1
|
Wilson BE, Jacob S, Do V, Amir E, Bray F, Ferlay J, Knaul FM, Elawawy A, Pearson SA, Barton MB. Are NCCN Resource-Stratified Guidelines for Breast Cancer Systemic Therapy Achievable? A Population-Based Study of Global Need and Economic Impact. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:1074-1083. [PMID: 34228485 PMCID: PMC8457816 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Resource-stratified guidelines (RSG) for cancer provide a hierarchy of interventions, based on resource availability. We quantify treatment need and cost if National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) RSGs for breast cancer (BC) are adopted globally. METHODS We developed decision trees for first-course systemic therapy, merged with SEER and Global Cancer Observatory 2018 incidence data to estimate treatment need and cost if NCCN RSG are implemented globally based on country-level income. Simulations were used to quantify need and cost of globally scaling up services to Maximal. RESULTS Based on NCCN RSG, first-course chemotherapy is indicated in 0% (Basic), 87% (Core), and 86% (Enhanced) but declined to 50% (Maximal) because of incorporation of genomic profiling. First-course endocrine therapy (ET) is indicated in 80% in all settings. In 2018, treatment need was 1.4 million people for chemotherapy, 183,943 for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies and 1.6 million for ET. The cost per person for chemotherapy or HER2 or immunotherapy increased by 17-fold from Core to Maximal ($1,278-$22,313 Australian dollars [AUD]). The cost of ET per person rose eight-fold from Basic to Maximal ($1,236-$9,809 AUD). If all patients with BC globally were treated with Maximal resources, the need for chemotherapy would decline by 28%, whereas cost of first-course treatment would rise by 1.8-fold ($21-$37 billion AUD) because of more costly therapies. CONCLUSION NCCN RSGs for BC could result in chemotherapy overtreatment in Core and Enhanced settings. The absence of chemotherapy in Basic settings should be reconsidered, and future iterations of RSG should perform cross-tumor comparisons to ensure equitable resource distribution and maximize population-level outcomes. Our model is flexible and can be tailored to the costs, population attributes, and resource availability of any institution or country for health-services planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke E Wilson
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susannah Jacob
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Viet Do
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,Liverpool Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eitan Amir
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Freddie Bray
- Cancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Cancer Research, Lyon, France
| | - Jacques Ferlay
- Cancer Surveillance Section, International Agency for Cancer Research, Lyon, France
| | - Felicia M Knaul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.,Institute for Advanced Study of the Americas, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.,Tómatelo a Pecho, A.C., Mexico City, Mexico.,Mexican Health Foundation (FUNSALUD), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ahmed Elawawy
- Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.,Alsoliman Radiation and Oncology Center, Port Said, Egypt
| | - Sallie-Anne Pearson
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.,Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael B Barton
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alkhudair N, Alshamrani M, Samarkandi H, Almodaheem H, Alabdulkarim H, Alsaqaaby M, Alnajjar F, Alhashem H, Bakkar M, Bazarbashi S, Alnahedh M, Alfraih F, Alawagi M, Al-jedai A. Cancer Management in Saudi Arabia: Recommendations by the Saudi Oncology HeAlth Economics ExpeRt GrouP (SHARP). Saudi Pharm J 2021; 29:115-120. [PMID: 33679175 PMCID: PMC7910134 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is widely recognized as a major global health problem and is estimated to rank as one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Saudi Arabia has undergone remarkable socioeconomic development in the past 40 years which has contributed to the increase in cancer incidence. The high costs of new oncology medications in combination with uncertainty of long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes highlight the importance of considering value, in terms of clinical outcomes, relative to cost. We convened a group of experts to discuss key factors impacting the current state of cancer management in Saudi Arabia and to agree on a list of recommendations, with a focus on value-based care, considering evidence, patients, and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Alkhudair
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majed Alshamrani
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadeel Samarkandi
- Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Alfaisal University, College of Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hajer Almodaheem
- Therapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Pharmaceutical Care Services, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hana Alabdulkarim
- Drug Policy and Economic Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mai Alsaqaaby
- Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fouad Alnajjar
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hashem Alhashem
- Department of Oncology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Shouki Bazarbashi
- King Abdullah Center of Oncology and Liver Disease, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Alnahedh
- Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Feras Alfraih
- King Abdullah Center of Oncology and Liver Disease, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Alawagi
- Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Al-jedai
- Alfaisal University, College of Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Therapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Pharmaceutical Care Services, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Corresponding author at: Therapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Pharmaceutical Care Services, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tannock IF, Amir E, Booth CM, Niraula S, Ocana A, Seruga B, Templeton AJ, Vera-Badillo F. Relevance of randomised controlled trials in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2017; 17:e560-e567. [PMID: 27924754 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30572-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Well-designed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can prevent bias in the comparison of treatments and provide a sound basis for changes in clinical practice. However, the design and reporting of many RCTs can render their results of little relevance to clinical practice. In this Personal View, we discuss the limitations of RCT data and suggest some ways to improve the clinical relevance of RCTs in the everyday management of patients with cancer. RCTs should ask questions of clinical rather than commercial interest, avoid non-validated surrogate endpoints in registration trials, and have entry criteria that allow inclusion of all patients who are fit to receive treatment. Furthermore, RCTs should be reported with complete accounting of frequency and management of toxicities, and with strict guidelines to ensure freedom from bias. Premature reporting of results should be avoided. The bar for clinical benefit should be raised for drug registration, which should require publication and review of mature data from RCTs, post-marketing health outcome studies, and value-based pricing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian F Tannock
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Eitan Amir
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Departments of Oncology and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Saroj Niraula
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Haematology, University of Manitoba and CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Alberto Ocana
- Translational Research Unit, Albacete University Hospital, Albacete, Spain
| | - Bostjan Seruga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Arnoud J Templeton
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Claraspital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Francisco Vera-Badillo
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group and Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Tecnológico de Monterrey School of Medicine, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|