Recruitment of precarious families in an interventional study: Lessons from the French "Fruits and vegetables at home" (FLAM) trial

Facilitators and barriers of children's participation in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions: A systematic review

Recruitment of children into clinical trials is challenging. Most systematic reviews exploring facilitators and barriers of child recruitment in clinical trials are related to drugs or experimental treatments for various health conditions. This may differ in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions. The objective was to conduct a systematic review of facilitators and barriers for children's participation in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions from the perspective of parents, children, and researchers. Studies were identified from five databases and restricted to children 2-18 years and the English language. Studies without results on facilitators and barriers of recruitment were excluded. Four hundred twenty-three records were identified; 94 duplicates and 269 unrelated records were initially excluded; 60 records were reviewed for full-text, and subsequently 34 were excluded, for a total of 26 included studies. The top barriers for recruiting children into clinical trials were time constraints, understanding of clinical trial information or complexity of consent/trial info, and transportation/lack of childcare. The most common facilitators were benefits to others and self, compensation/incentives, physician recommendations/referrals, and support. These barriers and facilitators should be addressed in future studies to assist in the successful recruitment of children into nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions.

Impact of fruits and vegetables vouchers on food insecurity in disadvantaged families from a Paris suburb

BACKGROUND

Social inequalities in nutrition lead a high number of families to struggle with food insecurity, even in developed countries. We aimed to assess the impact of fruits and vegetables vouchers on food security among disadvantaged households from a Paris suburb.

METHODS

We used a pre-post assessment design. Families answered face-to-face questionnaires on food consumption and food security status before and after a randomly assigned intervention. Households in the intervention group received vouchers to buy exclusively fruits and vegetables over one year. Both intervention and control groups benefitted from nutritional education through workshops performed by dieticians during the study period. The Household Food Security Module (HFSM) was used to assess food security status of households at inclusion. Food Insufficiency Indicator (FSI) was used to assess food security at inclusion and follow-up. Evolution of FSI on both groups was evaluated using McNemar test.

RESULTS

Among the 91 families included between May 2015 and May 2016, 64 completed the post assessment questionnaire. At inclusion, 68.3% of families were experiencing food insecurity and 78.1% were experiencing food insufficiency. No association was found between food consumptions and food security status. After one-year follow-up, the prevalence of food insufficiency was significantly decreased in the intervention group (61.8%, with p value = 0.03), and unchanged in the control group.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, food insufficiency was significantly decreased in families receiving vouchers for fruits and vegetables over a one-year period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02461238, registered 3 June 2015 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02461238.