1
|
Smolders A, Lomax A, Weber DC, Albertini F. Deep learning based uncertainty prediction of deformable image registration for contour propagation and dose accumulation in online adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:245027. [PMID: 37820691 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Online adaptive radiotherapy aims to fully leverage the advantages of highly conformal therapy by reducing anatomical and set-up uncertainty, thereby alleviating the need for robust treatments. This requires extensive automation, among which is the use of deformable image registration (DIR) for contour propagation and dose accumulation. However, inconsistencies in DIR solutions between different algorithms have caused distrust, hampering its direct clinical use. This work aims to enable the clinical use of DIR by developing deep learning methods to predict DIR uncertainty and propagating it into clinically usable metrics.Approach.Supervised and unsupervised neural networks were trained to predict the Gaussian uncertainty of a given deformable vector field (DVF). Since both methods rely on different assumptions, their predictions differ and were further merged into a combined model. The resulting normally distributed DVFs can be directly sampled to propagate the uncertainty into contour and accumulated dose uncertainty.Main results.The unsupervised and combined models can accurately predict the uncertainty in the manually annotated landmarks on the DIRLAB dataset. Furthermore, for 5 patients with lung cancer, the propagation of the predicted DVF uncertainty into contour uncertainty yielded for both methods anexpected calibration errorof less than 3%. Additionally, theprobabilisticly accumulated dose volume histograms(DVH) encompass well the accumulated proton therapy doses using 5 different DIR algorithms. It was additionally shown that the unsupervised model can be used for different DIR algorithms without the need for retraining.Significance.Our work presents first-of-a-kind deep learning methods to predict the uncertainty of the DIR process. The methods are fast, yield high-quality uncertainty estimates and are useable for different algorithms and applications. This allows clinics to use DIR uncertainty in their workflows without the need to change their DIR implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Smolders
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A Lomax
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D C Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - F Albertini
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McDonald BA, Zachiu C, Christodouleas J, Naser MA, Ruschin M, Sonke JJ, Thorwarth D, Létourneau D, Tyagi N, Tadic T, Yang J, Li XA, Bernchou U, Hyer DE, Snyder JE, Bubula-Rehm E, Fuller CD, Brock KK. Dose accumulation for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy: From practical considerations to state-of-the-art clinical implementation. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1086258. [PMID: 36776378 PMCID: PMC9909539 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1086258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
MRI-linear accelerator (MR-linac) devices have been introduced into clinical practice in recent years and have enabled MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART). However, by accounting for anatomical changes throughout radiation therapy (RT) and delivering different treatment plans at each fraction, adaptive radiation therapy (ART) highlights several challenges in terms of calculating the total delivered dose. Dose accumulation strategies-which typically involve deformable image registration between planning images, deformable dose mapping, and voxel-wise dose summation-can be employed for ART to estimate the delivered dose. In MRgART, plan adaptation on MRI instead of CT necessitates additional considerations in the dose accumulation process because MRI pixel values do not contain the quantitative information used for dose calculation. In this review, we discuss considerations for dose accumulation specific to MRgART and in relation to current MR-linac clinical workflows. We present a general dose accumulation framework for MRgART and discuss relevant quality assurance criteria. Finally, we highlight the clinical importance of dose accumulation in the ART era as well as the possible ways in which dose accumulation can transform clinical practice and improve our ability to deliver personalized RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigid A. McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cornel Zachiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Mohamed A. Naser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Létourneau
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Tony Tadic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - X. Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Uffe Bernchou
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Daniel E. Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Jeffrey E. Snyder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | | | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kristy K. Brock
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|