The Impact of Intra-thoracic Anatomical Changes upon the Delivery of Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

Detailed dosimetric evaluation of inter-fraction and respiratory motion in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy based on daily 4D cone beam CT images

Objective. Periodic respiratory motion and inter-fraction variations are sources of geometric uncertainty in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of pulmonary lesions. This study extensively evaluates and validates the separate and combined dosimetric effect of both factors using 4D-CT and daily 4D-cone beam CT (CBCT) dose accumulation scenarios.Approach. A first cohort of twenty early stage or metastatic disease lung cancer patients were retrospectively selected to evaluate each scenario. The planned-dose (3D_Ref) was optimized on a 3D mid-position CT. To estimate the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion (4D_Ref), inter-fractional variations (3D_Acc) and the combined effect of both factors (4D_Acc), three dose accumulation scenarios based on 4D-CT, daily mid-cone beam CT (CBCT) position and 4D-CBCT were implemented via CT-CT/CT-CBCT deformable image registration (DIR) techniques. Each scenario was compared to 3D_Ref.A separate cohort of ten lung SBRT patients was selected to validate DIR techniques. The distance discordance metric (DDM) was implemented per voxel and per patient for tumor and organs at risk (OARs), and the dosimetric impact for CT-CBCT DIR geometric errors was calculated.Main results.Median and interquartile range (IQR) of the dose difference per voxel were 0.05/2.69 Gy and -0.12/2.68 Gy for3DAcc-3DRefand4DAcc-3DRef.For4DRef-3DRefthe IQR was considerably smaller -0.15/0.78 Gy. These findings were confirmed by dose volume histogram parameters calculated in tumor and OARs. For CT-CT/CT-CBCT DIR validation, DDM (95th percentile) was highest for heart (6.26 mm)/spinal cord (8.00 mm), and below 3 mm for tumor and the rest of OARs. The dosimetric impact of CT-CBCT DIR errors was below 2 Gy for tumor and OARs.Significance. The dosimetric impact of inter-fraction variations were shown to dominate those of periodic respiration in SBRT for pulmonary lesions. Therefore, treatment evaluation and dose-effect studies would benefit more from dose accumulation focusing on day-to-day changes then those that focus on respiratory motion.

A novel bone suppression algorithm in intensity‐based 2D/3D image registration for real‐time tumour motion monitoring: development and phantom‐based validation

Background

Real‐time tumor motion monitoring (TMM) is a crucial process for intra‐fractional respiration management in lung cancer radiotherapy. Since the tumor can be partly or fully located behind the ribs, the TMM is challenging.

Purpose

The aim of this work was to develop a bone suppression (BS) algorithm designed for real‐time 2D/3D marker‐less TMM to increase the visibility of the tumor when overlapping with bony structures and consequently to improve the accuracy of TMM.

Method

A BS method was implemented in the in‐house developed software for ultrafast intensity‐based 2D/3D tumor registration (Fast Image‐based Registration [FIRE]). The method operates on both, digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) and intra‐fractional X‐ray images. The bony structures are derived from computed tomography data by thresholding during ray‐casting, and the resulting bone DRR is subtracted from intra‐fractional X‐ray images to obtain a soft‐tissue‐only image for subsequent tumor registration. The accuracy of TMM utilizing BS was evaluated within a retrospective phantom study with nine different 3D‐printed tumor phantoms placed in the in‐house developed Advanced Radiation DOSimetry (ARDOS) breathing phantom. A 24 mm craniocaudal tumor motion, including rib eclipses, was simulated, and X‐ray images were acquired on the Elekta Versa HD Linac in the lateral and posterior–anterior directions. An error assessment for BS images was evaluated with respect to the ground truth tumor position.

Results

A total error (root mean square error) of 0.87 ± 0.23 mm and 1.03 ± 0.26 mm was found for posterior–anterior and lateral imaging; the mean time for BS was 8.03 ± 1.54 ms. Without utilizing BS, TMM failed in all X‐ray images since the registration algorithm focused on the rib position due to the predominant intensity of this tissue within DRR and X‐ray images.

Conclusion

The BS algorithm developed and implemented improved the accuracy, robustness, and stability of real‐time TMM in lung cancer in a phantom study, even in the case of rib interlude where normal tumor registration fails.

Adapting for Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART): The need to evolve our roles as Therapeutic Radiographers

OBJECTIVES

4D Adaptive Radiotherapy (4D-ART) has been stated as the future baseline standard-of-care for technical radiotherapy. Its goal is to optimise radiation dose received by 'adapting' to changes 'seen' in each individual patient, for each treatment delivery (fraction), throughout each treatment delivery. The drive for technological developments to achieve this is ongoing. To enhance the potential benefits, we should consider other aspects of the processes needed: How do changes in clinical practices and processes affect the role of the Therapeutic Radiographer? The aim is to raise the need to explore questions of Therapeutic Radiographers roles and responsibilities within 4D-ART.

KEY FINDINGS

Moving from using current predictive strategies (such as plan-of-the-day) to being able to dynamically adapt (real-time/4D-ART) for patient changes requires rapid clinical judgements to be made. The question becomes 'who makes these decisions'? Currently Therapeutic Radiographers maybe ideally placed for this. Dynamically adaptive radiotherapy requires Radiographers to have clinical decisions-making skills and authorities within the multi-professional team (MPT). It is not sufficient to train radiographers in the 'how' to use 4D-ART techniques and technologies; the ability to make good clinical judgments comes from understanding the principles supporting this concept by understanding the 'why'.

CONCLUSION

To support future service needs and ongoing developments within ART, Radiographer's roles need to adapt and evolve, as well as the way their role is perceived within the MPT. We need to provide Radiographers with the education required, abilities and authorities to act.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Role revision is required to include greater responsibility for clinical decision making for implementing 4D-ART practices.