1
|
Thorwarth D. Clinical use of positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning - Medical physics considerations. Z Med Phys 2023; 33:13-21. [PMID: 36272949 PMCID: PMC10068574 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PET/CT imaging plays an increasing role in radiotherapy treatment planning. The aim of this article was to identify the major use cases and technical as well as medical physics challenges during integration of these data into treatment planning. Dedicated aspects, such as (i) PET/CT-based radiotherapy simulation, (ii) PET-based target volume delineation, (iii) functional avoidance to optimized organ-at-risk sparing and (iv) functionally adapted individualized radiotherapy are discussed in this article. Furthermore, medical physics aspects to be taken into account are summarized and presented in form of check-lists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noto B, Roll W, Zinken L, Rischen R, Kerschke L, Evers G, Heindel W, Schäfers M, Büther F. Respiratory motion correction in F-18-FDG PET/CT impacts lymph node assessment in lung cancer patients. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:61. [PMID: 36107357 PMCID: PMC9478021 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00926-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS Elastic motion correction in PET has been shown to increase image quality and quantitative measurements of PET datasets affected by respiratory motion. However, little is known on the impact of respiratory motion correction on clinical image evaluation in oncologic PET. This study evaluated the impact of motion correction on expert readers' lymph node assessment of lung cancer patients. METHODS Forty-three patients undergoing F-18-FDG PET/CT for the staging of suspected lung cancer were included. Three different PET reconstructions were investigated: non-motion-corrected ("static"), belt gating-based motion-corrected ("BG-MC") and data-driven gating-based motion-corrected ("DDG-MC"). Assessment was conducted independently by two nuclear medicine specialists blinded to the reconstruction method on a six-point scale [Formula: see text] ranging from "certainly negative" (1) to "certainly positive" (6). Differences in [Formula: see text] between reconstruction methods, accounting for variation caused by readers, were assessed by nonparametric regression analysis of longitudinal data. From [Formula: see text], a dichotomous score for N1, N2, and N3 ("negative," "positive") and a subjective certainty score were derived. SUV and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were compared between reconstruction methods. RESULTS BG-MC resulted in higher scores for N1 compared to static (p = 0.001), whereas DDG-MC resulted in higher scores for N2 compared to static (p = 0.016). Motion correction resulted in the migration of N1 from tumor free to metastatic on the dichotomized score, consensually for both readers, in 3/43 cases and in 2 cases for N2. SUV was significantly higher for motion-corrected PET, while MTV was significantly lower (all p < 0.003). No significant differences in the certainty scores were noted. CONCLUSIONS PET motion correction resulted in significantly higher lymph node assessment scores of expert readers. Significant effects on quantitative PET parameters were seen; however, subjective reader certainty was not improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Noto
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany ,grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Clinical for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Roll
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Laura Zinken
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Robert Rischen
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Clinical for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Laura Kerschke
- grid.5949.10000 0001 2172 9288Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Georg Evers
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Walter Heindel
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Clinical for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany ,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Schäfers
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany ,grid.5949.10000 0001 2172 9288European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany ,West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Münster, Germany
| | - Florian Büther
- grid.16149.3b0000 0004 0551 4246Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany ,grid.5949.10000 0001 2172 9288European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grootjans W, Rietbergen DDD, van Velden FHP. Added Value of Respiratory Gating in Positron Emission Tomography for the Clinical Management of Lung Cancer Patients. Semin Nucl Med 2022; 52:745-758. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
4
|
Rogasch JMM, Hofheinz F, van Heek L, Voltin CA, Boellaard R, Kobe C. Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020451. [PMID: 35204542 PMCID: PMC8871060 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology—both imaging hardware and reconstruction software—into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M. M. Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Lutz van Heek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (L.v.H.); (C.-A.V.)
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (L.v.H.); (C.-A.V.)
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam University Medical Center, Free University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (L.v.H.); (C.-A.V.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-221-478-7534
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Crivellaro C, Guerra L. Respiratory Gating and the Performance of PET/CT in Pulmonary Lesions. Curr Radiopharm 2021; 13:218-227. [PMID: 32183685 PMCID: PMC8206192 DOI: 10.2174/1874471013666200317144629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Motion artifacts related to the patient’s breathing can be the cause of underestimation of the lesion uptake and can lead to missing of small lung lesions. The respiratory gating (RG) technology has demonstrated a significant increase in image quality. Objective The aim of this paper was to evaluate the advantages of RG technique on PET/CT performance in lung lesions. The impact of 4D-PET/CT on diagnosis (metabolic characterization), staging and re-staging lung cancer was also assessed, including its application for radiotherapy planning. Finally, new technologies for respiratory motion management were also discussed. Methods A comprehensive electronic search of the literature was performed by using Medline database (PubMed) searching “PET/CT”, “gated” and “lung”. Original articles, review articles, and editorials published in the last 10 years were selected, included and critically reviewed in order to select relevant articles. Results Many papers compared Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in gated and ungated PET studies showing an increase in SUV of gated images, particularly for the small lesions located in medium and lower lung. In addition, other features as Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) and textural-features presented differences when obtained from gated and ungated PET acquisitions. Besides the increase in quantification, gating techniques can determine an increase in the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT. Gated PET/CT was evaluated for lung cancer staging, therapy response assessment and for radiation therapy planning. Conclusion New technologies able to track the motion of organs lesion directly from raw PET data, can reduce or definitively solve problems (i.e.: extended acquisition time, radiation exposure) currently limiting the use of gated PET/CT in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Crivellaro
- School of Medicine and Surgery - University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Guerra
- School of Medicine and Surgery - University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan, Italy,Nuclear Medicine Department, ASST- Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Filice A, Casali M, Ciammella P, Galaverni M, Fioroni F, Iotti C, Versari A. Radiotherapy Planning and Molecular Imaging in Lung Cancer. Curr Radiopharm 2020; 13:204-217. [PMID: 32186275 PMCID: PMC8206193 DOI: 10.2174/1874471013666200318144154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients suitable for radical chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer, 18F-FDGPET/ CT is a proposed management to improve the accuracy of high dose radiotherapy. However, there is a high rate of locoregional failure in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), probably due to the fact that standard dosing may not be effective in all patients. The aim of the present review was to address some criticisms associated with the radiotherapy image-guided in NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted. Only published articles that met the following criteria were included: articles, only original papers, radiopharmaceutical ([18F]FDG and any tracer other than [18F]FDG), target, only specific for lung cancer radiotherapy planning, and experimental design (eventually "in vitro" studies were excluded). Peer-reviewed indexed journals, regardless of publication status (published, ahead of print, in press, etc.) were included. Reviews, case reports, abstracts, editorials, poster presentations, and publications in languages other than English were excluded. The decision to include or exclude an article was made by consensus and any disagreement was resolved through discussion. RESULTS Hundred eligible full-text articles were assessed. Diverse information is now available in the literature about the role of FDG and new alternative radiopharmaceuticals for the planning of radiotherapy in NSCLC. In particular, the role of alternative technologies for the segmentation of FDG uptake is essential, although indeterminate for RT planning. The pros and cons of the available techniques have been extensively reported. CONCLUSION PET/CT has a central place in the planning of radiotherapy for lung cancer and, in particular, for NSCLC assuming a substantial role in the delineation of tumor volume. The development of new radiopharmaceuticals can help overcome the problems related to the disadvantage of FDG to accumulate also in activated inflammatory cells, thus improving tumor characterization and providing new prognostic biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Filice
- Address correspondence to this author at the Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Reggio Emilia, Italy; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pike LC, Thomas CM, Guerrero-Urbano T, Michaelidou A, Greener T, Miles E, Eaton D, Barrington SF. Guidance on the use of PET for treatment planning in radiotherapy clinical trials. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190180. [PMID: 31437023 PMCID: PMC6849663 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to propose meaningful guidance covering the practical and technical issues involved when planning or conducting clinical trials involving positron emission tomography (PET)-guided radiotherapy. The complexity of imaging requirements will depend on the study aims, design and PET methods used. Where PET is used to adapt radiotherapy, a high level of accuracy and reproducibility is required to ensure effective and safe treatment delivery. The guidance in this document is intended to assist researchers designing clinical trials involving PET-guided radiotherapy to provide sufficient information about the appropriate methods to complete PET-CT imaging to a consistent standard at participating centres. The guidance is divided into six categories: application of PET in radiotherapy, resource requirements, quality assurance, imaging protocol design, data management and image processing. Each section provides an overview of the recent literature to support the specific recommendations. This guidance builds on previous recommendations from the National Cancer Research Institute PET Research Network and has been produced in collaboration with the National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy C Pike
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tony Greener
- Radiotherapy Physics, Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Miles
- National Radiotherapy Trials QA Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | | | - Sally F Barrington
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Das SK, McGurk R, Miften M, Mutic S, Bowsher J, Bayouth J, Erdi Y, Mawlawi O, Boellaard R, Bowen SR, Xing L, Bradley J, Schoder H, Yin FF, Sullivan DC, Kinahan P. Task Group 174 Report: Utilization of [ 18 F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ([ 18 F]FDG-PET) in Radiation Therapy. Med Phys 2019; 46:e706-e725. [PMID: 31230358 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of positron emission tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) is rapidly increasing in the areas of staging, segmentation, treatment planning, and response assessment. The most common radiotracer is 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18 F]FDG), a glucose analog with demonstrated efficacy in cancer diagnosis and staging. However, diagnosis and RT planning are different endeavors with unique requirements, and very little literature is available for guiding physicists and clinicians in the utilization of [18 F]FDG-PET in RT. The two goals of this report are to educate and provide recommendations. The report provides background and education on current PET imaging systems, PET tracers, intensity quantification, and current utilization in RT (staging, segmentation, image registration, treatment planning, and therapy response assessment). Recommendations are provided on acceptance testing, annual and monthly quality assurance, scanning protocols to ensure consistency between interpatient scans and intrapatient longitudinal scans, reporting of patient and scan parameters in literature, requirements for incorporation of [18 F]FDG-PET in treatment planning systems, and image registration. The recommendations provided here are minimum requirements and are not meant to cover all aspects of the use of [18 F]FDG-PET for RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiva K Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ross McGurk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Moyed Miften
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James Bowsher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John Bayouth
- Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Yusuf Erdi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas, M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen R Bowen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Heiko Schoder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel C Sullivan
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
« Définition des volumes cibles : quand et comment l’oncologue radiothérapeute peut-il utiliser la TEP ? ». Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:745-752. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
10
|
Using Cine-Averaged CT With the Shallow Breathing Pattern to Reduce Respiration-Induced Artifacts for Thoracic Cavity PET/CT Scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:140-146. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
11
|
Elhalawani H, Elgohari B, Lin TA, Mohamed ASR, Fitzgerald TJ, Laurie F, Ulin K, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Guerrero T, Holliday EB, Russo G, Patel A, Jones W, Walker GV, Awan M, Choi M, Dagan R, Mahmoud O, Shapiro A, Kong FMS, Gomez D, Zeng J, Decker R, Spoelstra FOB, Gaspar LE, Kachnic LA, Thomas CR, Okunieff P, Fuller CD. An in-silico quality assurance study of contouring target volumes in thoracic tumors within a cooperative group setting. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 15:83-92. [PMID: 30775563 PMCID: PMC6365802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed at quantifying inter-observer Pancoast tumors delineation variability. Experts’ delineations were used to define ground truth. Other observers’ delineations were compared against ground truth. High degree of variability was noted for most target volumes except GTV_P. This unveils potentials for protocol modification for future IMRT studies.
Introduction Target delineation variability is a significant technical impediment in multi-institutional trials which employ intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as there is a real potential for clinically meaningful variances that can impact the outcomes in clinical trials. The goal of this study is to determine the variability of target delineation among participants from different institutions as part of Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Radiotherapy Committee’s multi-institutional in-silico quality assurance study in patients with Pancoast tumors as a “dry run” for trial implementation. Methods CT simulation scans were acquired from four patients with Pancoast tumor. Two patients had simulation 4D-CT and FDG-FDG PET-CT while two patients had 3D-CT and FDG-FDG PET-CT. Seventeen SWOG-affiliated physicians independently delineated target volumes defined as gross primary and nodal tumor volumes (GTV_P & GTV_N), clinical target volume (CTV), and planning target volume (PTV). Six board-certified thoracic radiation oncologists were designated as the ‘Experts’ for this study. Their delineations were used to create a simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contours using ADMIRE software (Elekta AB, Sweden 2017). Individual participants’ contours were then compared with Experts’ STAPLE contours. Results When compared to the Experts’ STAPLE, GTV_P had the best agreement among all participants, while GTV_N showed the lowest agreement among all participants. There were no statistically significant differences in all studied parameters for all TVs for cases with 4D-CT versus cases with 3D-CT simulation scans. Conclusions High degree of inter-observer variation was noted for all target volume except for GTV_P, unveiling potentials for protocol modification for subsequent clinically meaningful improvement in target definition. Various similarity indices exist that can be used to guide multi-institutional radiotherapy delineation QA credentialing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA
| | - Timothy A Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA.,Baylor College of Medicine, TX 77030, USA
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Thomas J Fitzgerald
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core QA Center Rhode Island, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fran Laurie
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core QA Center Rhode Island, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kenneth Ulin
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core QA Center Rhode Island, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas Guerrero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gregory Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Abhilasha Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - William Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Gary V Walker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona, USA
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, OH, USA
| | - Mehee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, IL, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, FL, USA
| | - Omar Mahmoud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, FL, USA
| | - Anna Shapiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Upstate Cancer Center, SUNY Upstate Medical University, NY, USA
| | - Feng-Ming Spring Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, WA, USA
| | - Roy Decker
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut, USA
| | - Femke O B Spoelstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurie E Gaspar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee, USA
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Oregon, USA
| | - Paul Okunieff
- SWOG, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Florida, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Büther F, Ernst I, Frohwein LJ, Pouw J, Schäfers KP, Stegger L. Data-driven gating in PET: Influence of respiratory signal noise on motion resolution. Med Phys 2018; 45:3205-3213. [PMID: 29782653 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Data-driven gating (DDG) approaches for positron emission tomography (PET) are interesting alternatives to conventional hardware-based gating methods. In DDG, the measured PET data themselves are utilized to calculate a respiratory signal, that is, subsequently used for gating purposes. The success of gating is then highly dependent on the statistical quality of the PET data. In this study, we investigate how this quality determines signal noise and thus motion resolution in clinical PET scans using a center-of-mass-based (COM) DDG approach, specifically with regard to motion management of target structures in future radiotherapy planning applications. METHODS PET list mode datasets acquired in one bed position of 19 different radiotherapy patients undergoing pretreatment [18 F]FDG PET/CT or [18 F]FDG PET/MRI were included into this retrospective study. All scans were performed over a region with organs (myocardium, kidneys) or tumor lesions of high tracer uptake and under free breathing. Aside from the original list mode data, datasets with progressively decreasing PET statistics were generated. From these, COM DDG signals were derived for subsequent amplitude-based gating of the original list mode file. The apparent respiratory shift d from end-expiration to end-inspiration was determined from the gated images and expressed as a function of signal-to-noise ratio SNR of the determined gating signals. This relation was tested against additional 25 [18 F]FDG PET/MRI list mode datasets where high-precision MR navigator-like respiratory signals were available as reference signal for respiratory gating of PET data, and data from a dedicated thorax phantom scan. RESULTS All original 19 high-quality list mode datasets demonstrated the same behavior in terms of motion resolution when reducing the amount of list mode events for DDG signal generation. Ratios and directions of respiratory shifts between end-respiratory gates and the respective nongated image were constant over all statistic levels. Motion resolution d/dmax could be modeled as d/dmax=1-e-1.52(SNR-1)0.52, with dmax as the actual respiratory shift. Determining dmax from d and SNR in the 25 test datasets and the phantom scan demonstrated no significant differences to the MR navigator-derived shift values and the predefined shift, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The SNR can serve as a general metric to assess the success of COM-based DDG, even in different scanners and patients. The derived formula for motion resolution can be used to estimate the actual motion extent reasonably well in cases of limited PET raw data statistics. This may be of interest for individualized radiotherapy treatment planning procedures of target structures subjected to respiratory motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Büther
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany
| | - Iris Ernst
- German CyberKnife Centre, Senator-Schwartz-Ring 8, Soest, 59494, Germany
| | - Lynn Johann Frohwein
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Waldeyerstr. 15, Münster, 48149, Germany
| | - Joost Pouw
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany.,Magnetic Detection and Imaging Group, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands
| | - Klaus Peter Schäfers
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Waldeyerstr. 15, Münster, 48149, Germany
| | - Lars Stegger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
How much primary tumor metabolic volume reduction is required to improve outcome in stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy? A single-centre experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:2103-2109. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4063-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
14
|
Kesner A, Pan T, Zaidi H. Data-driven motion correction will replace motion-tracking devices in molecular imaging-guided radiation therapy treatment planning. Med Phys 2018; 45:3477-3480. [PMID: 29679489 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kesner
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tinsu Pan
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas, M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1352, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Molecular Imaging Using PET/CT for Radiation Therapy Planning for Adult Cancers: Current Status and Expanding Applications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:783-791. [PMID: 30353883 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Accurate tumor delineation is a priority in radiation therapy (RT). Metabolic imaging has a key and evolving role in target volume selection and delineation. This is especially so for non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell cancer of the head and neck, and lymphoma, for which positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is complimentary to structural imaging modalities, not only in delineating primary tumors, but also often in revealing previously undiagnosed regional nodal disease. At some sites, PET/CT has been confirmed to enable target size reduction compared with structural imaging alone, with enhanced normal tissue sparing and potentially allowing for dose escalation. These contributions often dramatically affect RT strategies. However, some limitations exist to the use of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in RT planning, including its relatively poor spatial resolution and partial voluming effects for small tumors. A role is developing for contributions from metabolic imaging to RT planning at other tumor sites and exciting new applications for the use of non-fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic markers for RT planning.
Collapse
|
16
|
Frood R, McDermott G, Scarsbrook A. Respiratory-gated PET/CT for pulmonary lesion characterisation-promises and problems. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170640. [PMID: 29338327 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
2-deoxy-2-(18Fluorine)-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET/CT is an integral part of lung carcinoma staging and frequently used in the assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules. However, a limitation of conventional three-dimensional PET/CT when imaging the thorax is its susceptibility to motion artefact, which blurs the signal from the lesion resulting in inaccurate representation of size and metabolic activity. Respiratory gated (four-dimensional) PET/CT aims to negate the effects of motion artefact and provide a more accurate interpretation of pulmonary nodules and lymphadenopathy. There have been recent advances in technology and a shift from traditional hardware to more streamlined software methods for respiratory gating which should allow more widespread use of respiratory-gating in the future. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence surrounding four-dimensional PET/CT in pulmonary lesion characterisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell Frood
- 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds , United Kingdom
| | - Garry McDermott
- 2 Department of Medical Physics & Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds , United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds , United Kingdom.,3 Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds , Leeds , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|