The Impact of Liver and Renal Dysfunction on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Sedative and Analgesic Drugs in Critically Ill Adult Patients

Real-World Insights From Türkiye: Biologic DMARDs Usage in Spondyloarthritis Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

AIM

The objective was to evaluate biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and their side effects that hindered the continuation of treatment in a patient population diagnosed with spondyloarthritis (SpA) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤ 60 mL/min, and to compare these side effects between patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those without.

METHODS

This multicenter, observational cohort study utilized data from the TReasure database, which records SpA patients in a web-based system across Türkiye. A total of 6052 patients being included. SpA patients were categorized into two main groups: non-CKD patients and CKD patients. The clinical characteristics, disease activity, treatment options, drug retention rates, reasons for drug discontinuation, and types of adverse effects were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Biologics prescription pattern varied between CKD and non-CKD patients. Etanercept was prescribed more frequently (53.1%) in CKD patients. Regarding the number of side effects and drug discontinuations in CKD patients, no statistically significant differences were found between the non-CKD and CKD groups for any of the bDMARDs (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and certolizumab). No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration of drug retention based on CKD status for bDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

This study offers preliminary evidence supporting the effective and safe use of bDMARDs in patients with SpA and CKD.

Differential Effects of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acidergic Sedatives on Risk of Post-Extubation Delirium in the ICU: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Health Care Network

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether different gamma-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) sedatives such as propofol and benzodiazepines carry differential risks of post-extubation delirium in the ICU.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Seven ICUs in an academic hospital network, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA).

PATIENTS

Ten thousand five hundred and one adult patients mechanically ventilated for over 24 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We tested the hypothesis that benzodiazepine versus propofol-based sedation is associated with fewer delirium-free days within 14 days after extubation. Further, we hypothesized that the measured sedation level evoked by GABAergic drugs is a better predictor of delirium than the drug dose administered. The proportion of GABAergic drug-induced deep sedation was defined as the ratio of days with a mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of less than or equal to -3 during mechanical ventilation. Multivariable regression and effect modification analyses were used. Delirium-free days were lower in patients who received a high proportion of deep sedation using benzodiazepine compared with propofol-based sedation (adjusted absolute difference, -1.17 d; 95% CI, -0.64 to -1.69; p < 0.001). This differential effect was magnified in elderly patients (age > 65) and in patients with liver or kidney failure (p-for-interaction < 0.001) but not observed in patients who received a low proportion of deep sedation (p = 0.95). GABAergic-induced deep sedation days during mechanical ventilation was a better predictor of post-extubation delirium than the GABAergic daily average effective dose (area under the curve 0.76 vs 0.69; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Deep sedation during mechanical ventilation with benzodiazepines compared with propofol is associated with increased risk of post-extubation delirium. Our data do not support the view that benzodiazepine-based compared with propofol-based sedation in the ICU is an independent risk factor of delirium, as long as deep sedation can be avoided in these patients.

Sevoflurane for procedural sedation in critically ill patients: A pharmacokinetic comparative study between burn and non-burn patients

BACKGROUND

Sevoflurane has anti-inflammatory proprieties and short lasting effects making it of interest for procedural sedation in critically ill patients. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane and metabolites in severely ill burn patients and controls. The secondary objective was to assess potential kidney injury.

METHODS

Prospective interventional study in a burn and a surgical intensive care unit; 24 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients (12 burns, 12 controls) were included. The sevoflurane was administered with an expired fraction target of 2% during short-term procedural sedation. Plasma concentrations of sevoflurane, hexafluoroisopropanolol (HFIP) and free fluoride ions were recorded at different times. Kinetic Pro (Wgroupe, France) was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Kidney injury was assessed with neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL).

RESULTS

The mean total burn surface area was 36±11%. The average plasma concentration of sevoflurane was 70.4±37.5mg·L^-1 in burns and 57.2±28.1mg·L^-1 in controls at the end of the procedure (P=0.58). The volume of distribution was higher (46.8±7.2 vs 22.2±2.50L, P<0.001), and the drug half-life longer in burns (1.19±0.28h vs 0.65±0.04h, P<0.0001). Free metabolite HFIP was higher in burns. Plasma fluoride was not different between burns and controls. NGAL did not rise after procedures.

CONCLUSION

We observed an increased volume of distribution, slower elimination rate, and altered metabolism of sevoflurane in burn patients compared to controls. Repeated use for procedural sedation in burn patients needs further evaluation. No renal toxicity was detected.

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02048683.