Variation in Cardiac Screening and Management of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the UK and Republic of Ireland

Anesthetic key points in a patient with a terminal ileum neuroendocrine tumor and a rare carcinoid left heart disease presented for non-cardiac surgery: case report

BACKGROUND

Carcinoid tumors are rare neuroendocrine malignancies presenting in an increasing number in our center. The incidence of carcinoid tumors is approximatively between 2.5 and 5 cases per 100,000 people of whom about 50% develop carcinoid syndrome. Once the carcinoid syndrome has developed, a carcinoid cardiomyopathy can occur. Carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) remains a serious and rare complication associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Although carcinoid tumors have been known and studied for several years, there are still scarce data on the anesthetic management and the peri operative period.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a case of a Caucasian 44-year-old woman with an unusual presentation of left CaHD with an ileal neuroendocrine tumor and liver metastases. Our preoperative somatostatin administration protocol, limit the cardiac damage. The maintenance of stable hemodynamics, the use of balanced anesthetic technique, all along with a good understanding of the pathology, played a major role in the successful management of anesthesia. This case report allows us to introduce our decision algorithm for the management of this type of pathology in our tertiary hospital, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc.

CONCLUSION

Despite the paucity of data, anesthetic management of patients with carcinoid tumor can be safely performed with effective hemodynamic monitoring and a good understanding of the pathophysiology. Knowledge and application of a clear institutional algorithm for octreotide administration and multidisciplinary consultation at a referral center are essential for the management of these patients.

The Role of Transthoracic Echocardiography for Assessment of Mortality in Patients with Carcinoid Heart Disease Undergoing Valve Replacement

Patients with carcinoid heart disease (CHD) are referred for valve replacement if they have severe symptomatic disease or evidence of right ventricular (RV) failure and an anticipated survival of at least 12 months. Data are lacking, however, on the role of transthoracic echocardiography in predicting outcomes. We carried out a retrospective, single-centre cohort study of patients with a biopsy-confirmed neuroendocrine tumour (NET) and CHD undergoing valve replacement for severe valve disease and symptoms of right heart failure. The aim was to identify factors associated with postoperative mortality, both within one year of surgery and during long-term follow-up. Of 88 patients with NET, 49 were treated surgically (mean age: 64.4 ± 7.6 years; 55% male), of whom 48 had a bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement for severe tricuspid regurgitation; 39 patients had a pulmonary valve replacement. Over a median potential follow-up of 96 months (interquartile range: 56-125), there were 37 deaths, with 30-day and one-year mortality of 14% (n = 7) and 39% (n = 19), respectively. A significant relationship between RV size and one-year mortality was observed, with 57% of those with severe RV dilatation dying within a year of surgery, compared to 33% in those with normal RV size (p = 0.039). This difference remained significant in the time-to-event analysis of long-term survival (p = 0.008). RV size was found to reduce significantly with surgery (p < 0.001). Those with persisting RV dilatation (p = 0.007) or worse RV function (p = 0.001) on postoperative echocardiography had significantly shorter long-term survival. In this single-centre retrospective study of patients undergoing surgery for CHD, increasingly severe RV dilatation on preoperative echocardiography predicted adverse outcomes, yielding a doubling of the one-year mortality rate relative to normal RV size. These data support the possibility that early surgery might deliver greater long-term benefits in this patient cohort.

Synoptic reporting of echocardiography in carcinoid heart disease (ENETS Carcinoid Heart Disease Task Force)

BACKGROUND

This European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Expert Consensus document aims to provide practical guidance and standardization for echocardiography in the screening and follow-up of carcinoid heart disease (CHD) in patients with a neuroendocrine tumour (NET) and carcinoid syndrome.

METHODS

NET experts within the ENETS Carcinoid Heart Disease Task Force reviewed both general reporting guidelines and specialized scoring systems for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in CHD. Based on this review, a dedicated template report was designed by the multidisciplinary working group of cardiologists, oncologists, endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons and radiologists.

RESULTS

We propose a Synoptic Reporting of Echocardiography in Carcinoid Heart Disease which represents an agreed peer reviewed proforma to capture information at the time of referral and enable a detailed outcome of CHD assessment. This includes a systematic and detailed list of structures to evaluate data to capture at the time of reporting of TTE.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to these reporting guidelines aims to promote homogeneous and detailed evaluation of CHD to secure accurate assessment and allow comparison of studies performed intra- and inter-individually. These guidelines could also facilitate CHD assessment as part of prospective clinical trials to enable standardization of the findings seen in response to therapy.

Update in carcinoid heart disease - the heart of the matter

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a paraneoplastic cardiac manifestation occurring in patients with carcinoid syndrome (CS) and advanced neuroendocrine malignancy. In about 20-40% of patients with CS, chronic exposure to tumor-released circulating vasoactive peptides typically results in right-sided valvular fibrosis leading to valve dysfunction and right heart failure. CHD remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The management of patients with CHD is complex, as both the systemic malignant disease and the heart involvement have to be addressed. Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention in selected patients are of utmost importance and offer a survival benefit. In patients with advanced carcinoid heart disease, valve replacement surgery is the most effective option to alleviate cardiac symptoms and contribute to survival outcomes. A collaboration of a multidisciplinary team in centers with experience is required to provide optimal patient management. Here, we review the current literature regarding CHD presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic tools, and available treatment strategies.

Vigilance for carcinoid heart disease is still required in the era of somatostatin analogues: Lessons from a case series

AIM

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a well-documented complication of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) due to secreted hormones causing fibrosis. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) can decrease hormonal secretion and inhibit tumor growth. The reported incidence of CHD has decreased as SSA use has increased. We describe a series of patients who have developed CHD even though they were treated with SSA therapy.

METHODS

Nine patients were seen in four centers in Australia and New Zealand. The average duration of follow-up from diagnosis was 39 months.

RESULTS

Three patients had Grade 1 and six Grade 2 disease by World Health Organization 2010 criteria. All patients had no CHD symptoms at baseline and started SSA therapy soon after diagnosis, yet developed significant, symptomatic cardiac dysfunction in their disease course. The median time from NET diagnosis to SSA initiation was 1 month, and median time from NET diagnosis to CHD diagnosis was 23 months (range 4-52). All patients who were tested had persistently increased hormonal levels (chromogranin A, urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid).

CONCLUSIONS

The good symptomatic control afforded by SSAs should not lead to reduced vigilance in screening for CHD, especially in patients with persistently elevated hormonal assays. Clinicians should consider regular echocardiographic screening in patients with a secretory syndrome.

Update on Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Complications of Carcinoid Syndrome

Carcinoid syndrome (CS) develops in patients with hormone-producing neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) when hormones reach a significant level in the systemic circulation. The classical symptoms of carcinoid syndrome are flushing, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, and wheezing. Neuroendocrine neoplasms can produce multiple hormones: 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) is the most well-known one, but histamine, catecholamines, and brady/tachykinins are also released. Serotonin overproduction can lead to symptoms and also stimulates fibrosis formation which can result in development of carcinoid syndrome-associated complications such as carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) and mesenteric fibrosis. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) is one of the main factors in developing fibrosis, but platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF or CCN2) are also related to fibrosis development. Treatment of CS focuses on reducing serotonin levels with somatostatin analogues (SSA's). Telotristat ethyl and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) have recently become available for patients with symptoms despite being established on SSA's. Screening for CaHD is advised, and early intervention prolongs survival. Mesenteric fibrosis is often present and associated with poorer survival, but the role for prophylactic surgery of this is unclear. Depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment are frequently present symptoms in patients with CS but not always part of their care plan. The role of antidepressants, mainly SSRIs, is debatable, but recent retrospective studies show evidence for safe use in patients with CS. Carcinoid crisis is a life-threatening complication of CS which can appear spontaneously but mostly described during surgery, anaesthesia, chemotherapy, PRRT, and radiological procedures and may be prevented by octreotide administration.

Multidisciplinary team management of carcinoid heart disease

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a consequence of valvular fibrosis triggered by vasoactive substances released from neuroendocrine tumours, classically in those with metastatic disease and resulting in tricuspid and pulmonary valve failure. CHD affects one in five patients who have carcinoid syndrome (CS). Valve leaflets become thickened, retracted and immobile, resulting most often in regurgitation that causes right ventricular dilatation and ultimately, right heart failure. The development of CHD heralds a significantly worse prognosis than those patients with CS who do not develop valvular disease. Diagnosis requires a low threshold of suspicion in all patients with CS, since symptoms occur late in the disease process and clinical signs are difficult to elicit. As a result, routine screening is recommended using the biomarker, N-terminal pro-natriuretic peptide, and regular echocardiography is then required for diagnosis and follow-up. There is no direct medical therapy for CHD, but the focus of non-surgical care is to control CS symptoms, reduce tumour load and decrease hormone levels. Valve surgery improves long-term outcome for those with severe disease compared to medical management, although peri-operative mortality remains at between 10 and 20% in experienced centres. Therefore, care needs to be multidisciplinary at all stages, with clear discussion with the patient and between teams to ensure optimum outcome for these often-complex patients.

Carcinoid Heart Disease in Patients With Bronchopulmonary Carcinoid

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) in bronchopulmonary carcinoid and its relationship with left-sided valvular disease are unknown.

METHODS

All patients with a pathologic diagnosis of bronchopulmonary carcinoid and echocardiography performed at our institution between 2001 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Echocardiograms were reviewed for features of CaHD including valvular leaflet thickening and retraction with resulting regurgitation and/or stenosis.

RESULTS

Bronchopulmonary carcinoid was present in 185 patients (age 67 ± 13 years, 63% female). Carcinoid syndrome was present in 7.7% and liver metastases in 10%. Echocardiographic features of CaHD were present in just 2 (1%) patients. A 62-year-old woman underwent resection of stage 1A bronchopulmonary carcinoid without carcinoid syndrome and also received 7 months dexfenfluramine therapy. During 15-year follow-up, mitral regurgitation decreased and tricuspid regurgitation remained stable, a course more consistent with diet-drug-related valve disease than CaHD. A 71-year-old woman status post-resection of a grade 1 hilar carcinoid tumor with carcinoid syndrome, liver metastases, and elevated 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid had typical thickening and retraction of tricuspid and pulmonary valves with severe regurgitation. The aortic valve was mildly thickened and retracted with mild regurgitation. She underwent tricuspid and pulmonary valve replacement and closure of a patent foramen ovale. Pathologic examination confirmed CaHD.

CONCLUSIONS

CaHD occurs in less than 1% of patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoid. Bronchopulmonary carcinoid was associated with neither CaHD in the absence of liver metastases nor left-sided valve involvement in the absence of patent foramen ovale.

Carcinoid-syndrome: recent advances, current status and controversies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances and controversies in all aspects of carcinoid-syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last few years there have been a number of advances in all aspects of carcinoid syndrome as well as new therapies. These include new studies on its epidemiology which demonstrate it is increasing in frequency; increasing insights into the pathogenesis of its various clinical manifestations and into its natural history: definition of prognostic factors; new methods to verify its presence; the development of new drugs to treat its various manifestations, both initially and in somatostatin-refractory cases; and an increased understanding of the pathogenesis, natural history and management of carcinoid heart disease. These advances have generated several controversies and these are also reviewed.

SUMMARY

There have been numerous advances in all aspects of the carcinoid-syndrome, which is the most common functional syndrome neuroendocrine tumors produce. These advances are leading to new approaches to the management of these patients and in some cases to new controversies.

Echocardiography in functional midgut neuroendocrine tumors: When and how often

The management of patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNET) is rapidly evolving. Current preoperative detection rates of primary tumor sites are higher than ever and progression-free survival in patients with already advanced disease is expanding due to the implementation of novel efficacious treatment strategies. This survival benefit may potentially translate into a need for a multidisciplinary approach to an even more heterogenous variety of clinical conditions, among these, carcinoid syndrome (CS) and carcinoid heart disease (CHD). The latter often triggers substantial morbidity and mortality, hence a systematic screening, an accurate diagnosis, as well as effective interventions are critically important. The rarity of the disease has result in a relative lack of statistically powerful evidence, which in turn may have rendered significant variability between practices. In this regard, despite recent guidelines, the optimal follow-up of patients with CHD remain debatable to some authors, perhaps due to the preponderance of certain schools throughout the manuscript. Herein, we present a concise and practical guidance document on clinical screening and echocardiographic surveillance of patients with CHD based on a comprehensive review of the literature, and complemented by our experience at the Center for Carcinoid and Neuroendocrine Tumors at The Mount Sinai Hospital.

Management of Well-differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEPNETs): A Review

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are heterogeneous tumors that arise from the neuroendocrine cells of the digestive tract and other organs, such as the lung, ovary, and thyroid glands. They can be well differentiated or poorly differentiated, and management of these tumors differs for each histologic subtype. We have performed a review of NETs and focused on management of well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) and carcinoid syndrome.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed to obtain articles on the management of well-differentiated NETs. Using the key words neuroendocrine tumors, carcinoid, pNET, octreotide, somatostatin analogues, and radiolabeled therapy, we reviewed Phase II and III trials that were published over the past 30 years. We also reviewed guidelines from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, North America Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network in our search.

FINDINGS

NETs are usually slow-growing tumors that remain asymptomatic for a long duration and can be either nonfunctioning or functioning. Surgical resection is recommended for locoregional disease, impending obstruction, symptom control, and advanced disease. Nonsurgical treatment options include somatostatin analogues (SSAs), multikinase inhibitors, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and radiolabeled SSAs. Carcinoid syndrome is mainly treated with SSAs.

IMPLICATIONS

Although GEPNETs are slow-growing tumors, most patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease, and therefore it is important that the management of each patient be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting to optimize the treatment strategy. Patients should be considered for clinical trials and refractory cases referred to a specialty center.

Diagnosing and Managing Carcinoid Heart Disease in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Expert Statement

Carcinoid heart disease is a frequent occurrence in patients with carcinoid syndrome and is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality. The pathophysiology of carcinoid heart disease is poorly understood; however, chronic exposure to excessive circulating serotonin is considered one of the most important contributing factors. Despite recognition, international consensus guidelines specifically addressing the diagnosis and management of carcinoid heart disease are lacking. Furthermore, there is considerable variation in multiple aspects of screening and management of the disease. The aim of these guidelines was to provide succinct, practical advice on the diagnosis and management of carcinoid heart disease as well as its surveillance. Recommendations and proposed algorithms for the investigation, screening, and management have been developed based on an evidence-based review of the published data and on the expert opinion of a multidisciplinary consensus panel consisting of neuroendocrine tumor experts, including oncologists, gastroenterologists, and endocrinologists, in conjunction with cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons.

Cardiac Surgery for Carcinoid Heart Disease: A Weapon Not to Be Misused

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) complicates approximately 25% of patients with a carcinoid tumor and carcinoid syndrome and leads to heart valve degeneration with mixed-stenotic and regurgitation pathology and consequent heart failure (HF) leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Cardiac surgery in symptomatic, severe CHD leads to significantly better functional capacity and prolonged survival when compared to medical treatment alone. Recent studies have shown improvement in postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for CHD over the last decades. The trend for early diagnosis and application of surgery prior to the manifestation of HF symptoms, which tended to develop during the previous years, does not seem justifiable based on the findings of recent studies. Therefore, the optimal timing of intervention in CHD and the type of valve that should preferably be used remain issues of controversy. This review comprehensively examines the existing literature on the treatment options for patients with CHD, with a special focus on short- and long-term survival after cardiac surgery, and discusses the selection of the exact patient profile and intervention timing that are more likely to optimize the benefit-to-risk ratio for surgical intervention.

Limited value for urinary 5-HIAA excretion as prognostic marker in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours

OBJECTIVE

To determine if urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) excretion is of prognostic value for overall survival (OS) in patients with a gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumour (NET) and to compare the prognostic value with patient characteristics, ENETS/WHO grading, ENETS TNM staging and biomarkers.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data was collected from patients with a gastrointestinal NET or a NET with gastrointestinal metastases and available 5-HIAA excretion in 24-h urine samples. Laboratory results were stratified for urinary 5-HIAA and chromogranin A (CgA): <2× upper limit of normal (ULN), 2-10× ULN, or >10× ULN. For neuron-specific enolase (NSE), this was the reference range or >1× ULN. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests, and hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression for univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients were included, 46.6% female with a mean age of 59.9 years. OS was shortest in patients with urinary 5-HIAA excretion >10× ULN vs reference range (median 83 months vs 141 months, P = 0.002). In univariate analysis, urinary 5-HIAA excretion >10× ULN was a negative predictor (HR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.09-2.39). However, in multivariate analysis, only age (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.08), grade 3 disease (HR 5.09, 95% CI: 2.20-11.79), NSE >1× ULN (HR 2.36, 95% CI: 1.34-4.14) and CgA >10× ULN (HR 3.61, 95% CI: 1.56-8.34) remained as the predictors.

CONCLUSION

Urinary 5-HIAA excretion >10× ULN is a negative predictor for OS. However, when added to other biomarkers and grading, it is no longer a predictor for OS. Therefore, it should only be determined to assess carcinoid syndrome and not for prognostic value.