Medication administration evaluation tool design: An expert panel review

Nursing Students' Medication Administration: A Focus on Hand Hygiene and Patient Identification

BACKGROUND

Procedural failures during medication administration include a lack of appropriate hand hygiene and failure to verify patient identification prior to administration of medication. Procedural failures are common among nurses and nursing students and can lead to serious patient harm.

METHOD

A descriptive cross-sectional research design was used to collect observational data from a simulation-based experience of a medication administration scenario.

RESULTS

Thirty-five senior baccalaureate nursing students from two geographically distant universities in the United States participated in the study. All of the participants made at least one procedural failure during the simulated experience. Hand hygiene compliance was 40.3%, and patient identification compliance was 43.8%.

CONCLUSION

Students often failed to comply with medication administration safety guidelines. Nursing programs must make changes to the methods used to teach safe medication administration to prepare students for this critical skill. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(7):403-407.].

Reaching Consensus on Global Health Competencies for Undergraduate Nurses in Indonesia: A Delphi Study

BACKGROUND: Trends in the era of globalization show an increasing need for nurses to have the Global Health Competencies (GHC) so as to enable them to address global health problems particularly in the pandemic Covid-19. However, evidence-based information about relevance and feasibility of these competencies for undergraduate nursing students in Indonesia is very limited. AIM: This study aims to achieve consensus among experts on global health competencies for Indonesian undergraduate nursing students. METHODS: Using the 2-rounds Delphi method in a sequential mixed-method design, a total of 35 nursing experts voluntarily participated in the study. Six experts participated in the first round, and 29 others were in the second round, hence the collection of Quantitative and qualitative data. The Item Content Validation Index (I-CVI) = 0.78 and Scale Content Validation Index (S-CVI) = 0.9 were used to determine the level of agreement among the experts. RESULTS: At the end of round 2, an agreement was reached on the 9 GHC domains. However, from the original 44 competencies there were 5 competencies that was excluded in the first round and 3 competencies in the second round. These results were supported by the most frequent comments from the experts that these competencies were lacking in clarity, suitability and irrelevant to undergraduate nurses’ competencies. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study has resulted in an agreement among experts regarding global health competencies for undergraduate nursing students in Indonesia. It is predicted that the findings of this study can contribute to the development of global health competencies in the nursing profession. Having these competencies will enable nurses to participate in overcoming global health problems. Validation of the new GHC by larger groups of nursing educators and graduate users is required. Keywords: Delphi, global health competencies, Indonesia, nurses.

Adaptation and validation of pediatric peripheral intravenous catheter insertion and care practices audit tools

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the translation process and establish the validity of the three instruments in Indonesian to assess pediatric peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion and care practices.

Methods

The six-step forward and backward translation method was used to translate the adapted questionnaires. The English version questionnaires included the point prevalence audit checklist, the nurse survey consisting of the nurse PIVC knowledge questionnaire and the nurse PIVC confidence questionnaire, plus a Patient/parent Experience Survey. Data collection was conducted in Indonesia between October 2019 and February 2020. In total, there were six translators (two for each instrument), nine-panel vascular access experts (three for each instrument), and 30 participants (ten for each instrument) of the target population involved in the translation and validation of the three instruments. Three-panel experts rated the content relevance of each instrument using a four-point rating scale. Item level and scale level content validity index and kappa index were calculated. Ten-panel members of the target population evaluated each questionnaire regarding feasibility, clarity, logical sequence, and formatting. Qualitative comments from the panel were also reviewed.

Results

The translation process indicated relatively low discrepancies between translators except for semantic equivalence. There were nine, eight, and one semantic discrepancies found in the forward translation of the point prevalence audit checklist, nurse survey, and patient/parent experience survey. The semantic discrepancies were less prevalent in the backward translation, with only one, three, and two items reported during the process. The item validity index for all of the three instruments showed relatively high agreement between experts (I-CVI > 0.78, S-CVI/Ave >0.90, S-CVI/UA > 0.70, and kappa index >0.74). The face validity was established with the panel reporting that the three instruments were easy to understand and presented logically. However, some re-formatting of the nurse survey and patient/parent experience survey were needed to avoid ambiguity and confusion for the participants.

Conclusions

The results indicate that the translated three survey instruments that had been widely used in other developed countries show good content validity in the Indonesian context. They can be used as a reference for further testing in different countries and contribute to understanding the pediatric PIVC audit tools used in future clinical research.