Vaginal misoprostol 800 μg every 12 h for second-trimester abortion

Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester

Labor induction abortion is effective throughout the second trimester. Patterns of use and gestational age limits vary by locality. Earlier gestations (typically 12 to 20 weeks) have shorter abortion times than later gestational ages, but differences in complication rates within the second trimester according to gestational age have not been demonstrated. The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is the most effective and fastest regimen. Typically, mifepristone 200 mg is followed by use of misoprostol 24-48 h later. Ninety-five percent of abortions are complete within 24 h of misoprostol administration. Compared with misoprostol alone, the combined regimen results in a clinically significant reduction of 40% to 50% in time to abortion and can be used at all gestational ages. However, mifepristone is not widely available. Accordingly, prostaglandin analogues without mifepristone (most commonly misoprostol or gemeprost) or high-dose oxytocin are used. Misoprostol is more widely used because it is inexpensive and stable at room temperature. Misoprostol alone is best used vaginally or sublingually, and doses of 400 mcg are generally superior to 200 mcg or less. Dosing every 3 h is superior to less frequent dosing, although intervals of up to 12 h are effective when using higher doses (600 or 800 mcg) of misoprostol. Abortion rates at 24 h are approximately 80%-85%. Although gemeprost has similar outcomes as compared to misoprostol, it has higher cost, requires refrigeration, and can only be used vaginally. High-dose oxytocin can be used in circumstances when prostaglandins are not available or are contraindicated. Osmotic dilators do not shorten induction times when inserted at the same time as misoprostol; however, their use prior to induction using misoprostol has not been studied. Preprocedure-induced fetal demise has not been studied systematically for possible effects on time to abortion. While isolated case reports and retrospective reviews document uterine rupture during second-trimester induction with misoprostol, the magnitude of the risk is not known. The relationship of individual uterotonic agents to uterine rupture is not clear. Based on existing evidence, the Society of Family Planning recommends that, when labor induction abortion is performed in the second trimester, combined use of mifepristone and misoprostol is the ideal regimen to effect abortion quickly and completely. The Society of Family Planning further recommends that alternative regimens, primarily misoprostol alone, should only be used when mifepristone is not available.

Effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for induction of midtrimester abortion

AIM

To evaluate the effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of misoprostol for induction of midtrimester abortion.

METHODS

The study comprised 110 women, with a gestational age of 14-26 weeks, with a missed abortion as an indication for the induction of abortion. On admission, the vaginal pH was measured and two groups were generated: (A) those with pH<5 (n=63); and (B) those with pH >or= 5 (n=47). All of the women received intravaginal misoprostol tablets moistened with 3 mL of 5% acetic acid, 200 microg every 4 h for a maximum of 5 doses within 24 h. If the patient did not have adequate uterine contractions, the same regimen was repeated over the following 24 h and if no response was achieved, this was considered a failure of therapy.

RESULTS

All patients aborted within 48 h. A significant positive correlation between vaginal pH and the misoprostol application-abortion interval was found. The mean induction-abortion interval was significantly shorter in group A compared to group B (12.1 vs 23.6 h, P<0.001), with abortion rates at 24 h being 100% and 63.8%, respectively. Moreover, a significantly lower dose of misoprostol was used in group A with a lower incidence of fever and abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal pH influences the efficacy of misoprostol administered vaginally for the induction of midtrimester abortion. The presence of this relationship, despite premoistening misoprostol with an acidifying agent, suggests that the effect of vaginal pH might extend beyond affecting the pharmacokinetics of the drug.

Randomized comparison of second trimester pregnancy termination utilizing saline moistened or dry misoprostol

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized prospective study was to compare efficacy and side effects of saline moistened misoprostol with dry misoprostol, administered 800 mug intravaginally every 6 h up to a maximum of 3 doses in 24 h for second trimester pregnancy termination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 81 women seeking termination of second trimester pregnancy (55 fetal death, 17 fetal structural anomaly, 5 chromosomal abnormality, 4 other reasons) were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: (1) intravaginal non-moistened (dry) misoprostol in group A (n = 40) or (2) misoprostol moistened with 3 ml of saline in group B (n = 41).

RESULTS

All of the patients in either group aborted within 48 h (100% success rate). Delivery was achieved in a median (interquartile range) of 13 (40) h with the group A protocol and 12 (36) h with the group B protocol (P = 0.652). Delivery with first dose, delivery within 12 h and delivery within 24 h were similar (P > 0.05) in group B (34.1, 87.5 and 60%, respectively) and group A (25, 82.9, 46.3, respectively). Both treatment regimens were tolerable and with similar side effects.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol moistened with saline was not more effective than dry misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination.

Misoprostol moistened with acetic acid or saline for second trimester pregnancy termination: a randomized prospective double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of a new regimen of 800 microg misoprostol administered intravaginally every 6 h up to a maximum of three doses in 24 h for second trimester pregnancy termination.

METHODS

A total of 66 women seeking termination of second trimester pregnancy (30 fetal structural anomaly, six chromosomal abnormality and 30 fetal death) were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: (i) intravaginal misoprostol moistened with 3 ml of 5% acetic acid in group A (n = 33); or (ii) intravaginal misoprostol moistened with 3 ml of saline in group B (n = 33).

RESULTS

The overall median (range) induction-abortion interval was 10 h (2-46) [10 h (4-35) in 36 live fetuses and 9 h (2-46) in 30 dead fetuses, P = 0.515]. All of the patients in both groups aborted within 48 h (100% success rate). The median (range) induction-abortion interval revealed a significantly faster delivery time (P < 0.001) in group A [8 h (2-24)] than in group B [14 h (3-46)].

CONCLUSIONS

This new regimen of 800 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 6 h for a maximum of three doses in 24 h was an effective alternative method for second trimester abortion. In addition, misoprostol moistened with acetic acid was significantly more effective than misoprostol moistened with saline.