Radical Treatment of Stage II Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With Nonsurgical Approaches: A Multi-institution Report of Outcomes

Investigation of uncertainty in internal target volume definition for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

This study evaluated the validity of internal target volumes (ITVs) defined by three- (3DCT) and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), and subsequently compared them with actual movements during treatment. Five patients with upper lobe lung tumors were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) at 48 Gy in four fractions. Planning 3DCT images were acquired with peak-exhale and peak-inhale breath-holds, and 4DCT images were acquired in the cine mode under free breathing. Cine images were acquired using an electronic portal imaging device during irradiation. Tumor coverage was evaluated based on the manner in which the peak-to-peak breathing amplitude on the planning CT covered the range of tumor motion (± 3 SD) during irradiation in the left-right, anteroposterior, and cranio-caudal (CC) directions. The mean tumor coverage of the 4DCT-based ITV was better than that of the 3DCT-based ITV in the CC direction. The internal margin should be considered when setting the irradiation field for 4DCT. The proposed 4DCT-based ITV can be used as an efficient approach in free-breathing SBRT for upper-lobe tumors of the lung because its coverage is superior to that of 3DCT.

Nonoperative Treatment of Large (5-7 cm), Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Commonly Deviates From NCCN Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of nonoperative patients with large, node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poorly defined. Current NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) recommend definitive radiotherapy (RT) with or without sequential chemotherapy and do not include concurrent chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) as a treatment option. In this study, we identified factors that predict nonadherence to NCCN Guidelines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who received definitive RT for nonmetastatic, node-negative NSCLC with tumor size of 5 to 7 cm were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 through 2016. Patients were evaluated by RT type (stereotactic body RT [SBRT], hypofractionated RT [HFRT], or conventionally fractionated RT [CFRT]) and chemotherapy use (none, sequential, or concurrent with RT). Patients were classified as receiving NCCN-adherent (RT with or without sequential chemotherapy) or NCCN-nonadherent (concurrent chemoRT) treatment. Demographic and clinical factors were assessed with logistic regression modeling. Overall survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and univariable/multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 2,020 patients in our cohort, 32% received NCCN-nonadherent concurrent chemoRT, whereas others received NCCN-adherent RT alone (51%) or sequential RT and chemotherapy (17%). CFRT was most widely used (64% CFRT vs 22% SBRT vs 14% HFRT). Multivariable analysis revealed multiple factors to be associated with NCCN-nonadherent chemoRT: age ≤70 versus >70 years (odds ratio [OR] , 2.72; P<.001), treatment at a nonacademic facility (OR, 1.65; P<.001), and tumor size 6 to 7 cm versus 5 to 6 cm (OR, 1.27; P=.026). Survival was similar between the NCCN-nonadherent chemoRT and NCCN-adherent groups (hazard ratio, 1.00; P=.992) in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of inoperable patients with large, node-negative NSCLC are not treated according to NCCN Guidelines and receive concurrent chemoRT. Younger patients with larger tumors receiving treatment at nonacademic medical centers were more likely to receive NCCN-nonadherent therapy, but adherence to NCCN Guidelines was not associated with differences in overall survival.

Applicability of the PACIFIC trial results in patients not eligible for the PACIFIC trial: Canadian rapid consensus statement and recommendations

BACKGROUND

The PACIFIC study established durvalumab as a standard of care for consolidation therapy in patients treated with radical intent chemoradiation for stage III inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. In clinical practice, many patients are not eligible for trials, yet radical intent chemoradiation may still be used.

METHODS

A virtual anonymous tumour board Delphi-model was used in order to generate consensus on the use of durvalumab in six clinical situations where chemoradiation is used in clinical practice and recommended in guidelines, yet not PACIFIC eligible. Two anonymous iterations were sent and recommendations were circulated for approval and comment. Results are presented using a modified PICOT format (patients, intervention, control, outcomes, and ongoing trials).

RESULTS

In three of the scenarios, consensus was reached and recommendations were for the use of consolidation durvalumab, but being respectful of potentially increased toxicity/reduced benefit in comparison to PACIFIC results (treatment of stage IIB inoperable, recurrent mediastinal disease, and residual gross disease post attempted surgical removal). There was a recommendation against using durvalumab in resected stage III disease with R1 or R0 margins, even if chemoradiation were considered. There was not consensus on the use of consolidation durvalumab in the setting of oligometastatic disease or in the setting of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma or combined small cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of 'real-world' lung cancer often involves chemoradiation in settings outside of stage III and eligible for the PACIFIC study. This paper offers recommendations in these scenarios based on a consensus approach.

A Japanese lung cancer registry study on demographics and treatment modalities in medically treated patients

This study provides the benchmark statistics on medically treated patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in Japan. Demographic background, treatment, and prognosis were obtained from patients with lung cancer pathologically diagnosed in 2012, who received nonsurgical treatment. Descriptive statistics and their associations with survival were analyzed. In total, 12 320 patients were registered from 314 institutions in Japan. The median age was 70 years, and 73% of the patients were male. The number (%) of stages I, II, III, and IV diseases were 468 (3.8%), 421 (3.4%), 3260 (26.5%), and 8171 (66.3%), respectively. NSCLC and SCLC accounted for 9872 (80.1%) and 2353 (19.1%) patients, respectively. Thoracic radiotherapy‐based therapy, chemotherapy, and palliative care alone were administered to 2572 (20.9%), 7790 (63.2%), and 1952 (15.8%) patients, respectively. Clinical TNM stage was one of the strongest prognostic factors with the 3‐year survival rates of 62.9%, 47.3%, 40.0%, 27.8%, 37.5%, 26.5%, and 18.2% for stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IV, respectively. Among 6158 patients with NSCLC treated with chemotherapy, the 3‐year survival rate was 33.4% in patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) at some point in their clinical course, whereas it was 17.4% in patients who did not. The 3‐year survival rate of SCLC was only 15.9%. In conclusion, approximately two‐thirds of the patients were diagnosed as stage IV at the initial diagnosis. Use of EGFR‐TKIs significantly improved the survival of patients with NSCLC.

Definitive treatment patterns and survival in stage II non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study delineated definitive treatment patterns for Stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States and evaluated survival by treatment approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with clinically-staged Stage II NSCLC treated with surgery-based therapy, chemoradiation, conventionally-fractionated radiation (CFR), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Median survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals were computed using Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

Between 2004-2012, 19,749 patients met study criteria: 13,382 (67.8%) underwent surgery-based treatment, 4,310 (21.8%) received chemoradiation, 1,606 (8.1%) received CFR, and 451 (2.3%) received SBRT. Surgery and SBRT utilization increased over time while CFR and chemoradiation decreased (all p ≤ 0.002). Patients receiving radiation-based treatments were older, with more comorbidities, and higher T/N stage (all p < 0.0001). With median follow-up of 25.2 months, median survival was 51.6, 23.3, 15.4, and 23.7 months for surgery-based treatment, chemoradiation, CFR, and SBRT, respectively (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, chemoradiation (HR 1.67 [1.59-1.75], p < 0.0001), CFR (HR 2.38 [2.22-2.55], p < 0.0001), and SBRT (HR 1.76 [1.53-2.01], p < 0.0001) were associated with decreased survival versus surgery-based treatment. CFR was associated with decreased survival versus chemoradiation (HR 1.52 [1.41-1.63], p < 0.0001) and SBRT (HR 1.39 [1.19-1.61], p < 0.0001). SBRT was associated with similar survival versus chemoradiation (HR 1.10 [0.95-1.27], p = 0.212).

CONCLUSION

NCDB data demonstrate increasing use of surgery-based treatments and SBRT for Stage II NSCLC over time. Radiation-based therapies were associated with decreased survival compared to surgery. CFR was associated with decreased survival compared to chemoradiation and SBRT.