Short intravenous amphotericin B followed by oral posaconazole using a simple, stratified treatment approach for diabetes or COVID-19-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: a prospective cohort study

Mucormycosis

Mucormycosis is an aggressive and frequently lethal disease. Most patients with mucormycosis have poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and rhino-orbito-cerebral disease. Patients with hematologic malignancy and transplant recipients mostly present with rhino-orbito-cerebral or pulmonary disease. Prompt recognition of clinical symptoms and radiographic features of mucormycosis is required to establish timely diagnosis and initiate targeted therapy. Diagnosis is, historically, made by direct microscopy, culture, and pathology of biopsy tissue, but molecular methods are increasingly playing a role in establishing an earlier diagnosis. Treatment is multidisciplinary, involving early surgical intervention, antifungal therapy, and correction of underlying immune compromising risk factors when possible.

COVID-19-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: a single center prospective study of 264 patients

PURPOSE

Outbreaks of mucormycosis were reported worldwide throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We report clinical outcomes of a treatment protocol for COVID-19-associated rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM).

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven mucormycosis and COVID-19 were included. All received intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate 1 mg/kg and surgical endoscopic sinus debridement (FESS). Those with rhino-orbital or cerebral disease limited to the cavernous sinus were eligible for transcutaneous retrobulbar amphotericin B (TRAMB). Patients were followed with weekly imaging, endoscopic examinations, and serial debridement as necessary. Patients were discharged on oral posaconazole for 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 264 patients were followed for a mean of 2.5 months. On presentation, 163 patients (174 eyes) had eye involvement. Of these, 141 eyes (81.0%) had light perception or worse vision. By the last follow-up, 163 patients (176 eyes) were affected, and of these, 96 eyes (54.5%) had no light perception. Twenty-one patients (8%) died and 3 orbits (0.5%) were exenterated. There was no change in mortality (p = 0.38) or exenteration (p = 0.38) in the 55 patients who received TRAMB compared to patients with rhino-orbital or cerebral disease limited to the cavernous sinus who did not. Asymptomatic COVID-19 was associated with higher mortality than symptomatic COVID-19 (p = 0.025). Uncontrolled diabetes was a risk factor for death (p = 0.022). New diabetes was associated with increased mortality versus pre-existing diabetes (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to manage COVID-19-ROCM. In our cohort, TRAMB therapy did not increase mortality or exenteration rates. While poor vision on presentation was profound, some vision recovery was noted with treatment. COVID-19 immune dysregulation may predispose patients to ROCM, particularly those with asymptomatic disease.

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis

BACKGROUND

Invasive mucormycosis (IM) poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden among immunocompromised patients.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole with those of amphotericin B in patients with IM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we enrolled patients who were diagnosed with IM and treated with either isavuconazole or amphotericin B.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients met the study criteria. Of these, 47 received isavuconazole, and 59 received amphotericin B as the primary treatment. The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, including a history of malignancy, use of immunosuppressants, infection sites, and pathogens. The amphotericin B group demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of renal disorders (p < 0.001) and hypokalemia (p < 0.001) than the isavuconazole group. The proportion of patients who received salvage therapy was greater in the amphotericin B group than in the isavuconazole group (42% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Eighteen patients in the amphotericin B group discontinued treatment because of adverse events, whereas no patients in the isavuconazole group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. A significant difference in the primary therapeutic response between the isavuconazole and amphotericin B groups was noted (p = 0.013), with a higher treatment failure rate in the amphotericin B group (68% vs. 36%, p = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality or mucormycosis-attributable mortality rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Isavuconazole outperformed amphotericin B as a first-line treatment option for IM in terms of its clinical effectiveness and safety.

Observational study on the clinical profile and treatment outcome on long-term follow-up of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 associated mucormycosis were followed up for 6 months to study the clinical profile, readmissions, long-term treatment outcome and the mortality rate.

RESULTS

Among 37 patients with COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, the mortality rate was 33.3 %, 42.9% and 100 % among patients with mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 infection. One month after discharge, among the 20 patients who survived, 10 (50 %) patients had worsening symptoms and required readmission. Nine patients required readmission for amphotericin and 1 patient was admitted for surgical intervention. On follow-up at 1 month, 30 % (6/20) patients became asymptomatic. However, at 3 months, 45 % (9/20) of the patients were asymptomatic. At 6 months of follow-up, 80 % (16/20) were asymptomatic. At 6 months, one each had residual abnormalities like visual loss in one eye, visual field deficit, change in voice and residual weakness of the limbs along with cranial nerve paresis.

CONCLUSION

The follow-up study revealed that a significant number of patients required readmission within the first month, but most of the patients became asymptomatic by 6 months. The readmission rate was higher in patients who received a shorter duration of amphotericin.

Clinical Characteristics, Prognosis Factors and Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnosis of Mucormycosis in patients With Hematologic Diseases

INTRODUCTION

New diagnostic methods and antifungal strategies may improve prognosis of mucormycosis. We describe the diagnostic value of metagenomic next⁃generation sequencing (mNGS) and identify the prognostic factors of mucormycosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of hematologic patients suffered from mucormycosis and treated with monotherapy [amphotericin B (AmB) or posaconazole] or combination therapy (AmB and posaconazole). The primary outcome was 84-day all-cause mortality after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included, with "proven" (n = 27), "probable" (n = 16) mucormycosis confirmed by traditional diagnostic methods, and "possible" (n = 52) mucormycosis with positive mNGS results. The mortality rate at 84 days was 44.2%. Possible + mNGS patients and probable patients had similar diagnosis processes, overall survival rates (44.2% vs 50.0%, p = 0.685) and overall response rates to effective drugs (44.0% vs 37.5%, p = 0.647). Furthermore, the median diagnostic time was shorter in possible + mNGS patients than proven and probable patients (14 vs 26 days, p < 0.001). Combination therapy was associated with better survival compared to monotherapy at six weeks after treatment (78.8% vs 53.1%, p = 0.0075). Multivariate analysis showed that combination therapy was the protective factor (HR = 0.338, 95% CI: 0.162-0.703, p = 0.004), though diabetes (HR = 3.864, 95% CI: 1.897-7.874, p < 0.001) and hypoxemia (HR = 3.536, 95% CI: 1.874-6.673, p < 0.001) were risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucormycosis is a life-threatening infection. Early management of diabetes and hypoxemia may improve the prognosis. Exploring effective diagnostic and treatment methods is important, and combination antifungal therapy seems to hold potential benefits.

A Comparative Study of Acute Invasive Fungal Sinusitis During the First and Second Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic

We aimed to compare the demography, clinical profile, histopathology, fungal culture, radiology, surgery performed, medical therapy and outcomes of patients with acute invasive fungal sinusitis seen during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic by retrospectively reviewing their case records. Of 238 patients, 43(18.1%) presented during the first wave and 195(81.9%) during the second wave. Patients seen during the first wave were older (p = 0.04) and more likely to have visual impairment (p = 0.004), frozen eye (p = 0.012), altered sensorium (p = 0.007) and stage 3 disease (p = 0.03). Those seen during the second wave were more often COVID-19 positive and had newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04)and stage 1 disease (p = 0.03). Most patients had a positive culture for Rhizopus species during both waves. Histopathology showed broad aseptate hyphae in all patients but angioinvasion was seen more often during the first wave (p = 0.04). The majority of patients were treated with endoscopic+/- open debridement followed by intravenous amphotericin B and oral posaconazole. While the overall survival rate was similar (first wave 65.1%; second wave 79%; p = 0.106), mortality after discharge was greater during the first wave (11.6% vs 1.5%; p = 0.001). Mortality was higher in patients with stage 3 disease (p = 0.003). Significant differences in clinical presentation, histopathology, radiological stage of disease and post-discharge survival were noted between the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, the causes for which were multi-factorial.