A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Using the JBR.10-Based 15-Gene Expression Signature to Guide Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Prognostic value of TLR from FDG PET/CT in patients with margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic value of TLR from PET/CT in patients with resection margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compare high-risk factors necessitating adjuvant treatment (AT).

METHODS

Consecutive FDG PET/CT scans performed for the initial staging of NSCLC stage IB and IIA were retrospectively reviewed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor and mean SUV of the liver were acquired. The tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR) was also calculated. Charts were reviewed for basic patient characteristics and high-risk factors for considering AT (poor differentiation, visceral pleura invasion, vascular invasion, tumors > 4 cm, and wedge resection). Statistical analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 112 patients included, 15 (13.4%) died, with a median overall survival (OS) of 43.8 months. Twenty-two patients (19.6%) exhibited recurrence, with median disease-free survival (DFS) of 36.0 months. In univariable analysis, pathology, poor differentiation, and TLR were associated with shorter DFS and OS. In multivariable analysis, TLR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.263, p = 0.008) and differentiation (HR = 3.087, p = 0.012) were associated with shorter DFS. Also, TLR (HR = 1.422, p < 0.001) was associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSION

TLR from FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and survival. PET parameters constitute risk factors for consideration in the decision-making for AT in margin-negative stage IB and IIA NSCLC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In this study, TLR from FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic factor in stage IB-IIA non-small cell cancer patients. Although additional validation studies are warranted, TLR has the potential to be used to determine the need for adjuvant therapy.

KEY POINTS

• High TLR is an independent poor prognostic factor in stage IB-IIA NSCLC. • Adjuvant treatment should be considered in patients with high TLR following complete tumor resection.

Development of biomarkers for predicting recurrence by determining the metastatic ability of cancer cells

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been carried out for patients with cancer who underwent curative resection, but it is basically not needed for patients without micro-metastatic lesions who undergo a perfectly curative surgical operation. The patients who need adjuvant chemotherapy are defined as those whose micro-metastases cannot be detected by imaging modalities in the other sites of the resective areas, despite curative resection for the primary sites. If biomarkers to efficiently evaluate the metastatic potential of each patient could be developed, we may be able to provide personalized adjuvant chemotherapy in the clinical setting. Actinin-4 (ACTN4, gene name ACTN4) is an actin-bundling protein that we identified in 1998 as a novel molecule involved in cancer invasion and metastasis. Protein overexpression of actinin-4 in cancer cells leads to the invasive phenotype, and patients with gene amplification of ACTN4 have a worse prognosis than patients with a normal copy number in some cancers, including pancreas, lung, and salivary gland cancers. In this review, the biological roles of actinin-4 for cancer invasion and metastasis are summarized, and the potential usefulness of actinin-4 as a biomarker for evaluation of metastatic ability is examined.

Comprehensive Comparison Between Adjuvant Targeted Therapy and Chemotherapy for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Background

Chemotherapy has been the current standard adjuvant treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, while recent studies showed benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to comprehensively evaluate the benefit of EGFR-TKI compared with chemotherapy for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after resection from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.

Method

A Markov model was established. Clinical data were based on the phase 3, ADJUVANT trial, where stage II-IIIA, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were randomized into gefitinib group or chemotherapy group after resection. Cost parameters mainly included costs of drugs, examinations, and adverse events (AEs). Effect parameters were evaluated by quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Outcomes contained incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), average cost-effective ratio (ACER), and net benefit. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set as 3 times per capita gross domestic product ($30,828/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to verify the stability of the model.

Results

Patients who received gefitinib had both a higher cost ($12,057.98 vs. $11,883.73) and a higher QALY (1.55 vs. 1.42) than patients who received chemotherapy. With an ICER of $1,345.62/QALY, adjuvant gefitinib was of economic benefit compared with chemotherapy. The ACER and net benefit were also consistent (gefitinib vs. chemotherapy, ACER: $7,802.30/QALY vs. $8,392.77/QALY; net benefit: $35,584.85 vs. $31,767.17). Sensitivity analyses indicated the stability of the model and the impact of utility.

Conclusion

Adjuvant EGFR-TKI application for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients was cost-effective compared with chemotherapy, which might provide a reference for clinical decision-making and medical insurance policy formulation in China.

Reverse engineering a predictive signature characterized by proliferation, DNA damage, and immune escape from stage I lung adenocarcinoma recurrence

Identifying early-stage cancer patients at risk for progression is a major goal of biomarker research. This report describes a novel 19-gene signature (19-GCS) that predicts stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) recurrence and response to therapy and performs comparably in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC), which shares LAC molecular traits. Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and cross-validation analyses were used to build the signature from training, test, and validation sets comprising 831 stage I LAC transcriptomes from multiple independent data sets. A statistical analysis was performed using the R language. Pathway and gene set enrichment were used to identify underlying mechanisms. 19-GCS strongly predicts overall survival and recurrence-free survival in stage I LAC (P=0.002 and P<0.001, respectively) and in stage I-II PAC (P<0.0001 and P<0.0005, respectively). A multivariate cox regression analysis demonstrated the independence of 19-GCS from significant clinical factors. Pathway analyses revealed that 19-GCS high-risk LAC and PAC tumors are characterized by increased proliferation, enhanced stemness, DNA repair deficiency, and compromised MHC class I and II antigen presentation along with decreased immune infiltration. Importantly, high-risk LAC patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant cisplatin while PAC patients derive additional benefit from FOLFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine-based regimens. When validated prospectively, this proof-of-concept biomarker may contribute to tailoring treatment, recurrence reduction, and survival improvements in early-stage lung and pancreatic cancers.