FISHing Tips: What Every Clinician Should Know About 1p19q Analysis in Gliomas Using Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation

A custom next-generation sequencing panel for 1p/19q codeletion and mutational analysis in gliomas

The World Health Organization has updated their classification system for the diagnosis of gliomas, combining histological features with molecular data including isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q. 1p/19q codeletion analysis is commonly performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In this study, we developed a 57-gene targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel including 1p/19q codeletion detection mainly to assess diagnosis and potential treatment response in melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and glioma patients. Loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed using the NGS method on 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioma tissues that showed 1p and/or 19q loss determined by FISH. Conventional methods were applied for the validation of some glioma-related gene mutations. In 81.1% (30 of 37) and 94.6% (35 of 37) of cases, 1p and 19q were found to be in agreement whereas concordance for 1p/19q codeletion and no 1p/19q codeletion was found in 94.7% (18 of 19) and 94.4% (17 of 18) of cases, respectively. Overall, comparing NGS results with those of conventional methods showed high concordance. In conclusion, the NGS panel allows reliable analysis of 1p/19q codeletion and mutation at the same time.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in central nervous system tumours: the molecular state of play

Central nervous system (CNS) tumours were one of the first cancer types to adopt and integrate molecular profiling into routine clinical diagnosis in 2016. The vast majority of these biomarkers, used to discriminate between tumour types, also offered prognostic information. With the advent of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and other large genomic datasets, further prognostic sub-stratification was possible within tumour types, leading to increased precision in CNS tumour grading. This review outlines the evolution of the molecular landscape of adult CNS tumours, through the prism of World Health Organization (WHO) Classifications. We begin our journey in the pre-molecular era, where high-grade gliomas were divided into 'primary' and 'secondary' glioblastomas. Molecular alterations explaining these clinicopathological observations were the first branching points of glioma diagnostics, with the discovery of IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q codeletion. Subsequently, the rigorous characterisation of paediatric gliomas led to the unearthing of histone H3 alterations as a key event in gliomagenesis, which also had implications for young adult patients. Simultaneously, studies investigating prognostic biomarkers within tumour types were undertaken. Certain genomic phenotypes were found to portend unfavourable outcomes, for example, MYCN amplification in spinal ependymoma. The arrival of methylation profiling, having revolutionised the diagnosis of CNS tumours, now promises to bring increased prognostic accuracy, as has been shown in meningiomas. While MGMT promoter hypermethylation has remained a reliable biomarker of response to cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy in CNS tumours has unfortunately not had the success of other cancers. Therefore, predictive biomarkers have lagged behind the identification of prognostic biomarkers in CNS tumours. Emerging research from new clinical trials is cause for guarded optimism and may shift our conceptualisation of predictive biomarker testing in CNS tumours.

In Situ Hybridization of Brain Slices

In situ hybridization (ISH) is an important technique for identifying gene expression at the cellular level in various organs, including brain slices. This approach hybridizes nucleic acid probes to cellular mRNA, allowing the detection of transcriptional products. Recent advances have enabled RNA preservation in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, making ISH applicable to brain tumor diagnosis and research. Here, we provide a concise overview of the standard application of chromogenic ISH in neuroscience research and neuropathology practice using FFPE blocks of brain slice sections.

Comprehensive clinical assays for molecular diagnostics of gliomas: the current state and future prospects

Glioma is one of the most intractable types of cancer, due to delayed diagnosis at advanced stages. The clinical symptoms of glioma are unclear and due to a variety of glioma subtypes, available low-invasive testing is not effective enough to be introduced into routine medical laboratory practice. Therefore, recent advances in the clinical diagnosis of glioma have focused on liquid biopsy approaches that utilize a wide range of techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Among all techniques, NGS is the most advantageous diagnostic method. Despite the rapid cheapening of NGS experiments, the cost of such diagnostics remains high. Moreover, high-throughput diagnostics are not appropriate for molecular profiling of gliomas since patients with gliomas exhibit only a few diagnostic markers. In this review, we highlighted all available assays for glioma diagnosing for main pathogenic glioma DNA sequence alterations. In the present study, we reviewed the possibility of integrating routine molecular methods into the diagnosis of gliomas. We state that the development of an affordable assay covering all glioma genetic aberrations could enable early detection and improve patient outcomes. Moreover, the development of such molecular diagnostic kits could potentially be a good alternative to expensive NGS-based approaches.

Understanding the molecular profiling of diffuse gliomas classification: A brief overview

Background

Gliomas represent almost 30% of all primary brain tumors and account for 80% of malignant primary ones. In the last two decades, significant progress has been made in understanding gliomas' molecular origin and development. These advancements have demonstrated a remarkable improvement in classification systems based on mutational markers, which contribute paramount information in addition to traditional histology-based classification.

Methods

We performed a narrative review of the literature including each molecular marker described for adult diffuse gliomas used in the World Health Organization (WHO) central nervous system 5.

Results

The 2021 WHO classification of diffuse gliomas encompasses many molecular aspects considered in the latest proposed hallmarks of cancer. The outcome of patients with diffuse gliomas relies on their molecular behavior and consequently, to determine clinical outcomes for these patients, molecular profiling should be mandatory. At least, the following molecular markers are necessary for the current most accurate classification of these tumors: (1) isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) IDH-1 mutation, (2) 1p/19q codeletion, (3) cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B deletion, (4) telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation, (5) α-thalassemia/ mental retardation syndrome X-linked loss, (6) epidermal growth factor receptor amplification, and (7) tumor protein P53 mutation. These molecular markers have allowed the differentiation of multiple variations of the same disease, including the differentiation of distinct molecular Grade 4 gliomas. This could imply different clinical outcomes and possibly impact targeted therapies in the years to come.

Conclusion

Physicians face different challenging scenarios according to the clinical features of patients with gliomas. In addition to the current advances in clinical decision-making, including radiological and surgical techniques, understanding the disease's molecular pathogenesis is paramount to improving the benefits of its clinical treatments. This review aims to describe straightforwardly the most remarkable aspects of the molecular pathogenesis of diffuse gliomas.

Low grade gliomas guide-lines elaborated by the tumor section of Spanish Society of Neurosurgery

Adult low-grade gliomas (Low Grade Gliomas, LGG) are tumors that originate from the glial cells of the brain and whose management involves great controversy, starting from the diagnosis, to the treatment and subsequent follow-up. For this reason, the Tumor Group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) has held a consensus meeting, in which the most relevant neurosurgical issues have been discussed, reaching recommendations based on the best scientific evidence. In order to obtain the maximum benefit from these treatments, an individualised assessment of each patient should be made by a multidisciplinary team. Experts in each LGG treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature. Each area has been summarized and focused on the best published evidence. LGG have been surrounded by treatment controversy, although during the last years more accurate data has been published in order to reach treatment consensus. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case.

Evaluation of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 panel for the detection of 1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglial tumours

AIMS

Accurate assessment of 1p/19q codeletion status in diffuse gliomas is of paramount importance for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes. While targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely implemented for glioma molecular profiling, its role in detecting structural chromosomal variants is less well established, requiring supplementary informatic tools for robust detection. Herein, we evaluated a commercially available amplicon-based targeted NGS panel (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3) for the detection of 1p/19q losses in glioma tissues using an Ion Torrent platform and the standard built-in NGS data analysis pipeline solely.

METHODS

Using as little as 20 ng of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, we analysed 25 previously characterised gliomas for multi-locus copy number losses (CNLs) on 1p and 19q, including 11 oligodendrogliomas (ODG) and 14 non-oligodendroglial (non-ODG) controls. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) was used as a reference standard.

RESULTS

The software confidently detected combined contiguous 1p/19q CNLs in 11/11 ODGs (100% sensitivity), using a copy number cut-off of ≤1.5 and a minimum of 10 amplicons covering the regions. Only partial non-specific losses were identified in non-ODGs (100% specificity). Copy number averages of ODG and non-ODG groups were significantly different (p<0.001). NGS was concordant with FISH and was superior to it in distinguishing partial from contiguous losses indicative of whole-arm chromosomal deletion.

CONCLUSIONS

This commercial NGS panel, along with the standard Ion Torrent algorithm, accurately detected 1p/19q losses in ODG samples, obviating the need for specialised custom-made informatic analyses. This can easily be incorporated into routine glioma workflow as an alternative to FISH.

Diagnostic accuracy of 1p/19q codeletion tests in oligodendroglioma: A comprehensive meta-analysis based on a Cochrane systematic review

Codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q, in conjunction with a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 gene, is the molecular diagnostic criterion for oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. 1p/19q codeletion is a diagnostic marker and allows prognostication and prediction of the best drug response within IDH-mutant tumours. We performed a Cochrane review and simple economic analysis to establish the most sensitive, specific and cost-effective techniques for determining 1p/19q codeletion status. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) test methods were considered as reference standard. Most techniques (FISH, chromogenic in situ hybridisation [CISH], PCR, real-time PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification [MLPA], single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] array, comparative genomic hybridisation [CGH], array CGH, next-generation sequencing [NGS], mass spectrometry and NanoString) showed good sensitivity (few false negatives) for detection of 1p/19q codeletions in glioma, irrespective of whether FISH or PCR-based LOH was used as the reference standard. Both NGS and SNP array had a high specificity (fewer false positives) for 1p/19q codeletion when considered against FISH as the reference standard. Our findings suggest that G banding is not a suitable test for 1p/19q analysis. Within these limits, considering cost per diagnosis and using FISH as a reference, MLPA was marginally more cost-effective than other tests, although these economic analyses were limited by the range of available parameters, time horizon and data from multiple healthcare organisations.

Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma

BACKGROUND

Complete deletion of both the short arm of chromosome 1 (1p) and the long arm of chromosome 19 (19q), known as 1p/19q codeletion, is a mutation that can occur in gliomas. It occurs in a type of glioma known as oligodendroglioma and its higher grade counterpart known as anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Detection of 1p/19q codeletion in gliomas is important because, together with another mutation in an enzyme known as isocitrate dehydrogenase, it is needed to make the diagnosis of an oligodendroglioma. Presence of 1p/19q codeletion also informs patient prognosis and prediction of the best drug treatment. The main two tests in use are fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) assays (also known as PCR-based short tandem repeat or microsatellite analysis). Many other tests are available. None of the tests is perfect, although PCR-based LOH is expected to have very high sensitivity.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the sensitivity and specificity and cost-effectiveness of different deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based techniques for determining 1p/19q codeletion status in glioma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and BIOSIS up to July 2019. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication. We sought economic evaluation studies from the results of this search and using the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included cross-sectional studies in adults with glioma or any subtype of glioma, presenting raw data or cross-tabulations of two or more DNA-based tests for 1p/19q codeletion. We also sought economic evaluations of these tests.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed procedures outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews. Two review authors independently screened titles/abstracts/full texts, performed data extraction, and undertook applicability and risk of bias assessments using QUADAS-2. Meta-analyses used the hierarchical summary ROC model to estimate and compare test accuracy. We used FISH and PCR-based LOH as alternate reference standards to examine how tests compared with those in common use, and conducted a latent class analysis comparing FISH and PCR-based LOH. We constructed an economic model to evaluate cost-effectiveness.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 53 studies examining: PCR-based LOH, FISH, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, next-generation sequencing (NGS), comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH), array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH), multiplex-ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), real-time PCR, chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH), mass spectrometry (MS), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, G-banding, methylation array and NanoString. Risk of bias was low for only one study; most gave us concerns about how patients were selected or about missing data. We had applicability concerns about many of the studies because only patients with specific subtypes of glioma were included. 1520 participants contributed to analyses using FISH as the reference, 1304 participants to analyses involving PCR-based LOH as the reference and 262 participants to analyses of comparisons between methods from studies not including FISH or PCR-based LOH. Most evidence was available for comparison of FISH with PCR-based LOH (15 studies, 915 participants): PCR-based LOH detected 94% of FISH-determined codeletions (95% credible interval (CrI) 83% to 98%) and FISH detected 91% of codeletions determined by PCR-based LOH (CrI 78% to 97%). Of tumours determined not to have a deletion by FISH, 94% (CrI 87% to 98%) had a deletion detected by PCR-based LOH, and of those determined not to have a deletion by PCR-based LOH, 96% (CrI 90% to 99%) had a deletion detected by FISH. The latent class analysis suggested that PCR-based LOH may be slightly more accurate than FISH. Most other techniques appeared to have high sensitivity (i.e. produced few false-negative results) for detection of 1p/19q codeletion when either FISH or PCR-based LOH was considered as the reference standard, although there was limited evidence. There was some indication of differences in specificity (false-positive rate) with some techniques. Both NGS and SNP array had high specificity when considered against FISH as the reference standard (NGS: 6 studies, 243 participants; SNP: 6 studies, 111 participants), although we rated certainty in the evidence as low or very low. NGS and SNP array also had high specificity when PCR-based LOH was considered the reference standard, although with much more uncertainty as these results were based on fewer studies (just one study with 49 participants for NGS and two studies with 33 participants for SNP array). G-banding had low sensitivity and specificity when PCR-based LOH was the reference standard. Although MS had very high sensitivity and specificity when both FISH and PCR-based LOH were considered the reference standard, these results were based on only one study with a small number of participants. Real-time PCR also showed high specificity with FISH as a reference standard, although there were only two studies including 40 participants. We found no relevant economic evaluations. Our economic model using FISH as the reference standard suggested that the resource-optimising test depends on which measure of diagnostic accuracy is most important. With FISH as the reference standard, MLPA is likely to be cost-effective if society was willing to pay GBP 1000 or less for a true positive detected. However, as the value placed on a true positive increased, CISH was most cost-effective. Findings differed when the outcome measure changed to either true negative detected or correct diagnosis. When PCR-based LOH was used as the reference standard, MLPA was likely to be cost-effective for all measures of diagnostic accuracy at lower threshold values for willingness to pay. However, as the threshold values increased, none of the tests were clearly more likely to be considered cost-effective.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In our review, most techniques (except G-banding) appeared to have good sensitivity (few false negatives) for detection of 1p/19q codeletions in glioma against both FISH and PCR-based LOH as a reference standard. However, we judged the certainty of the evidence low or very low for all the tests. There are possible differences in specificity, with both NGS and SNP array having high specificity (fewer false positives) for 1p/19q codeletion when considered against FISH as the reference standard. The economic analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies.

IDH1/2 Mutations in Patients With Diffuse Gliomas: A Single Centre Retrospective Massively Parallel Sequencing Analysis

Patients below 55 years were genetically studied because the prevalence of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) decreases in older patients and on grounds of cost-effectiveness, as suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2016. The aim of our study was to use novel massively parallel sequencing (MPS) approaches to examine rare variants of IDH1/2 in Czech diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors (gliomas) patients below 55 years of age who had been immunohistochemically (IHC) diagnosed as IDH1 R132H negative. The IHC IDH1 status (wild type or mutant) of 275 tissue samples was analyzed using antibodies against the IDH1 R132H protein. Sixty-three samples of 55 years old patients with IHC IDH1 WT status were genotyped using two different MPS technologies to detect rare IDH1 and IDH2 variants. The tiered IHC (60 positive) and molecular (10 positive) approach thus revealed that 70 of the 275 samples (25%) bore IDH1/IDH2 mutations. The combined molecular and IHC approach thus revealed that 70 of the 275 samples (25%) considered in the study bore IDH1/IDH2 mutations. IHC detection of the IDH1 R132H variant should be routinely complemented with MPS to detect rare IDH1/2 variants in glioma patients below 55 years of age with negative IHC result of IDH R132H variant.

Recurrent oligodendroglioma with changed 1p/19q status

We report a case of oligodendroglioma that had consistent histopathological features as well as a distinct change in 1p/19q status in the second recurrence, after temozolomide chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The first tumor recurrence had oligodendroglial morphology, IDH1 R132H and TERT promoter mutations, and 1p/19q codeletion detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Copy number analysis, assessed by next‐generation sequencing, confirmed 1p/19q codeletion, and disclosed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosomes 4 and 9 and chromosome 11 gain. The second recurrence featured not only oligodendroglial morphology but also the appearance of admixed multinucleated giant cells or neoplastic cells having oval nuclei and mitoses and showing microvascular proliferation; it maintained IDH1 R132H and TERT promoter mutations, acquired TP53 mutation, and showed 19q LOH, but disomic 1p, detected by FISH. Copy number analysis depicted LOH of chromosomes 3p, 13, and 19q, 1p partial deletion (1p chr1p34.2‐p11), and gain of chromosomes 2p25.3‐p24.1, 8q12.2‐q24.3, and 11q13.3‐q25. B‐allele frequency analysis of polymorphic sites disclosed copy‐neutral LOH at 1p36.33‐p34.2, supporting the initial deletion of 1p, followed by reduplication of 1p36.33‐p34.2 alone. These findings suggest that the two tumor recurrences might have originated from an initial neoplastic clone, featuring 1p/19q codeletion and IDH1 and TERT promoter mutations, and have independently acquired other copy number alterations. The reduplication of chromosome 1p might be the result of temozolomide treatment, and gave rise to false negative 1p deletion detected by FISH. The possibility of 1p copy‐neutral LOH should be considered in recurrent oligodendrogliomas with altered 1p/19q status detected by FISH.

Shallow whole-genome sequencing: a useful, easy to apply molecular technique for CNA detection on FFPE tumor tissue-a glioma-driven study

Copy number alterations (CNAs) have increasingly become part of the diagnostic algorithm of glial tumors. Alterations such as homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B, 7 +/ 10 - chromosome copy number changes or EGFR amplification are predictive of a poor prognosis. The codeletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q, typically associated with oligodendroglioma, implies a more favorable prognosis. Detection of this codeletion by the current diagnostic standard, being fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), is sometimes however subject to technical and interpretation problems. In this study, we evaluated CNA detection by shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) as an inexpensive, complementary molecular technique. A cohort of 36 glioma tissue samples, enriched with "difficult" and "ambiguous" cases, was analyzed by sWGS. sWGS results were compared with FISH assays of chromosomes 1p and 19q. In addition, CNAs relevant to glioblastoma diagnosis were explored. In 4/36 samples, EGFR (7p11.2) amplifications and homozygous loss of CDKN2A/B were identified by sWGS. Six out of 8 IDH-wild-type glioblastomas demonstrated a prognostic chromosome 7/chromosome 10 signature. In 11/36 samples, local interstitial and terminal 1p/19q alterations were detected by sWGS, implying that FISH's targeted nature might promote false arm-level extrapolations. In this cohort, differences in overall survival between patients with and without codeletion were better pronounced by the sequencing-based distinction (likelihood ratio of 7.48) in comparison to FISH groupings (likelihood ratio of 0.97 at diagnosis and 1.79 ± 0.62 at reobservation), suggesting sWGS is more accurate than FISH. We recognized adverse effects of tissue block age on FISH signals. In addition, we show how sWGS reveals relevant aberrations beyond the 1p/19q state, such as EGFR amplification, combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10, and homozygous loss of CDKN2A/B. The findings presented by this study might stimulate implementation of sWGS as a complementary, easy to apply technique for copy number detection.

Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for 1p/19q Codeletion and IDH1-IDH2 Mutational Analysis Uncovers Mistaken Overdiagnoses of 1p/19q Codeletion by FISH

The 1p/19q codeletion is the result of a translocation between chromosome 1 (Chr1p) and chromosome 19 (Chr19q) with the loss of derivative (1;19)(p10;q10) chromosome. The 1p/19q codeletion has predictive and prognostic significance, and it is essential for the classification of gliomas. In routine practice, the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) diagnosis of 1p/19q codeletion is sometimes unexpected. This study aimed to develop a next-generation sequencing panel for the concurrent definition of the 1p/19q codeletion and IDH1/IDH2 mutation status to resolve these equivocal cases. A total of 65 glioma samples were investigated using a 1p/19q-single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-IDH panel. The panel consists of 192 amplicons, including SNPs mapping to Chr1 and Chr19 and amplicons for IDH1/IDH2 analysis. The 1p/19q SNP-IDH panel consistently identified IDH1/IDH2 mutations. In 49 of 60 cases (81.7%), it provided the same 1p/19q results obtained by FISH. In the remaining 11 cases, the 1p/19q SNP-IDH panel uncovered partial chromosome imbalances as a result of interstitial amplification or deletion of the regions where the FISH probes map, leading to a mistaken overdiagnosis of 1p/19q codeletion by FISH. The 1p/19q SNP-IDH next-generation sequencing panel allows reliable analysis of the 1p/19q codeletion and IDH1/IDH2 mutation at the same time. The panel not only allows resolution of difficult cases but also represents a cost-effective alternative to standard molecular diagnostics procedures.

H3K27me3 immunostaining is diagnostic and prognostic in diffuse gliomas with oligodendroglial or mixed oligoastrocytic morphology

Oligodendroglioma is defined by IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion. The latter is mutually exclusive to ATRX immunohistochemical loss and has been recently associated with the loss of H3K27me3 immunostaining. We aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of H3K27me3 immuno-expression in diffuse gliomas with oligodendroglial or mixed oligoastrocytic morphology. H3K27me3 immunostaining was performed in 69 diffuse gliomas with oligodendroglial (n = 62) or oligoastrocytic (n = 7) morphology. The integration with routinely assessed IDH mutations, ATRX immunostaining, and 1p/19q codeletion classified these cases as 60 oligodendroglial and 9 astrocytic. H3K27me3 was lost in 58/60 oligodendrogliomas with retained (n = 47) or non-conclusive (n = 11) ATRX staining, 3/6 IDH-mutant astrocytomas with ATRX loss, and 3/3 IDH-wt astrocytomas. H3K27me3 was retained in 2/60 oligodendrogliomas with retained ATRX, and in 3/6 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, two of which had lost and one retained ATRX. The combination of H3K27me3 and ATRX immunostainings with IDH mutational status correctly classified 55/69 (80%) cases. In IDH-mutant gliomas, ATRX loss indicates astrocytic phenotype, while ATRX retention and H3K27me3 loss identify oligodendroglial phenotype. Only 14 (20%) IDH-mutant cases with retained ATRX and H3K27me3 or inconclusive ATRX immunostaining would have requested 1p/19q codeletion testing to be classified. Furthermore, H3K27me3 retention was associated with significantly shorter relapse-free survival (P < 0.0001), independently from IDH mutation or 1p/19q codeletion (P < 0.005). Our data suggest that adding H3K27me3 immunostaining to the diagnostic workflow of diffuse gliomas with oligodendroglial or mixed morphology is useful for drastically reducing the number of cases requiring 1p/19q codeletion testing and providing relevant prognostic information.

FoundationOne CDx testing accurately determines whole arm 1p19q codeletion status in gliomas

BACKGROUND

Molecular profiling of gliomas is vital to ensure diagnostic accuracy, inform prognosis, and identify clinical trial options for primary and recurrent tumors. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of reporting the whole arm 1p19q codeletion status from the FoundationOne platform.

METHODS

Testing was performed on glioma samples as part of clinical care and analyzed up to 395 cancer-associated genes (including IDH1/2). The whole arm 1p19q codeletion status was predicted from the same assay using a custom research-use only algorithm, which was validated using 463 glioma samples with available fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) data. For 519 patients with available outcomes data, progression-free and overall survival were assessed based on whole arm 1p19q codeletion status derived from sequencing data.

RESULTS

Concordance between 1p19q status based on FISH and our algorithm was 96.7% (449/463) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 91.0%. All discordant samples were positive for codeletion by FISH and harbored genomic alterations inconsistent with oligodendrogliomas. Median overall survival was 168 months for the IDH1/2 mutant, codeleted group, and 122 months for IDH1/2 mutant-only (hazard ratio (HR): 0.42; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

1p19q codeletion status derived from FoundationOne testing is highly concordant with FISH results. Genomic profiling may be a reliable substitute for traditional FISH testing while also providing IDH1/2 status.

False-positive 1p/19q Testing Results in Gliomas: Clinical and Research Consequences

BACKGROUND

The revised fourth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System-published in 2016-established 1p19q codeletion as the molecular hallmark for the diagnosis of oligodendrogliomas. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the most commonly used modality for 1p19q testing. However, as with most laboratory testing, 1p19q FISH testing has a false-positive rate, potentially resulting in an erroneous diagnosis of oligodendroglioma with significant implications for the choice of therapy and prognosis.

METHODS

The authors describe a case series of 5 patients treated at the Ohio State University James Cancer Center to illustrate the problem of false-positive 1p19q FISH results.

RESULTS

In our case series, the authors present a spectrum of possibilities for conflicting 1p19q testing results and the clinical consequences. The authors present 4 cases that, in retrospect, are believed to have had a false 1p19q FISH results. One other case may represent a true transformation of oligodendroglioma to glioblastoma or a second malignancy. Neuro-oncologists should pay attention to additional molecular markers, namely ATRX, TP53, and MGMT methylation status, before discussing the pathology with the patient and formulating a treatment plan.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologists and neuro-oncologists should be aware of false-positive 1p19q FISH results as they can significantly change treatment and prognosis for glioma patients. Moreover, this issue should be taken into account when designing clinical trials specific to this disease cohort.

Frequency of false-positive FISH 1p/19q codeletion in adult diffuse astrocytic gliomas

Background

Oligodendroglioma is genetically defined by concomitant IDH (IDH1/IDH2) mutation and whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Codeletion of 1p/19q traditionally evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cannot distinguish partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Partial 1p/19q codeletion called positive by FISH is diagnostically a "false-positive" result. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) discriminates partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Herein, we aimed to estimate the frequency of partial 1p/19q codeletion that would lead to a false-positive FISH result.

Methods

FISH 1p/19q codeletion test probe coordinates were mapped onto Oncoscan CMA data to determine the rate of partial 1p/19q codeletion predicted to be positive by FISH. Diffuse astrocytic gliomas with available CMA data (2015-2018) were evaluated and classified based on IDH1-R132H/ATRX/p53 immunohistochemistry, IDH/TERT promoter targeted sequencing, and/or CMA according to classification updates. Predicted false-positive cases were verified by FISH whenever possible.

Results

The overall estimated false-positive FISH 1p/19q codeletion rate was 3.6% (8/223). Predicted false positives were verified by FISH in 6 (of 8) cases. False-positive rates did not differ significantly (P = .49) between IDH-mutant (4.6%; 4/86) and IDH-wildtype (2.9%; 4/137) tumors. IDH-wildtype false positives were all WHO grade IV, whereas IDH-mutant false positives spanned WHO grades II-IV. Testing for 1p/19q codeletion would not have been indicated for most false positives based on current classification recommendations.

Conclusion

Selective 1p/19q codeletion testing and cautious interpretation for conflicting FISH and histopathological findings are recommended to avoid potential misdiagnosis.

Extent of resection, molecular signature, and survival in 1p19q-codeleted gliomas

OBJECTIVE

Genomic analysis in neurooncology has underscored the importance of understanding the patterns of survival in different molecular subtypes within gliomas and their responses to treatment. In particular, diffuse gliomas are now principally characterized by their mutation status (IDH1 and 1p/19q codeletion), yet there remains a paucity of information regarding the prognostic value of molecular markers and extent of resection (EOR) on survival. Furthermore, given the modern emphasis on molecular rather than histological diagnosis, it is important to examine the effect of maximal resection on survival in all gliomas with 1p/q19 codeletions, as these will now be classified as oligodendrogliomas under the new WHO guidelines. The objectives of the present study were twofold: 1) to assess the association between EOR and survival for patients with oligodendrogliomas in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), which includes information on mutation status, and 2) to demonstrate the same effect for all patients with 1p/19q codeleted gliomas in the NCDB.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for all cases of oligodendroglioma between 2004 and 2014, with follow-up dates through 2016. The authors found 2514 cases of histologically confirmed oligodendrogliomas for the final analysis of the effect of EOR on survival. Upon further query, 1067 1p/19q-codeleted tumors were identified in the NCDB. Patients who received subtotal resection (STR) or gross-total resection (GTR) were compared to those who received no tumor debulking surgery. Univariable and multivariable analyses of both overall survival and cause-specific survival were performed.

RESULTS

EOR was associated with increased overall survival for both histologically confirmed oligodendrogliomas and all 1p/19q-codeleted-defined tumors (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Tumor grade, location, and size covaried predictably with EOR. When evaluating tumors by each classification system for predictors of overall survival, facility setting, age, comorbidity index, grade, location, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were all shown to be significantly associated with overall survival. STR and GTR were independent predictors of improved survival in historically classified oligodendrogliomas (HR 0.83, p = 0.18; HR 0.69, p = 0.01, respectively) and in 1p/19q-codeleted tumors (HR 0.49, p < 0.01; HR 0.43, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

By using the NCDB, the authors have demonstrated a side-by-side comparison of the survival benefits of greater EOR in 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas.

Detection of Copy Number Alterations by Shallow Whole-Genome Sequencing of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tumor Tissue

CONTEXT.—

In routine clinical practice, tumor tissue is stored in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. However, the use of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue for genome analysis is challenged by poorer DNA quality and quantity. Although several studies have reported genome-wide massive parallel sequencing applied on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples for mutation analysis, copy number analysis is not yet commonly performed.

OBJECTIVE.—

To evaluate the use of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue for copy number alteration detection using shallow whole-genome sequencing, more generally referred to as copy number variation sequencing.

DESIGN.—

We selected samples from 21 patients, covering a range of different tumor entities. The performance of copy number detection was compared across 3 setups: array comparative genomic hybridization in combination with fresh material; copy number variation sequencing on fresh material; and copy number variation sequencing on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material.

RESULTS.—

Very similar copy number profiles between paired samples were obtained. Although formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded profiles often displayed more noise, detected copy numbers seemed equally reliable if the tumor fraction was at least 20%.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Copy number variation sequencing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material represents a trustworthy method. It is very likely that copy number variation sequencing of routinely obtained biopsy material will become important for individual patient care and research. Moreover, the basic technology needed for copy number variation sequencing is present in most molecular diagnostics laboratories.

IDH mutant lower grade (WHO Grades II/III) astrocytomas can be stratified for risk by CDKN2A, CDK4 and PDGFRA copy number alterations

In the 2016, WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation is a main classifier for lower grade astrocytomas and IDH-mutated astrocytomas is now regarded as a single group with longer survival. However, the molecular and clinical heterogeneity among IDH mutant lower grade (WHO Grades II/III) astrocytomas have only rarely been investigated. In this study, we recruited 160 IDH mutant lower grade (WHO Grades II/III) astrocytomas, and examined PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A deletion and CDK4 amplification by FISH analysis, TERT promoter mutation by Sanger sequencing and ATRX loss and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry. We identified PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A homozygous deletion and CDK4 amplification in 18.8%, 15.0% and 18.1% of our cohort respectively, and these alterations occurred in a mutually exclusive fashion. PDGFRA amplification was associated with shorter PFS (P = 0.0003) and OS (P < 0.0001). In tumors without PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A homozygous deletion or CDK4 amplification was associated with a shorter OS (P = 0.035). Tumors were divided into three risk groups based on the presence of molecular alterations: high risk (PDGFRA amplification), intermediate risk (CDKN2A deletion or CDK4 amplification) and low risk (neither CDKN2A deletion and CDK4 amplification nor PDGFRA amplification). These three risk groups were significantly different in overall survival with mean survivals of 40.5, 62.9 and 71.5 months. The high-risk group also demonstrated a shorter PFS compared to intermediate- (P = 0.036) and low-risk (P < 0.0001) groups. One limitation of this study is the relatively short follow-up period, a common confounding factor for studies on low-grade tumors. Our data illustrate that IDH mutant lower grade astrocytomas is not a homogeneous group and should be molecularly stratified for risk.

Somatic deletion of KDM1A/LSD1 gene is associated to advanced colorectal cancer stages

Aims

KDM1A/LSD1 and ZNF217 are involved in a protein complex that participates in transcriptional regulation. ZNF217 has been analysed in numerous cancers and its amplification has been associated with advanced stages of disease; however, a similar role for KDM1A/LSD1 has not been uncovered. In this study, we estimated the number of KDM1A/LSD1 and ZNF217 gene copies in tissue samples from patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as its association with clinicopathological features in patients with CRC.

Methods

Paraffin-embedded tumour samples from 50 patients with CRC with a histopathological diagnosis of CRC were included. The number of copies of KDM1A/LSD1 and ZNF217 genes was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). We also analysed the association between copy numbers of selected genes and clinicopathological data based on multivariate analysis.

Results

Deletion of the KDM1A/LSD1 gene occurred in 19 samples (38%), whereas ZNF217 gene amplification was identified in 11 samples (22%). We found a significant association between lymph node metastasis or advanced tumour stage and KDM1A/LSD1 gene deletion (p value=0.0003 and p value=0.011, respectively).

Conclusions

KDM1A/LSD1 gene deletion could be considered a novel prognostic biomarker of late-stage CRC.

Conventional Magnetic Resonance Features for Predicting 1p19q Codeletion Status of World Health Organization Grade II and III Diffuse Gliomas

PURPOSE

The conventional magnetic resonance features of World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and III diffuse gliomas in relation to chromosome 1p and 19q deletions (1p19q codeletion) were analyzed.

METHODS

We identified 147 cases of WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas (1p/19q codeletion, 36 cases; no 1p/19q codeletion, 111 cases). χ Test and univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between the imaging features and 1p19q codeletion status of WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas in the discovery group, including the WHO grade II and III subgroups.

RESULTS

(1) In the entire population, multivariate regression demonstrated that proportion contrast-enhanced tumor (>5% vs ≤5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.169; P = 0.009), enhancing margin (poorly vs well defined; OR, 12.435; P = 0.002), and hemorrhage (yes vs no; OR, 21.082; P < 0.001) were associated with a higher incidence of 1p19q codeletion status. The nomogram showed good discrimination (area under the curve [AUC], 0.803) and calibration. (2) For grade II tumors, subgroup analysis found that enhancing margin (poorly vs well defined; OR, 0.308; P = 0.007) and subventricular zone (presence vs absence-; OR, 0.137; P < 0.001) were associated with a higher incidence of 1p19q codeletion status (AUC, 0.779). (3) For grade III tumors, subgroup analysis found that age (≥40 years vs <40 years; OR, 5.977; P = 0.03) and hemorrhage (yes vs no; OR, 18.051; P < 0.001) were associated with a higher incidence of 1p19q codeletion status (AUC, 0.816).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional magnetic resonance features can be conveniently used to facilitate the preoperative prediction of 1p19q codeletion status of WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Comparison of 1p and 19q status of glioblastoma by whole exome sequencing, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and fluorescence in situ hybridization

According to the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system, detecting 1p/19q co-deletion became essential in clinical neuropathology for gliomas with oligodendroglioma-like morphology. Here, we assessed genomic profiles of glioblastoma in 80 cases including 1p/19q status using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and/or whole exome sequencing (WES). Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were subjected to FISH analysis, and the corresponding frozen tissues from the same tumors were evaluated for aCGH and/or WES for 1p/19q co-deletion and other genetic parameters, which included IDH1-R132H, ATRX, TP53, CIC, and NOTCH1 mutations and MGMT methylation status. We also evaluated correlations between 1p/19q co-deletion status and molecular markers or clinical outcomes. The FISH analyses revealed 1p/19q co-deletion in two cases, isolated deletion of 1p in six cases, and 19q in two cases, whereas the aCGH and WES results showed isolated deletion of 19q in four cases and 19 monosomy in only one case. Eleven cases showed discordant 1p/19q results between aCGH/WES and FISH analysis, and in most of them, 1p and/or 19q deletion on FISH analysis corresponded to the partial deletions at 1p36 and/or 19q13 on aCGH/WES. Our cohort exhibited IDH1-R132H mutations (5.4%), MGMT promotor methylation (34.6%), and mutations in ATRX (9.5%), TP53 (33.3%), and NOTCH1 (3.8%) but not in CIC (0%). In addition, MGMT methylation and ATRX mutation were significantly associated with clinical prognosis. In glioblastomas, partial deletions of 1p36 and/or 19q13 were uncommon, some of which appeared as 1p and/or 19q deletions on FISH analysis.