2
|
Lee K, Le T, Hau E, Hanna GG, Gee H, Vinod S, Dammak S, Palma D, Ong A, Yeghiaian-Alvandi R, Buck J, Lim R. A systematic review into the radiological features predicting local recurrence after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Local recurrence features of NSCLC post-SABR. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 113:40-59. [PMID: 34879247 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Post-treatment surveillance for local recurrence (LR) following SABR can include both fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT). Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) shares a similar appearance to LR after treatment making the detection of LR on imaging difficult for clinicians. We aimed to summarise radiological features of CT and FDG-PET predicting LR, and to evaluate radiomics as another tool for detecting LR. METHODS AND MATERIALS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases for published studies and Web of Science, Wiley Online and Science Direct databases for conference abstracts that had patient populations with NSCLC and reported post-SABR radiological features of FDG-PET or CT and radiomics from either FDG-PET or CT. Studies for inclusion were independently reviewed by two authors. RESULTS Across 32 relevant studies, the incidence of LR was 13% (222/1726). On CT, certain gross radiological appearances, and kinetic features of changes in size, diameter, volume or 3 consecutive rises in volume of mass-like consolidation are suggestive of LR. Particular regard should be made for the presence of any ≥3 high-risk features (HRF) on CT or the individual HRF of enlarging opacity at ≥12 month's post-SABR as being highly suspicious of LR. On FDG-PET a relative reduction of <5% of SUVmax from baseline in the first 12 months or cut-offs of SUVmax >5 and SUVmean >3.44 after 12 months can indicate LR. There is limited evidence available to corroborate radiomic features suggestive of LR. CONCLUSION This research has identified common features of LR compared to RILI which may aid in early and accurate detection of LR post-SABR; further research is required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Lee
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Tue Le
- Radiation Oncology - Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Hau
- Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Harriet Gee
- Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Children's Medical Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shalini Vinod
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Salma Dammak
- The School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Baines Imaging Research Laboratory, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Palma
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anselm Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Jacqueline Buck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Lim
- Department of Radiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tarasevych S, Lauwers P, Vandaele F, van Meerbeeck JP. Novel treatment options in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14:1007-20. [PMID: 24930519 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.929500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In the last 5 years, the current management of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer has been challenged due to novel surgical approaches and advances in radiation technology. The outcome after a sublobar resection is promising, especially for tumors less than 2 cm. Other treatment opportunities are available for high risk patients with comorbidity and impaired pulmonary function. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy is a good alternative treatment to surgery, especially in elderly and comorbid patients. However, randomized evidence comparing sublobar resection and stereotactic radiotherapy is presently lacking. The most recent development in radiotherapy is hadron therapy with a presumed reduced toxicity because of its peculiar physical and biological effects. Promising thermal and microwave ablative techniques are in development and have specific niche indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svitlana Tarasevych
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Multidisciplinary Oncology Center Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang K, Dahele M, Senan S, Guckenberger M, Rodrigues GB, Ward A, Boldt RG, Palma DA. Radiographic changes after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)--can we distinguish recurrence from fibrosis? A systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 2012; 102:335-42. [PMID: 22305958 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2011] [Revised: 12/15/2011] [Accepted: 12/23/2011] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in lung density on computed tomography (CT) are common after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and can confound the early detection of recurrence. We performed a systematic review to describe post-SABR findings on computed tomography (CT) and positron-emission tomography (PET), identify imaging characteristics that predict recurrence and propose a follow-up imaging algorithm. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of studies providing detailed radiologic descriptions of anatomic and metabolic lung changes after SABR. Our search returned 824 studies; 26 met our inclusion criteria. Data are presented according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Acute changes post-SABR predominantly appear as consolidation or ground glass opacities. Late changes often demonstrate a modified conventional pattern of fibrosis, evolving beyond 2years after treatment. Several CT features, including an enlarging opacity, correlate with recurrence. Although PET SUVmax may rise immediately post-SABR, an SUVmax⩾5 carries a high predictive value of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS CT density changes are common post-SABR. The available evidence suggests that recurrent disease should be suspected if high-risk CT changes are seen with SUVmax⩾5 on PET. Further studies are needed to validate the predictive values of such metrics, and for advanced analysis of CT changes to allow early detection of potentially curable local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kitty Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|