1
|
Exploring the quiet eye in archery using field- and laboratory-based tasks. Exp Brain Res 2017; 235:2843-2855. [PMID: 28660285 PMCID: PMC5550539 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4988-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The ‘quiet eye’ (QE)—a period of extended gaze fixation on a target—has been reported in many tasks that require accurate aiming. Longer quiet eye durations (QEDs) are reported in experts compared to non-experts and on successful versus less successful trials. The QE has been extensively studied in the field; however, the cognitive mechanisms underlying the QE are not yet fully understood. We investigated the QEDs of ten expert and ten novice archers in the field and in the laboratory using a computer-based archery task. The computer task consisted of shooting archery targets using a joystick. Random ‘noise’ (visual motion perturbation) was introduced at high and low levels to allow for the controlled examination of the effects of task complexity and processing demands. In this computer task, we also tested an additional group of ten non-archers as controls. In both field and computer tasks, eye movements were measured using electro-oculography. The expert archers exhibited longer QED compared to the novice archers in the field task. In the computer task, the archers again exhibited longer QEDs and were more accurate compared to non-archers. Furthermore, expert archers showed earlier QE onsets and longer QEDs during high noise conditions compared to the novices and non-archers. Our findings show skill-based effects on QED in field conditions and in a novel computer-based archery task, in which online (visual) perturbations modulated experts’ QEDs. These longer QEDs in experts may be used for more efficient programming in which accurate predictions are facilitated by attention control.
Collapse
|
2
|
Age effects on voluntary and automatic adjustments in anti-pointing tasks. Exp Brain Res 2016; 234:419-28. [PMID: 26497989 PMCID: PMC4731427 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4459-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
We examined the effects of age on automatic and voluntary motor adjustments in pointing tasks. To this end, young (20-25 years) and middle-aged adults (48-62 years) were instructed to point at a target that could unexpectedly change its location (to the left or right) or its color (to green or red) during the movement. In the location change conditions, participants were asked to either adjust their pointing movement toward the new location (i.e., normal pointing) or in the opposite direction (i.e., anti-pointing). In the color change conditions, participants were instructed to adjust their movement to the left or right depending on the change in color. The results showed that in a large proportion of the anti-pointing trials, participants made two adjustments: an early initial automatic adjustment in the direction of the target shift followed by a late voluntary adjustment toward the opposite direction. It was found that the late voluntary adjustments were delayed for the middle-aged participants relative to the young participants. There were no age differences for the fast automatic adjustment in normal pointing, but the early adjustment in anti-pointing tended to be later in the middle-aged adults. Finally, the difference in the onset of early and late adjustments in anti-pointing adjustments was greater among the middle-aged adults. Hence, this study is the first to show that aging slows down voluntary goal-directed movement control processes to greater extent than the automatic stimulus-driven processes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Coupling of online control and inhibitory systems in children with atypical motor development: A growth curve modelling study. Brain Cogn 2016; 109:84-95. [PMID: 27648975 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Revised: 12/03/2015] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous research indicates that children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) show deficits performing online corrections, an issue exacerbated by adding inhibitory constraints; however, cross-sectional data suggests that these deficits may reduce with age. Using a longitudinal design, the aim of the study presented here was to model the coupling that occurs between inhibitory systems and (predictive) online control in typically developing children (TDC) and in those with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) over an extended period of time, using a framework of interactive specialization. We predicted that TDC would show a non-linear growth pattern, consistent with re-organisation in the coupling during the middle childhood period, while DCD would display a developmental lag. METHOD A group of 196 children (111 girls and 85 boys) aged between 6 and 12years participated in the study. Children were classified as DCD according to research criteria. Using a cohort sequential design, both TDC and DCD groups were divided into age cohorts. Predictive (online) control was defined operationally by performance on a Double-Jump Reaching Task (DJRT), which was assessed at 6-month intervals over two years (5 time points in total). Inhibitory control was examined using an anti-jump condition of the DJRT paradigm whereby children were instructed to touch a target location in the hemispace opposite a cued location. RESULTS For the TDC group, model comparison using growth curve analysis revealed that a quadratic trend was the most appropriate fit with evidence of rapid improvement in anti-reach performance up until middle childhood (around 8-9years of age), followed by a more gradual rate of improvement into late childhood and early adolescence. This pattern was evident on both chronometric and kinematic measures. In contrast, for children with DCD, a linear function provided the best to fit on the key metrics, with a slower rate of improvement than controls. CONCLUSION We conclude that children with DCD require a more extended period of development to effectively couple online motor control and executive systems when completing anti-reach movements, whereas TDC show rapid improvement in early and middle childhood. These group differences in growth curves are likely to reflect a maturational lag in the development of motor-cognitive networks in children with DCD.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ruddock S, Piek J, Sugden D, Morris S, Hyde C, Caeyenberghs K, Wilson P. Coupling online control and inhibitory systems in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: Goal-directed reaching. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2015; 36C:244-255. [PMID: 25462485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
For children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), the real-time coupling between frontal executive function and online motor control has not been explored despite reported deficits in each domain. The aim of the present study was to investigate how children with DCD enlist online control under task constraints that compel the need for inhibitory control. A total of 129 school children were sampled from mainstream primary schools. Forty-two children who met research criteria for DCD were compared with 87 typically developing controls on a modified double-jump reaching task. Children within each skill group were divided into three age bands: younger (6-7 years), mid-aged (8-9), and older (10-12). Online control was compared between groups as a function of trial type (non-jump, jump, anti-jump). Overall, results showed that while movement times were similar between skill groups under simple task constraints (non-jump), on perturbation (or jump) trials the DCD group were significantly slower than controls and corrected trajectories later. Critically, the DCD group was further disadvantaged by anti-jump trials where inhibitory control was required; however, this effect reduced with age. While coupling online control and executive systems is not well developed in younger and mid-aged children, there is evidence of age-appropriate coupling in older children. Longitudinal data are needed to clarify this intriguing finding. The theoretical and applied implications of these results are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Ruddock
- Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jan Piek
- Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter Wilson
- Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Automatic correction of hand pointing in stereoscopic depth. Sci Rep 2014; 4:7444. [PMID: 25501878 PMCID: PMC5377023 DOI: 10.1038/srep07444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2014] [Accepted: 11/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to examine whether stereoscopic depth information could drive fast automatic correction of hand pointing, an experiment was designed in a 3D visual environment in which participants were asked to point to a target at different stereoscopic depths as quickly and accurately as possible within a limited time window (≤300 ms). The experiment consisted of two tasks: "depthGO" in which participants were asked to point to the new target position if the target jumped, and "depthSTOP" in which participants were instructed to abort their ongoing movements after the target jumped. The depth jump was designed to occur in 20% of the trials in both tasks. Results showed that fast automatic correction of hand movements could be driven by stereoscopic depth to occur in as early as 190 ms.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sarlegna FR, Mutha PK. The influence of visual target information on the online control of movements. Vision Res 2014; 110:144-54. [PMID: 25038472 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2014] [Revised: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The continuously changing properties of our environment require constant monitoring of our actions and updating of our motor commands based on the task goals. Such updating relies upon our predictions about the sensory consequences of our movement commands, as well as sensory feedback received during movement execution. Here we focus on how visual information about target location is used to update and guide ongoing actions so that the task goal is successfully achieved. We review several studies that have manipulated vision of the target in a variety of ways, ranging from complete removal of visual target information to changes in visual target properties after movement onset to examine how such changes are accounted for during motor execution. We also examined the specific role of a critical neural structure, the parietal cortex, and argue that a fundamental challenge for the future is to understand how visual information about target location is integrated with other streams of information, during movement execution, to estimate the state of the body and the environment in order to ensure optimal motor performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pratik K Mutha
- Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad 382424, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Battaglia-Mayer A, Buiatti T, Caminiti R, Ferraina S, Lacquaniti F, Shallice T. Correction and suppression of reaching movements in the cerebral cortex: Physiological and neuropsychological aspects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 42:232-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Revised: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
8
|
Ruddock SR, Hyde CE, Piek JP, Sugden D, Morris S, Wilson PH. Executive Systems Constrain the Flexibility of Online Control in Children During Goal-Directed Reaching. Dev Neuropsychol 2014; 39:51-68. [DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2013.855215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
9
|
Explicit knowledge and real-time action control: anticipating a change does not make us respond more quickly. Exp Brain Res 2013; 229:359-72. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3401-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2012] [Accepted: 12/30/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
10
|
McIntosh RD, Mulroue A, Brockmole JR. How automatic is the hand's automatic pilot? Evidence from dual-task studies. Exp Brain Res 2010; 206:257-69. [PMID: 20820760 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2404-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2010] [Accepted: 08/19/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The ability to correct reaching movements for changes in target position has been described as the hand's 'automatic pilot'. These corrections are preconscious and occur by default in double-step reaching tasks, even if the goal is to react to the target jump in some other way, for instance by stopping the movement (STOP instruction). Nonetheless, corrections are strongly modulated by conscious intention: participants make more corrections when asked to follow the target (GO instruction) and can suppress them when explicitly asked not to follow the target (NOGO instruction). We studied the influence of a cognitively demanding (auditory 1-back) task upon correction behaviour under GO, STOP and NOGO instructions. Correction rates under the STOP instruction were unaffected by cognitive load, consistent with the assumption that they reflect the default behaviour of the automatic pilot. Correction rates under the GO instruction were also unaffected, suggesting that minimal cognitive resources are required to enhance online correction. By contrast, cognitive load impeded the ability to suppress online corrections under the NOGO instruction. These data reveal a constitutional bias in the automatic pilot system: intentional suppression of the default correction behaviour is cognitively demanding, but enhancement towards greater responsiveness is seemingly effortless.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D McIntosh
- Human Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cressman EK, Cameron BD, Lam MY, Franks IM, Chua R. Movement duration does not affect automatic online control. Hum Mov Sci 2010; 29:871-81. [PMID: 20800916 DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2009] [Revised: 07/05/2010] [Accepted: 07/06/2010] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Pisella et al. (2000) have shown that fast aiming movements are automatically modified on-line in response to a change in target position. Specifically, when a movement is less than 300ms in duration the reach is completed to a target's new location even when one never intended to respond to the target jump. In contrast, when movements are slower, the reach is completed according to instructions. At present, it is unclear if it is possible for one's intentions to guide the initial stages of these slow movements. To determine if the intentional control mechanism can guide the initial stages of a slow aiming movement, participants aimed to targets that could jump at movement onset, with a slow and very slow movement time goal. In particular, participants were to point towards ("pro-point") or away from ("anti-point") the target jump, with a movement time goal of 500 or 1200ms. Results showed that in the anti-point condition, movement trajectories first deviated in the same direction as the target jump, followed by a response in the intended (opposite) direction. This suggests that while movement outcome is controlled by the intentional system, even in these slow aiming movements the automatic system is engaged at movement onset.
Collapse
|
12
|
Striemer CL, Yukovsky J, Goodale MA. Can intention override the "automatic pilot"? Exp Brain Res 2010; 202:623-32. [PMID: 20135102 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2169-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2009] [Accepted: 01/12/2010] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Previous research has suggested that the visuomotor system possesses an "automatic pilot" which allows people to make rapid online movement corrections in response to sudden changes in target position. Importantly, the automatic pilot has been shown to operate in the absence of visual awareness, and even under circumstances in which people are explicitly asked not to correct their ongoing movement. In the current study, we investigated the extent to which the automatic pilot could be "disengaged" by explicitly instructing participants to ignore the target jump (i.e., "NO-GO"), by manipulating the order in which the two tasks were completed (i.e., either "GO" or NO-GO first), and by manipulating the proportion of trials in which the target jumped. The results indicated that participants made fewer corrections in response to the target jump when they were asked not to correct their movement (i.e., NO-GO), and when they completed the NO-GO task prior to the task in which they were asked to correct their movement when the target jumped (i.e., the GO task). However, increasing the proportion of jumping targets had only a minimal influence on performance. Critically, participants still made a significant number of unintended corrections (i.e., errors) in the NO-GO tasks, even under explicit instructions not to correct their movement if the target jumped. Overall these data suggest that, while the automatic pilot can be influenced to some degree by top-down strategies and previous experience, the pre-potent response to correct an ongoing movement cannot be completely disengaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Striemer
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Brain and Mind, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C2, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cameron BD, Enns JT, Franks IM, Chua R. The hand's automatic pilot can update visual information while the eye is in motion. Exp Brain Res 2009; 195:445-54. [PMID: 19404623 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1812-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2008] [Accepted: 04/08/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
When participants reach for a target, their hand can adjust to a change in target position that occurs while their eyes are in motion (the hand's automatic pilot) even though they are not aware of the target's displacement (saccadic suppression of perceptual experience). However, previous studies of this effect have displayed the target without interruption, such that the new target position remains visible during the fixation that follows the saccade. Here we test whether a change in target position that begins and ends during the saccade can be used to update aiming movements. We also ask whether such information can be acquired from two targets at a time. The results showed that participants responded to single and double target jumps even when these targets were extinguished prior to saccade termination. The results imply that the hand's automatic pilot is updated with new visual information even when the eye is in motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan D Cameron
- School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|