Brains and speciation: Control of behavior

Differences in Colour Pattern, Behaviour and Gene Expression in the Brain Suggest Divergent Camouflage Strategies in Sympatric Reef Fish Species

Camouflage is a critical survival strategy that helps to evade predation and increase hunting success. Background matching and disruptive colouration are different camouflage strategies that are subject to different selective pressures and can drive divergence in their associated traits such as colour pattern and behaviour. This study tested whether two closely related reef fish species (Hypoplectrus spp.) with distinct colour patterns exhibit different predator escape responses and differential gene expression in the brain indicative of divergent camouflage strategies. Combining field and laboratory experiments, we show that barred hamlets, characterised by disruptive colouration, are dynamic in their escape responses, while black hamlets, with their darker colouration, had a preference for hiding. The behavioural differences between these species seem to be limited to divergent predator escape responses since other behaviours such as activity or sociability did not differ. Importantly, the observed behavioural differences were accompanied by transcriptomic differences in their brains, particularly in regions associated with the perception of looming threats and less so in the region involved in conditioning. Differential expression in the diencephalon suggests enhanced neuronal plasticity in barred hamlets, which might allow for rapid adjustments in their escape response, while black hamlets exhibited upregulation in genes linked to immune response and oxygen transport in the optic tectum. Overall, our findings suggest that the two species utilise different camouflage strategies, which might contribute to the maintenance of colour pattern differences and thereby influence the speciation and diversification of these closely related sympatric reef fishes.

Selective expansion of motor cortical projections in the evolution of vocal novelty

Deciphering how cortical architecture evolves to drive behavioral innovations is a long-standing challenge in neuroscience and evolutionary biology. Here, we leverage a striking behavioral novelty in the Alston's singing mouse (Scotinomys teguina), compared to the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus), to quantitatively test models of motor cortical evolution. We used bulk tracing, serial two-photon tomography, and high-throughput DNA sequencing of over 76,000 barcoded neurons to discover a specific and substantial expansion (200%) of orofacial motor cortical (OMC) projections to the auditory cortical region (AudR) and the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG), both implicated in vocal behaviors. Moreover, analysis of individual OMC neurons' projection motifs revealed preferential expansion of exclusive projections to AudR. Our results imply that selective expansion of ancestral motor cortical projections can underlie behavioral divergence over short evolutionary timescales, suggesting potential mechanisms for the evolution of enhanced cortical control over vocalizations-a crucial preadaptation for human language.

Measuring the replicability of our own research

In the study of transgenic mouse models of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, we use batteries of tests to measure deficits in behaviour and from the results of these tests, we make inferences about the mental states of the mice that we interpret as deficits in "learning", "memory", "anxiety", "depression", etc. This paper discusses the problems of determining whether a particular transgenic mouse is a valid mouse model of disease X, the problem of background strains, and the question of whether our behavioural tests are measuring what we say they are. The problem of the reliability of results is then discussed: are they replicable between labs and can we replicate our results in our own lab? This involves the study of intra- and inter- experimenter reliability. The variables that influence replicability and the importance of conducting a complete behavioural phenotype: sensory, motor, cognitive and social emotional behaviour are discussed. Then the thorny question of failure to replicate is examined: Is it a curse or a blessing? Finally, the role of failure in research and what it tells us about our research paradigms is examined.

Monsoon boosted radiation of the endemic East Asian carps

Major historical events often trigger the rapid flourishing of a few lineages, which in turn shape established biodiversity patterns. How did this process occur and develop? This study provides a window into this issue. The endemic East Asian carps (EEAC) dominated the ichthyofauna of East Asia and exhibited a high degree of adaptation to monsoonal river-lake ecosystems. A series of evidence, including ecogeography, phylogenetics, and macroevolution, suggests that the EEAC is a lineage that arose with the East Asian monsoon and thrived intimately with subsequent monsoon activities. We further deduce the evolution of the EEAC and find that a range of historical events in the monsoon setting (e.g., marine transgression and regression and glacial-interglacial cycle) have further reshaped the distribution patterns of EEAC's members. Comparative genomics analyses reveal that introgressions during the initial period of EEAC radiation and innovations in the regulation of the brain and nervous system may have aided their adaptation to river-lake ecosystems in a monsoon setting, which boosted radiation. Overall, this study strengthens knowledge of the evolutionary patterns of freshwater fishes in East Asia and provides a model case for understanding the impact of major historical events on the evolution of biota.

A connectomics-based taxonomy of mammals

Mammalian taxonomies are conventionally defined by morphological traits and genetics. How species differ in terms of neural circuits and whether inter-species differences in neural circuit organization conform to these taxonomies is unknown. The main obstacle to the comparison of neural architectures has been differences in network reconstruction techniques, yielding species-specific connectomes that are not directly comparable to one another. Here, we comprehensively chart connectome organization across the mammalian phylogenetic spectrum using a common reconstruction protocol. We analyse the mammalian MRI (MaMI) data set, a database that encompasses high-resolution ex vivo structural and diffusion MRI scans of 124 species across 12 taxonomic orders and 5 superorders, collected using a unified MRI protocol. We assess similarity between species connectomes using two methods: similarity of Laplacian eigenspectra and similarity of multiscale topological features. We find greater inter-species similarities among species within the same taxonomic order, suggesting that connectome organization reflects established taxonomic relationships defined by morphology and genetics. While all connectomes retain hallmark global features and relative proportions of connection classes, inter-species variation is driven by local regional connectivity profiles. By encoding connectomes into a common frame of reference, these findings establish a foundation for investigating how neural circuits change over phylogeny, forging a link from genes to circuits to behaviour.