Assessment of health-related quality of life with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL after palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases

Pain response to palliative radiotherapy in bone metastases vs. non-bone lesions: Prospective study

BACKGROUND

This study compared the pain response to palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases and non-bone lesions based on the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Effectiveness (ICPRE) criteria.

METHODS

This two-cohort study used data from a prospective cohort of 867 registered lesions from 500 patients conducted between August 2021 and September 2023. Pain responses were assessed using the ICPRE criteria at prespecified timings of 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks. The primary outcome was the pain response rate within 12 weeks, comparing two groups of patients with bone and non-bone lesions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding covariates based on opioid use, irradiation history, performance status, NRS, primary disease, and radiation dose.

RESULTS

Among 678 lesions from 440 patients who met the criteria, 541 (80 %) and 137 (20 %) were in the bone and non-bone cohort, including primary tumors, lymph node metastases, and others. The mean age was 63 years, and 45 % were female. Treatment included conventional radiotherapy of a single 8 Gy dose, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, and 30 Gy in 10 fractions, used in 89 % of lesions. While opioid use (67 %) and re-irradiation rates (22 %) were not different between cohorts, the non-bone cohort had shorter median survival (4.9 months vs. 6.3 months, P = 0.017) and more frequently fractionated irradiation (85 % vs. 67 %, P < 0.001). No differences were observed in pain response rates between the two groups (57 % vs. 62 %, P = 0.33), which remained consistent after adjusting covariates. Re-irradiation and opioid were associated with negative impacts on pain response in the bone cohort. In contrast, the increased irradiation dose was identified as potentially affecting the non-bone cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested palliative radiotherapy is effective for painful non-bone lesions and potential dose-dependency for pain response, highlighting the need for future randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal radiation dose.

Quality of Life Report Associated With Pain Response and Patient Classification System for Palliative Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study

PURPOSE

A novel classification system has been proposed to stratify patients undergoing palliative radiation therapy based on their pain response and time to progression. This study used prospective observational data to quantify quality of life (QoL) changes associated with pain response and the classification system.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between August 2021 and September 2022, 366 painful lesions with a numerical rating scale of 2 or more from the 261 eligible patients underwent palliative radiation therapy. Patients were followed-up prospectively at 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks postradiation therapy, with EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BM22 questionnaires obtained simultaneously with pain response assessments. The primary endpoint was defined as the global health status/QoL improvements at 12 weeks based on minimally clinically important differences and compared by the pain response (responders vs. nonresponders) and by class 1 (no opioids, no reirradiation, n = 89), 2 (neither class 1 nor 3, n = 211), and 3 (opioids and reirradiation, n = 66).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 21 weeks for pain response and 13 weeks for QoL assessment, 1773 pairs of QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BM22 questionnaires were collected. The QoL assessment at baseline was covered with 97% (355/366) of lesions and 67% (183/273) at 12 weeks: this compliance was lower in nonresponders than in responders (57% vs. 72%, P = .004) and highest in class 1, followed by classes 2 and 3 (70% vs. 44% vs. 39%, P = .001). The improvement rate was significantly different by class, with class 3 having the lowest in all subscales except nausea and psychosocial aspects: the improvement rate of global health status/QoL was 33% in class 1, 31% in class 2, and 20% in class 3, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The QoL changes associated with pain response and the classification system were identified, suggesting that the classification system may help identify populations more or less likely to improve QoL, in addition to separating pain response rates.

Quality of life improvement after radiotherapy for bone metastases assessed using real-world data: a secondary analysis of a Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Single-center studies or randomized controlled trials have evaluated the impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on quality of life (QOL). We investigated the real-world impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on QOL using nationwide multicenter cohort data.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study at 26 centers in Japan. Of 333 patients who received radiotherapy for bone metastases between December 2020 and March 2021, 232 (70%) were enrolled in the study. Patient-reported QOL was evaluated at enrollment and at two- and six-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Possible predictors (patient-, tumor -, and treatment-related factors) of QOL improvement were screened using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

QOL scores showed significant improvement at two-month follow-up in seven (global health status/QOL, emotional functioning, pain, insomnia, painful sites, pain characteristics and functional interference) of the 14 scales. Of these seven scales, mean improvement ≥ the minimal clinically important difference (defined by a change of 10 or more on the 0 to 100 scale) was seen in four scales (pain, insomnia, pain characteristics and functional interference). We did not find any predictors of QOL improvement in the functional interference scale of QLQ-BM22.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy for bone metastases performed in daily practice is effective in improving some scales of QOL.

Health Utility of Pain Response Versus Nonresponse to Palliative Radiation Therapy for Symptomatic Bone Metastases: Analyses Based on Real-World Data from 26 Centers

Background: Utility values of responders and nonresponders are essential inputs in cost-effectiveness studies of radiation therapy for painful bone metastases but, to our knowledge, they have not been reported separately. Objective: We sought to determine the utility values of responders and nonresponders using data from a prospective observational study on bone metastases. Methods: The original prospective observational study was conducted at 26 centers in Japan. Of 232 enrolled patients, 181 whose pain scores at baseline were ≥2 were analyzed. Health-related quality of life (QOL) was measured using the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument at baseline and 2- and 6-month follow-up assessments. At follow-up assessments, patients were categorized as responders or nonresponders. Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints. Results: Of the 181 patients analyzed, 133 (73%) and 84 (46%) were evaluable at the 2- and 6-month follow-up assessment, respectively. The EQ-5D-5L index score (utility) increased from baseline to the 2- and 6-month follow-up assessments; regarding opioid analgesic use, no clear trend was observed during the same period. The mean utility was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders at both follow-up times. The mean daily oral morphine equivalent dose was significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders at both follow-up times. Conclusion: We determined utility values for responders and nonresponders. Pain response was associated with better QOL and less opioid use. Our utility values according to response status can be used for model input in future cost-effectiveness studies on radiation therapy for bone metastases.

Impacts of radiation therapy on quality of life and pain relief in patients with bone metastases

Bone metastases (BM) are a common complication in advanced cancer patients, significantly contributing to morbidity and mortality due to their ability to cause pain, fractures, and spinal cord compression. Radiation therapy (RT) is vital in managing these complications by targeting metastatic lesions to ease pain, improve mobility, and reduce the risk of skeletal-related events such as fractures. Evidence supports the effectiveness of RT in pain relief, showing its ability to provide significant palliation and lessen the need for opioid painkillers, thereby enhancing the overall quality of life (QoL) for patients with BM. However, optimizing RT outcomes involves considerations such as the choice of radiation technique, dose fractionation schedules, and the integration of supportive care measures to mitigate treatment-related side effects like fatigue and skin reactions. These factors highlight the importance of personalized treatment planning tailored to individual patient needs and tumor characteristics. This mini-review aims to provide comprehensive insights into the multifaceted impacts of RT on pain management and QoL enhancement in BM patients, with implications for refining clinical practices and advancing patient care through the synthesis of findings from various studies.

Classification of Patients With Painful Tumors to Predict Response to Palliative Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors affecting pain response to develop a patient classification system for palliative radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our prospective observational study (UMIN000044984) provided data on patients who received palliative RT for painful tumors. The eligibility criteria were having a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 2 or more before treatment and receiving palliative RT between August 2021 and September 2022. Post-RT follow-up was scheduled prospectively at 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks. Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints criteria, with the primary outcome being the response rate within 12 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors affecting pain response and develop the classification system. Each class evaluated the differences in response rate, time to response, and progression.

RESULTS

Of the 488 registered lesions, 366 from 261 patients met the criteria. Most patients had bone metastases (75%), of whom 72% were using opioids and 22% underwent reirradiation. Conventional RT (eg, 8-Gy single fraction, 20 Gy in 5 fractions) was administered to 93% of patients. Over a median of 6.8 months of follow-up, the average NRS decreased from 6.1 to 3.4 at 12 weeks for 273 evaluable lesions, with a 60% response rate. Opioid use and reirradiation negatively affected the response rate in multivariate analysis (P < .01). Lesions were categorized into class 1 (no opioid use and no reirradiation; 89 lesions), class 2 (neither class 1 nor 3; 211 lesions), and class 3 (opioid use and reirradiation; 66 lesions), with respective response rates of 75%, 61%, and 36% (P < .001). Time to response was similar across the classes (P = .91), but the progression rates at 24 weeks differed (11%, 27%, and 63%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid use and reirradiation are factors leading to significant variations in pain response rates and time to progression.

Palliative radiotherapy: New prognostic factors for patients with bone metastasis

PURPOSE

Many cancer patients develop bone metastases, however the prognosis of overall survival differs. To provide an optimal treatment for these patients, especially towards the end of life, a reliable prediction of survival is needed. The goal of this study was to find new clinical factors in relation to overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospectively 22 clinical factors were collected from 734 patients. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used.

RESULTS

Most patients were diagnosed with lung cancer (29%), followed by prostate (19.8%) and breast cancer (14.7%). Median overall survival was 6.4months. Fourteen clinical factors showed significance in the univariate analyses. In the multivariate analyses 6 factors were found to be significant for the overall survival: Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor, gender, total organs affected, morphine use and systemic treatment options after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Morphine use and systemic treatment options after radiotherapy, Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor, gender and total organs affected are strong prediction factors on overall survival after palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastasis. These factors are easily applicable in the clinic.

Management of metastatic bone disease of melanoma

One of the most aggressive tumors arising from the skin, mucosa, and uvea is malignant melanoma, which easily metastasizes. Bone tissue is one of the most typical locations for distant metastasis, and around 5%-20% of patients eventually acquired skeletal metastases. For decades, the incidence of bone metastases was higher, bringing greater burden on the family, society, and healthcare system owing to the progress of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which prolonging the survival time substantially. Moreover, bone metastases result in skeletal-related events, which influence the quality of life, obviously. Appropriate intervention is therefore crucial. To obtain the optimum cost-effectiveness, existing treatment algorithm must be integrated, which is still controversial. We have aimed to throw light on current views concerning the formation, biological and clinical features, and treatment protocol of melanoma bone metastases to guide the decision-making process.

Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: Fractionation, Recalcification, and Symptom Control

Bone is a common site for metastases, which may cause pain and other skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer. Since the 1980s, prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the high efficacy of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for pain relief from focal, symptomatic lesions. In uncomplicated bone metastases, which include those without pathologic fracture, evidence of cord compression, or prior surgical intervention, improvement or complete pain relief with radiotherapy is as high as 60%, with no difference in efficacy when radiotherapy is delivered in a single or multiple fractions. The ability to treat with a single fraction makes EBRT an attractive therapy even for patients with poor performance status and/or life expectancy. Even in patients with complicated bone metastases (eg cord compression), several randomized trials have demonstrated similar rates of pain relief in addition to improved functional outcomes such as ambulation. In this review, we summarize the role of EBRT for alleviating painful bone metastases and explore its role for other endpoints including functional outcomes, recalcification, and prevention of SREs.

Pain Response Rates After Conventional Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases Assessed Using International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Initial Radiation Therapy and Reirradiation

Previous meta-analysis of conventional radiation therapy for painful bone metastases showed overall response (OR) rates of 72% to 75% (evaluable patients), 61% to 62% (intent-to-treat patients) for initial radiation therapy, and 68% for reirradiation (evaluable patients). However, the definition of pain response differed among the studies included. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pain response rates assessed by the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE) for both initial radiation therapy and reirradiation. The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published between 2002 and 2021. The inclusion criteria were (1) prospective studies or studies based on prospectively collected data and (2) studies in which pain response was assessed using ICPRE. Our primary outcomes of interest were the OR rates (sum of the complete and partial response rates) for both initial radiation therapy and reirradiation. Of the 6470 articles identified in our database search, 32 and 3 met the inclusion criteria for the analysis of initial radiation therapy and reirradiation, respectively. The OR rates of initial radiation therapy in evaluable patients (n = 4775) and intent-to-treat patients (n = 6775) were 60.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.2-65.4) and 45.4% (95% CI, 38.7-52.4), respectively. The OR rates of reirradiation in evaluable patients (n = 733) and intent-to-treat patients (n = 1085) were 70.8% (95% CI, 15.7-96.9) and 62.2% (95% CI, 5.3-98.0), respectively. Subgroup analyses of initial radiation therapy including the comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies showed no significant differences in any comparison, indicating similar response rates across different study designs. For initial radiation therapy, we determined the ICPRE-assessed response rates, which were lower than previously reported. The OR and complete response rates should be benchmarks for future randomized and nonrandomized studies. For reirradiation, the wide CIs demonstrate that the response rates based on ICPRE require further investigation.

The Burden of Metastatic Cancer-Induced Bone Pain: A Narrative Review

Bone pain is one of the most common forms of pain reported by cancer patients with metastatic disease. We conducted a review of oncology literature to further understand the epidemiology of and treatment approaches for metastatic cancer–induced bone pain and the effect of treatment of painful bone metastases on the patient’s quality of life. Two-thirds of patients with advanced, metastatic, or terminal cancer worldwide experience pain. Cancer pain due to bone metastases is the most common form of pain in patients with advanced disease and has been shown to significantly reduce patients’ quality of life. Treatment options for cancer pain due to bone metastases include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, palliative radiation, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and opioids. Therapies including palliative radiation and opioids have strong evidence supporting their efficacy treating cancer pain due to bone metastases; other therapies, like bisphosphonates and denosumab, do not. There is sufficient evidence that patients who experience pain relief after radiation therapy have improved quality of life; however, a substantial proportion are nonresponders. For those still requiring pain management, even with available analgesics, many patients are undertreated for cancer pain due to bone metastases, indicating an unmet need. The studies in this review were not designed to determine why cancer pain due to bone metastases was undertreated. Studies specifically addressing cancer pain due to bone metastases, rather than general cancer pain, are limited. Additional research is needed to determine patient preferences and physician attitudes regarding choice of analgesic for moderate to severe cancer pain due to bone metastases.

A Few-Shot Learning Approach Assists in the Prognosis Prediction of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound for the Local Control of Bone Metastatic Lesions

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) constitutes a noninvasive treatment strategy to ablate deep-seated bone metastases. However, limited evidence suggests that, although cytokines are influenced by thermal necrosis, there is still no cytokine threshold for clinical responses. A prediction model to approximate the postablation immune status on the basis of circulating cytokine activation is thus needed. IL-6 and IP-10, which are proinflammatory cytokines, decreased significantly during the acute phase. Wound-healing cytokines such as VEGF and PDGF increased after ablation, but the increase was not statistically significant. In this phase, IL-6, IL-13, IP-10, and eotaxin expression levels diminished the ongoing inflammatory progression in the treated sites. These cytokine changes also correlated with the response rate of primary tumor control after acute periods. The few-shot learning algorithm was applied to test the correlation between cytokine levels and local control (p = 0.036). The best-fitted model included IL-6, IL-13, IP-10, and eotaxin as cytokine parameters from the few-shot selection, and had an accuracy of 85.2%, sensitivity of 88.6%, and AUC of 0.95. The acceptable usage of this model may help predict the acute-phase prognosis of a patient with painful bone metastasis who underwent local MRgFUS. The application of machine learning in bone metastasis is equivalent or better than the current logistic regression.

Factors Affecting the Quality of Life of Patients with Painful Spinal Bone Metastases

This study examined changes in the quality of life (QOL), as well as the factors affecting QOL, among patients with painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis for 1 month after radiotherapy. Methods: This study included 79 participants (40 male and 39 female; median age, 65 (42–88) years) who had undergone radiotherapy for painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis. Patients’ age, sex, activities of daily living (Barthel index), pain, spinal instability (spinal instability neoplastic score [SINS]), and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) were investigated. Results: Having an unstable SINS score was a positive factor for global health status (p < 0.05). The improvement in activities of daily living and response to pain were positive factors for physical function (p < 0.05). A positive effect on emotional function was confirmed among female patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Engaging in rehabilitation along with radiotherapy leads to improvements in QOL for patients with spinal bone metastases.

The efficacy of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy on pain and quality of life in patients with painful bone metastases: a prospective study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy in alleviating pain and improving the quality of life (QoL) with validated questionnaires in patients with painful bone metastases (BoM).

METHODS

This prospective, observational study recruited 167 patients with painful BoM who were treated with palliative radiotherapy (PRT) from February 2015 to February 2018. After the first clinical assessment, the patients filled out specific questionnaires and underwent a fast radiotherapy treatment within 48 hours. The patients were followed up for eight weeks.

RESULTS

The median age was 66.30 years. The most common primary cancer was lung cancer (31.1%). The most often prescribed scheme was 8 Gy in one fraction (70%). The patients experienced significant pain response and improved QoL compared with baseline, especially in the first two weeks after radiation. Overall, reduced pain and drug score were reported at two weeks of PRT in 68 (51.5%) and 37 (28%) of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PRT is an effective treatment option for patients with painful BoM.

Does Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Influence the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients?

The aim of this study is to observe the influence of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) on the physical and mental conditions of cancer patients using a Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire during regular dental practice measures. Twenty cancer patients (8 males and 12 females) with established MRONJ were enrolled in the “MoMax” (Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial) project of the Department of Oral Sciences and Maxillofacial Surgery at “Sapienza” University of Rome, and were included in the study. The 12-item Short Form Survey was used to evaluate the QoL. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference for Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores based on age (p = 0.018). The regression analysis revealed that the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores were negatively influenced by the anti-resorptive medication duration (p = 0.031 and β = −1.137). No significant differences were observed with the other variables considered. The QoL of cancer patients is generally deteriorated and MRONJ may cause a further negative impact. This study highlights the possible need to include psychosocial and physical evaluations in the management process of MRONJ in cancer patients.

Prognostic and predictive factors for clinical and radiographic responses in patients with painful bone metastasis treated with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery

Background: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) is an alternative local therapy for patients with painful bone metastasis. However, little is known about the prognostic and predictive factors of MRgFUS in treating bone metastasis. Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed the performance status, treated site, pretreatment pain score, pretreatment tumor volume and lesion coverage volume factor (CVF) of 31 patients who underwent MRgFUS. A numerical rating scale for pain was used at the same time to assess the clinical response. Radiographic responses were evaluated using a modified version of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center criteria and reference to the MR imaging or computed tomography scans obtained 3 months after treatment. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the effect of variables on clinical and radiographic responses. Results: The overall clinical response rate was 83.9% and radiographic response rate was 67.7%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the better pretreatment Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (odds ratio: 1.220, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.033-1.440; p = 0.019) was significantly associated with a more positive clinical response, and that the lesion CVF (odds ratio: 1.183, 95% CI: 1.029-1.183; p = 0.0055) was an independent prognostic factor for radiographic responses. The radiographic response of patients with lesion CVF ≥70% and CVF <70% were 91.7% and 52.6%, respectively (p = 0.0235). Conclusion: The pretreatment KPS was an independent prognostic factor for clinical responses, and lesion CVF was an independent prognostic factor for radiographic responses.

Optimal dose-fractionation schedule of palliative radiotherapy for patients with bone metastases: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The optimal dose-fractionation schedule of palliative radiotherapy has been debated in patients with bone metastases. Our objective is to comprehensively compare multiple fraction schedules with single fraction radiotherapy in terms of efficacy and toxicities by performing a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Electronic searches of titles/abstracts of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases will be performed, using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, clinical trials, American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology. The primary outcome of interest is the incidence of skeletal-related event following palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases in prospective studies. The risk of bias and quality of evidence will be evaluated based on Cochrane Collaboration's tool and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation in the network meta-analysis. We will conduct subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis regardless of heterogeneity estimates.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will synthesise the evidence regarding dose-fractionation schedule of palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases. We hope the findings from this study will help clinicians and patients select optimum palliative radiotherapy by identifying the optimal dose-fractionation schedule of palliative radiotherapy with the most value in terms of patient-important outcomes. The evidence obtained from network meta-analysis will help to guide head-to-head research in the future. The results will be disseminated through international conference reports and peer-reviewed manuscripts. Ethics review board is not required for this network meta-analysis.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019135195.

Evaluating the effectiveness of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia for the treatment response of patients with painful bony metastases: A phase 2 clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Since the survival time of patients with bony metastases has noticeably improved in recent years, these patients are at high risk of complications associated with this metastasis. Hence, the appropriate choice of treatment modality or combination of therapeutic approaches can lead to increasing bone pain relief, improving quality of life, etc. This study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia for the treatment response of patients with painful bony metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a single-arm clinical trial, 23 eligible patients (14 female and 9 male) with the mean age of 67 years old and suffering from bony metastases were enrolled in the study. Two hours after radiotherapy, the patients underwent hyperthermia for 1 h in the supine position. All the patients completed the brief pain inventory (BPI) assessment tool and quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) at the baseline, end of the treatment and 1, 2 and 3 months thereafter. The response to the treatment was assessed as the zero score (complete response) or two or more than two-point drop of the worst pain within the preceding 24 h (partial response) during the 3-month posttreatment.

RESULTS

All the pain intensity and interference scores, except the pain interference with the enjoyment of life score, significantly decreased. A total of 18 out of 23 patients (78%) achieved complete or partial response. The number of patients using pain relief medications decreased from 74% (n=17) at the baseline to 48% (n=11) 3 months later. Moreover, except for nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, diarrhea and financial impact problems, the patients' quality of life improved significantly in all the functional scales and symptoms within 3 months.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that using hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy significantly ameliorated bone pain among the patients suffering from cancer with painful bony metastases.

Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Purpose

Bone metastases are reported in 10% to 12% of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and can lead to pain and skeletal-related events (SREs), resulting in diminished quality of life and functional status. In other solid tumors with bone metastases, radiation therapy (RT) is an established treatment approach for SREs, yet few data are available in NENs historically considered to be radioresistant. We hypothesize that RT is effective for pain and other SREs in NENs and aimed to delineate any differences in pain palliation and time until progression of pain between different fractionation and dosing schedules of RT.

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed 686 records of patients with NENs treated at the institution between 2011 and 2018 and identified 28 (4.1%) patients treated with RT for 61 cases of SREs. The primary endpoint was change in patient reported pain scores after RT.

Results

All 28 patients experienced bone pain. Nineteen sites were treated with a single fraction (doses of 800-1800 cGy) and 42 sites with fractionated regimens (doses of 900-3750 cGy over 3-15 fractions). In 55 of 61 cases (90%), patients experienced improvement in pain after RT. The median time to recurrence or progression of pain was 3.5 months. Significant differences were found between primary site and change in performance status (P = .024), sex, and reported magnitude of pain score decrease after RT (P = .025). There were no differences in the time to the progression of pain, change in performance status, and degree of improvement in pain based on age, chemotherapy received during RT, or radiation site. Outcomes were similar for patients who received single-fraction versus fractionated regimens (P = .545) and between those receiving palliative versus ablative RT regimens (P = .812).

Conclusions

Although the majority of cases in this NEN cohort benefited from RT, additional studies on the use of RT in the treatment of painful bone metastases are warranted.

Pain Response Rates After Conventional Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases in Prospective Nonrandomized Studies: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the pain response rates after conventional radiation therapy (RT) for painful bone metastases in prospective nonrandomized studies, which better reflect daily practice than randomized controlled trials.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for articles published between 2002 and 2018. We only included articles in which pain response after RT was assessed using the International Consensus Endpoint initially published in 2002, or the updated version from 2012. In addition, to be included in this review, the study design was required to be prospective or based on prospectively collected data. Our primary outcomes of interest were the overall and complete response rates after conventional RT for bone metastases.

RESULTS

Of the 2863 articles identified in our database search, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Six studies excluded patients with features of complicated bone metastases. Only 2 papers reported exclusion criteria regarding analgesic use. Radiation schedules that were frequently used were 1 × 8 Gy, 5 × 4 Gy, and 10 × 3 Gy. The overall response rate in evaluable patients was 55%, and 754 of the 1379 evaluable patients experienced a complete or partial response. The complete response rate was 15% (196 of 1348 evaluable patients). In the intent-to-treat patient group, the overall response rate was 29% (754 of 2559 enrolled patients), and the complete response rate 8% (196 of 2528 enrolled patients).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined the pain response rates after conventional RT for painful bone metastases in prospective nonrandomized studies. The present review may provide benchmarks for future nonrandomized studies that investigate palliative RT for bone metastases.

Evaluation of Quality of Life Outcomes Following Palliative Treatment of Bone Metastases with Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: An International Multicentre Study

AIMS

To determine quality of life (QoL) outcomes after palliation of pain from bone metastases using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-guided HIFU), measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C15-PAL and the QLQ-BM22 questionnaires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients undergoing MR-guided HIFU in an international multicentre trial self-completed the QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BM22 questionnaires before and on days 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 post-treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to represent changes in symptom and functional scales over time and to determine their clinical significance. QoL changes were compared in pain responders and non-responders (who were classified according to change in worst pain score and analgesic intake, between baseline and day 30).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients had analysable QoL data. Clinically significant improvements were seen in the QoL scales of physical functioning, fatigue, appetite loss, nausea and vomiting, constipation and pain in the 53% of patients who were classified as responders at day 30. No significant changes were seen in the 47% of patients who were non-responders at this time point.

CONCLUSION

Local treatment of pain from bone metastases with MR-guided HIFU, even in the presence of disseminated malignancy, has a substantial positive effect on physical functioning, and improves other symptomatic QoL measures. This indicated a greater response to treatment over and above pain control alone. MR-guided HIFU is non-invasive and should be considered for patients with localised metastatic bone pain and poor QoL.

Healthcare-resource utilization associated with radiation to bone across eight European countries: Results from a retrospective study

Background

Bone metastases and lytic lesions due to multiple myeloma are common in advanced cancer and can lead to debilitating complications (skeletal-related events [SREs]), including requirement for radiation to bone. Despite the high frequency of radiation to bone in patients with metastatic bone disease, our knowledge of associated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) is limited.

Methods

This retrospective study estimated HRU following radiation to bone in Austria, the Czech Republic, Finland, Greece, Poland, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland. Eligible patients were ≥ 20 years old, had bone metastases secondary to breast, lung or prostate cancer, or bone lesions associated with multiple myeloma, and had received radiation to bone between 1 July 2004 and 1 July 2009. HRU data were extracted from hospital patient charts from 3.5 months before the index SRE (radiation to bone preceded by a SRE-free period of ≥ 6.5 months) until 3 months after the last SRE that the patient experienced during the study period.

Results

In total, 482 patients were included. The number of inpatient stays increased from baseline by a mean of 0.52 (standard deviation [SD] 1.17) stays per radiation to bone event and the duration of stays increased by a mean of 7.8 (SD 14.8) days. Outpatient visits increased by a mean of 4.24 (SD 6.57) visits and procedures by a mean of 8.51 (SD 7.46) procedures.

Conclusion

HRU increased following radiation to bone across all countries studied. Agents that prevent severe pain and delay the need for radiation have the potential to reduce the burden imposed on healthcare resources and patients.

Screening for psychological distress before radiotherapy for painful bone metastases may be useful to identify patients with high levels of distress

BACKGROUND

Psychological distress (PD) has a major impact on quality of life. We studied the incidence of PD before and after radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Furthermore, we aimed to identify factors predictive for PD.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 1998, the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study included 1157 patients with painful bone metastases. Patients were randomized between two fractionation schedules. The study showed a pain response of 74% in both groups. Patients filled out weekly questionnaires for 13 weeks, then monthly for two years. The questionnaires included a subscale for PD on the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. We used generalized estimating equations and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

At baseline, 290 patients (27%) had a high level of PD. For the entire group, the level of PD remained constant over time. The majority of patients with a low level of PD at baseline remained at a low level during follow-up. In patients with a high level of PD at baseline, the mean level of PD decreased after treatment and stabilized around the cutoff level. Female patients, higher age, worse performance, lower pain score and worse self-reported QoL were associated with an increased chance of PD, although the model showed moderate discriminative power.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients had a high level of PD before and after radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Most patients who reported high levels of PD when referred for palliative radiotherapy remained at high levels thereafter. Therefore, screening of PD prior to treatment seems appropriate, in order to select patients requiring intervention.

Effect of Radiotherapy on Painful Bone Metastases: A Secondary Analysis of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group Symptom Control Trial SC.23

Importance

Many studies that found improved quality of life (QOL) after radiotherapy of bone metastases have small sample sizes and do not use specific questionnaires. How soon after radiotherapy one can expect an improvement in QOL is unknown.

Objective

To investigate QOL at days 10 and 42 after radiotherapy with a bone metastases-specific QOL tool.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this secondary analysis of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group Symptom Control Trial SC.23, a double-blind randomized clinical trial that investigated dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of pain flare after radiotherapy, patients were accrued from 23 Canadian centers from May 30, 2011, to December 11, 2014, and were followed up for 42 days after treatment. Participants referred for radiotherapy for bone metastases were required to have a pain score at the site(s) of treatment of at least 2 (range, 0-10).

Interventions

Patients were treated with a single 8-Gy radiotherapy dose for 1 or 2 bone metastases.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patients reported their worst pain score and analgesic intake at baseline and days 10 and 42 after treatment. Pain response was assessed with International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions. Self-reported QOL was completed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Bone Metastases Module (QLQ-BM22) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 15 Palliative (QLQ-C15-PAL) at the same time points.

Results

A total of 298 patients were accrued (median age, 68.8 [range, 32-94] years at day 10 and 68.0 [range, 34-90] years at day 42). A total of 122 patients (40.9%) responded to radiotherapy at day 10 and 116 patients (38.9%) at day 42. At day 10, compared with nonresponders, patients with a pain response had a greater reduction in pain (mean reduction, 17.0 vs 1.8; P = .002) and pain characteristics (mean reduction, 12.8 vs 1.1; P = .002), as well as greater improvements in functional interference (mean increase, 11.6 vs 3.6; P = .01) and psychosocial aspects (mean increase, 1.2 points in responders vs mean decrease of 2.2 points in nonresponders, P = .04). Comparing changes in QOL from baseline to day 42, responders had significantly greater improvements in the physical (mean increase, 6.2 vs -9.0; P < .001), emotional (mean increase, 12.3 vs -5.5; P < .001), and global domains (mean increase, 10.3 vs -4.5; P < .001) of the QLQ-C15-PAL compared with nonresponders.

Conclusions and Relevance

Forty percent of patients experienced pain reduction and better QOL at day 10 after radiotherapy with further improvements in QOL at day 42 in responders. A single 8-Gy radiotherapy dose for bone metastases should be offered to all patients, even those with poor survival.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01248585.

Single vs. multiple fraction regimens for palliative radiotherapy treatment of multiple myeloma : A prospective randomised study

PURPOSE

To compare the impact of a single fraction (8 Gy × 1 fraction) and multifraction (3 Gy × 10 fractions) radiotherapy regimens on pain relief, recalcification and the quality of life (QoL) in patients with bone destructions due to multiple myeloma (MM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 101 patients were included in a randomised prospective clinical trial: 58 patients were included in the control arm (3 Gy × 10 fractions) and 43 patients into the experimental arm (8 Gy × 1 fraction). The response rate was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy criteria. Recalcification was evaluated with radiographs. QoL questionnaires were completed before and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Pain relief was obtained in 81/101 patients (80.2%): complete response in 56 (69%) and partial in 25 patients (30.9%). No significant differences were observed in analgesic response between the groups. Significant factors for pain relief were female gender, age under 65, IgG MM type, presence of recalcification at the irradiated site. Recalcification was found in 32/101 patients (33.7%): complete in 17 (53.2%) and partial in 15 (46.2%). No significant differences were observed in recalcification between the groups. Significant factors for recalcification were Karnofsky index ≥ 60%, haemoglobin level ≤ 80 g/dl, MM stage II and analgesic response at the irradiated site. The QoL after radiotherapy was improved in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The same analgesic and recalcification response was observed using two different radiotherapy regimens. Higher doses should be used to achieve a better QoL.

Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL modules in patients with bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Validated tools for evaluating quality of life (QOL) in patients with bone metastases include the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C15-PAL modules. A statistically significant difference in metric scores may not be clinically significant. To aid in their interpretation, we performed analyses to determine the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for these QOL instruments.

METHODS

Both anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to determine the MCID among patients with bone metastases enrolled in a randomized phase III trial. For the anchor-based approach, overall QOL as measured by the QLQ-C15-PAL module was used as the anchor and only the subscales with moderate or better correlation were used for subsequent MCID analysis. In the anchor-based approach, patients were classified as improved, stable or deteriorated by the change in the overall QOL score from baseline to follow-up after 42 days. The MCID and confidence interval was then calculated for all subscales. In the distribution-based approach, the MCID was expressed as a proportion of the standard deviation and standard error measurement from the subscale score distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients completed the questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. Only the dyspnea and insomnia subscales did not have at least moderate correlation with the overall QOL anchor. Using the anchor-based approach, 10/11 subscales had an MCID score significantly different than 0 for improvement and 3/11 subscales had a significant MCID score for deterioration. The magnitude of MCID scores was higher for improvement in comparison with deterioration. For improvement, the anchor-based approach showed good agreement with the distribution-based approach when using 0.5 SD as the MCID. However, there was greater lack of agreement between these approaches for deterioration.

CONCLUSION

We present the MCID scores for the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C15-PAL QOL instruments. The results of this study can guide clinicians in the interpretation of these instruments.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

NCT01248585.

Quality of life after palliative radiotherapy in bone metastases: A literature review

Objective

To investigate the quality of life (QOL) following palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in OvidSP Medline (1946–Jan Week 4 2014), Embase (1947–Week 5 2014), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Dec 2013) databases. The search was limited to English. Subject headings and keywords included ‘palliative radiation’, ‘cancer palliative therapy’, ‘bone metastases’, ‘quality of life’, and ‘pain’. All studies (prospective or retrospective) reporting change in QOL before and after palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases were included.

Results

Eighteen articles were selected from a total of 1730. The most commonly used tool to evaluate QOL was the Brief Pain Inventory. Seventeen studies collected data prospectively. An improvement in symptoms and functional interference scores following radiotherapy was observed in all studies. The difference in changes in QOL between responders and non responders was inconsistently reported.

Conclusion

QOL improves in patients who respond to palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases.

Changes of peripheral blood lymphocyte subtypes in patients with end stage cancer administered localized radiotherapy and bojungikki-tang

Localized radiotherapy (RT) can cause immune dysfunction. Bojungikki-tang is known to restore immune function. We investigated the absolute counts and percentages of peripheral blood (PB) lymphocyte subtypes in end stage cancer patients before and after RT and after oral administration of Bojungikki-tang water extract (BJITE) and to evaluate the changes mediated by RT and BJITE. Absolute counts and percentages of lymphocyte and lymphocyte subsets were determined in whole blood using the TetraONE System (Beckman Coulter, USA). Flow cytometry results were compared before and after RT and after administration of BJITE. Absolute numbers of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells and CD19+ B cells decreased significantly after RT (P < 0.05). Absolute numbers of CD3-CD56+ cells did not change in both groups. No significant differences were observed in the absolute counts of lymphocyte subtypes before and after administration of BJITE or vitamin group. When BJITE group was compared with vitamin group, absolute numbers of CD19+ B cells increased. RT-induced decrease in T cells and B cells in PB suggests that immune deterioration occurs after RT. Administration of BJITE might be effective in the restoration of number of B cells.

The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients

PURPOSE

Quality of life (QL) is a key outcome for advanced disease cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, a short version of the QLQ-C30 for palliative care. The aim of the present study is to validate the QLQ-C15-PAL for use with Spanish patients with bone metastasis.

METHODS

For this study, we used a consecutive sample of stage IV cancer patients with bone metastases who started radiotherapy with palliative intention. Two assessments were proposed for each patient: one on the first day of treatment and one a month after the end of the radiotherapy sessions. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, and validity was undertaken.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients completed the first questionnaire and seventy five completed the second. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all items met the standards for convergent validity, and all except the fatigue scale met the standards for divergent validity. Cronbach's coefficient met the 0.7 alpha criterion on all scales except pain (second assessment). Most QLQ-C15-PAL areas had low-to-moderate correlations with the other areas. Significant differences appeared in the comparisons between groups with regard to: patients who died before the second assessment (six areas); patients receiving chemotherapy before starting radiotherapy in the two assessments (three and four areas, respectively); the performance status in the two assessments (nine and eight areas); and the number of RT sessions received (four). Quality of life was better in the second assessment in nine areas.

CONCLUSION

The QLQ-C15-PAL is a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. These results are in line with those of other validation studies.

Palliative radiotherapy in patients with a poor performance status: the palliative effect is correlated with prolongation of the survival time

Background

The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy and tolerability of palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with a poor performance status (PS) and to evaluate the relationship between the palliative effect and survival time.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-three patients with a poor PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3 or 4) were treated with palliative RT using the three-dimensional conformal technique and retrospectively analyzed. Each patient's primary symptom treated with palliative RT as the major cause of the poor PS was evaluated using the second item of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS) at the start and one week after the completion of palliative RT.

Results

One hundred and fourteen (86%) of the 133 patients completed the planned palliative radiation dose. Grade 3 acute toxicity was observed in two patients (2%) and Grade 2 acute toxicity was observed in 10 patients (9%). No Grade 2 or higher late toxicities were observed, except for Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis in one patient. Improvement in the STAS scores between pre- and post-palliative RT was recorded in 76 (61%) of the 125 patients with available scores of STAS. A significant improvement in the mean STAS score between pre- and post-palliative RT was recognized (p < 0.0001). Improvement in the STAS score was found to be the most statistically significant prognostic factor for overall survival after palliative RT in both the multivariate and univariate analyses. The median overall survival time in the patients with an improvement in the STAS score was 6.4 months, while that in the patients without improvement was 2.4 months (p < 0.0005).

Conclusions

Palliative RT in patients with a poor PS provides symptomatic benefits in more than half of patients without inducing severe toxicities. The palliative effect is strongly correlated with prolongation of the survival time and may contribute to improving the remaining survival time in patients with metastatic/advanced cancer with a poor PS.

The role of palliative external beam radiation therapy in boney metastases pain management

Bone is the third most common organ affected by neoplastic metastases, and about 70% of patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer that develop metastases will have osseous involvement. As part of a multi-pronged approach to pain management in these patients, external beam radio therapy (EBRT) continues to be a mainstay of treatment for metastatic bone pain. This article reviews the role of radiation therapy in palliative management strategies for patients with bone metastases, including the clinical and cost-effectiveness of single fraction (SFRT) versus multiple fraction (MFRT) EBRT in pain relief. Studies indicate that SFRT is more cost-effective than MFRT, yet both are clinically effective in pain management. Therefore, EBRT use retains an important place among analgesia, bone modifying agents, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy in improving quality of life (QoL) and reducing morbidity from metastatic bone pain.