Real-World Persistence and Time to Next Treatment With Ibrutinib in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Including Patients at High Risk for Atrial Fibrillation or Stroke

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in Medicare patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective claims analysis (2015-2020)

AIMS

To understand treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and the economic burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly adults in the US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective database analysis utilized US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data from 2015 to 2020 to describe DLBCL patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among patients aged ≥66 years. Patients were indexed at DLBCL diagnosis and required to have continuous enrollment from 12 months pre-index until 3 months post-index. HCRU and costs (USD 2022) are reported as per-patient per-month (PPPM) estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 11,893 patients received ≥1-line (L) therapy; 1,633 and 391 received ≥2 L and ≥3 L therapies, respectively. Median (Q1, Q3) age at 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L initiation, respectively, was 76 (71, 81), 77 (72, 82), and 77 (72, 82) years. The most common therapy was R-CHOP (70.9%) for 1 L and bendamustine ± rituximab for 2 L (18.7%) and 3 L (17.4%). CAR T was used by 14.8% of patients in 3 L. Overall, 39.6% (1 L), 42.1% (2 L), and 47.8% (3 L) of patients had all-cause hospitalizations. All-cause mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM during each line were $22,060 ($20,121 [$16,676-$24,597]) in 1 L, $30,027 ($20,868 [$13,416-$31,016]) in 2 L, and $47,064 ($25,689 [$15,555-$44,149]) in 3 L, with increasing costs driven primarily by inpatient expenses. Total all-cause 3 L mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM for patients with and without CAR T were $153,847 ($100,768 [$26,534-$253,630]) and $28,466 ($23,696 [$15,466-$39,107]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No clear standard of care exists in 3 L therapy for older adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. The economic burden of DLBCL intensifies with each progressing line of therapy, thus underscoring the need for additional therapeutic options.

Time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line ibrutinib or acalabrutinib

Aim: To investigate real-world time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line (1L) ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. Materials & methods: US specialty pharmacy electronic medical records (21/11/2018-30/4/2022) were used; patients initiated 1L on/after 21/11/2019 (acalabrutinib approval). Results: Among 710 patients receiving ibrutinib, 5.9% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 9.2 months); among 373 patients receiving acalabrutinib, 7.5% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 5.9 months). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, acalabrutinib-treated patients were 89% more likely to initiate next treatment (hazard ratio = 1.89; p = 0.016). Conclusion: This study addresses a need for real-world comparative effectiveness between 1L ibrutinib and acalabrutinib and shows that next treatment (a clinically meaningful measure for real-world progression) occurred less frequently with 1L ibrutinib.

Ibrutinib as first line therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients over 80 years old: A retrospective real-life multicenter Italian cohort

Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) predominantly affects the elderly, limited data exists about the outcomes of over 80-year-old patients, usually underrepresented in clinical trials. We conducted a multicenter study enrolling 79 consecutive CLL patients ≥80 years at the time of frontline therapy, all treated with ibrutinib. Nearly 48% of cases exhibited unmutated IGHV genes, 32% 17p deletion, and 39.2% TP53 mutations; 63.3% displayed a cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) > 6. The overall response rate on ibrutinib, computed in 74/79 patients (5 patients excluded for early withdrawal), was 89.9%. After a median follow-up of 28.9 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 42.5 and 51.8 months, respectively. CIRS>6 and temporary discontinuation of ibrutinib lasting for 7-30 days were the only parameters associated with a significantly shorter PFS and were both relevant in predicting a shorter PFS compared to patients with CIRS≤6 and therapy discontinuation ≤7 days. The most common grade≥3 adverse events were infections (25.5%), neutropenia (10.1%), and anemia (2.5%). Eighteen patients (22.8%) experienced a cardiovascular event, including grade-2 atrial fibrillation (n = 9; 11%), grade-2 hypertension (n = 5; 6%), heart failure (n = 3; 3%), and acute coronary syndrome (n = 1; 1%). Mild bleeding events were observed in 27 patients (34.2%). Ibrutinib was permanently discontinued in 26 patients due to progressive disease (n = 11, including 5 Richter's syndromes), secondary malignancies (n = 6), infections (n = 3), cardiac failure (n = 3), severe bleeding (n = 2), and sudden death (n = 1). In conclusion, our analyses confirmed the overall effectiveness and favorable safety profile of the ibrutinib-single agent therapeutic approach in CLL patients ≥80 years.

Real-World Comparison of First-Line Treatment Adherence Between Single-Agent Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Purpose

Increased dosing frequency adversely affects treatment adherence and outcomes in chronic diseases; however, such data related to treatment adherence is lacking in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). This study compared adherence between patients treated with ibrutinib (once-daily) versus acalabrutinib (twice-daily) as first-line (1L) therapy for CLL/SLL.

Patients and Methods

Specialty pharmacy electronic medical records were used to identify adults with CLL/SLL initiating 1L ibrutinib or acalabrutinib between 01/01/2018 and 11/30/2020. Adherence was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and medication possession ratio (MPR) and was compared between cohorts using odds ratios (ORs) obtained from logistic regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics.

Results

Between 01/01/2018 and 11/30/2020, 1374 and 140 patients initiated ibrutinib and acalabrutinib, respectively. Based on PDC/MPR ≥80%, patients treated with once-daily ibrutinib were more likely to be adherent than those treated with twice-daily acalabrutinib (OR ranges: PDC: 1.04-1.76; MPR: 1.03-1.58). At 6 months, patients on ibrutinib had a 58-76% higher likelihood of staying adherent compared to patients on acalabrutinib (PDC: 75.9% for ibrutinib vs 63.6% for acalabrutinib, OR: 1.76, P=0.008; MPR: 76.8% vs 66.9%, OR: 1.58, P=0.036) with a similar trend noted for the entire line of treatment (LOT) (PDC: 53.0% vs 41.4%, OR: 1.53, P=0.021; MPR: 58.7% vs 47.1%, OR: 1.50, P=0.027).

Conclusion

In this real-world analysis, CLL/SLL patients initiating 1L once-daily ibrutinib had >50% higher treatment adherence than those initiating twice-daily acalabrutinib during their LOT. Given the importance of sustained adherence for disease control in CLL/SLL, dosing frequency may be an important consideration for patients and physicians.

Predictors of ibrutinib-associated atrial fibrillation: 5-year follow-up of a prospective study

Ibrutinib-associated atrial fibrillation (IRAF) emerged among the adverse events of major interests in ibrutinib-treated patients as real-world studies showed a higher incidence compared to clinical trials. We prospectively analyzed predictors of IRAF in 43 single-center consecutive patients affected by chronic lymphocytic leukemia that started therapy with ibrutinib between 2015 and 2017. Key secondary endpoints were to describe the management of IRAF and survival outcomes. During a median follow-up period of 52 months, we registered 45 CV events, with a total of 23 AF events in 13 patients (CI 30.0% (95% CI: 16.5-43.9)). Pre-existent cardiovascular risk factors, in particular hypertension, a previous history of AF and a high Shanafelt risk score emerged as predictors of IRAF. Baseline echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial (LA) dimensions confirmed to predict IRAF occurrence and cut-off values were identified in our cohort: 32 mm for LA diameter and 18 cm2 for LA area. No difference in progression free survival and overall survival emerged in patients experiencing IRAF. Following AF, anticoagulation was started in all eligible patients, and cardioactive therapy was accordingly modified. Echocardiography represents a highly reproducible and widespread tool to be included in the work-up of ibrutinib candidates; the identification of IRAF predictors represents a useful guide to clinical practice.

First-Line Treatment of Older Patients with CLL: A New Approach in the Chemo-Free Era

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, with or without the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Obinutuzumab, represent the preferred options for the first-line therapy of CLL because they are more effective and may improve quality of life. However, patient inclusion criteria are heterogeneous across trials designed for older patients, and the identification of CLL-specific parameters identifying unfit patients at risk of developing drug-specific adverse events is required to guide treatment choice. Due to inclusion/exclusion criteria in trials, higher discontinuation rates with BTKi were reported in real-world studies, and registry analyses provided useful information on factors predicting earlier discontinuation in a real-world setting. Though targeted agents were shown to be cost-effective treatments in high-income countries, the out-of-pocket expenses may limit accessibility to these drugs, and the overall expenditure for new drugs in CLL is projected to increase substantially, posing an issue for sustainability. This being said, the choice of a finite-duration treatment based on venetoclax-containing regimens or treatment until progression with BTKi is today possible in high-income countries, and the therapy choice drivers are represented by coexisting medical conditions rather than age, patient expectations, logistics, and sustainability.