prowess remain unclear. Employing computational tools, this study revealed that although the carboxylate moiety in CT-133 and the native agonist PGD2 aided in their stability within the CRTH2 binding pocket, the tetrahydrocarbazole group of CT-133 engaged in strong interactions with binding pocket residues which could have formed as the basis of the antagonistic advantage of CT-133. Tetrahydrocarbazole group interactions also enhanced the relative stability CT-133 within the binding pocket which consequently favored CT-133 binding affinity. CT-133 binding also induced an inactive or 'desensitized' state in the helix 8 of CRTH2 which could conversely favor the recruitment of arrestin. These revelations would aid in the speedy development of small molecule inhibitors of CRTH2 in the treatment of type 2 inflammation dependent diseases.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling of Receptor Internalization with CRTH2 Antagonists to Optimize Dose Selection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper-2 cells (CRTH2) is a G-protein-coupled receptor for prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), a key mediator in inflammatory disorders. Two selective and potent CRTH2 antagonists currently in clinical development, ACT-453859 and setipiprant, were compared with respect to their (predicted) clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models were developed to characterize how plasma concentrations (PK) of ACT-453859, its active metabolite ACT-463036 and setipiprant related to their effect on blocking PGD2-induced internalization of CRTH2 on eosinophils (PD). Simulations were used to identify doses and dosing regimens leading to 90 % of maximum blockade of CRTH2 internalization at trough.

RESULTS

A combined concentration of ACT-453859 and its metabolite ACT-463036, with weights proportional to potency (based on an eosinophil shape change assay), enabled good characterization of the PD effect. The modelling and simulation results facilitated decision making by suggesting an ACT-453859 dose of 400 mg once daily (or 100 mg twice daily) for clinically relevant CRTH2 antagonism.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacometric quantification demonstrated that CRTH2 internalization is a useful new biomarker to study CRTH2 antagonism. Ninety percent of maximum blockade of CRTH2 internalization at trough is suggested as a quantitative PD target in clinical studies.

Efficacy and safety of setipiprant in seasonal allergic rhinitis: results from Phase 2 and Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-referenced studies

Background

Antagonism of chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule on T-helper type-2 cells (CRTH2), a G-protein coupled receptor for prostaglandin D2, could be beneficial for treating allergic disorders. We present findings on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of a CRTH2 antagonist (setipiprant) in participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) in a real-life setting over 2 weeks.

Methods

A Phase 2 trial and a Phase 3 trial were conducted at seven centers in Texas, USA during the Mountain Cedar pollen season. Both were prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-referenced (cetirizine) studies. The Phase 2 trial assessed setipiprant 100–1000 mg b.i.d. and 1000 mg o.d. versus placebo in adult and elderly participants. The Phase 3 trial assessed setipiprant 1000 mg b.i.d. in adolescent, adult, and elderly participants. Efficacy was assessed using daytime nasal symptom scores (DNSS), night-time nasal symptom scores (NNSS) and daytime eye symptom scores (DESS).

Results

579 participants were randomized in the Phase 2 trial (mean age 41.6–43.4 years); 630 were randomized in the Phase 3 trial (mean age 37.5–40.7 years). A statistically significant, dose-related improvement in mean change from baseline DNSS was observed over 2 weeks with setipiprant 1000 mg b.i.d. versus placebo in the Phase 2 trial (−0.15 [95% CI −0.29, −0.01]; p = 0.030). Setipiprant 1000 mg b.i.d. had no significant effect on this endpoint in the Phase 3 trial (−0.02 [95% CI −0.12, 0.07]; p = 0.652). Total and individual NNSS and DESS symptom scores were significantly improved with setipiprant 1000 mg b.i.d. versus placebo in the Phase 2 but not the Phase 3 trial. Setipiprant showed a favorable safety/tolerability profile.

Conclusions

The Phase 2 trial was the first large clinical study to assess a CRTH2 antagonist in seasonal AR in a real-life setting. Setipiprant dose-related efficacy in the Phase 2 trial was not confirmed during Phase 3. Setipiprant was well tolerated in both studies.

Trial registration NCT01241214 and NCT01484119

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13223-017-0183-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and setipiprant, a CRTH2 antagonist

PURPOSE

Setipiprant, a selective oral CRTH2 antagonist, has been investigated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. In vitro data showed that setipiprant has a weak induction potential on CYP3A4. An interaction at the hepatic level between setipiprant and CYP3A4 substrates was not expected even at the dosing regimen of 1,000 mg setipiprant b.i.d. due to the high plasma protein binding. However, at this dosing regimen, interactions at the gut level could not be excluded.

METHODS

In this single-center, open-label study, 40 mg of simvastatin was administered orally on Day 1, and then concomitantly with setipiprant on Day 10 following 9 days of setipiprant 1,000 mg b.i.d. to 22 healthy male subjects.

RESULTS

In the presence of setipiprant, the simvastatin concentration-time profile was similar to that of simvastatin alone. The concentrations of simvastatin were, however, slightly lower, resulting in a 9 % decrease in C max (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.91, 90 % confidence interval (CI) (0.73, 1.13)) and in a 16 % lower AUC0-∞ (GMR 0.84, 90 % CI (0.72, 0.99)). Exposure to simvastatin acid was similar when comparing simvastatin with or without setipiprant. The GMR and 90 % CI for AUC0-∞ were within the 0.8 to 1.25 limits, whereas those for C max were outside (GMR 2.73, 90 % CI (2.11, 3.53)). Moreover, the median t max of simvastatin acid occurred earlier (1.8 h) when combined compared to 3.0 h when administered alone.

CONCLUSIONS

As setipiprant has little impact on simvastatin pharmacokinetics, it does not modulate CYP3A4 in a clinically relevant manner.