Segmentation of brain tissues using a 3-D multi-layer Hidden Markov Model

Dendritic Spines Taxonomy: The Functional and Structural Classification • Time-Dependent Probabilistic Model of Neuronal Activation

Categorizing spines into four subpopulations, stubby, mushroom, thin, or filopodia, is one of the common approaches in morphological analysis. Most cellular models describing synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation (LTP), and long-term depression associate synaptic strength with either spine enlargement or spine shrinkage. Unfortunately, although we have a lot of available software with automatic spine segmentation and feature extraction methods, at present none of them allows for automatic and unbiased distinction between dendritic spine subpopulations, or for the detailed computational models of spine behavior. Therefore, we propose structural classification based on two different mathematical approaches: unsupervised construction of spine shape taxonomy based on arbitrary features (SpineTool) and supervised classification exploiting convolution kernels theory (2dSpAn). We compared two populations of spines in a form of static and dynamic data sets gathered at three time points. The dynamic data contain two sets of spines: the active set and the control set. The first population was stimulated with LTP, and the other population in its resting state was used as a control population. We propose one equation describing the distribution of variables that best fits all dendritic spine parameters.

A hybrid method based on fuzzy clustering and local region-based level set for segmentation of inhomogeneous medical images

medical images are more affected by intensity inhomogeneity rather than noise and outliers. This has a great impact on the efficiency of region-based image segmentation methods, because they rely on homogeneity of intensities in the regions of interest. Meanwhile, initialization and configuration of controlling parameters affect the performance of level set segmentation. To address these problems, this paper proposes a new hybrid method that integrates a local region-based level set method with a variation of fuzzy clustering. Specifically it takes an information fusion approach based on a coarse-to-fine framework that seamlessly fuses local spatial information and gray level information with the information of the local region-based level set method. Also, the controlling parameters of level set are directly computed from fuzzy clustering result. This approach has valuable benefits such as automation, no need to prior knowledge about the region of interest (ROI), robustness on intensity inhomogeneity, automatic adjustment of controlling parameters, insensitivity to initialization, and satisfactory accuracy. So, the contribution of this paper is to provide these advantages together which have not been proposed yet for inhomogeneous medical images. Proposed method was tested on several medical images from different modalities for performance evaluation. Experimental results approve its effectiveness in segmenting medical images in comparison with similar methods.

Automatic segmentation of corpus callosum using Gaussian mixture modeling and Fuzzy C means methods

This paper presents a comparative study of the success and performance of the Gaussian mixture modeling and Fuzzy C means methods to determine the volume and cross-sectionals areas of the corpus callosum (CC) using simulated and real MR brain images. The Gaussian mixture model (GMM) utilizes weighted sum of Gaussian distributions by applying statistical decision procedures to define image classes. In the Fuzzy C means (FCM), the image classes are represented by certain membership function according to fuzziness information expressing the distance from the cluster centers. In this study, automatic segmentation for midsagittal section of the CC was achieved from simulated and real brain images. The volume of CC was obtained using sagittal sections areas. To compare the success of the methods, segmentation accuracy, Jaccard similarity and time consuming for segmentation were calculated. The results show that the GMM method resulted by a small margin in more accurate segmentation (midsagittal section segmentation accuracy 98.3% and 97.01% for GMM and FCM); however the FCM method resulted in faster segmentation than GMM. With this study, an accurate and automatic segmentation system that allows opportunity for quantitative comparison to doctors in the planning of treatment and the diagnosis of diseases affecting the size of the CC was developed. This study can be adapted to perform segmentation on other regions of the brain, thus, it can be operated as practical use in the clinic.