Single-Dose Rasburicase Might Be Adequate To Overcome Tumor Lysis Syndrome In Hematological Malignancies

Understanding oncologic emergencies and related emergency department visits and hospitalizations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer frequently visit the emergency department (ED) and are at high risk for hospitalization due to severe illness from cancer progression or treatment side effects. With an aging population and rising cancer incidence rates worldwide, it is crucial to understand how EDs and other acute care venues manage oncologic emergencies. Insights from other nations and health systems may inform resources necessary for optimal ED management and novel care delivery pathways. We described clinical management of oncologic emergencies and their contribution to ED visits and hospitalizations worldwide.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed original research studies published in the English language between January 1st, 2003, to December 31st, 2022, garnered from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We included all studies investigating adult (≥ 18 years) cancer patients with emergency visits. We examined chief complaints or predictors of ED use that explicitly defined oncologic emergencies.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 49 articles addressing cancer-related emergency visits. Most publications reported single-site studies (n = 34/49), with approximately even distribution across clinical settings- ED (n = 22/49) and acute care hospital/ICU (n = 27/49). The number of patient observations varied widely among the published studies (range: 9 - 87,555 patients), with most studies not specifying the cancer type (n = 33/49), stage (n = 41/49), or treatment type (n = 36/49). Most studies (n = 31/49) examined patients aged ≥ 60 years. Infection was the most common oncologic emergency documented (n = 22/49), followed by pain (n = 20/49), dyspnea (n = 19/49), and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (n = 17/49). Interventions within the ED or hospital ranged from pharmacological management with opioids (n = 11/49), antibiotics (n = 9/49), corticosteroids (n = 5/49), and invasive procedures (e.g., palliative stenting; n = 13/49) or surgical interventions (n = 2/49).

CONCLUSION

Limited research specifically addresses oncologic emergencies despite the international prevalence of ED presentations among cancer patients. Patients with cancer presenting to the ED appear to have a variety of complaints which could result from their cancers and thus may require tailored diagnostic and intervention pathways to provide optimal acute care. Further acute geriatric oncology research may clarify the optimal management strategies to improve the outcomes for this vulnerable patient population.

Rasburicase in treating tumor lysis syndrome: An umbrella review

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) remains a debilitating cause of hospitalization and death in patients with cancer and is a significant challenge for healthcare providers despite advancements in its management. This umbrella review analyzed the results of meta-analyses on the use of rasburicase in the treatment of patients with cancer. A literature search was performed of five databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Global Index Medicus, and ScienceDirect) for articles with full texts available online. A measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and Review Manager software was used to conduct all statistical analyses. The systematic search identified eight relevant meta-analyses, with primary analyses including outcome data that analyzed mortality, renal failure, and comparisons with allopurinol. The pooled data showed that rasburicase effectively reduced TLS development and serum uric acid levels in children and adults with malignancies. Most outcomes did not differ significantly compared with those of allopurinol. Future trials should focus on the cost-effectiveness of rasburicase compared to that of allopurinol while including high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients. Rasburicase is safe and effective for managing patients with TLS. However, recent large-scale meta-analyses have reported conflicting results. Most meta-analyses were graded as low to critically low as per AMSTAR 2. The analysis revealed that the benefit of rasburicase did not differ significantly from that of allopurinol, which has higher cost-effectiveness and fewer side effects.