Differences in efficacy, differences in providers: results from a hazard analysis of medical abortion

Declining risk of surgical intervention following early medical abortion: A time trend analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the time trend in risk of surgical intervention following early medical abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective observational study including all medical abortions induced before a gestational age of 63 days during the period 2008-2012 in a Danish gynecology clinic with a single provider deciding the necessity of subsequent surgical intervention. All included abortions were followed for 8 weeks from first medical administration. We extracted information on surgical intervention during follow-up and potential confounding variables from local and national health registers and assessed these according to calendar time. Multiple logistic regression provided an adjusted odds ratio of the association between calendar time and risk of surgical intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 1372 abortions were induced on site during the study period. Surgical interventions on site decreased from 10.2% in 2008 to 2.6% in 2012 (p < 0.001). The decline was significant after adjustment of gestational age, maternal age, and reproductive history, odds ratio for 1-year increase 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.86).

CONCLUSION

Risk of surgical intervention following early medical abortion declined by time independent of known risk factors for surgical intervention in a setting with a single provider deciding the necessity of surgical intervention.

Effectiveness and safety of early medication abortion provided in pharmacies by auxiliary nurse-midwives: A non-inferiority study in Nepal

BACKGROUND

Expanding access to medication abortion through pharmacies is a promising avenue to reach women with safe and convenient care, yet no pharmacy provision interventions have been evaluated. This observational non-inferiority study investigated the effectiveness and safety of mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion provided at pharmacies, compared to government-certified public health facilities, by trained auxiliary nurse-midwives in Nepal.

METHODS

Auxiliary nurse-midwives were trained to provide medication abortion through twelve pharmacies and public facilities as part of a demonstration project in two districts. Eligible women were ≤63 days pregnant, aged 16-45, and had no medical contraindications. Between 2014-2015, participants (n = 605) obtained 200 mg mifepristone orally and 800 μg misoprostol sublingually or intravaginally 24 hours later, and followed-up 14-21 days later. The primary outcome was complete abortion without manual vacuum aspiration; the secondary outcome was complication requiring treatment. We assessed risk differences by facility type with multivariable logistic mixed-effects regression.

RESULTS

Over 99% of enrolled women completed follow-up (n = 600). Complete abortions occurred in 588 (98·0%) cases, with ten incomplete abortions and two continuing pregnancies. 293/297 (98·7%) pharmacy participants and 295/303 (97·4%) public facility participants had complete abortions, with an adjusted risk difference falling within the pre-specified 5 percentage-point non-inferiority margin (1·5% [-0·8%, 3·8%]). No serious adverse events occurred. Five (1.7%) pharmacy and two (0.7%) public facility participants experienced a complication warranting treatment (aRD, 0.8% [-1.0%-2.7%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Early mifepristone-misoprostol abortion was as effective and safe when provided by trained auxiliary nurse-midwives at pharmacies as at government-certified health facilities. Findings support policy expanding provision through registered pharmacies by trained auxiliary nurse-midwives to improve access to safe care.

Acceptability and feasibility of 400 μg buccal misoprostol after 200 mg mifepristone for early medical abortion in Georgia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to examine the acceptability and feasibility of early medical abortion using 200 mg mifepristone and 400 μg buccal misoprostol in Georgia, outside the capital city of Tbilisi.

METHODS

A total of 622 women in four regions of western and eastern Georgia who presented for termination of pregnancy at up to 63 d of gestation were enrolled in the study. In the western regions, women took one 200 mg pill of mifepristone in the clinic and were given the option of administering 400 μg misoprostol buccally, either at the clinic or at home, 24-48 h later. In the eastern region, women were given the option to take both drugs at home. Abortion status was determined 2 weeks after mifepristone administration.

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent of participants had a successful abortion. Twenty-one percent of women in the eastern region elected to take mifepristone at home; nearly all participants in both regions (98%) chose to take misoprostol at home. Ninety-five percent of women were very satisfied or satisfied with the method, and 95% said they would prefer medical abortion for a future procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical abortion with mifepristone and 400 μg buccal misoprostol is an acceptable and feasible option for women in Georgia, outside the capital city of Tbilisi.

Outpatient versus inpatient intravaginal misoprostol for the treatment of first trimester incomplete miscarriage: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Study objective To assess the efficacy of outpatient misoprostol administration versus inpatient misoprostol administration for the treatment of first trimester incomplete miscarriage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital from May 2012 to April 2013. A total of 154 patients with first trimester incomplete miscarriage were randomised to receive misoprostol either as outpatient or inpatient. Intra-vaginal misoprostol 800 mcg was administered eight hourly to a maximum of three doses. Complete evacuation is achieved when the cervical os was closed on vaginal examination or ultrasound showed no more retained products of conception evidenced by endometrial thickness of less than 15 mm. Treatment failure was defined as failure in achieving complete evacuation on day seven hence surgical evacuation is offered.

RESULTS

Outpatient administration of misoprostol was as effective as inpatient treatment with success rate of 89.2 and 85.7 % (p = 0.520). The side effects were not significantly different between the two groups. Side effects that occurred were minor and only required symptomatic treatment. Duration of bleeding was 6.0 days in both groups (p = 0.317). Mean reduction in haemoglobin was lesser in the outpatient group (0.4 g/dl) as compared to in the inpatient group (0.6 g/dl) which was statistically significant (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Medical evacuation using intra-vaginal misoprostol 800 mcg eight hourly for a maximum of three doses in an outpatient setting is as effective as in inpatient setting with tolerable side effects.

[Medical abortion from 12 through 14 weeks' gestation: a retrospective study with 126 patients]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of medical abortion performed according to a single protocol from 12 through 14 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study of medical abortions from 12 through 14 weeks performed from January 2007 through March 2009. The protocol combined 600 mg de mifepristone orally, followed 48 h later by 400 μg of misoprostol, administered orally, and repeated after 3h, four times a day (during two days), if patient did not begin to abort. Outcome measures were the abortion rate, the rate of complication, the rate of manual uterine revision or vacuum aspiration, the time of expulsion and the misoprostol dose.

RESULTS

The study included 126 medical abortions. The abortion rate was 98% and the secondary manual revision or vacuum aspiration rate was 41%. The mean time to expulsion was 10.4 (±8.8)h, and the mean misoprostol dose 1040 (±420) μg. Higher parity was significantly correlated with shorter time to expulsion (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Medical abortion was consistently effective from 12 through 14 weeks but with high rate of secondary manual revision or vacuum aspiration.

[Medical abortion at home and at hospital: a trial of efficacy and acceptability]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and the acceptability of medical abortion at home and at hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 11 February 2008 to 16 July 2008, 399 patients were included in the study: 173 at home and 226 at hospital.

RESULTS

Efficacy was evaluated for 305 patients because 94 were lost of follow-up (23.6%). Efficacy of medical abortion was 86.7% (124/143) at home and 95.8% (155/162) at hospital. There were one ongoing pregnancy and 25 surgical aspirations (8.6%). The family planning nurse received a phone call from five patients after mifepristone at home (2.9%) and seven patients after mifepristone at hospital (3.1%). Only one patient "at home" had an emergency consultation (0.6%) and nine patients "at hospital" (4%). Ten patients went back to their gynecologist before their appointment for follow-up (2.5%): five "at home" (2.9%) and five "at hospital" (2.2%). Thirteen patients were referred by the private provider to the hospital medical specialist. Acceptability is known for 70.2% of patients: 98% thought that medical abortion at home was acceptable and 92.9% at hospital.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The failure rate of medical abortion is higher at home and is due to aspirations for incomplete abortion. The procedure at home seems to be more acceptable than at hospital. It will be interesting to realize a prospective randomized study to compare the procedures at home and at hospital.

Medication abortion

Medical methods for pregnancy termination in early gestation offer women an alternative to surgical evacuation and have the potential to improve access globally to safe abortion. Several drug regimens are used with varying efficacy including mifepristone plus misoprostol, misoprostol alone, and methotrexate plus misoprostol. Where available, a mifepristone plus misoprostol regimen is most frequently used and is highly effective for early abortion. We review these drug regimens along with clinical practice recommendations including patient counseling and selection, regimen administration location, expected side effects, and follow-up procedures. Overall, women who choose medical abortion report high levels of satisfaction.

Two distinct oral routes of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of oral immediately swallowed and buccal misoprostol 800 mcg after mifepristone 200 mg for terminating pregnancy through 63 days since the last menstrual period (LMP).

METHODS

This seven-site study randomly assigned 966 women seeking abortions to oral or buccal misoprostol 800 mcg 24-36 hours after mifepristone 200 mg with 7-14-day follow-up.

RESULTS

Success rates in the oral and buccal groups were 91.3% (389 of 426) and 96.2% (405 of 421), respectively (P=.003; relative risk [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.98). Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 3.5% (15 of 426) of women who took oral misoprostol compared with 1.0% (4 of 421) of women in the buccal group (P=.012; RR 3.71, 95% CI 1.24-11.07). Through 49 days since the LMP, oral and buccal regimens performed similarly, but success with oral misoprostol decreased as pregnancy advanced. In pregnancies of 57-63 days since the LMP, success with oral misoprostol fell below 90%, whereas that with buccal remained high (oral 85.1% [97 of 114], buccal 94.8% [109 of 115], P=.015, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98). Furthermore, in this gestational age group, there were significantly more ongoing pregnancies among women who took misoprostol orally (7.9% [9 of 114]) compared with buccally (1.7% [2 of 115]; P=.029, RR 4.54, 95% CI 1.0-20.55). Adverse effect profiles were similar, although fever and chills were reported approximately 10% more often among women who took buccal misoprostol. Satisfaction and acceptability were high for both methods.

CONCLUSION

Buccal misoprostol 800 mcg after mifepristone 200 mg is a good option for medical abortion through 63 days since the LMP. Oral misoprostol 800 mcg is also a safe and effective alternative, although success rates diminish with increasing gestational age.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00386867

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Regimens of misoprostol with mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, adverse effects and acceptability of the three most common misoprostol regimens used with mifepristone for medical abortion.

DESIGN

Randomised nonblinded trial.

SETTING

Three clinics associated with major research universities in Canada; two in major urban areas and one in a periurban area.

POPULATION

Women of reproductive age.

METHODS

Consenting women presenting for abortion services with gestations less than 56 days and who met inclusion criteria were given 200 mg mifepristone orally and then randomised into three misoprostol study groups: (group I) 400 micrograms of oral misoprostol, (group II) 600 micrograms of oral misoprostol, and (group III) 800 micrograms of vaginal misoprostol. Misoprostol was self-administered at home 24-48 hours following mifepristone, and participants were instructed to take a second similar misoprostol dose at 24 hours after the initial dose if bleeding was less than a normal menstrual period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Successful abortion without surgery was 94.1%, with no significant differences across the three study groups (94.7% in group I, 93.4% in group II, and 94.3% in group III; P= 0.975).

RESULTS

Efficacy and adverse effects did not differ significantly across the three study groups. Pain increased significantly across the study and the gestational age groups and was associated with lower acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a range of safe and effective options for early medical abortion with mifepristone including a choice between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol.

[The efficacy and acceptability of mifepristone medical abortion with home administration misoprostol provided by private providers linked with the hospital: a prospective study of 433 patients]

BACKGROUND

Until July 2001 medical abortion was only authorized in France in public hospitals or private clinics. A new law effective in July 2001 allows private practitioners (gynaecologists or general practitioners) to provide medical abortion in their offices as long as they are linked to a hospital official agreement. Unfortunately mifepristone was not available outside hospitals before September 2004, so the study was conducted still providing the drugs in the hospital family planning clinic.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and the acceptability of mifepristone medical abortion with home administration of misoprostol provided by private practitioners linked with the hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred thirty-three women seeking medical abortion before 7 weeks LMP were included between 2 January 2003 and 7 July 2004. All consultations before abortion and 2 weeks after abortion took place in a private provider's office. Drugs were administrated in the hospital family planning clinic: patients were given 3 tablets of mifepristone (600 mg) orally by the midwife and received 2 tablets of misoprostol (400 microg) that they would take at home 48 hours later. In case of any problems or complications, patients could phone or meet their private providers, phone the hospital midwife or go to the hospital emergency service. Private providers received training in medical abortion training and could at any time reach a medical specialist in the hospital family planning clinic for information or to refer a patient.

RESULTS

- Efficacy was evaluated for 339 women, because 94 patients were lost to follow-up (21.7%). Efficacy of medical abortion was 93.8% (318/339). There were 21 surgical aspirations (6.2%): for women's decision in 1.5% of cases, for medical decision without complications in 3.5% of cases, and for failure of the method in 1.2% of cases (2 ongoing pregnancies and 2 heavy haemorrhages with transfusion). The family planning midwife received a phone call from 21 patients after mifepristone (4.8%), Twenty-five patients had an emergency consultation (5.7%), and 22 patients went back to their private providers before their appointment for follow-up (5%). Twenty-two patients (5%) were referred by the private provider to the hospital medical specialist. Acceptability is known for 26% of patients; 96.2% thought that the abortion procedure was acceptable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The failure rate of medical abortion in this study is largely due to aspirations for incomplete abortion. To improve the efficacy of medical abortion offered by private providers linked with the hospital, all the relevant professionals (private providers, residents in the emergency service, family planning providers) must be well trained in medical abortion, especially in how to interpret and react to ultrasound images obtained in the follow up visit. The procedure is very acceptable to women. Medical abortion offered via a network should be well accepted by practitioners, since only 5% of women will need more than two consultations and only 6.2% will need surgical aspiration in the hospital. This study allows us to be optimistic about the expansion of medical abortion in France outside the hospital via a provider-hospital network based on the fact that since September 2004 private providers can get mifepristone directly in the pharmacies of the city.

Is home-based administration of prostaglandin safe and feasible for medical abortion? Results from a multisite study in Vietnam

OBJECTIVES

To study the efficacy and acceptability of a simplified medical abortion regimen in Vietnam.

DESIGN

Open-label study.

SETTING

One peri-urban and three urban hospitals and four urban maternal-child health family planning clinics located in Northern, Central and Southern Vietnam.

SAMPLE

A total of 1601 women seeking abortion services from January 2001 to December 2001.

METHODS

Consenting women presenting for abortion services with gestations less than 56 days LMP who met the inclusion criteria were given 200 mg mifepristone and offered the choice of either home or clinic administration of 400 microg oral misoprostol two days later.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Complete abortion rate of 89.2% (n= 1395), with 1.5% (n= 24) of the women lost to follow up. The majority of women (>90%) reported that their medical abortion experience was either 'very satisfactory' or 'satisfactory'.

RESULTS

There was a strong preference for home administration of misoprostol, with more than four-fifths of the study population selecting to administer the prostaglandin at home. Location of misoprostol administration did not affect efficacy rate. Regardless of location selected, women expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the medical abortion experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical abortion with the option of home administration of misoprostol is safe and feasible for introduction into the Vietnamese healthcare system.

Two regimens of misoprostol for treatment of incomplete abortion

OBJECTIVES

Misoprostol shows promise for treatment of incomplete abortion. We evaluated 2 simple misoprostol regimens to estimate whether they were effective in treating incomplete abortion.

METHODS

A total of 169 women was randomly assigned to either a single or double dose of 600 microg misoprostol. The women, who would have received a surgical evacuation of the uterus for incomplete abortion, were patients at 2 hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand. The 2 groups of women were compared for success of treatment (no need for surgical evacuation), side effects, and acceptability.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent of women in the single-dose group and 70% of women in the double-dose group had complete abortions with misoprostol. More than 90% of women in the single- and double-dose groups reported that the side effects were tolerable; frequency of side effects was similar between the 2 groups. Women found the treatment acceptable. Approximately 90% of women in both groups would recommend the treatment to a friend. Acceptability and efficacy were different at the 2 participating clinics.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol is an effective treatment for incomplete abortion. Simple regimens may be as effective as more complicated ones and a single dose of 600 microg should be further evaluated in larger trials.