Feasible Optimization of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Dose by Tumor Size for Stage I Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

Impact of Maximum Point Dose Within the Planning Target Volume on Local Control of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the maximum dose delivered to the planning target volume (PTV) in the delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancer. We investigated whether higher biologically effective doses (BED) within the PTV were associated with improved tumor control.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with early-stage, node-negative nonsmall cell lung cancer who received curative-intent SBRT between 2005 and 2018. We calculated the maximum BED (maxBED) within the PTV for all patients, analyzing outcomes using the cumulative incidence method and Fine-Gray test statistics to assess prognostic impact.

RESULTS

We analyzed 171 patients (median age, 70.2; range, 43 to 90 y) with 181 lung nodules. Median follow-up was 2.7 years (range, 0.1 to 12 y) for all patients and 4.2 years (range, 0.2 to 8.4 y) for living patients. Median maximum tumor diameter was 1.9 cm (range, 0.7 to 5.6 cm). Patients received a prescription of 48 or 50 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions, respectively, except for one who received 60 Gy in 5 fractions. Median maxBED was 120 Gy (range, 101 to 171 Gy). There was no difference in the 3-year local control (LC) rate among patients treated with a maxBED<120 Gy versus ≥120 Gy ( P =0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in LC were observed between patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with SBRT in 4 or 5 fractions with a maxBED≥120 Gy. However, a higher maxBED trended toward improved LC rates, suggesting a maxBED threshold greater than 120 Gy may be needed to improve LC rates.

Relationship between Dose Prescription Methods and Local Control Rate in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Variations in dose prescription methods in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) make it difficult to properly compare the outcomes of published studies. We conducted a comprehensive search of the published literature to summarize the outcomes by discerning the relationship between local control (LC) and dose prescription sites. We systematically searched PubMed to identify observational studies reporting LC after SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC. The correlations between LC and four types of biologically effective doses (BED) were evaluated, which were calculated from nominal, central, and peripheral prescription points and, from those, the average BED. To evaluate information on SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC, 188 studies were analyzed. The number of relevant articles increased over time. The use of an inhomogeneity correction was mentioned in less than half of the articles, even among the most recent. To evaluate the relationship between the four BEDs and LC, 33 studies were analyzed. Univariate meta-regression revealed that only the central BED significantly correlated with the 3-year LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC (p = 0.03). As a limitation, tumor volume, which might affect the results of this study, could not be considered due to a lack of data. In conclusion, the central dose prescription is appropriate for evaluating the correlation between the dose and LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC. The standardization of SBRT dose prescriptions is desirable.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are recommended for patients with inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with both offering promising results. However, it is largely unknown which of these two treatment modalities provides superior benefits for patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes and safety between SBRT and RFA in patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

Eligible studies published between 2001 and 2020 were obtained through a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Original English-language studies on the treatment of early-stage NSCLC with SBRT or RFA were included. Local control (LC) rates, overall survival (OS) rates, and adverse events were obtained by pooled analyses.

Results

Eighty-seven SBRT studies (12,811 patients) and 18 RFA studies (1,535 patients) met the eligibility criteria. For SBRT, the LC rates (with 95% confidence intervals) at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98% (97-98%), 95% (95-96%), 92% (91-93%), and 92% (91-93%), respectively, which were significantly higher than those for RFA [75% (69-82%), 31% (22-39%), 67% (58-76%), and 41% (30-52%), respectively] (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in short-term OS between SBRT and RFA [1-year OS rate: 87% (86-88%) versus 89% (88-91%), P=0.07; 2-year OS rate: 71% (69-72%) versus 69% (64-74%), P=0.42]. Regarding long-term OS, the 3- and 5-year OS rates for SBRT were 58% (56-59%) and 39% (37-40%), respectively, which were significantly (P<0.01) superior to those for RFA [48% (45-51%) and 21% (19-23%), respectively]. The most common complication of SBRT was radiation pneumonitis (grade ≥2), making up 9.1% of patients treated with SBRT, while pneumothorax was the most common complication of RFA, making up 27.2% of patients treated with RFA.

Discussion

Compared with RFA, SBRT has superior LC and long-term OS rates but similar short-term OS rates. Prospective randomized trials with large sample sizes comparing the efficacy of SBRT and RFA are warranted.

Can dosimetry affect local control and survival in patients with early-stage lung cancer treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)? An analysis of the UK's largest cohort of lung SABR patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

A recent study has shown that tight conformity of lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) plans might worsen loco-regional control and can predict distant metastases. The study aims to report overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and dosimetry of early-stage lung cancer patients treated with SABR and to try to explore any dosimetric predictor of outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients treated in our institute (May 2009-August 2018) were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes. Dosimetric data were extracted from Xio and Monaco software. Patients were treated according to the United Kingdom (UK) SABR consortium guidelines. Kaplan-Meier's analysis with log-rank test was used for survival analysis. The univariate and multivariable Cox regression model was used for correlating dosimetric variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

We treated 1266 patients with median age of 75 years and 47.4% were male. Median follow up was 56 months. Median OS was 36 months with 1, 2, and 5 years OS of 84.2%, 64.5%, and 31.5%, respectively. Median for PFS and LRFS was not reached. One, 2, and 5 years PFS were 87.4%, 78.4%, and 72.5%, respectively. One, 2, and 5 years LRFS were 98.2%, 95.1%, and 92.5%, respectively. Planning target volume (PTV), dose to 99% volume of PTV (D99), and R50 (volume receiving the 50% dose/volume (PTV)) were significantly associated with OS. PTV, mean lung dose (MLD), V20 (volume of lung minus gross tumour volume (GTV) receiving 20 Gy), V12.5 (volume of lung minus GTV receiving 12.5 Gy), and dose fractionation were significantly associated with PFS. Nothing was associated with LRFS on univariate analysis. R100 of >1.1 was associated with better OS, PFS, and LRFS compared to R100 ≤ 1.1.

CONCLUSION

SABR achieves good clinical outcomes in patients with early-stage lung cancer; even in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. In the largest UK early lung cancer cohort treated with SABR, we found that dosimetry correlates with clinical outcomes. Further validation of these results is needed to guide future optimisation of SABR delivery.

[Prognosis factors after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma]

Lung cancer is the fourth most common cancer in France with a prevalence of 30,000 new cases per year. Lobectomy surgery with dissection is the gold standard treatment for T1-T2 localized non-small cell lung carcinoma. A segmentectomy may be proposed to operable patients but fragile from a respiratory point of view. For inoperable patients or patients with unsatisfactory pulmonary function tests, local treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy may be proposed to achieve local control rates ranging from 85 to 95% at 3-5 years. Several studies have examined prognostic factors after stereotaxic pulmonary radiotherapy. We conducted a general review of the literature to identify factors affecting local control.

Calculating the individualized fraction regime in stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer based on uncomplicated tumor control probability function

BACKGROUND

To calculate the individualized fraction regime (IFR) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP, P⁺) function.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with peripheral lung cancer or lung metastases who had undergone SBRT were analyzed. Treatment planning was performed using the dose regime of 48 Gy in 4 fractions. Dose volume histogram (DVH) data for the gross tumor volume (GTV), lung, chest wall (CW) and rib were exported and the dose bin was multiplied by a certain percentage of the dose in that bin which ranged from 1 to 200% in steps of 1%. For each dose fraction, P⁺ values were calculated by considering the tumor control probability (TCP), radiation-induced pneumonitis (RIP), chest wall pain (CWP) and radiation-induced rib fracture (RIRF). UTCP values as a function of physical dose were plotted and the maximum P⁺ values corresponded to the optimal therapeutic gain. The IFR in 3 fractions was also calculated with the same method by converting the dose using the linear quadratic (LQ) model.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients attained an IFR using the introduced methods. All the patients achieved a TCP value higher than 92.0%. The IFR ranged from 3 × 10.8 Gy to 3 × 12.5 Gy for 3 fraction regimes and from 4 × 9.2 Gy to 4 × 10.7 Gy for 4 fraction regimes. Four patients with typical tumor characteristics demonstrated that the IFR was patient-specific and could maximize the therapeutic gain. Patients with a large tumor had a lower TCP and UTCP and a smaller fractional dose than patients with a small tumor. Patients with a tumor adjacent to the organ at risk (OAR) or at a high risk of RIP had a lower UTCP and a smaller fractional dose compared with patients with a tumor located distant from the OAR.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method is capable of predicting the IFR for NSCLC patients undergoing SBRT. Further validation in clinical samples is required.

Maximum standardized uptake value at pre-treatment PET in estimating lung cancer progression after stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify the feasibility of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) as a predictive factor for prognosis in early stage primary lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven T1-3N0M0 primary lung cancer patients treated with curative SBRT between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Four patients (14.8%) treated with SBRT to address residual tumor after wedge resection and one patient (3.7%) with local recurrence after resection were included. The SUVmax at baseline PET/CT was assessed to determine its relationship with prognosis after SBRT. Patients were divided into two groups based on maximum SUVmax on pre-treatment FDG PET/CT, estimated by receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 17.7 months (range, 2.3 to 60.0 months). The actuarial 2-year local control, progressionfree survival (PFS), and overall survival were 80.4%, 66.0%, and 78.2%, respectively. With regard to failure patterns, 5 patients exhibited local failure (in-field failure, 18.5%), 1 (3.7%) experienced regional nodal relapse, and other 2 (7.4%) developed distant failure. SUVmax was significantly correlated with progression (p = 0.08, optimal cut-off point SUVmax > 5.1). PFS was significantly influenced by pretreatment SUVmax (SUVmax > 5.1 vs. SUVmax ≤ 5.1; p = 0.012) and T stage (T1 vs. T2-3; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

SUVmax at pre-treatment FDG PET/CT demonstrated a predictive value for PFS after SBRT for lung cancer.

Promising Clinical Outcome With Long Term Follow-Up After Body Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Stereotactic ablative radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for patients with inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the body gamma knife SRS (ɤ-SRS) is a special SABR technology developed in China. This study prospectively assessed the clinical outcome, toxicity and cost following body ɤ-SRS for early stage NSCLC. Methods: From 2007 to 2010, a total of 29 patients with early stage NSCLC were prospectively enrolled in this study. The prescription dose for Planning Target Volume (PTV), Clinical Target Volume (CTV), and Gross Target Volume (GTV) were 50, 60, and 70 gray (Gy) in 10 fractions. Isodose curves of 50, 60, and 70% covered at least 100% of PTV, 90% of CTV, and 80% of GTV, respectively. The body ɤ-SRS was delivered 5 days per week and completed in 2 weeks. Results: Median follow-up time was 62.0 (range 11.1-140.3) months. 1-, 3-, 5-year OS rates were 93.1%, 72.0%, 60.3%; PFS rates were 86.2, 64.2 and 48.8%; and LR, RR, and DM rates were 10.9%, 21.4%, 29.0%. The median cost of the body ɤ-SRS during treatment was 4,838 (range 4,615-4,923) dollars and the median cost through 5 years was 36,960 (range 9920-56,824) dollars. Conclusion: With existing clinical data, the body ɤ-SRS is an effective treatment option for patients with medically inoperable early stage NSCLC or patients who do not prefer operation, as they may benefit from the minimized toxicity. Due to excellent cost effectiveness, the availability of the body ɤ-SRS will expand, especially in developing nations, and underdeveloped countries.

Twice-daily Thoracic Radiotherapy for Limited-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer Does Not Increase the Incidence of Acute Severe Esophagitis

PURPOSE

Acute esophagitis is common after thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) given with chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS SCLC). Although twice-daily TRT to 45 Gy in 30 fractions is considered standard, some clinicians are reluctant to use this schedule because of its perceived impracticality and risk of severe esophagitis. We reviewed a single-institution experience with severe (grade ≥ 3) esophagitis after TRT with chemotherapy for LS SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 504 patients were identified as having received TRT (≥45 Gy) with platinum-containing chemotherapy for LS SCLC at MD Anderson Cancer Center in 1987 through 2012. Patients with complete or good partial response were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation. Esophagitis was scored retrospectively with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, V3.0. Clinical variables were analyzed for possible association with acute grade ≥ 3 esophagitis.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 23.9 months (range, 1.2-240.8 months), 103 (20%) patients had experienced grade ≥ 3 esophagitis. In univariate analysis, TRT dose ≥ 60 Gy was the only factor associated with severe esophagitis (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-3.30; P = .043); use of twice-daily TRT was not (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.61-1.52; P = .867). The significance of TRT to ≥ 60 Gy was maintained in multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for tumor size (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.05-3.46; P = .034).

CONCLUSIONS

TRT to ≥ 60 Gy predicted acute severe esophagitis, but twice-daily fractionation did not. Standard-dose 45-Gy twice-daily TRT should not be avoided for fear of severe esophagitis.

Evolution of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer and Birmingham's (UK) Experience

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has taken a pivotal role in early lung cancer management particularly in the medically inoperable patients. Retrospective studies have shown this to be well tolerated with comparable results to surgery and no significant increase in toxicity. Paucity of randomized evidence has dictated initiation of several trials to provide good quality evidence to steer future practice. This review summaries salient developments in lung SABR, comparisons to surgery and other platforms and our local experience at University Hospitals Birmingham, UK of lung SABR since its initiation in June 2013.